Re: UI enhancement request

2009-09-04 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, at 22:26:31 [GMT -0700] (which was 7:26 where I
live) Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:

> Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
>> Here is a UI enhancement request: In the "edit-key" menu, typing "uid
>> *" selects all UID's. Currently, I have to type "uid #" for every UID
>> individually. Typing "uid" by itself currently deselects all UID's.

> I just re-read my post and realized how badly worded it was (verb
> tense). Correction: I want to be able to type "uid *" and have it select
> all UID's.

> This would be in preparation for some global function like changing
> algorithm preferences, etc.

I assume that you know that you can select different UID's one after
another just by pressing the number followed by return/enter and then
the following UID?

Btw if you use a signature delimiter one does not have to delete half of a
message when replying ;-)

-- 
Henk M. de Bruijn
_
The Bat! Natural Email System 4.2.10.8 on Microsoft® Windows Vista™
Home Premium Versie 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz, 2333 MHz 64 bits
AntispamSniper for The Bat! Pro 3.2.1.1


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: UI enhancement request

2009-09-04 Thread Henk M. de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, at 09:49:34 [GMT +0300] (which was 8:49 where I
live) Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:32:26AM +0200, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, at 22:26:31 [GMT -0700] (which was 7:26 where I
>> live) Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:

>> > I just re-read my post and realized how badly worded it was (verb
>> > tense). Correction: I want to be able to type "uid *" and have it select
>> > all UID's.

>> > This would be in preparation for some global function like changing
>> > algorithm preferences, etc.

>> I assume that you know that you can select different UID's one after
>> another just by pressing the number followed by return/enter and then
>> the following UID?

> But he still has to issue the same command several times after
> selecting each and every UID in turn.  "uid *" could indeed be
> a useful feature, although it might be not too easy to implement.

 Are you sure? Because I use this very regularly and I only have to
 issue sign or tsign only once.

- --
Met vriendelijke groet,
Henk M. de Bruijn
_
The Bat! Natural Email System 4.2.10.8 on Microsoft® Windows Vista?
Home Premium Versie 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 Build 6001
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8200 @ 2.33GHz, 2333 MHz 64bits
AntispamSniper for The Bat! Pro 3.2.1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (x86_64-pc-Msys/MingW32)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJKoLwqAAoJEBHuy+60ZN0PiL0H/1Z76A/Y4GKCEQohzjDucZGj
aB87zdiKSNlYCyayIIPlV4X0Uiq57OqnmtLU3W4aASdcKDprKOxFDJtkpCFS3tqZ
U1dydLJyTZDHCFi76GRHthzKyOpm8RGwpobrxlJS08a5baOYda521yzEuIuhe73Z
UNqs82Fe8nErHm/w2PVTYNAcWHYL9GqDkQ0Hl0AXE2FizOimSJiCccCL1ziHw5Sh
WYks3hoojIUx4nGOH94JdG6qWJIfDKiIhVjpP3aActHPJOsjdfEv7sm3y4Rp+pFK
ui2lm+6xXLVFt00GEQVqxrPeTMmksYRgJqIBtQ0r7ZbVwj/ArucoFXgSZJY/nIE=
=jUzQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: UI enhancement request

2009-09-04 Thread Joseph Oreste Bruni


On Sep 4, 2009, at 12:05 AM, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, at 09:49:34 [GMT +0300] (which was 8:49 where I
live) Peter Pentchev wrote:

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 08:32:26AM +0200, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:

On Thu, 03 Sep 2009, at 22:26:31 [GMT -0700] (which was 7:26 where I
live) Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:



I just re-read my post and realized how badly worded it was (verb
tense). Correction: I want to be able to type "uid *" and have it  
select

all UID's.



This would be in preparation for some global function like changing
algorithm preferences, etc.



I assume that you know that you can select different UID's one after
another just by pressing the number followed by return/enter and  
then

the following UID?



But he still has to issue the same command several times after
selecting each and every UID in turn.  "uid *" could indeed be
a useful feature, although it might be not too easy to implement.


Are you sure? Because I use this very regularly and I only have to
issue sign or tsign only once.



Specifically, "setpref" only works on the currently selected UID.  
Since typing "uid" with no arguments clears all UID selections, it  
shouldn't be too much of a stretch to code "uid *" to select all  
UID's. It's not that this is something one would do frequently, however.




___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: UI enhancement request

2009-09-04 Thread Werner Koch
Hi,

I just implemented your suggestion in gnupg-2:


 uid N

 Toggle selection of user ID or photographic user ID with index n.
 Use * to select all and 0 to deselect all.

 key N 

 Toggle selection of subkey with index N.  Use * to select all and 0
 to deselect all.



Salam-Shalom,

   Werner



-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


what is the HEX signature off a normal *.gpg file . for EmailFilter - BCC Mail protect Quarant

2009-09-04 Thread Joachim . Blomberg
Hi,

im sending  *.gpg Mail-Attachments to external Customers , but our 
EmailFilter - BCC Mail protect Quarantine stopps the and we have to 
release them manual.
I need the HEX File Siganture for GPG Files to customize that in BCC Mail 
Protect .

Thanks 


Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Best Regards

Joachim Blomberg
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[Announce] GnuPG 2.0.13 released

2009-09-04 Thread Werner Koch
Hello!

We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-2
release:  Version 2.0.13.

The GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) is GNU's tool for secure communication
and data storage.  It can be used to encrypt data, create digital
signatures, help authenticating using Secure Shell and to provide a
framework for public key cryptography.  It includes an advanced key
management facility and is compliant with the OpenPGP and S/MIME
standards.

GnuPG-2 has a different architecture than GnuPG-1 (e.g. 1.4.10) in
that it splits up functionality into several modules.  However, both
versions may be installed alongside without any conflict.  In fact,
the gpg version from GnuPG-1 is able to make use of the gpg-agent as
included in GnuPG-2 and allows for seamless passphrase caching.  The
advantage of GnuPG-1 is its smaller size and the lack of dependency on
other modules at run and build time.  We will keep maintaining GnuPG-1
versions because they are very useful for small systems and for server
based applications requiring only OpenPGP support.

GnuPG is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License
(GPL version 3).  GnuPG-2 works best on GNU/Linux or *BSD systems.


What's New
===

 * GPG now generates 2048 bit RSA keys by default.  The default hash
   algorithm preferences has changed to prefer SHA-256 over SHA-1.
   2048 bit DSA keys are now generated to use a 256 bit hash algorithm

 * The envvars XMODIFIERS, GTK_IM_MODULE and QT_IM_MODULE are now
   passed to the Pinentry to make SCIM work.

 * The GPGSM command --gen-key features a --batch mode and implements
   all features of gpgsm-gencert.sh in standard mode.

 * New option --re-import for GPGSM's IMPORT server command.

 * Enhanced writing of existing keys to OpenPGP v2 cards.

 * Add hack to the internal CCID driver to allow the use of some
   Omnikey based card readers with 2048 bit keys.

 * GPG now repeatly asks the user to insert the requested OpenPGP
   card.  This can be disabled with --limit-card-insert-tries=1.

 * Minor bug fixes.


Getting the Software


Please follow the instructions found at http://www.gnupg.org/download/
or read on:

GnuPG 2.0.13 may be downloaded from one of the GnuPG mirror sites or
direct from ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/gnupg/ .  The list of mirrors
can be found at http://www.gnupg.org/mirrors.html .  Note, that GnuPG
is not available at ftp.gnu.org.

On the FTP server and its mirrors you should find the following files
in the gnupg/ directory:

  gnupg-2.0.13.tar.bz2 (3854k)
  gnupg-2.0.13.tar.bz2.sig

  GnuPG source compressed using BZIP2 and OpenPGP signature.

  gnupg-2.0.12-2.0.13.diff.bz2 (231k)

  A patch file to upgrade a 2.0.12 GnuPG source tree.  This patch
  does not include updates of the language files.

Note, that we don't distribute gzip compressed tarballs for GnuPG-2. 


Checking the Integrity
==

In order to check that the version of GnuPG which you are going to
install is an original and unmodified one, you can do it in one of
the following ways:

 * If you already have a trusted version of GnuPG installed, you
   can simply check the supplied signature.  For example to check the
   signature of the file gnupg-2.0.13.tar.bz2 you would use this command:

 gpg --verify gnupg-2.0.13.tar.bz2.sig

   This checks whether the signature file matches the source file.
   You should see a message indicating that the signature is good and
   made by that signing key.  Make sure that you have the right key,
   either by checking the fingerprint of that key with other sources
   or by checking that the key has been signed by a trustworthy other
   key.  Note, that you can retrieve the signing key using the command

 finger wk ,at' g10code.com

   or using a keyserver like

 gpg --recv-key 1CE0C630

   The distribution key 1CE0C630 is signed by the well known key
   5B0358A2.  If you get an key expired message, you should retrieve a
   fresh copy as the expiration date might have been prolonged.

   NEVER USE A GNUPG VERSION YOU JUST DOWNLOADED TO CHECK THE
   INTEGRITY OF THE SOURCE - USE AN EXISTING GNUPG INSTALLATION!

 * If you are not able to use an old version of GnuPG, you have to verify
   the SHA-1 checksum.  Assuming you downloaded the file
   gnupg-2.0.13.tar.bz2, you would run the sha1sum command like this:

 sha1sum gnupg-2.0.13.tar.bz2

   and check that the output matches the first line from the
   following list:

2ff42aff14cdddafc291d44ac1968af5f09a9d4d  gnupg-2.0.13.tar.bz2
56c0c0ca1eb5836e773fbf7c920bb46af0965aec  gnupg-2.0.12-2.0.13.diff.bz2


Internationalization


GnuPG comes with support for 27 languages.  Due to a lot of new and
changed strings many translations are not entirely complete.  Jedi,
Maxim Britov, Jaime Suárez and Nilgün Belma Bugüner have been kind
enough to go over their translations and thus the Chinese, German,
Russian, Spanish, and Turkish translations are pretty

Re: what is the HEX signature off a normal *.gpg file . for EmailFilter - BCC Mail protect Quarant

2009-09-04 Thread David Shaw

On Sep 4, 2009, at 10:06 AM, joachim.blomb...@vr-leasing.de wrote:



Hi,

im sending  *.gpg Mail-Attachments to external Customers , but our  
EmailFilter - BCC Mail protect Quarantine stopps the and we have to  
release them manual.
I need the HEX File Siganture for GPG Files to customize that in BCC  
Mail Protect .


This is unfortunately a difficult question.  GPG (really, OpenPGP)  
supports multiple encodings and thus multiple signatures a file may  
present to a mail scanner.


You may be able to match the most common signatures, but by no means  
will that cover them all.


Having said that, some common signatures (in "file magic" format) are:

0   beshort 0x9900  text/PGP key public ring
0   beshort 0x9501  text/PGP key security  
ring
0   beshort 0x9500  text/PGP key security  
ring

0   beshort 0xa600  text/PGP encrypted data
0   string  -BEGIN\040PGP   text/PGP armored data
>15 string  PUBLIC\040KEY\040BLOCK- public key block
>15 string  MESSAGE-message
>15 string  SIGNED\040MESSAGE-  signed message
>15 string  PGP\040SIGNATURE-   signature
0   beshort 0x8501  data

David


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


encrypting compression algorithms

2009-09-04 Thread M.B.Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi list,
when symmetrically encrypting a file, e.g.:

$ gpg --output file.ods.gpg --symmetric file.ods

the command above generates a "gpg" extension encrypted AND compressed
file, is that correct?

How do I know which compression algorithm was used?

How can I force any other available algorithm?


Regards,



- --
Marcio Barbado, Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFKoUVbhIh3kh+NgOcRAokMAKC8cHDZsPAVBdewgZspneqpexxTAwCdFGZ2
QRPvKTZbGx4+KkAiwl7IOJM=
=/Yuj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.0.13 released

2009-09-04 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 04.09.2009, Werner Koch wrote: 

> We are pleased to announce the availability of a new stable GnuPG-2
> release:  Version 2.0.13.
[]

I'm unable to compile this version on my system. The configure script
bails out with the following message:

[]
checking for nl_langinfo and THOUSANDS_SEP... yes
configure: checking system features for estream
configure:
***
*** It is now required to build with support for the
*** GNU Portable Threads Library (Pth). Please install this
*** library first.  The library is for example available at
***   ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/pth/
*** On a Debian GNU/Linux system you can install it using
***   apt-get install libpth-dev
*** To build GnuPG for Windows you need to use the W32PTH
*** package; available at:
***   ftp://ftp.g10code.com/g10code/w32pth/
***
configure: error:
***
*** Required libraries not found. Please consult the above messages
*** and install them before running configure again.
***

Both 32 and 64 bit pth is installed, and pointing configure to the libs 
using "--with-pth-prefix=PFX" doesn't help either.

liesel:# ls -l /usr/lib64/libpth*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  598616 2008-12-03 12:00 /usr/lib64/libpth.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1677386 2009-02-22 12:23 /usr/lib64/libpthread.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root4796 2009-02-22 12:32 
/usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 222 2009-02-22 12:23 /usr/lib64/libpthread.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  17 2009-05-18 20:17 /usr/lib64/libpth.so -> 
libpth.so.20.0.27
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  17 2009-05-18 20:17 /usr/lib64/libpth.so.20 -> 
libpth.so.20.0.27
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  101840 2008-12-03 12:00 /usr/lib64/libpth.so.20.0.27

liesel:# ls -l /usr/lib/libpth*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 401812 2008-12-03 06:02 /usr/lib/libpth.a
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2009-09-04 19:57 /usr/lib/libpth.so -> 
libpth.so.20.0.27
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 2009-09-04 19:57 /usr/lib/libpth.so.20 -> 
libpth.so.20.0.27
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 100444 2008-12-03 06:02 /usr/lib/libpth.so.20.0.27

Does anybody know what's wrong here?

Thanks,
Heinz.



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


1.4.10 & BZIP2 in Windows Build

2009-09-04 Thread John W. Moore III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Is there any particular reason why BZIP2 is missing from the Windows
Binary Release of 1.4.10?

JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Friday 04 Sep 2009, 15:18  --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn5068: (MingW32)
Comment: Public Key at:  http://tinyurl.com/8cpho
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: Personal Web Page:  http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJKoWgkAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPARkIAJ6Cwkt/29US1ollnYuaU5l1
Dj3oB8ZsVD8U7QkRIe2D22ZevYxdBKrfHUXO/NVrGBdXwms1EX5JZ69ovEZ2v5Ep
aJUxI4x+VB6u4L7/WHizqn10V7qNaH/CWEUEiBzJmKdmmY/RIBt+zOuhwRKr5aF0
BHTN1Dn2ozTwzgErBZfUYAH96oJC28ofYQih0uC0O+8wexmW5DkaS42PdX6xCcQ7
Hb62ZZOuhL3lwnQBp4qbKOuFQW5BPREucb9J+u17twDKI9bVFuLKjS/UR2+Cluib
lub5nf6YwuPQwUb9e3tsqIyED4SGC/Kl/OIFm8jxdRW8PTGIjqaV4H/norcZO7s=
=OJZM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: 1.4.10 & BZIP2 in Windows Build

2009-09-04 Thread John W. Moore III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

David Koppenhofer wrote:
> I asked the same question in the form of a bug report on g10code
> https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1126
> 
> As you can see from the bug, it was recommended that I use gpg4win -
> nevermind the fact I don't want or need all the 'extras' that come
> with it.

Thanks David.  Rather than resetting the preferences on My Key and then
asking every correspondent to update the copy on their Keyring I suppose
I shall remain using 1.4.10svn5068 to avoid receiving messages that I
cannot decrypt if they were sent using BZIP2.  

JOHN ;)
Timestamp: Friday 04 Sep 2009, 15:44  --400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10-svn5068: (MingW32)
Comment: Public Key at:  http://tinyurl.com/8cpho
Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org
Comment: Personal Web Page:  http://tinyurl.com/yzhbhx

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJKoW4kAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPIZwIAJq2guyppFJ2Cf7UL/4L5k8l
wrS7m7D1PQKTVMMEtTeWFoHXzzPdDIOn1B3YyaROAYjkKAcR0MhK1nnlN9YwlPQD
HuVKVQ5nexhHxYV2aPolZYp3K1ZhpXPBeugfwR3Q2f9HQZyai0UTPSuDH/zkYNRZ
XvEkoBXixdY5FKh1m59tJ2uiNbElXSfAKzhpUsN+49i14zvyFsOm33b2lmXN6SHf
PEU9+Ujw0dWJ9N5bXxU7KZMux7JLjUOShZebsmjZ+ZHtEUBbGD6VVdmGsg51+57H
ZqJAjeK8FyO9kSXdyHZ47atntvcszvkOIyh5MP60LHPy02C0QUp43ffa6nYyYXM=
=g4Bf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


BZIP2

2009-09-04 Thread Henrik O A Barkman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512


What is the reason for the Windows build of 1.4.10 (both the pulled and
fixed binaries) not supporting BZIP2?


D:\Test>gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later

This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Home: d:/Profiler/GnuPG
Supported algorithms:
Pubkey: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
Cipher: IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH
Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB, BZIP2

D:\Test>gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.10
Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later

This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Home: d:/Profiler/GnuPG
Supported algorithms:
Pubkey: RSA, RSA-E, RSA-S, ELG-E, DSA
Cipher: IDEA, 3DES, CAST5, BLOWFISH, AES, AES192, AES256, TWOFISH,
CAMELLIA128, CAMELLIA192, CAMELLIA256
Hash: MD5, SHA1, RIPEMD160, SHA256, SHA384, SHA512, SHA224
Compression: Uncompressed, ZIP, ZLIB

D:\Test>


- --
$\hbar$ -- http://www.facebook.com/barkmanstein -- OpenPGP 0x60D02095
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iGUEAREKACUFAkqhaKYeGGhrcDovL3Bvb2wuc2tzLWtleXNlcnZlcnMubmV0AAoJ
EEGwNGJg0CCVx3IAoKGn/M2Iugy6iGfjTslHy84BuL2BAJwP7zNobY4lGZya2pqK
QXKv6F0ptw==
=TxU6
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


[Announce] GnuPG 1.4.10 released

2009-09-04 Thread Johan Wevers
Compiles and runs fine on Slackware 10.

However, 2 small points: the signature check claims the key has expired, and
gpg --version says it's from 2008.

-- 
ir. J.C.A. Wevers //  Physics and science fiction site:
joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl   //  http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html
PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: 1.4.10 & BZIP2 in Windows Build

2009-09-04 Thread Carlo Luciano Bianco
Il /04 set 2009/, *John W. Moore III* ha scritto:

> Thanks David.  Rather than resetting the preferences on My Key and
> then asking every correspondent to update the copy on their
> Keyring I suppose I shall remain using 1.4.10svn5068 to avoid
> receiving messages that I cannot decrypt if they were sent using
> BZIP2.  

There is another possibility, John... I have just updated my tutorial 
for the new versions of MinGW, MSYS and GCC and, of course, for GnuPG 
1.4.10a including bzip2 support... ;-)

As usual, comments, suggestions, clarifications, insults, and so on are 
welcome! ;-)

-- 
 Carlo Luciano Bianco \ ICQ UIN: 109517158
__/ Home page: 
GnuPG 4069 RSAv4 key: \_
UID:0xE361F839--Fingerprint:9516BCF66B8F12E0C3C3154C61788B6DE361F839


___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


Re: [Announce] GnuPG 1.4.10 released

2009-09-04 Thread Joseph Oreste Bruni
 
On Friday, September 04, 2009, at 01:48PM, "Johan Wevers" 
 wrote:
>Compiles and runs fine on Slackware 10.
>
>However, 2 small points: the signature check claims the key has expired, and
>gpg --version says it's from 2008.
>

Werner's current key includes subkeys that don't expire until July 2011. You 
might need to refresh your copy. The previous subkeys expired at the end of 
2007.

WRT the copyright date, your right, it says 2008.

gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.10
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

-Joe



___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


GnuPG 1.4.10a

2009-09-04 Thread Laurent Jumet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hello !

I'm trying 1.4.10a but I get a warning:
gpg: uncompressing failed: unknown compress algorithm
with old messages that previously were decrypted with 1.4.9

I had to suppress Z3 from the compression list; worked with 1.4.9 but not
with 1.4.10a

- -- 
Laurent Jumet
  KeyID: 0xCFAF704C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)

iHEEAREDADEFAkqhkWkqGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucG9pbnRkZWNoYXQubmV0LzB4Q0ZB
RjcwNEMuYXNjAAoJEPUdbaDPr3BMFoEAoKMI0ejc6XM7Ik+oU+lMN+NiSHgVAJsE
HOAp8TdUbmCDva0UPlPlx0jXfA==
=PWIn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


CAMELLIA...

2009-09-04 Thread Laurent Jumet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

Hello !

Is CAMELLIA actually part of OpenPGP?
Are S11, S12 & S13 assigned definitively?

Is BZIP2 definitively excluded, or is it an option when compiling? In the 
latter case, why don't compiling with it?

- -- 
Laurent Jumet
  KeyID: 0xCFAF704C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)

iHEEAREDADEFAkqiB5cqGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucG9pbnRkZWNoYXQubmV0LzB4Q0ZB
RjcwNEMuYXNjAAoJEPUdbaDPr3BMxNwAoPzyKqX23adRgQ77To0YXF1IGQysAKCU
ZAdi2Wdr2p5FYZmvuL75EizrbQ==
=DX/3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users