Re: [IPsec] [IANA #1230840] expert review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs (ikev2-parameters)
Hi Michelle, > -Original Message- > From: Michelle Thangtamsatid via RT [mailto:drafts-expert-rev...@iana.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 9:01 PM > Cc: kivi...@iki.fi; val...@smyslov.net; ipsec@ietf.org > Subject: [IANA #1230840] expert review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs > (ikev2-parameters) > > Dear Tero and Valery (cc: ipsecme WG), > > As the designated experts for the IKEv2 Notify Message Types - Status Types > registry, can you review the > proposed registration in draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs for us? Please see > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs As a dedicated expert I have no problem with this registration request. This is a WG document and it has been thoroughly reviewed. > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll > make the registration at > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters > > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know whether you > want us to wait for both reviewers > to respond before we mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to > the authors, if the > registrations aren't OK). I don't think that Tero would have any objections (note, that he is the document shepherd and have reviewed it in this role), but you may want to wait for his explicit confirmation. Regards, Valery. > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration reviews. > The due date for this request is > 2022-05-31. > > thanks, > > Michelle Thangtamsatid > IANA Services Specialist ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
Re: [IPsec] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs-12
Hi Bo, Thanks for your review! I've addressed your comments below along with local modifications to the document as noted. Bo Wu via Datatracker writes: Reviewer: Bo Wu Review result: Has Nits Hi all, I have been selected as the Operational Directorate reviewer for this draft. Summary: I think this draft is ready for publication after the nits fixed. Comments: This draft uses IPsec tunnel mode to improve confidentiality by hiding inner packet identifiable information, packet size and packet timing. The document is well-written and readable. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Query: Section 4. Configuration of AGGFRAG Tunnels for IP-TFS This section defines the configurations of three parameters: Bandwidth, packet size, and congestion control. It also says "No standardized configuration method is required." As I see WG is working on YANG and MIB drafts related to this draft. I am wondering if these drafts can be referenced in this section as examples of the configuration and operation method? I've added informational references to the drafts in this section. Nits： - Expand on first use: ESP,CC 2.2.3.1. Optional Extra Padding OLD： While use of padding to avoid fragmentation does not impact interoperability, used inappropriately it can reduce the effective throughput of a tunnel. Suggest: While the use of padding to avoid fragmentation does not impact interoperability, using inappropriately it can reduce the effective throughput of a tunnel. Going to leave this up to the RFC editor. Appendix C C.1. Comparing Overhead OLD For comparing overhead the overhead of ESP for both normal and AGGFRAG tunnel packets must be calculated, Suggest： For comparing the overhead of ESP for both normal and AGGFRAG tunnel packets must be calculated Fixed. Thanks, Chris. ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
Re: [IPsec] [IANA #1230840] expert review for draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs (ikev2-parameters)
Valery Smyslov writes: > > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know > > whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond before > > we mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the > > authors, if the registrations aren't OK). > > I don't think that Tero would have any objections (note, that he is > the document shepherd and have reviewed it in this role), but you > may want to wait for his explicit confirmation. I do not have any objections to these allocations. -- kivi...@iki.fi ___ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
