Re: company-confidential or mozillian-confidential?

[Stormy Peters]

On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Benjamin Kerensa 
wrote:

>
> As an example, by default, when you file a request for support of an event
> to Developer Engagement, those requests now generate two bugs. One for
> tracking and another for discussion (which is done in private and flagged
> company-confidential.) I could give plenty of other examples but because
> this is a public mailing list it would reach into areas I am not allowed to
> discuss on a public mailing list.
>
>
I can give history on this.


This process is for events asking for sponsorship for their event.
Sometimes it's community members asking for support (but most of those go
to Reps). Often it's large events, with sponsorship brochures, asking for
Mozilla to sponsor their event.

The private discussion is used to decide if the event meets Mozilla's
strategy and goals and, if appropriate, how/what to negotiate.

It didn't seem appropriate to discuss things like "well, they asked for $5K
for silver, but they offer a booth, and what we really want is more
tickets, so how about we offer them $3K for 3 tickets and see if they'll
take it and if they don't, we could go up to $4K." It would make
negotiations much harder if the event planners could also see that. :) And
yes, perhaps the world of negotiation would benefit if both sides shared
information like that, but that should be tried with a smaller, more
trusted group, not a whole bunch of events.

Note, that this is the history of why it was setup this way, not
necessarily how it works today.

Stormy
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Modules for websites needs updating

[David Weir]

Can someone update these

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Mozilla_Websites

I believe Mozillians is now pierros for example

also https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/All#Governance_Sub_Modules as Brendan
left Mozilla




-- 
Regards
David
Satdav on IRC on most days
Check out my Mozillians Profile 
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Re: Modules for websites needs updating

[Adam Roach]

On 4/20/15 14:03, David Weir wrote:

alsohttps://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/All#Governance_Sub_Modules  as Brendan
left Mozilla


I didn't think being an employee was a prerequisite for module ownership.


--
Adam Roach
Principal Platform Engineer
a...@mozilla.com
+1 650 903 0800 x863
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Re: Modules for websites needs updating

[Kyle Huey]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:03 PM, David Weir  wrote:
> Can someone update these
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Mozilla_Websites
>
> I believe Mozillians is now pierros for example

You should ask the relevant teams to do this.

> also https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/All#Governance_Sub_Modules as Brendan
> left Mozilla

Brendan left the Mozilla Corporation.  That has no bearing on his role
in the governance structure.

- Kyle
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Re: Modules for websites needs updating

[Benjamin Kerensa]

On Apr 20, 2015 12:06 PM, "Kyle Huey"  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 12:03 PM, David Weir 
wrote:
> > Can someone update these
> >
> > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/Mozilla_Websites
> >
> > I believe Mozillians is now pierros for example
>
> You should ask the relevant teams to do this.
>
> > also https://wiki.mozilla.org/Modules/All#Governance_Sub_Modules as
Brendan
> > left Mozilla
>
> Brendan left the Mozilla Corporation.  That has no bearing on his role
> in the governance structure

No but he also has been hands of and distanced himself from Mozilla for
obvious the same reasons he left MoCo.

Does he intend to participate in module / governance?
___
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance