[hibernate-dev] NoORM IRC meeting transcripts
We discussed about: - releasing OGM 5.1.0.Alpha1 with Neo4j Remote - enabling the enforcer plugin for the Neo4j module now that the Lucene dependency is aligned with the one in Hibernate Search - the Hibernate ORM module ZIP and writing a blog post about it - trying to have the HotRod dialect for OGM 5.1.0.Alpha2 - creating new CI nodes on a machine owned by Sanne - a new account request for CentOS CI: https://ci.centos.org/ Minutes: http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2016/hibernate-dev.2016-07-05-13.07.html Minutes (text): http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2016/hibernate-dev.2016-07-05-13.07.txt Log: http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/hibernate-dev/2016/hibernate-dev.2016-07-05-13.07.log.html Davide ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
[hibernate-dev] Dropping "Serializable" requirement for IDs ?
Hi all, today creating a unit test I was greeted by this "old friend": > org.hibernate.MappingException: Composite-id class must implement > Serializable: shall we get rid of this requirement? It's just an inconvenience for end users to have to remember this marker, as far as I know we don't really need this anymore. I realise some code might still be needing this, but we probably can do better by not actually serializing it with the default platform serializer? Just an idea for a potential 6.0 improvement.. Thanks, Sanne ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Re: [hibernate-dev] Dropping "Serializable" requirement for IDs ?
I'm ok with this. That is no longer a real requirement. Any disagree? On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, 11:58 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Hi all, > today creating a unit test I was greeted by this "old friend": > > > org.hibernate.MappingException: Composite-id class must implement > Serializable: > > shall we get rid of this requirement? > > It's just an inconvenience for end users to have to remember this > marker, as far as I know we don't really need this anymore. > > I realise some code might still be needing this, but we probably can > do better by not actually serializing it with the default platform > serializer? > > Just an idea for a potential 6.0 improvement.. > > Thanks, > Sanne > ___ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Re: [hibernate-dev] Dropping "Serializable" requirement for IDs ?
+1 from me as well -- thanks for bringing that up, Sanne. On 07/05/2016 01:28 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: > I'm ok with this. That is no longer a real requirement. > > Any disagree? > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, 11:58 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >> Hi all, >> today creating a unit test I was greeted by this "old friend": >> >>> org.hibernate.MappingException: Composite-id class must implement >> Serializable: >> >> shall we get rid of this requirement? >> >> It's just an inconvenience for end users to have to remember this >> marker, as far as I know we don't really need this anymore. >> >> I realise some code might still be needing this, but we probably can >> do better by not actually serializing it with the default platform >> serializer? >> >> Just an idea for a potential 6.0 improvement.. >> >> Thanks, >> Sanne >> ___ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > ___ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Re: [hibernate-dev] Dropping "Serializable" requirement for IDs ?
+1 On 07/05/2016 02:12 PM, Brett Meyer wrote: > +1 from me as well -- thanks for bringing that up, Sanne. > > On 07/05/2016 01:28 PM, Steve Ebersole wrote: >> I'm ok with this. That is no longer a real requirement. >> >> Any disagree? >> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016, 11:58 AM Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> today creating a unit test I was greeted by this "old friend": >>> org.hibernate.MappingException: Composite-id class must implement >>> Serializable: >>> >>> shall we get rid of this requirement? >>> >>> It's just an inconvenience for end users to have to remember this >>> marker, as far as I know we don't really need this anymore. >>> >>> I realise some code might still be needing this, but we probably can >>> do better by not actually serializing it with the default platform >>> serializer? >>> >>> Just an idea for a potential 6.0 improvement.. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sanne >>> ___ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> >> ___ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > > ___ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
