Re: [PATCH v13 0/9] Add LoongArch support

2023-03-31 Thread WANG Xuerui

On 2023/3/31 14:01, Xiaotian Wu wrote:

LoongArch is a new Loongson 3A5000 CPU instruction set, you can read
documents[1] or visit the development community[2] to get more information.

[1]: https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/README-EN.html
[2]: https://github.com/loongson

This patch series will add the basic support for Loongarch architecture, it can
compile on LoongArch and display the GRUB UI.

Please review the patches, thank you.

Xiaotian Wu (9):
   PE: Add LoongArch definitions
   Add LoongArch definitions
   LoongArch: Add setjmp implementation
   LoongArch: Add early startup code
   LoongArch: Add awareness for LoongArch relocations
   LoongArch: Add auxiliary files
   LoongArch: Add to build system
   LoongArch: Support new relocation types in v2.00 ABI
   tests: add support for LoongArch


I've packaged this in Gentoo's loongson-overlay [1] and boot-tested on 
real Loongson 3A5000 hardware (Lemote A2101 board, with latest (beta10) 
new-world firmware [2]). Things work just fine.


[1]: 
https://github.com/xen0n/loongson-overlay/commit/619407b4cf16198fa87c1739dc9348bde19ea8ac

[2]: https://github.com/loongson/Firmware/pull/20

For the whole series:

Tested-by: WANG Xuerui 

Thanks for all your (and your team's) hard work.


___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel


Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs/iso9660: Delay CE hop until end of current SUSP area

2023-03-31 Thread Daniel Kiper
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:57:05AM +, Glenn Washburn wrote:
> On 3/30/23 18:30, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 05:56:49PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > SUSP 1.12 says:
> > >
> > >The "CE" System Use Entry indicates a Continuation Area that shall be
> > >processed after the current System Use field or Continuation Area is
> > >processed.
> > >
> > > But GRUB rather takes an encountered CE entry as reason to immediately
> > > switch reading to the location that is given by the CE entry.
> > > This can skip over important information.
> > >
> > > The usual ISO 9660 producers on GNU/Linux write the CE entry as last
> > > entry of System Use field or Continuation Area. So the problem does not
> > > show up with their output. Nevertheless, Linux and libisofs obey the
> > > specs whereas GRUB does not.
> > >
> > > As demonstration i crafted a small ISO, where the CE entry comes before
> > > the NM entry which tells the Rock Ridge file name "RockRidgeName:x".
> > > Linux shows the NM name, nevertheless:
> > >$ sudo mount iso9660_early_ce.iso /mnt/iso
> > >mount: /mnt/iso: WARNING: source write-protected, mounted read-only.
> > >$ ls /mnt/iso
> > >RockRidgeName:x
> > >$
> > >
> > > GRUB does not see the NM entry and thus shows the dull ISO 9660 name
> > > (which is actually "ROCKRIDG.;1"):
> > >$ ./grub-fstest iso9660_early_ce.iso ls /
> > >rockridg
> > >$
> > >
> > > After the code change of my patch, i get:
> > >$ ./grub-fstest iso9660_early_ce.iso ls /
> > >RockRidgeName:x
> > >$
> > >
> > > A new code block in tests/iso9660_test.in verifies that the patched code
> > > is in effect:
> > >make check TESTS=iso9660_test
> > > detects the old code state and shows that the new code still has the
> > > capability to cope with endless CE loops.
> > >
> > > -
> > > How to create an ISO 9660 filesystem where CE is not the last SUSP entry
> > > of a file's directory record:
> > >
> > > # Deliberately chosen names
> > > iso=iso9660_early_ce.iso
> > > # rr_path is longer than 8, mixed-case, with non-ISO-9660 character
> > > rr_path=/RockRidgeName:x
> > >
> > > # A dummy file as payload
> > > echo x >x
> > >
> > > # 250 fattr characters to surely exceed the size of a directory record
> > > 
> > > long_string=0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
> > >
> > > # Create ISO with the payload file and attached fattr named 
> > > user.dummy .
> > > # Make it small with the most restrictive ISO 9660 file name rules.
> > > test -e "$iso" && rm "$iso"
> > > xorriso -compliance no_emul_toc:iso_9660_level=1 \
> > > -padding 0 \
> > > -outdev "$iso" \
> > > -xattr on \
> > > -map x "$rr_path" \
> > > -setfattr user.dummy "$long_string" "$rr_path" --
> > >
> > > # Cut out the NM field and the CE field from the directory record
> > > # of $rr_path. The numbers were determined by looking at a hex dump.
> > > dd if="$iso" bs=1 skip=37198 count=20 of=nm_field
> > > dd if="$iso" bs=1 skip=37218 count=28 of=ce_field
> > >
> > > # Put them back in reverse sequence
> > > dd conv=notrunc if=ce_field bs=1 seek=37198 of="$iso"
> > > dd conv=notrunc if=nm_field bs=1 seek=37226 of="$iso"
> >
> > Patch set LGTM. Though I would prefer to hear Glenn's opinion on the test
> > Thomas introduces because AIUI this [1] email presented some concerns.
> >
> > Glenn?
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2023-03/msg00022.html
>
> I had partially written a response to the above referenced email a couple
> weeks ago, but didn't sent it because it seemed unnecessary with the way
> Thomas changed the test to work with or without extra trailing spaces. So
> the concerns in the referenced email aren't a concern for this test patch.
>
> As for a more general concern, not really either. If the trailing spaces are
> removed later on, tests will fail and then they can be fixed. To sum up what
> I was going to say in response to the referenced email, grub-fstest is a
> tool for running grub commands/code in user-space and has subcommands
> corresponding for specifying what code to run. I haven't verified, but I
> believe that in this case the grub "ls" command is creating the output, so
> its likely that the command is what is producing the extra space, not
> grub-fstest itself. Again, not something to worry about here, IMO.
>
> So patch #2, the test patch, in the series LGTM.

Glenn, thank you for detailed response.

Then for both patches Reviewed-by: Daniel Kiper ...

Thomas, thank you for fixing this issue.

Daniel

__

Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs/iso9660: Delay CE hop until end of current SUSP area

2023-03-31 Thread Lidong Chen

Tested-by: Lidong Chen mailto:lidong.c...@oracle.com>>

On Mar 8, 2023, at 10:28 PM, Lidong Chen  wrote:

Hi,

Thanks for the detailed instruction for running the test!
The patches look good to me. I ran the tests with and without the patches, I 
got the expected result.

Thanks,
Lidong


On Mar 7, 2023, at 8:56 AM, Thomas Schmitt  wrote:

Hi,

SUSP 1.12 says:

The "CE" System Use Entry indicates a Continuation Area that shall be
processed after the current System Use field or Continuation Area is
processed.

But GRUB rather takes an encountered CE entry as reason to immediately
switch reading to the location that is given by the CE entry.
This can skip over important information.

The usual ISO 9660 producers on GNU/Linux write the CE entry as last
entry of System Use field or Continuation Area. So the problem does not
show up with their output. Nevertheless, Linux and libisofs obey the
specs whereas GRUB does not.

As demonstration i crafted a small ISO, where the CE entry comes before
the NM entry which tells the Rock Ridge file name "RockRidgeName:x".
Linux shows the NM name, nevertheless:
$ sudo mount iso9660_early_ce.iso /mnt/iso
mount: /mnt/iso: WARNING: source write-protected, mounted read-only.
$ ls /mnt/iso
RockRidgeName:x
$

GRUB does not see the NM entry and thus shows the dull ISO 9660 name
(which is actually "ROCKRIDG.;1"):
$ ./grub-fstest iso9660_early_ce.iso ls /
rockridg
$

After the code change of my patch, i get:
$ ./grub-fstest iso9660_early_ce.iso ls /
RockRidgeName:x
$

A new code block in tests/iso9660_test.in verifies that the patched code
is in effect:
make check TESTS=iso9660_test
detects the old code state and shows that the new code still has the
capability to cope with endless CE loops.

-
How to create an ISO 9660 filesystem where CE is not the last SUSP entry
of a file's directory record:

 # Deliberately chosen names
 iso=iso9660_early_ce.iso
 # rr_path is longer than 8, mixed-case, with non-ISO-9660 character
 rr_path=/RockRidgeName:x

 # A dummy file as payload
 echo x >x

 # 250 fattr characters to surely exceed the size of a directory record
 
long_string=0123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789

 # Create ISO with the payload file and attached fattr named user.dummy .
 # Make it small with the most restrictive ISO 9660 file name rules.
 test -e "$iso" && rm "$iso"
 xorriso -compliance no_emul_toc:iso_9660_level=1 \
 -padding 0 \
 -outdev "$iso" \
 -xattr on \
 -map x "$rr_path" \
 -setfattr user.dummy "$long_string" "$rr_path" --

 # Cut out the NM field and the CE field from the directory record
 # of $rr_path. The numbers were determined by looking at a hex dump.
 dd if="$iso" bs=1 skip=37198 count=20 of=nm_field
 dd if="$iso" bs=1 skip=37218 count=28 of=ce_field

 # Put them back in reverse sequence
 dd conv=notrunc if=ce_field bs=1 seek=37198 of="$iso"
 dd conv=notrunc if=nm_field bs=1 seek=37226 of="$iso"

-

Have a nice day :)

Thomas

Thomas Schmitt (2):
fs/iso9660: Delay CE hop until end of current SUSP area
tests: Add test for iso9660 delayed CE hop

grub-core/fs/iso9660.c|  84 ++
tests/iso9660_early_ce.iso.gz | Bin 0 -> 709 bytes
tests/iso9660_test.in |  24 ++
3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tests/iso9660_early_ce.iso.gz

--
2.30.2



___
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel