Re: pending mate upgrade patches to 1.26
Hello Andy, Am Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:09:41PM -0700 schrieb Andy Tai: > The state of them is that there are two prerequisites that have passed > Guix QA check: > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64001 I had a quick look at this patch, but am a bit confused. If I read it correctly, it updates tzdata (which causes a lot of rebuilds, and without updating python-pytz as stipulated by a comment in the code of tzdata), and then it creates a new variable tzdata-next which looks to be the same. Would the good approach not be to update tzdata and python-pytz, and to copy the old version into tzdata-for-tests? It is quite possible I am misunderstanding something, and in any case I would like to defer to someone more knowledgeable about the core packages. Andreas
Re: python-nbconvert build fails
Am Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 08:23:36PM +0100 schrieb Christina O'Donnell: > Sorry, I've just seen this is a duplicate of > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64729. > I should have checked there first! No problem, thanks for the report anyway! The package builds now, so a new "guix pull" should be enough. Andreas
Re: Scheduled monthly update for (gnu packages astronomy)
Am Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 10:36:26PM +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > You’re now well known so pretty much the only thing I would wait for as > a reviewer before applying these updates is (1) a green light from > qa.guix, This looks like it lags behind now. > and (2) a bit of spare time. Ah, we should not wait for the impossible to happen! ;-) The status of the patches is unclear to me, it looks as if some of them have been rewritten and merged by Tobias (maybe this also confuses QA? do the patches still apply?) But I find it difficult to understand what needs to be done still. For instance, there is a patch "stuff: Update to 1.26.0-0.9008dc0", but it is already at version 2.0.1 in master. How about sending a second version for the remaining patches on top of current master? Andreas
Re: July Guix London meetup
Hi all, > Join us on Mon 24th July, 6 pm – 8.30 pm, at the Lakeside Terrace of > the Barbican Centre, Silk Street, EC2Y 8DS, London. You'll find us at > a table near the water fountains. We'll have a couple of small Guix > posters to indicate it's us. Quick reminder for the Guix London meetup today! Cheers! Arun
Re: pending mate upgrade patches to 1.26
Hi, these patches have been merged by Mr. Song (iyzs...@envs.net) . He worked to get these built without the two extra patches. Thanks On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:54 AM Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello Andy, > > Am Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:09:41PM -0700 schrieb Andy Tai: > > The state of them is that there are two prerequisites that have passed > > Guix QA check: > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64001 > > I had a quick look at this patch, but am a bit confused. If I read it > correctly, it updates tzdata (which causes a lot of rebuilds, and without > updating python-pytz as stipulated by a comment in the code of tzdata), > and then it creates a new variable tzdata-next which looks to be the same. > > Would the good approach not be to update tzdata and python-pytz, and to > copy the old version into tzdata-for-tests? > > It is quite possible I am misunderstanding something, and in any case I > would like to defer to someone more knowledgeable about the core packages. > > Andreas > > -- Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai, Line: andy_tai, WeChat: andytai1010 Year 2023 民國112年 自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟 自動的行為力是勞動與技能
Re: pending mate upgrade patches to 1.26
Am Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 09:28:38AM -0700 schrieb Andy Tai: > Hi, these patches have been merged by Mr. Song (iyzs...@envs.net) . He worked > to get these built without the two extra patches. Thanks So closing the bugs https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64001 and https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64012 ; if this was a misunderstanding, please feel free to reopen them or to submit new patches. Andreas
Re: Scheduled monthly update for (gnu packages astronomy)
Hi Andreas, Thank you for your time. This issue may be closed https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64287 as Tobias applied all of it's patches. I'm not sure about the reason of splittingt them into smaller ones, it may be a question to him :-) I'll rebase patches from https://issues.guix.gnu.org/64201 to the current master branch and sent V2, hope they are look ok. Regards, Oleg On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 09:53, Andreas Enge wrote: > > Am Sun, Jul 02, 2023 at 10:36:26PM +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > You’re now well known so pretty much the only thing I would wait for as > > a reviewer before applying these updates is (1) a green light from > > qa.guix, > > This looks like it lags behind now. > > > and (2) a bit of spare time. > > Ah, we should not wait for the impossible to happen! ;-) > > The status of the patches is unclear to me, it looks as if some of them > have been rewritten and merged by Tobias (maybe this also confuses QA? > do the patches still apply?) But I find it difficult to understand what > needs to be done still. For instance, there is a patch "stuff: Update to > 1.26.0-0.9008dc0", but it is already at version 2.0.1 in master. > > How about sending a second version for the remaining patches on top of > current master? > > Andreas > -- … наш разум - превосходная объяснительная машина которая способна найти смысл почти в чем угодно, истолковать любой феномен, но совершенно не в состоянии принять мысль о непредсказуемости.
conda (python) build failure and patches
Hi, conda (of python world) package in Guix is not building on Guix right now, and there are patches in this bug report to fix that https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63277 Hope these can get reviewed and merged. (How these interact with the Python team branch? Also needs that team to consider)
