[jira] [Assigned] (CXF-8185) Generated Ephemeral Public Key missing in JWE Headers when Json Serialization is used

2020-01-02 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Colm O hEigeartaigh reassigned CXF-8185:


Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh

> Generated Ephemeral Public Key missing in JWE Headers when Json Serialization 
> is used
> -
>
> Key: CXF-8185
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8185
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: JAX-RS Security
>Affects Versions: 3.3.4
>Reporter: Frederik Libert
>Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>Priority: Blocker
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When using Key Agreement with Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Static 
> (ECDH-ES), the 
> JWA Specification says that an Ephemeral Public Key MUST be set as "epk" 
> Header Parameter (
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7518#page-16).
> The key is generated during the encryption process.
> However, it is only added to the jwe output when using compact serialization.
> When using Json serialization, the header gets lost somewhere along the way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (CXF-8156) Incorrect service name displayed in logs during Runtime Exception

2020-01-02 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17006747#comment-17006747
 ] 

Colm O hEigeartaigh commented on CXF-8156:
--

Can you put together a test-case to reproduce the problem?

> Incorrect service name displayed in logs during Runtime Exception
> -
>
> Key: CXF-8156
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8156
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: JAX-RS
>Reporter: Swathantra Kumar N
>Priority: Major
>
> This is with reference to the ticket CXF-2538, wherein the service name was 
> appended to the exception stack trace logs. For this getName() of the 
> JAXRSServiceImpl was used to get the name of the service.
> In getName() method, when the serviceName and address properties are null, 
> then we pick up first record in the classResourceInfos list. In scenarios 
> where there are multiple endpoints and I am not setting the serviceName 
> property while constructing JAXRSServiceImpl which happens in 
> initializeServiceModel() of JAXRSServiceFactoryBean. Because, there isn't a 
> specific service that I can initialize during the service factory creation(I 
> have multiple rest services). In these scenarios, when I request a service 
> and the service throws Runtime exception, In the logs I see an incorrect 
> Service Name being displayed due to the fact that we are hardcoding to pick 
> the first item in the classResourceInfos.
>  
> Is there a specific purpose of hardcoding to pick the first item in the list 
> ? I feel there should be a logic to determine the particular Service name 
> which I requested, may be CXF-5360 where there is a discussion of selecting 
> an appropriate service name using ResourceComparator when there are multiple 
> rest services could be used to decide on the serviceName ?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (CXF-8097) Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)

2020-01-02 Thread Carsten D (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Carsten D updated CXF-8097:
---
Attachment: cxf-8097-mcve.zip

> Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)
> --
>
> Key: CXF-8097
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: JAX-RS
>Affects Versions: 3.3.2, 3.3.3
>Reporter: Carsten D
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot 2019-12-17 at 08.44.29.png, cxf-8097-mcve.zip
>
>
> I have just migrated a very outdated Spring backend to Spring 5 and with it 
> upgraded CXF to first 3.3.2 and just now 3.3.3. I have a REST service class 
> defining two different methods with the same path defined via 
> {{javax.ws.rs.Path}} annotation, differentiated by {{javax.ws.rs.HEAD}} and 
> {{javax.ws.rs.GET}} annotations. Both methods are annotated with 
> {{@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM)}}.
> When this method is called I get (redacted):
> {{WARN  [JAXRSUtils.compare:129] Both ServiceRestImpl#getFile and 
> ServiceRestImpl#getFileAsHeadRequest are equal candidates for handling the 
> current request which can lead to unpredictable results}}
> The differentiation works: HEAD requests are handled by the {{@HEAD}} 
> annotated method and GET requests by the {{@GET}} annotated one (this has 
> always worked). Therefore the warning is false but will severely clutter 
> production log output, possibly affect performance.
> Relevant dependencies:
> * Spring framework 5.1.8
> * "org.apache.cxf", "cxf-rt-rs-service-description", "3.3.3"
> * "javax.servlet", "javax.servlet-api", "4.0.1"
> * "javax.ws.rs", "javax.ws.rs-api", "2.0.1"
> I'd appreciate support. May be linked to:
> * CXF-7670
> * CXF-6684



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (CXF-8097) Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)

2020-01-02 Thread Carsten D (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17006804#comment-17006804
 ] 

Carsten D commented on CXF-8097:


[~coheigea]

I have now managed to mostly strip my project to reproduce the problem. Please 
see  [^cxf-8097-mcve.zip].

You may run this server after extracting it with
{code}
./gradlew runTestServer
{code}

Afterwards you should be able to trigger this warning by sending HEAD and GET 
requests:
{code}
// this is the HEAD request which produces the WARN log statement
curl --location --head 'http://localhost:8989/api/test/path/x/y/z/test'

// this calls a different method but on the same path, this does not produce 
the log statement
curl --location --request GET 'http://localhost:8989/api/test/path/x/y/z/test'
{code}

> Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)
> --
>
> Key: CXF-8097
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: JAX-RS
>Affects Versions: 3.3.2, 3.3.3
>Reporter: Carsten D
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot 2019-12-17 at 08.44.29.png, cxf-8097-mcve.zip
>
>
> I have just migrated a very outdated Spring backend to Spring 5 and with it 
> upgraded CXF to first 3.3.2 and just now 3.3.3. I have a REST service class 
> defining two different methods with the same path defined via 
> {{javax.ws.rs.Path}} annotation, differentiated by {{javax.ws.rs.HEAD}} and 
> {{javax.ws.rs.GET}} annotations. Both methods are annotated with 
> {{@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM)}}.
> When this method is called I get (redacted):
> {{WARN  [JAXRSUtils.compare:129] Both ServiceRestImpl#getFile and 
> ServiceRestImpl#getFileAsHeadRequest are equal candidates for handling the 
> current request which can lead to unpredictable results}}
> The differentiation works: HEAD requests are handled by the {{@HEAD}} 
> annotated method and GET requests by the {{@GET}} annotated one (this has 
> always worked). Therefore the warning is false but will severely clutter 
> production log output, possibly affect performance.
> Relevant dependencies:
> * Spring framework 5.1.8
> * "org.apache.cxf", "cxf-rt-rs-service-description", "3.3.3"
> * "javax.servlet", "javax.servlet-api", "4.0.1"
> * "javax.ws.rs", "javax.ws.rs-api", "2.0.1"
> I'd appreciate support. May be linked to:
> * CXF-7670
> * CXF-6684



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Comment Edited] (CXF-8097) Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)

2020-01-02 Thread Carsten D (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17006804#comment-17006804
 ] 

Carsten D edited comment on CXF-8097 at 1/2/20 1:26 PM:


[~coheigea]

I have now managed to mostly strip my project to reproduce the problem. Please 
see  [^cxf-8097-mcve.zip].

You may run this server after extracting it with
{code}
./gradlew runTestServer
{code}

Afterwards you should be able to trigger this warning by sending HEAD and GET 
requests:
{code}
// this is the HEAD request which produces the WARN log statement
curl --location --head 'http://localhost:8989/api/test/path/x/y/z/test'

// this calls a different method but on the same path, this does not produce 
the log statement
curl --location --request GET 'http://localhost:8989/api/test/path/x/y/z/test'
{code}

Output:
{code}
2020-01-02 14:18:01,509 INFO  [qtp1970436060-24] [] 
[ServletRequestLogHandler.handle:23] Request: HEAD /api/test/path/x/y/z/test, 
Content-Type: null, Body: 0 bytes
2020-01-02 14:18:01,595 WARN  [qtp1970436060-24] [] [JAXRSUtils.compare:129] 
Both com.test.app.rest.service.impl.TestRestServiceImpl#test and 
com.test.app.rest.service.impl.TestRestServiceImpl#testAsHeadRequest are equal 
candidates for handling the current request which can lead to unpredictable 
results
2020-01-02 14:18:01,599 INFO  [qtp1970436060-24] [] 
[TestRestServiceImpl.testAsHeadRequest:46] HEAD request
2020-01-02 14:18:01,630 INFO  [qtp1970436060-24] [] 
[ServletRequestLogHandler.handle:33] Response -- Status: 200, Content-Type: 
application/octet-stream
{code}


was (Author: carsten.d):
[~coheigea]

I have now managed to mostly strip my project to reproduce the problem. Please 
see  [^cxf-8097-mcve.zip].

You may run this server after extracting it with
{code}
./gradlew runTestServer
{code}

Afterwards you should be able to trigger this warning by sending HEAD and GET 
requests:
{code}
// this is the HEAD request which produces the WARN log statement
curl --location --head 'http://localhost:8989/api/test/path/x/y/z/test'

// this calls a different method but on the same path, this does not produce 
the log statement
curl --location --request GET 'http://localhost:8989/api/test/path/x/y/z/test'
{code}

> Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)
> --
>
> Key: CXF-8097
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: JAX-RS
>Affects Versions: 3.3.2, 3.3.3
>Reporter: Carsten D
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot 2019-12-17 at 08.44.29.png, cxf-8097-mcve.zip
>
>
> I have just migrated a very outdated Spring backend to Spring 5 and with it 
> upgraded CXF to first 3.3.2 and just now 3.3.3. I have a REST service class 
> defining two different methods with the same path defined via 
> {{javax.ws.rs.Path}} annotation, differentiated by {{javax.ws.rs.HEAD}} and 
> {{javax.ws.rs.GET}} annotations. Both methods are annotated with 
> {{@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM)}}.
> When this method is called I get (redacted):
> {{WARN  [JAXRSUtils.compare:129] Both ServiceRestImpl#getFile and 
> ServiceRestImpl#getFileAsHeadRequest are equal candidates for handling the 
> current request which can lead to unpredictable results}}
> The differentiation works: HEAD requests are handled by the {{@HEAD}} 
> annotated method and GET requests by the {{@GET}} annotated one (this has 
> always worked). Therefore the warning is false but will severely clutter 
> production log output, possibly affect performance.
> Relevant dependencies:
> * Spring framework 5.1.8
> * "org.apache.cxf", "cxf-rt-rs-service-description", "3.3.3"
> * "javax.servlet", "javax.servlet-api", "4.0.1"
> * "javax.ws.rs", "javax.ws.rs-api", "2.0.1"
> I'd appreciate support. May be linked to:
> * CXF-7670
> * CXF-6684



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Updated] (CXF-8097) Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)

2020-01-02 Thread Carsten D (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Carsten D updated CXF-8097:
---
Affects Version/s: 3.3.4

> Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)
> --
>
> Key: CXF-8097
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: JAX-RS
>Affects Versions: 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.4
>Reporter: Carsten D
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot 2019-12-17 at 08.44.29.png, cxf-8097-mcve.zip
>
>
> I have just migrated a very outdated Spring backend to Spring 5 and with it 
> upgraded CXF to first 3.3.2 and just now 3.3.3. I have a REST service class 
> defining two different methods with the same path defined via 
> {{javax.ws.rs.Path}} annotation, differentiated by {{javax.ws.rs.HEAD}} and 
> {{javax.ws.rs.GET}} annotations. Both methods are annotated with 
> {{@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM)}}.
> When this method is called I get (redacted):
> {{WARN  [JAXRSUtils.compare:129] Both ServiceRestImpl#getFile and 
> ServiceRestImpl#getFileAsHeadRequest are equal candidates for handling the 
> current request which can lead to unpredictable results}}
> The differentiation works: HEAD requests are handled by the {{@HEAD}} 
> annotated method and GET requests by the {{@GET}} annotated one (this has 
> always worked). Therefore the warning is false but will severely clutter 
> production log output, possibly affect performance.
> Relevant dependencies:
> * Spring framework 5.1.8
> * "org.apache.cxf", "cxf-rt-rs-service-description", "3.3.3"
> * "javax.servlet", "javax.servlet-api", "4.0.1"
> * "javax.ws.rs", "javax.ws.rs-api", "2.0.1"
> I'd appreciate support. May be linked to:
> * CXF-7670
> * CXF-6684



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (CXF-7910) Change JAX-WS javax to jakarta artifact dependencies

2020-01-02 Thread S V Mohana Rao (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17007068#comment-17007068
 ] 

S V Mohana Rao commented on CXF-7910:
-

[~deki] Could you please update is it ready for release. Even the application 
is pointing to the Jakarta dependencies cxf pulling javax dependencies.  

{code:xml}
[INFO] |  +- org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-bindings-soap:jar:3.3.4:compile
[INFO] |  |  +- org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-wsdl:jar:3.3.4:compile
[INFO] |  |  |  \- wsdl4j:wsdl4j:jar:1.6.3:compile
[INFO] |  |  +- org.apache.cxf:cxf-rt-databinding-jaxb:jar:3.3.4:compile
[INFO] |  |  +- javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api:jar:1.3.2:compile
[INFO] |  |  \- com.sun.activation:javax.activation:jar:1.2.0:compile
{code}


> Change JAX-WS javax to jakarta artifact dependencies
> 
>
> Key: CXF-7910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7910
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: JAX-WS Runtime
>Reporter: Dennis Kieselhorst
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> See https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jax-ws-api/issues/46
> According to https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.jaxws/ will be 
> released on 2018-12-14.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (CXFXJC-36) Use Jakarta API dependencies

2020-01-02 Thread S V Mohana Rao (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXFXJC-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17007091#comment-17007091
 ] 

S V Mohana Rao commented on CXFXJC-36:
--

Could you please release these changes

> Use Jakarta API dependencies
> 
>
> Key: CXFXJC-36
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXFXJC-36
> Project: CXF XJC Utils
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>Reporter: Alexey Markevich
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.1
>
>  Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Assigned] (CXF-8097) Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)

2020-01-02 Thread Andriy Redko (Jira)


 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Andriy Redko reassigned CXF-8097:
-

Assignee: Andriy Redko

> Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)
> --
>
> Key: CXF-8097
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: JAX-RS
>Affects Versions: 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.4
>Reporter: Carsten D
>Assignee: Andriy Redko
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot 2019-12-17 at 08.44.29.png, cxf-8097-mcve.zip
>
>
> I have just migrated a very outdated Spring backend to Spring 5 and with it 
> upgraded CXF to first 3.3.2 and just now 3.3.3. I have a REST service class 
> defining two different methods with the same path defined via 
> {{javax.ws.rs.Path}} annotation, differentiated by {{javax.ws.rs.HEAD}} and 
> {{javax.ws.rs.GET}} annotations. Both methods are annotated with 
> {{@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM)}}.
> When this method is called I get (redacted):
> {{WARN  [JAXRSUtils.compare:129] Both ServiceRestImpl#getFile and 
> ServiceRestImpl#getFileAsHeadRequest are equal candidates for handling the 
> current request which can lead to unpredictable results}}
> The differentiation works: HEAD requests are handled by the {{@HEAD}} 
> annotated method and GET requests by the {{@GET}} annotated one (this has 
> always worked). Therefore the warning is false but will severely clutter 
> production log output, possibly affect performance.
> Relevant dependencies:
> * Spring framework 5.1.8
> * "org.apache.cxf", "cxf-rt-rs-service-description", "3.3.3"
> * "javax.servlet", "javax.servlet-api", "4.0.1"
> * "javax.ws.rs", "javax.ws.rs-api", "2.0.1"
> I'd appreciate support. May be linked to:
> * CXF-7670
> * CXF-6684



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (CXF-8097) Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)

2020-01-02 Thread Andriy Redko (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17007123#comment-17007123
 ] 

Andriy Redko commented on CXF-8097:
---

Hey [~carsten.d] ,

Thanks a lot for the sample project. I've noticed that you are using custom 
resource comparator (by overriding the CXF's default one):
{noformat}
...
factory.setResourceComparator(new QueryResourceInfoComperator());
factory.setServiceName(new QName("CXF-8097"));
return factory.create();
 {noformat}
This comparator's implementation is the reason why you see warning. When 
default CXF resource comparator is used , the warning is gone:
{noformat}
2020-01-02 16:24:53,814 INFO  [qtp603658030-20] [] 
[ServletRequestLogHandler.handle:23] Request: HEAD /api/test/path/x/y/z/test, 
Content-Type: null, Body: 0 bytes
2020-01-02 16:24:53,828 INFO  [qtp603658030-20] [] 
[TestRestServiceImpl.testAsHeadRequest:46] HEAD request
2020-01-02 16:24:53,828 INFO  [qtp603658030-20] [] 
[ServletRequestLogHandler.handle:33] Response -- Status: 200, Content-Type: 
application/octet-stream
2020-01-02 16:24:55,808 INFO  [qtp603658030-19] [] 
[ServletRequestLogHandler.handle:23] Request: GET /api/test/path/x/y/z/test, 
Content-Type: null, Body: 0 bytes
2020-01-02 16:24:55,810 INFO  [qtp603658030-19] [] 
[TestRestServiceImpl.test:34] GET request
2020-01-02 16:24:55,810 INFO  [qtp603658030-19] [] 
[ServletRequestLogHandler.handle:33] Response -- Status: 200, Content-Type: null
 {noformat}
The issue is that the custom comparator (*QueryResourceInfoComperator*) is 
inherited from *OperationResourceInfoComparator* but does not properly 
initialize it (passing *null*s to parent's constructor).
{noformat}
public QueryResourceInfoComperator()
{
super(null, null);
} {noformat}
This is purely CXF documentation fault (since this where the original example 
of custom resource comparator comes from), the 
*OperationResourceInfoComparator* is not reusable and is very 
context-dependent. Probably, the simplest solution in this case is to remove 
*OperationResourceInfoComparator* from inheritance chain and use delegation 
instead (otherwise the important details (like HTTP method) are not passed 
through, leading to warnings and surprises), for example:
{noformat}
@Override
public int compare(OperationResourceInfo oper1, OperationResourceInfo 
oper2, Message message)
{
 // HTTP method
final String httpMethod = HttpUtils.getProtocolHeader(message, 
Message.HTTP_REQUEST_METHOD, HttpMethod.POST, true);
final OperationResourceInfoComparator delegate = new 
OperationResourceInfoComparator(null, httpMethod);

// Check if CXF can make a decision
final int cxfResult = delegate .compare(oper1, oper2);
...
}  {noformat}
The proper fix would take some time but the workaround with delegation should 
do the job meantime. 
I am wondering, would it work for the time being? 
Thank you.

Best Regards,
    Andriy Redko

> Equal candidates for handling the current request (HEAD / GET)
> --
>
> Key: CXF-8097
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8097
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: JAX-RS
>Affects Versions: 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.4
>Reporter: Carsten D
>Priority: Major
> Attachments: Screenshot 2019-12-17 at 08.44.29.png, cxf-8097-mcve.zip
>
>
> I have just migrated a very outdated Spring backend to Spring 5 and with it 
> upgraded CXF to first 3.3.2 and just now 3.3.3. I have a REST service class 
> defining two different methods with the same path defined via 
> {{javax.ws.rs.Path}} annotation, differentiated by {{javax.ws.rs.HEAD}} and 
> {{javax.ws.rs.GET}} annotations. Both methods are annotated with 
> {{@Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_OCTET_STREAM)}}.
> When this method is called I get (redacted):
> {{WARN  [JAXRSUtils.compare:129] Both ServiceRestImpl#getFile and 
> ServiceRestImpl#getFileAsHeadRequest are equal candidates for handling the 
> current request which can lead to unpredictable results}}
> The differentiation works: HEAD requests are handled by the {{@HEAD}} 
> annotated method and GET requests by the {{@GET}} annotated one (this has 
> always worked). Therefore the warning is false but will severely clutter 
> production log output, possibly affect performance.
> Relevant dependencies:
> * Spring framework 5.1.8
> * "org.apache.cxf", "cxf-rt-rs-service-description", "3.3.3"
> * "javax.servlet", "javax.servlet-api", "4.0.1"
> * "javax.ws.rs", "javax.ws.rs-api", "2.0.1"
> I'd appreciate support. May be linked to:
> * CXF-7670
> * CXF-6684



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)


[jira] [Commented] (CXF-7910) Change JAX-WS javax to jakarta artifact dependencies

2020-01-02 Thread Dennis Kieselhorst (Jira)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17007262#comment-17007262
 ] 

Dennis Kieselhorst commented on CXF-7910:
-

[~mohanaraosv] you can already use 3.3.4 with the new Jakarta dependencies by 
excluding the javax ones and adding the new ones manually.

We will provide updated POMs with 3.4.0.

> Change JAX-WS javax to jakarta artifact dependencies
> 
>
> Key: CXF-7910
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-7910
> Project: CXF
>  Issue Type: Task
>  Components: JAX-WS Runtime
>Reporter: Dennis Kieselhorst
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>  Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> See https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jax-ws-api/issues/46
> According to https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.jaxws/ will be 
> released on 2018-12-14.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)