Re: Backporting for LTS 2.401.2 has started

2023-06-09 Thread m...@basilcrow.com
As others have noted, there is not really anything to backport at the
moment. How do others feel about backporting #7990 and #8065?

Context: Without dropping support for javax.inject, these changes add
support for jakarta.inject annotations, allowing a migration to begin
once plugins select a baseline that includes these changes.

The changes have shipped in a weekly without any issues. From my
perspective the backport is low-risk and would allow us to begin the
jakarta.inject migration sooner throughout the rest of the plugin
ecosystem rather than waiting for the next LTS line.

On the other hand, this does go against our usual policy of not
backporting changes with API surface area, so I do not feel strongly
about this backport either way.

If acceptable, I would be happy to create the backport PR.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/39d42ac6-5d09-4d92-85da-e559a0aa85f1n%40googlegroups.com.


Re: Plugin with Java 17 minimum dependencies

2024-05-06 Thread m...@basilcrow.com
On Saturday, April 27, 2024 at 11:56:06 AM UTC-7 ull...@gmail.com wrote:

At least it makes sense to rise an issue for the CD toolchain so this 
problem will not be forgotten when we switch to Java 17 in September.


Have we filed an issue for the CD toolchain?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/390d1c83-51ec-412a-a4d8-b635ec938df3n%40googlegroups.com.