Re: [Lazarus] Makefile issues
On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:35:24 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote: > Hello, > > The lazarus makefile has some dependency issues. > > make ide: That's an internal target. See "make help". >[...] > Based on the output of "make help", in an attempt to create > svn2revisioninc I did: > > > make tools > make -C tools > make[1]: Entering directory '/home/michael/projects/lazarus-tst/tools' > Makefile:2956: warning: overriding recipe for target '.' > Makefile:2954: warning: ignoring old recipe for target '.' > make --assume-new=lazres.pp lazres > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/michael/projects/lazarus-tst/tools' > Makefile:2956: warning: overriding recipe for target '.' > Makefile:2954: warning: ignoring old recipe for target '.' > /usr/local/bin/ppcx64 -gl -Fu. > -Fu../components/lazutils/lib/x86_64-linux > -Fu../lcl/units/x86_64-linux -Fu../lcl/units/x86_64-linux/nogui > -Fu/usr/local/lib/fpc/3.3.1/units/x86_64-linux/rtl -FE. -FU. -Cg > -Fl/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9 -Flinclude > -Fl/etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf -dx86_64 lazres.pp lazres.pp(43,22) > Fatal: Can't find unit LazLogger used by LazRes Sub target "tools" require a compiled nogui lcl. Just use the main targets. The makefiles are not supposed to be called in any order. They are merely a bootstrap to get to lazbuild and/or lazarus. >[...] > > make basecomponents Same here. >[...] > After some more failed attempts trying to compile "sub-targets", I > gave up. Good. > Am I correct in my understanding that in fact only the "main" targets > all, bigide, useride are supposed to work out of the box when you > start from a fresh checkout ? Yes. Mattias -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Makefile issues
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022, Mattias Gaertner via lazarus wrote: On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 14:35:24 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote: Hello, The lazarus makefile has some dependency issues. make ide: That's an internal target. See "make help". Am I correct in my understanding that in fact only the "main" targets all, bigide, useride are supposed to work out of the box when you start from a fresh checkout ? Yes. Well, it turns out that "make useride" also does not work on a fresh checkout. At least, I could no longer get it to work. see my comment in https://gitlab.com/freepascal.org/lazarus/lazarus/-/issues/40024 But the point of the 'main targets' is taken, so I filed a feature request in the issue tracker to be able to build the LCL using just the Makefile. basically, I would like something as make lcl to produce the LCL units. (it can be another 'main' target name if that is needed, obviously) Michael. -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Makefile issues
On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 23:22:38 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote: >[...] > Well, it turns out that "make useride" also does not work on a fresh > checkout. It didn't work when Cleaning is enabled. Fixed. >[...] > But the point of the 'main targets' is taken, so I filed a feature > request in the issue tracker to be able to build the LCL using just > the Makefile. > > basically, I would like something as > > make lcl > > to produce the LCL units. make registration lazutils lcl The problem is that make is pretty dumb, so it creates only a rudimentary Makefile.compiled file. If you use lazbuild or lazarus to compile a project they might decide to recompile the lcl. It would be safer to compile lazbuild, and then use that to compile the lcl. Mattias -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Re: [Lazarus] Makefile issues
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022, Mattias Gaertner via lazarus wrote: On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 23:22:38 +0100 (CET) Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote: [...] Well, it turns out that "make useride" also does not work on a fresh checkout. It didn't work when Cleaning is enabled. Fixed. [...] But the point of the 'main targets' is taken, so I filed a feature request in the issue tracker to be able to build the LCL using just the Makefile. basically, I would like something as make lcl to produce the LCL units. make registration lazutils lcl Slightly better is: make -J N registration make -J N lazutils make -J N lcl because the order as specified on the command-line is not guaranteed when you do parallel compilation. Still, it feels strange to me that make lcl is not enough, but OK. The problem is that make is pretty dumb, so it creates only a rudimentary Makefile.compiled file. Makefile.compiled does not even come into play, see below. If you use lazbuild or lazarus to compile a project they might decide to recompile the lcl. That may not happen, because the sources will not be installed on the build machine. It would be safer to compile lazbuild, and then use that to compile the lcl. The projects will be compiled with fpc only in a docker environment. The devops people don't want another build tool. Only make. (which is why I wanted to have make install working - but I had to resort to using find and cp manually) The goal is to have just fpc, its units and the LCL units in compiled form in the docker. Michael. -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
