Re: [hibernate-dev] CI - keeping jobs
Discarding old builds makes sense; But I'd keep some more, maybe 30 or even 50 unless disk space is an issue. 2013/5/10 Steve Ebersole > Is there a reason to not "Discard Old Builds", keeping just the last 10, > 15, 20 jobs? > ___ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Re: [hibernate-dev] CI - keeping jobs
Thanks for starting this; I didn't limit the builds yet as wanted to bring it up here first.. was about time. We're using just 4% of the available space, and that includes the operating system essentials and the Maven repository.. so you're free to suggest high values if you think that can be useful. Also how important are these reports in the long term? Is it ok in case of "disaster" that we don't recover previous build reports? There is no backup job in place currently: all what I do is take occasional create snapshots of the VM when I feel we reached a good milestone in progress, but these snaphosts include the whole OS and their goal is to backup the infrastructure more than to keep up with build logs. I'd suggest to have each project limit its own build as wished; you can even leave it unbounded if you wish so: in case of disk space need I'll reach out and ask; in such a situation we also have the option to rise the disk space dynamically, practically you can think of it as unlimited. I'm setting a time limit for Search and OGM of 90 days. Sanne On 10 May 2013 08:35, Gunnar Morling wrote: > Discarding old builds makes sense; But I'd keep some more, maybe 30 or even > 50 unless disk space is an issue. > > > 2013/5/10 Steve Ebersole > >> Is there a reason to not "Discard Old Builds", keeping just the last 10, >> 15, 20 jobs? >> ___ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > ___ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Re: [hibernate-dev] CI - keeping jobs
> I'm setting a time limit for Search and OGM of 90 days. +1 Davide On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > Thanks for starting this; I didn't limit the builds yet as wanted to > bring it up here first.. was about time. > > We're using just 4% of the available space, and that includes the > operating system essentials and the Maven repository.. so you're free > to suggest high values if you think that can be useful. > > Also how important are these reports in the long term? Is it ok in > case of "disaster" that we don't recover previous build reports? > There is no backup job in place currently: all what I do is take > occasional create snapshots of the VM when I feel we reached a good > milestone in progress, but these snaphosts include the whole OS and > their goal is to backup the infrastructure more than to keep up with > build logs. > > > I'd suggest to have each project limit its own build as wished; you > can even leave it unbounded if you wish so: in case of disk space need > I'll reach out and ask; in such a situation we also have the option to > rise the disk space dynamically, practically you can think of it as > unlimited. > > I'm setting a time limit for Search and OGM of 90 days. > > Sanne > > > On 10 May 2013 08:35, Gunnar Morling wrote: > > Discarding old builds makes sense; But I'd keep some more, maybe 30 or > even > > 50 unless disk space is an issue. > > > > > > 2013/5/10 Steve Ebersole > > > >> Is there a reason to not "Discard Old Builds", keeping just the last 10, > >> 15, 20 jobs? > >> ___ > >> hibernate-dev mailing list > >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > >> > > ___ > > hibernate-dev mailing list > > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > ___ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev > ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
Re: [hibernate-dev] CI - keeping jobs
+1, for all I care 30 would even be enough --Hardy On 10 Jan 2013, at 1:55 PM, Davide D'Alto wrote: >> I'm setting a time limit for Search and OGM of 90 days. > +1 > > Davide > > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > >> Thanks for starting this; I didn't limit the builds yet as wanted to >> bring it up here first.. was about time. >> >> We're using just 4% of the available space, and that includes the >> operating system essentials and the Maven repository.. so you're free >> to suggest high values if you think that can be useful. >> >> Also how important are these reports in the long term? Is it ok in >> case of "disaster" that we don't recover previous build reports? >> There is no backup job in place currently: all what I do is take >> occasional create snapshots of the VM when I feel we reached a good >> milestone in progress, but these snaphosts include the whole OS and >> their goal is to backup the infrastructure more than to keep up with >> build logs. >> >> >> I'd suggest to have each project limit its own build as wished; you >> can even leave it unbounded if you wish so: in case of disk space need >> I'll reach out and ask; in such a situation we also have the option to >> rise the disk space dynamically, practically you can think of it as >> unlimited. >> >> I'm setting a time limit for Search and OGM of 90 days. >> >> Sanne >> >> >> On 10 May 2013 08:35, Gunnar Morling wrote: >>> Discarding old builds makes sense; But I'd keep some more, maybe 30 or >> even >>> 50 unless disk space is an issue. >>> >>> >>> 2013/5/10 Steve Ebersole >>> Is there a reason to not "Discard Old Builds", keeping just the last 10, 15, 20 jobs? ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >>> ___ >>> hibernate-dev mailing list >>> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> ___ >> hibernate-dev mailing list >> hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev >> > ___ > hibernate-dev mailing list > hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
[hibernate-dev] hibernate-commons-annotations 4.0.2.Final released (OSGi improvement)
hibernate-commons-annotations 4.0.2.Final was just released. It contains only one fix: https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HCANN-51. The manifest was improved to support usage in OSGi environments. And that's it! Exciting, eh? Brett Meyer Red Hat Software Engineer, Hibernate ___ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev
