Re: [hibernate-dev] [Bean Validation] Latest spec publication point

2009-01-31 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
Ah, that makes things indeed much easier. Maybe you can publish the  
various xsds there as well?


--Hardy

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:02:29 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard  
 wrote:



The spec is getting to big to send it each time via email.
 From now one, I will publish it at  
http://hibernate.org/~emmanuel/validation/
Of course, I will also points to the major changes when I do some via  
email.





___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


Re: [hibernate-dev] [Bean Validation] Latest spec publication point

2009-01-31 Thread Emmanuel Bernard

XSD are committed in validation-api/src/resource

On  Jan 31, 2009, at 06:12, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:

Ah, that makes things indeed much easier. Maybe you can publish the  
various xsds there as well?


--Hardy

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:02:29 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard > wrote:



The spec is getting to big to send it each time via email.
From now one, I will publish it at http://hibernate.org/~emmanuel/validation/
Of course, I will also points to the major changes when I do some  
via email.







___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


Re: [hibernate-dev] [BVAL-RI] HibrnateValidatorConfiguration

2009-01-31 Thread Emmanuel Bernard


On  Jan 31, 2009, at 06:08, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:49:24 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard > wrote:


I don't think HibernateValidatorConfiguration should go in the  
engine package. That's a public API. it should stay in the root  
package.


Ok. The main point was to remove the engine / impl distinction which  
felt kind of arbitrary.
Also the MessageInterpolator and ConstraintFactory handling has  
changed. I think now it makes more

sense and we don't have to pass the references around everywhere.
Let me work a little more in this area. I will keep in mind that in  
the end HibernateValidatorConfiguration

should move up again.


yes, I agree.
Speaking of ValidatorContextImpl and ValidationContext
I think something should be done in this area, probably  
ValidatorContextImpl being passed as a constructore parameter to  
ValidatorImpl and encapsulated in ValidationContext.
BTW, either ValidationContext has a bad name or ValidatorContext has a  
bad name but one of them has to change:

 - ValidationContext => ValidatorExectionContext?

PS in ValidatorContext name has to change, let me know as it impacts  
the spec.


___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev


Re: [hibernate-dev] [BVAL-RI] HibrnateValidatorConfiguration

2009-01-31 Thread Hardy Ferentschik
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:34:42 +0100, Emmanuel Bernard  
 wrote:


BTW, either ValidationContext has a bad name or ValidatorContext has a  
bad name but one of them has to change:

  - ValidationContext => ValidatorExectionContext?


Agreed. The whole Validation vs Validator thing gets me all the time.  
ValidatorExecutionContext or
just ExecutionContext might be a way forward. I think with your latest  
booststrap class renaming and my
latest refactoring in the org.hibernate.validator.engine package helped  
aready a lot to make the

code more understandable.

--Hardy


___
hibernate-dev mailing list
hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev