assert validation error

2014-11-02 Thread Timothy W. Cook
using oXygen 16.1 with embedded Xerces.

I have a failure on a simple regex (yes I know it could be performed using
a pattern facet) used to demonstrate/test assertions.  It passes with
SaxonEE but fails with Xerces.

The complexType:

 


  A US telephone number. Exactly 12 characters; 111-111- with a
pattern match of "[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{4}"



















The instance:
 
Telephone Number (US)

2015-01-04T21:28:24Z

2012-09-09T06:33:19Z
111-111-
en-US


The element el-9c65478e-5cdf-413b-aa54-ce0574e48374 is declared as a type
ct-9c65478e-5cdf-413b-aa54-ce0574e48374 in the schema.

Should I file a bug report or is there an error in my code and Saxon
ignores it?

Thanks,
Tim





-- 


Timothy Cook
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org


Re: assert validation error

2014-11-03 Thread Timothy W. Cook
Awesome!

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Octavian Nadolu 
wrote:

>  Hello Tim,
>
> You reported a similar problem in "XERCESJ-1640", that was fixed by Mukul.
> It seems that the fix resolves also the your current validation problem.
> We did not integrate this fix in the Xerces build that is distributed in
> oXygen 16.1. This fix will be available in the next oXygen release.
>
> Do not hesitate to contact us you need further assistance or any other
> information.
>
> Best Regards,
> Octavian
>
> --
> Octavian Nadolu
>  XML Editorhttp://www.oxygenxml.com
>
>
>
> On 02.11.2014 13:31, Timothy W. Cook wrote:
>
>  using oXygen 16.1 with embedded Xerces.
>
>  I have a failure on a simple regex (yes I know it could be performed
> using a pattern facet) used to demonstrate/test assertions.  It passes with
> SaxonEE but fails with Xerces.
>
>  The complexType:
>
>   xml:lang="en-US"> 
> 
> 
>   A US telephone number. Exactly 12 characters; 111-111- with a
> pattern match of "[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{3}-[0-9]{4}"
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  name="data-name" type="xs:string" fixed="Telephone Number (US)"/>
>  ref="mlhim245:ExceptionalValue"/>
>  name="valid-time-begin" type="xs:dateTime"/>
>  name="valid-time-end" type="xs:dateTime"/>
>  name="DvString-dv" type="xs:string" default="111-111-"/>
>  name="language" type="xs:language"/>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
>  The instance:
>   
> Telephone Number (US)
>
> 2015-01-04T21:28:24Z
>
> 2012-09-09T06:33:19Z
> 111-111-
> en-US
> 
>
>  The element el-9c65478e-5cdf-413b-aa54-ce0574e48374 is declared as a
> type ct-9c65478e-5cdf-413b-aa54-ce0574e48374 in the schema.
>
>  Should I file a bug report or is there an error in my code and Saxon
> ignores it?
>
>  Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
>
> 
> Timothy Cook
> LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
> MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
>
>
>
>


-- 


Timothy Cook
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org


Re: web app for XSD 1.1 and 1.0 validations

2015-09-15 Thread Timothy W. Cook
I tested with one example of a valid document against a XML Schema 1.1 with
one included schema.  It worked great.  I tested a couple of times
invalidating the data and it seems to respond accordingly.  Have you
executed the full test suite on it?


On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Mukul Gandhi  wrote:

> Hello there,
>I've been thinking on this for a while, and now I'm ready to share the
> outcomes with Xerces forums. I've developed a little web app, that accepts
> XML and XSD documents from a user's workstation and returns validation
> results to the user's browser.
>
> The link to this app is
> http://xmlvalidation-mukulga.rhcloud.com
>
> This app uses the last XercesJ XSD 1.0 and 1.1 code bases. It'll be great
> if any of you folks give this app a try, and post comments on this list.
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi
>



-- 


Timothy Cook
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org


Re: web app for XSD 1.1 and 1.0 validations

2015-09-15 Thread Timothy W. Cook
BTW: This is an awesome contribution.

Thank You!


On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Timothy W. Cook  wrote:

> I tested with one example of a valid document against a XML Schema 1.1
> with one included schema.  It worked great.  I tested a couple of times
> invalidating the data and it seems to respond accordingly.  Have you
> executed the full test suite on it?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Mukul Gandhi  wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>>I've been thinking on this for a while, and now I'm ready to share the
>> outcomes with Xerces forums. I've developed a little web app, that accepts
>> XML and XSD documents from a user's workstation and returns validation
>> results to the user's browser.
>>
>> The link to this app is
>> http://xmlvalidation-mukulga.rhcloud.com
>>
>> This app uses the last XercesJ XSD 1.0 and 1.1 code bases. It'll be great
>> if any of you folks give this app a try, and post comments on this list.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Mukul Gandhi
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> 
> Timothy Cook
> LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
> MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
>
>


-- 


Timothy Cook
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org


Re: web app for XSD 1.1 and 1.0 validations

2015-09-15 Thread Timothy W. Cook
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mukul Gandhi  wrote:
>
>
> But the app's jars are derived from the current SVN code base. I believe,
> the app will work fine with all the XML and XSD documents available in the
> test suite.
>

​Certainly should and would likely be overkill to develop a client to do
those tests. The question was just one that popped into my head once I saw
it work so well. :-)

​



-- 


Timothy Cook
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org