Re: signatures for other people's emails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Hi On Wednesday 16 April 2014 at 5:37:56 PM, in , Hauke Laging wrote: > c) The real sender does not have the mail in his sent > mail archive That assumes he deleted it from his archive after sending to the supporter. > In case of doubt he does not even know > whether the mail has already been sent by the > supporter. Possible, if the supporter didn't cc him. > d) The same for the recipients: They cannot simply > search for a mail from the real sender. There is no reason the real sender couldn't also send the message directly. I see this at work from time to time, where somebody of high profile (or their PA) forwards a message that was already circulated and directs people to act on the contents. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net I think not, said Descartes, and promptly disappeared -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlNPjyhXFIAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pzHcEAI0u78qAlWyajTuSalOAQwcS0RIHivlNEsHE mstGb2N47pJVwP/GiqcxO0KD1KNGyJPHFvx9SXCwlos6V4hSLZzboLo2xsWi1eV1 zwguargWGpvyVMYN52jlSU6sYEbYESlqMJiDjAhpm+oDPCRyq9ccs93uK2UQtO+J BU7+UWt7 =6qxZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG and BCC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Hi On Friday 11 April 2014 at 9:59:21 PM, in , Ingo Klöcker wrote: > Apart from using the '--throw-keyids' option you could > send multiple copies of the message. One copy for the > public recipients which is encrypted with the keys of > all public recipients (To, Cc). And n copies for the n > Bcc recipients where each copy is encrypted with the > key of one Bcc recipient. That's what KMail does. A few years ago when trialling various email programs, one that I tried encrypted an individual copy for each recipient when you sent an encrypted mail with multiple recipients. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net A picture is a poem without words -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlNPrulXFIAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pYJgD/RQscR9CcMwHqXWHoyZ6lXM4ZUmaJvxZ8iz8 VTmI8l8m+dWc3VylQGfouEdjoIKqQagc0sNEd3SXMu98izAcejPXDWr/hW3kpB/M y93V0gzoc1FrgNO0ldmpqsuOhZ5PehoSoLlglYFm3IfTSAXU3TQQB4OOJ3V+X8qG R48jQVf/ =cgsC -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG tool for Windows Embeddd Compact 7
Hi, At Thursday 17 April 2014 14:08:06 dbhukta . wrote: > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 10:09 AM, dbhukta . wrote: > > > > Can you give the solution for GPGtool which will run for Windows Embedded > > Compact 7. Or any Binary file which will be compatible for windows > > embedded compact 7. > > As already said, there is no Version of GnuPG known to work wiht Windows Embedded Compact 7. The last Windows CE I know of where GnuPG was able to run was Windows Mobile 6.5 (Windows CE 5 Kernel). I have no idea about Windows Embedded Compact 7. And I can not estimate the effort / work required to port / compile GnuPG for that platform. If you have professional interest in this maybe you can contract Werner Koch's company g10code ( http://www.g10code.com/ ) to look into this for you. Regards, Andre -- Andre Heinecke | ++49-541-335083-262 | http://www.intevation.de/ Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück | AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998 Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG and BCC
On Thursday 17 April 2014 11:36:59 MFPA wrote: > On Friday 11 April 2014 at 9:59:21 PM, in > , Ingo Klöcker wrote: > > Apart from using the '--throw-keyids' option you could > > send multiple copies of the message. One copy for the > > public recipients which is encrypted with the keys of > > all public recipients (To, Cc). And n copies for the n > > Bcc recipients where each copy is encrypted with the > > key of one Bcc recipient. That's what KMail does. > > A few years ago when trialling various email programs, one that I > tried encrypted an individual copy for each recipient when you sent an > encrypted mail with multiple recipients. Sure. One could do this. But I don't see the point of encrypting an individual copy for each To/Cc recipient. The only additional information a single message encrypted for all To/Cc recipients gives the recipients is the list of key IDs of the other recipients. Under very special circumstances this could be undesirable, but under those special circumstances one probably also doesn't want to have all recipients listed in To/Cc. So, we are back to using Bcc or sending completely indiviual messages. Regards, Ingo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: GPG and BCC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Hi On Thursday 17 April 2014 at 7:14:21 PM, in , Ingo Klöcker wrote: > Sure. One could do this. But I don't see the point of > encrypting an individual copy for each To/Cc > recipient. The only additional information a single > message encrypted for all To/Cc recipients gives the > recipients is the list of key IDs of the other > recipients. Under very special circumstances this > could be undesirable, And could be avoided with --throw-keyids. > but under those special > circumstances one probably also doesn't want to have > all recipients listed in To/Cc. So, we are back to > using Bcc My opinion is that it is usually a good idea to err on the side of caution and use BCC, but in certain specific circumstances it is acceptable to use multiple entries in To or CC. > or sending completely indiviual messages. Tha mailer to which I was referring actually did send completely individual messages, when you told it to encrypt a message that had multiple recipients. -- Best regards MFPAmailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net A closed door is an invitation to knock -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlNQMdtXFIAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pIpYEAINFaDN9hZhpCgI1aHt34w9oW6xqjrLWIvf/ NI9Qug3UL+g6t8PngJvjD44zhxekLZIVatjx5+bZlif6aXAnwjpt6nBdF7z/03A9 fPhXhwG6YKFGmGcl9YkYiNls3vVSp0ZzyM4MWP14bALcA7nm2moHlgM5y0h48PRD bYoOHfGe =xsrr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
