[Spoilers ahead.]
> A Question: is the `vs` request (which sets the vertical spacing)
> honored in nroff mode?
Yes.
> B. In nroff (or nroff mode in groff), what _units_ is the argument
> to the `vs` request reckoned in?
I remember .vs always being given in points, with a default value of
12 pt, resulting in 6 lines per inch, or 66 lines per 11-inch sheet.
(I know this because I have set my terminal windows to a height of
67 lines, in order to display manual entries paginated for 11-inch
fan-fold line printer paper one page at a time, with an additional
line for the "less" prompt.)
Empirical tests with groff support this. However, groff appears to
round different values for .vs immediately to a multiple of 12 pt,
and then consistently use that rounded number. E.g.,
echo -e '.sp 12p\n.nf\n.vs 6\na\nb\nc\nd' | nroff | less
only shows "d", i.e., 6 gets rounded down to zero.
[This is in contrast to a conceivable different model, in which
groff might internally keep a higher-resolution line tally, and
output a linefeed only when this surpasses the next grid position.]
> C. A point is less than a vee, right?
Usually, but the vee can also be set to zero for special
formatting purposes.
> D. What does nroff do if you request to alter the vertical
> spacing in points?
Not sure what is meant here. I think it is always in points.
Or do you mean, if different values than the default are
requested? Then, see above.
> E. Attempt to address the foregoing questions empirically.
> Compare the results to the claims of CSTR #54.
> Do they agree?
[Now browsing CSTR #54...]
I can't see anything beyond it stating that the default scale
indicator for .vs is points, and that nroff rounds numerical
input to the actual resolution of its output device.
So I would say yes, they agree. :-)
However: I remember Unix nroff also supporting terminals with
half-line capability, which groff doesn't. Maybe someone here
has an old system they can use to test nroff's behavior when
formatting for one of these terminals?
