Re: [hibernate-dev] Search: Someone needing the standalone FullTextManager ?

2013-05-19 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
+1 

I was not even aware of it. Was it one of your experiments?



On 18 May 2013, at 23:59, Sanne Grinovero  wrote:

> There is an experimental feature in Hibernate Search which is as well
> known and as well documented as an easter egg:
> 
> org.hibernate.search.sandbox.standalone.FullTextManager
> 
> allows to use Hibernate Search in "standalone" mode, i.e. without a
> database and storing all data in the Lucene index only.
> 
> This doesn't even have tests, but hasn't harmed any kitten so far.
> However now while I'm looking at doing some refactorings in
> preparation of Lucene 4, this looks like something that will need a
> complete rewrite, and is adding some resistance already by depending
> on deprecated methods which I'd rather remove asap.
> 
> So I'm proposing to delete it, for the time being with no replacement.
> If there is interest we'd need to rewrite it anyway, but I'd prefer
> doing that eventually after the migration.
> 
> Are we all ok with this?
> 
> Cheers,
> Sanne
> ___
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


Re: [hibernate-dev] Search: Someone needing the standalone FullTextManager ?

2013-05-19 Thread sujit dhaygude
HI Hardy,

Just want to know
is JDBC batch updates not supported with HQL queries any ways it can
be achieved

Regards,
Sujit


On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:

> +1
>
> I was not even aware of it. Was it one of your experiments?
>
>
>
> On 18 May 2013, at 23:59, Sanne Grinovero  wrote:
>
> > There is an experimental feature in Hibernate Search which is as well
> > known and as well documented as an easter egg:
> >
> > org.hibernate.search.sandbox.standalone.FullTextManager
> >
> > allows to use Hibernate Search in "standalone" mode, i.e. without a
> > database and storing all data in the Lucene index only.
> >
> > This doesn't even have tests, but hasn't harmed any kitten so far.
> > However now while I'm looking at doing some refactorings in
> > preparation of Lucene 4, this looks like something that will need a
> > complete rewrite, and is adding some resistance already by depending
> > on deprecated methods which I'd rather remove asap.
> >
> > So I'm proposing to delete it, for the time being with no replacement.
> > If there is interest we'd need to rewrite it anyway, but I'd prefer
> > doing that eventually after the migration.
> >
> > Are we all ok with this?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sanne
> > ___
> > hibernate-dev mailing list
> > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
> ___
> hibernate-dev mailing list
> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
>
___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev