Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 17/22] drm/shmem-helper: Add generic memory shrinker
On Fri, 27 May 2022 at 01:55, Dmitry Osipenko
wrote:
>
> Introduce a common DRM SHMEM shrinker framework that allows to reduce
> code duplication among DRM drivers by replacing theirs custom shrinker
> implementations with the generic shrinker.
>
> In order to start using DRM SHMEM shrinker drivers should:
>
> 1. Implement new evict() shmem object callback.
> 2. Register shrinker using drm_gem_shmem_shrinker_register(drm_device).
> 3. Use drm_gem_shmem_set_purgeable(shmem) and alike API functions to
>activate shrinking of shmem GEMs.
>
> This patch is based on a ideas borrowed from Rob's Clark MSM shrinker,
> Thomas' Zimmermann variant of SHMEM shrinker and Intel's i915 shrinker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Almeida
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
So I guess I get a price for being blind since forever, because this
thing existed since at least 2013. I just stumbled over
llist_lru.[hc], a purpose built list helper for shrinkers. I think we
should try to adopt that so that our gpu shrinkers look more like
shrinkers for everything else.
Apologies for this, since I fear this might cause a bit of churn.
Hopefully it's all contained to the list manipulation code in shmem
helpers, I don't think this should leak any further.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c| 540 --
> .../gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c | 9 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 3 +
> include/drm/drm_device.h | 4 +
> include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h| 87 ++-
> 5 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> index 555fe212bd98..4cd0b5913492 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,42 @@ struct drm_gem_shmem_object *drm_gem_shmem_create(struct
> drm_device *dev, size_t
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gem_shmem_create);
>
> +static bool drm_gem_shmem_is_evictable(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
> +{
> + return (shmem->madv >= 0) && shmem->evict &&
> + shmem->eviction_enabled && shmem->pages_use_count &&
> + !shmem->pages_pin_count && !shmem->base.dma_buf &&
> + !shmem->base.import_attach && shmem->sgt && !shmem->evicted;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +drm_gem_shmem_update_pages_state(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
> +{
> + struct drm_gem_object *obj = &shmem->base;
> + struct drm_gem_shmem_shrinker *gem_shrinker =
> obj->dev->shmem_shrinker;
> +
> + dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
> +
> + if (!gem_shrinker || obj->import_attach)
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&gem_shrinker->lock);
> +
> + if (drm_gem_shmem_is_evictable(shmem) ||
> + drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem))
> + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list,
> &gem_shrinker->lru_evictable);
> + else if (shmem->madv < 0)
> + list_del_init(&shmem->madv_list);
> + else if (shmem->evicted)
> + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list, &gem_shrinker->lru_evicted);
> + else if (!shmem->pages)
> + list_del_init(&shmem->madv_list);
> + else
> + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list, &gem_shrinker->lru_pinned);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&gem_shrinker->lock);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * drm_gem_shmem_free - Free resources associated with a shmem GEM object
> * @shmem: shmem GEM object to free
> @@ -142,6 +178,9 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> *shmem)
> } else {
> dma_resv_lock(shmem->base.resv, NULL);
>
> + /* take out shmem GEM object from the memory shrinker */
> + drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, -1);
> +
> WARN_ON(shmem->vmap_use_count);
>
> if (shmem->sgt) {
> @@ -150,7 +189,7 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> *shmem)
> sg_free_table(shmem->sgt);
> kfree(shmem->sgt);
> }
> - if (shmem->pages)
> + if (shmem->pages_use_count)
> drm_gem_shmem_put_pages(shmem);
>
> WARN_ON(shmem->pages_use_count);
> @@ -163,18 +202,82 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> *shmem)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gem_shmem_free);
>
> -static int drm_gem_shmem_get_pages(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
> +/**
> + * drm_gem_shmem_set_evictable() - Make GEM evictable by memory shrinker
> + * @shmem: shmem GEM object
> + *
> + * Tell memory shrinker that this GEM can be evicted. Initially eviction is
> + * disabled for all GEMs. If GEM was purged, then -ENOMEM is returned.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0 on success or a negative error code on failure.
> + */
> +int drm_gem_shmem_set_evictable(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
> +{
> + dma_resv_lock(shmem->
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 17/22] drm/shmem-helper: Add generic memory shrinker
On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 May 2022 at 01:55, Dmitry Osipenko
> wrote:
> >
> > Introduce a common DRM SHMEM shrinker framework that allows to reduce
> > code duplication among DRM drivers by replacing theirs custom shrinker
> > implementations with the generic shrinker.
> >
> > In order to start using DRM SHMEM shrinker drivers should:
> >
> > 1. Implement new evict() shmem object callback.
> > 2. Register shrinker using drm_gem_shmem_shrinker_register(drm_device).
> > 3. Use drm_gem_shmem_set_purgeable(shmem) and alike API functions to
> >activate shrinking of shmem GEMs.
> >
> > This patch is based on a ideas borrowed from Rob's Clark MSM shrinker,
> > Thomas' Zimmermann variant of SHMEM shrinker and Intel's i915 shrinker.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Almeida
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
>
> So I guess I get a price for being blind since forever, because this
> thing existed since at least 2013. I just stumbled over
> llist_lru.[hc], a purpose built list helper for shrinkers. I think we
> should try to adopt that so that our gpu shrinkers look more like
> shrinkers for everything else.
followup from a bit of irc discussion w/ danvet about list_lru:
* It seems to be missing a way to bail out of iteration before
nr_to_scan is hit.. which is going to be inconvenient if you
want to allow active bos on the LRU but bail scanning once
you encounter the first one.
* Not sure if the numa node awareness is super useful for GEM
bos
First issue is perhaps not too hard to fix. But maybe a better
idea is a drm_gem_lru helper type thing which is more tailored
to GEM buffers?
BR,
-R
> Apologies for this, since I fear this might cause a bit of churn.
> Hopefully it's all contained to the list manipulation code in shmem
> helpers, I don't think this should leak any further.
> -Daniel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c| 540 --
> > .../gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c | 9 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 3 +
> > include/drm/drm_device.h | 4 +
> > include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h| 87 ++-
> > 5 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> > index 555fe212bd98..4cd0b5913492 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> > @@ -126,6 +126,42 @@ struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> > *drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gem_shmem_create);
> >
> > +static bool drm_gem_shmem_is_evictable(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
> > +{
> > + return (shmem->madv >= 0) && shmem->evict &&
> > + shmem->eviction_enabled && shmem->pages_use_count &&
> > + !shmem->pages_pin_count && !shmem->base.dma_buf &&
> > + !shmem->base.import_attach && shmem->sgt && !shmem->evicted;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +drm_gem_shmem_update_pages_state(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_gem_object *obj = &shmem->base;
> > + struct drm_gem_shmem_shrinker *gem_shrinker =
> > obj->dev->shmem_shrinker;
> > +
> > + dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
> > +
> > + if (!gem_shrinker || obj->import_attach)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&gem_shrinker->lock);
> > +
> > + if (drm_gem_shmem_is_evictable(shmem) ||
> > + drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem))
> > + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list,
> > &gem_shrinker->lru_evictable);
> > + else if (shmem->madv < 0)
> > + list_del_init(&shmem->madv_list);
> > + else if (shmem->evicted)
> > + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list,
> > &gem_shrinker->lru_evicted);
> > + else if (!shmem->pages)
> > + list_del_init(&shmem->madv_list);
> > + else
> > + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list,
> > &gem_shrinker->lru_pinned);
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&gem_shrinker->lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * drm_gem_shmem_free - Free resources associated with a shmem GEM object
> > * @shmem: shmem GEM object to free
> > @@ -142,6 +178,9 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> > *shmem)
> > } else {
> > dma_resv_lock(shmem->base.resv, NULL);
> >
> > + /* take out shmem GEM object from the memory shrinker */
> > + drm_gem_shmem_madvise(shmem, -1);
> > +
> > WARN_ON(shmem->vmap_use_count);
> >
> > if (shmem->sgt) {
> > @@ -150,7 +189,7 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> > *shmem)
> > sg_free_table(shmem->sgt);
> > kfree(shmem->sgt);
> > }
> > - if (shmem->pages)
> > + if (shmem->pages_use_count)
> >
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 17/22] drm/shmem-helper: Add generic memory shrinker
On Sun, 5 Jun 2022 at 20:32, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 9:47 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 27 May 2022 at 01:55, Dmitry Osipenko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Introduce a common DRM SHMEM shrinker framework that allows to reduce
> > > code duplication among DRM drivers by replacing theirs custom shrinker
> > > implementations with the generic shrinker.
> > >
> > > In order to start using DRM SHMEM shrinker drivers should:
> > >
> > > 1. Implement new evict() shmem object callback.
> > > 2. Register shrinker using drm_gem_shmem_shrinker_register(drm_device).
> > > 3. Use drm_gem_shmem_set_purgeable(shmem) and alike API functions to
> > >activate shrinking of shmem GEMs.
> > >
> > > This patch is based on a ideas borrowed from Rob's Clark MSM shrinker,
> > > Thomas' Zimmermann variant of SHMEM shrinker and Intel's i915 shrinker.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Almeida
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko
> >
> > So I guess I get a price for being blind since forever, because this
> > thing existed since at least 2013. I just stumbled over
> > llist_lru.[hc], a purpose built list helper for shrinkers. I think we
> > should try to adopt that so that our gpu shrinkers look more like
> > shrinkers for everything else.
>
> followup from a bit of irc discussion w/ danvet about list_lru:
>
> * It seems to be missing a way to bail out of iteration before
> nr_to_scan is hit.. which is going to be inconvenient if you
> want to allow active bos on the LRU but bail scanning once
> you encounter the first one.
>
> * Not sure if the numa node awareness is super useful for GEM
> bos
>
> First issue is perhaps not too hard to fix. But maybe a better
> idea is a drm_gem_lru helper type thing which is more tailored
> to GEM buffers?
Yeah I guess reusing list_lru isn't that good idea. So just
open-coding it for now, and then drm_gem_bo_lru or so if we need to
share it separately from shmem helpers with other drivers. Maybe will
be needed for ttm or so.
-Daniel
>
> BR,
> -R
>
> > Apologies for this, since I fear this might cause a bit of churn.
> > Hopefully it's all contained to the list manipulation code in shmem
> > helpers, I don't think this should leak any further.
> > -Daniel
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c| 540 --
> > > .../gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c | 9 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 3 +
> > > include/drm/drm_device.h | 4 +
> > > include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h| 87 ++-
> > > 5 files changed, 594 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> > > index 555fe212bd98..4cd0b5913492 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c
> > > @@ -126,6 +126,42 @@ struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> > > *drm_gem_shmem_create(struct drm_device *dev, size_t
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_gem_shmem_create);
> > >
> > > +static bool drm_gem_shmem_is_evictable(struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> > > *shmem)
> > > +{
> > > + return (shmem->madv >= 0) && shmem->evict &&
> > > + shmem->eviction_enabled && shmem->pages_use_count &&
> > > + !shmem->pages_pin_count && !shmem->base.dma_buf &&
> > > + !shmem->base.import_attach && shmem->sgt &&
> > > !shmem->evicted;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void
> > > +drm_gem_shmem_update_pages_state(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_gem_object *obj = &shmem->base;
> > > + struct drm_gem_shmem_shrinker *gem_shrinker =
> > > obj->dev->shmem_shrinker;
> > > +
> > > + dma_resv_assert_held(shmem->base.resv);
> > > +
> > > + if (!gem_shrinker || obj->import_attach)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&gem_shrinker->lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (drm_gem_shmem_is_evictable(shmem) ||
> > > + drm_gem_shmem_is_purgeable(shmem))
> > > + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list,
> > > &gem_shrinker->lru_evictable);
> > > + else if (shmem->madv < 0)
> > > + list_del_init(&shmem->madv_list);
> > > + else if (shmem->evicted)
> > > + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list,
> > > &gem_shrinker->lru_evicted);
> > > + else if (!shmem->pages)
> > > + list_del_init(&shmem->madv_list);
> > > + else
> > > + list_move_tail(&shmem->madv_list,
> > > &gem_shrinker->lru_pinned);
> > > +
> > > + mutex_unlock(&gem_shrinker->lock);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * drm_gem_shmem_free - Free resources associated with a shmem GEM object
> > > * @shmem: shmem GEM object to free
> > > @@ -142,6 +178,9 @@ void drm_gem_shmem_free(struct drm_gem_shmem_object
> > > *shmem)
> > > } else {
> > > dma_resv_lock(shmem->base.resv, NULL);
> > >
> > > +
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dg2: Add Wa_14015795083
i915 must disable Render DOP clock gating globally. B.Spec: 52621 Cc: Matt Roper Cc: Badal Nilawar Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 5 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h index 58e9b464d564..55a291ab5536 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h @@ -630,6 +630,7 @@ #define GEN7_MISCCPCTL _MMIO(0x9424) #define GEN7_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_ENABLE (1 << 0) +#define GEN12_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_RENDER_ENABLE(1 << 1) #define GEN8_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_CFCLK_ENABLE (1 << 2) #define GEN8_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_GUC_ENABLE (1 << 4) #define GEN8_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_MEDIA_ENABLE (1 << 6) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c index a604bc7c0701..b957dec64eee 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c @@ -1489,6 +1489,11 @@ dg2_gt_workarounds_init(struct intel_gt *gt, struct i915_wa_list *wal) * performance guide section. */ wa_write_or(wal, GEN12_SQCM, EN_32B_ACCESS); + + /* +* Wa_14015795083 +*/ + wa_write_clr(wal, GEN7_MISCCPCTL, GEN12_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_RENDER_ENABLE); } static void -- 2.26.2
[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dg2: Add Wa_14015795083
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/dg2: Add Wa_14015795083
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104760/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11727 -> Patchwork_104760v1
Summary
---
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104760v1/index.html
Participating hosts (48 -> 41)
--
Additional (1): bat-jsl-1
Missing(8): fi-rkl-11600 bat-dg1-6 fi-tgl-u2 bat-dg1-5 bat-dg2-8
fi-hsw-4200u bat-adlm-1 fi-ctg-p8600
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_104760v1 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
Issues hit
* igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-kbl-soraka: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] ([i915#794])
[1]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11727/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104760v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
- fi-blb-e6850: [PASS][3] -> [DMESG-FAIL][4] ([i915#4528])
[3]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11727/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
[4]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104760v1/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@vma:
- fi-bdw-5557u: [PASS][5] -> [INCOMPLETE][6] ([i915#5681])
[5]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11727/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@l...@vma.html
[6]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104760v1/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_selftest@l...@vma.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-kbl-soraka: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][7] ([i915#4312] / [i915#5257])
[7]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104760v1/fi-kbl-soraka/igt@run...@aborted.html
Possible fixes
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@basic-rte:
- fi-cfl-8109u: [DMESG-WARN][8] ([i915#1888] / [i915#62]) -> [PASS][9]
[8]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11727/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html
[9]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104760v1/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-rte.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_timelines:
- {bat-dg2-9}:[DMESG-WARN][10] ([i915#5763]) -> [PASS][11] +2
similar issues
[10]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11727/bat-dg2-9/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_timelines.html
[11]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104760v1/bat-dg2-9/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_timelines.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
- fi-cfl-8109u: [DMESG-WARN][12] ([i915#62]) -> [PASS][13] +15
similar issues
[12]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11727/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_track...@basic.html
[13]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104760v1/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_frontbuffer_track...@basic.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[fdo#109285]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109285
[fdo#109295]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109295
[fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827
[i915#1845]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1845
[i915#1888]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1888
[i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
[i915#3003]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3003
[i915#3301]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3301
[i915#3555]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3555
[i915#4103]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4103
[i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
[i915#4528]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4528
[i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
[i915#5257]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5257
[i915#533]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/533
[i915#5681]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5681
[i915#5763]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5763
[i915#5885]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5885
[i915#5903]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5903
[i915#62]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/62
[i915#794]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/794
Build changes
-
* Linux: CI_DRM_11727 -> Patchwork_104760v1
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_11727: 6034ccb11971698ace6b3af2f6ac02de120a2dc2 @
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_6505: edb1a467fb622b23b927e28ff603fa43851fea97 @
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
Patchwork_104760v1: 6034ccb1197
