Minnesota court takes dim view of encryption
From http://news.com.com/Minnesota+court+takes+dim+view+of+encryption/2100-1030_3-5718978.html "A Minnesota appeals court has ruled that the presence of encryption software on a computer may be viewed as evidence of criminal intent." ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: "--for-your-eyes-only"
Johan Wevers wrote: > Jean-David Beyer wrote: > > >>I do not see how it would be possible to stop the reader (i.e., the person, >>not the program) from copying and pasting that decrypted email; > > > It isn't. And if all else fails he can still write it down by hand. It's > considerd more like a hint, not as a 100% secure thing. And it might > prevent that decryptd files are on the computer by accident. > > After all, if you mail something secret and the receiver will tell > it further, no encryption protocol is going to protect you against > that. > This may help in IM http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr/ but the authors put in the caveat that this method may not be feasible for e-mail due to its latency. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Decryption
Werner Koch wrote: > On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:01:51 -0400, Mcqueen, Voncile LT said: > > >>Please decrypt the following message for me: >>jmjmj gsmsg lrjgu csqyj quflr mfajg erdmc cmqlv lqyhg gawgq arpgq sblce >>jrlrj lnemc cyjqu flrmf ajqer d > > > Thepi oneer sofaw arles sworl daret heyou ththa trefu semil itary servi > cexxx alber teins teinx x x > > > Salam-Shalom, > >Werner > How did you decrypt it? Shatadal. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
