Re: Compiling problems
hi Olf! Maybe you use a low version libgc? But I can compiler Guile successfully under openSUSE, libgc1 version is 7.1.9.6-143.1.2 On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 13:35 +0800, Olf wrote: > Hello everyone, > I am just trying to install guile to my home folder of a SLES cluster. I > had to install several dependencies as well which seemed to be no problem. > Now the ./configure script returns no errors but make cannot finish > compiling the libraries. > I run configure with linking against all libraries installed to my home > folder: > > *toInstall/guile-2.0.6> ./configure --prefix=$HOME/install > LDFLAGS=-L$HOME/install/lib CPPFLAGS=-I$HOME/install/include > LIBFFI_CFLAGS=-I$HOME/install/include LIBFFI_LIBS=-L$HOME/install/lib > BDW_GC_CFLAGS='-I$HOME/install/include' BDW_GC_LIBS='-L$HOME/install/lib'* > > > I get the following error message: > > > . > . > . > make all-am > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/hudelistf/toInstall/guile-2.0.6/libguile' > CC libguile_2.0_la-alist.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-arbiters.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-array-handle.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-array-map.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-arrays.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-async.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-backtrace.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-boolean.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-bitvectors.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-bytevectors.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-chars.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-control.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-continuations.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-debug.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-deprecated.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-deprecation.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-dynwind.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-eq.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-error.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-eval.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-evalext.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-expand.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-extensions.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-feature.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-filesys.lo > CC libguile_2.0_la-finalizers.lo > finalizers.c:166: error: static declaration of 'GC_set_finalizer_notifier' > follows non-static declaration > /home/hudelistf/install/include/gc/gc.h:177: error: previous declaration of > 'GC_set_finalizer_notifier' was here > make[3]: *** [libguile_2.0_la-finalizers.lo] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/hudelistf/toInstall/guile-2.0.6/libguile' > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/hudelistf/toInstall/guile-2.0.6/libguile' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hudelistf/toInstall/guile-2.0.6' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > toInstall/guile-2.0.6> > > > > Can anyone hint me how I can resolve the conflict about this > GC_set_finalizer_notifier? > > Thanks in advance, > Florian
Re: Compiling problems
Hi, yes there is the problem that in /usr/share there is an old version of libctl but I installed the latest version in $HOME/install. I was hoping by setting LDFLAGS and CPPFLAGS to this folder to link to that location. Can I tell make to only use these libraries? Florian On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 5:07 PM, nalaginrut wrote: > hi Olf! > Maybe you use a low version libgc? > But I can compiler Guile successfully under openSUSE, libgc1 version is > 7.1.9.6-143.1.2 > > On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 13:35 +0800, Olf wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I am just trying to install guile to my home folder of a SLES cluster. I > > had to install several dependencies as well which seemed to be no > problem. > > Now the ./configure script returns no errors but make cannot finish > > compiling the libraries. > > I run configure with linking against all libraries installed to my home > > folder: > > > > *toInstall/guile-2.0.6> ./configure --prefix=$HOME/install > > LDFLAGS=-L$HOME/install/lib CPPFLAGS=-I$HOME/install/include > > LIBFFI_CFLAGS=-I$HOME/install/include LIBFFI_LIBS=-L$HOME/install/lib > > BDW_GC_CFLAGS='-I$HOME/install/include' > BDW_GC_LIBS='-L$HOME/install/lib'* > > > > > > I get the following error message: > > > > > > . > > . > > . > > make all-am > > make[3]: Entering directory > `/home/hudelistf/toInstall/guile-2.0.6/libguile' > > CC libguile_2.0_la-alist.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-arbiters.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-array-handle.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-array-map.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-arrays.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-async.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-backtrace.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-boolean.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-bitvectors.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-bytevectors.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-chars.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-control.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-continuations.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-debug.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-deprecated.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-deprecation.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-dynwind.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-eq.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-error.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-eval.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-evalext.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-expand.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-extensions.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-feature.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-filesys.lo > > CC libguile_2.0_la-finalizers.lo > > finalizers.c:166: error: static declaration of > 'GC_set_finalizer_notifier' > > follows non-static declaration > > /home/hudelistf/install/include/gc/gc.h:177: error: previous declaration > of > > 'GC_set_finalizer_notifier' was here > > make[3]: *** [libguile_2.0_la-finalizers.lo] Error 1 > > make[3]: Leaving directory > `/home/hudelistf/toInstall/guile-2.0.6/libguile' > > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/home/hudelistf/toInstall/guile-2.0.6/libguile' > > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hudelistf/toInstall/guile-2.0.6' > > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > toInstall/guile-2.0.6> > > > > > > > > Can anyone hint me how I can resolve the conflict about this > > GC_set_finalizer_notifier? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Florian > > >
Re: Compiling problems
Hi, Which version of libgc do you use? 7.0+ is recommended. Olf skribis: > *toInstall/guile-2.0.6> ./configure --prefix=$HOME/install > LDFLAGS=-L$HOME/install/lib CPPFLAGS=-I$HOME/install/include > LIBFFI_CFLAGS=-I$HOME/install/include LIBFFI_LIBS=-L$HOME/install/lib > BDW_GC_CFLAGS='-I$HOME/install/include' BDW_GC_LIBS='-L$HOME/install/lib'* Note that normally, setting the ‘PKG_CONFIG_PATH’ environment variable to point to where libffi.pc and bdw-gc.pc live should be enough. Thanks, Ludo’.
