[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17068) Migrate Ref Guide content to using bin/solr post command

2024-01-28 Thread Eric Pugh (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17811668#comment-17811668
 ] 

Eric Pugh commented on SOLR-17068:
--

I am looking at this again.   What do folks think about just removing bin/post 
from the 9X line in favour of bin/solr post?   That would make life easier then 
trying to have bin/post and bin/solr post work in 9x, and then only having 
bin/solr post in 10x

> Migrate Ref Guide content to using bin/solr post command
> 
>
> Key: SOLR-17068
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17068
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Sub-task
>  Components: documentation
>Affects Versions: 9.4
>Reporter: Eric Pugh
>Priority: Minor
>
> The Ref Guide has many references to the old bin/post command (and it's 
> sibling awkward windows version) while ALSO having bin/solr post commands.   
> We need to finish the migration to bin/solr post so we don't have a awkward 
> split of both approaches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org



[PR] SOLR-17068: Resolve mish mash of bin/post and bin/solr post references in favour of bin/solr post. [solr]

2024-01-28 Thread via GitHub


epugh opened a new pull request, #2227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2227

   https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17068
   
   
   # Description
   
   Removing old bin/post references.
   
   # Solution
   
   Clean ups through out docs and code base.
   
   # Tests
   
   Bats and unit tests.
   
   # Checklist
   
   Please review the following and check all that apply:
   
   - [X ] I have reviewed the guidelines for [How to 
Contribute](https://github.com/apache/solr/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and my 
code conforms to the standards described there to the best of my ability.
   - [X ] I have created a Jira issue and added the issue ID to my pull request 
title.
   - [ X] I have given Solr maintainers 
[access](https://help.github.com/en/articles/allowing-changes-to-a-pull-request-branch-created-from-a-fork)
 to contribute to my PR branch. (optional but recommended)
   - [ X] I have developed this patch against the `main` branch.
   - [ X] I have run `./gradlew check`.
   - [ X] I have added tests for my changes.
   - [ X] I have added documentation for the [Reference 
Guide](https://github.com/apache/solr/tree/main/solr/solr-ref-guide)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org



Re: [PR] SOLR-17131: Optimize rows=0 since score/sort isn't necessary [solr]

2024-01-28 Thread via GitHub


dsmiley commented on PR #2221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2221#issuecomment-1913695210

   I also think a `queryResultWindowSize` of 1 (which is the default if it 
isn't specified in solrconfig and isn't documented AFAICT) should not bump up a 
request for no rows to a window of a paltry 1 doc.  I don't think that was 
intended; I think what was intended was to effectively have no window if it 
isn't specified.  I can see using a default of 1 _seems_ to convey that (for 
typical queries that have results) but not for rows=0 case.  Likely an 
oversight long ago.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-17126) Cut over System.getProperty to EnvUtils.getProperty

2024-01-28 Thread Jira


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-17126:
---
Fix Version/s: 9.6.0

> Cut over System.getProperty to EnvUtils.getProperty
> ---
>
> Key: SOLR-17126
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17126
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>Reporter: Jan Høydahl
>Assignee: Jan Høydahl
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.6.0
>
>  Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Followup from SOLR-15960. This will handle all modules.
> Let's create several PRs on the same CHANGES entry for migrations happening 
> in the 9.6 release.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org



Re: [PR] GH Labeler action: Category labels [solr]

2024-01-28 Thread via GitHub


janhoy commented on PR #2190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2190#issuecomment-1913734064

   Did some consolidation, now down to 9 new category labels:
   > api, cli, cloud, index, metrics, packagemanager, schema, search, security


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org



Re: [PR] SOLR-16935 Add spans to cover gaps in query processing [solr]

2024-01-28 Thread via GitHub


github-actions[bot] commented on PR #1853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1853#issuecomment-1913767966

   This PR had no visible activity in the past 60 days, labeling it as stale. 
Any new activity will remove the stale label. To attract more reviewers, please 
tag someone or notify the d...@solr.apache.org mailing list. Thank you for your 
contribution!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org



[jira] [Created] (SOLR-17132) LTR model upload API issue

2024-01-28 Thread rajanimaski (Jira)
rajanimaski created SOLR-17132:
--

 Summary: LTR model upload API issue
 Key: SOLR-17132
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17132
 Project: Solr
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
  Components: contrib - LTR
Affects Versions: 9.4.1
Reporter: rajanimaski


The LTR model upload API does not make the model available across all the 
nodes. After upload, "model not found exception" is reported by certain nodes. 
The model becomes available only after a collection "reload" api is requested. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-17132) LTR model upload API issue

2024-01-28 Thread rajanimaski (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17811721#comment-17811721
 ] 

rajanimaski commented on SOLR-17132:


 
Suggestion from [~ishan]    - LTR models could take advantage of the File store 
APIs that was built for distributed management of package files.  

> LTR model upload API issue
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-17132
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17132
> Project: Solr
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>  Components: contrib - LTR
>Affects Versions: 9.4.1
>Reporter: rajanimaski
>Priority: Major
>
> The LTR model upload API does not make the model available across all the 
> nodes. After upload, "model not found exception" is reported by certain 
> nodes. The model becomes available only after a collection "reload" api is 
> requested. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org