Re: There new XMPP (aka Jabber) room GnuPG-ru
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:21:07 +0100 Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > Maxim Britov escribe: > > For use it, you should have XMPP / Jabber account and client with > > conference support. Clients is: tkabber, psi, gaim, iChat and many > > others. > > I suggest Gajim which is truly ellegant and available for Linux and > Windows. I not used gajim yet. I prefer tkabber and psi at the moment. Tkabber can sign messages with gnupg. PSI/Tkabber can encrypt messages with gnupg. -- Maxim Britov GnuPG KeyID 0x4580A6D66F3DB1FB xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 198171258 Fingerprint: 4059 B5C5 8985 5A47 8F5A 8623 4580 A6D6 6F3D B1FB GnuPG-ru Team (http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-ru) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: There new XMPP (aka Jabber) room GnuPG-ru
Maxim Britov wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:21:07 +0100 > Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > > >>Maxim Britov escribe: >> >>>For use it, you should have XMPP / Jabber account and client with >>>conference support. Clients is: tkabber, psi, gaim, iChat and many >>>others. >> >>I suggest Gajim which is truly ellegant and available for Linux and >>Windows. > > > I not used gajim yet. I prefer tkabber and psi at the moment. > Tkabber can sign messages with gnupg. > PSI/Tkabber can encrypt messages with gnupg. > > PSI also has "signed presence". -- Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up| / \ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: There new XMPP (aka Jabber) room GnuPG-ru
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:36:16 +1030 Alphax wrote: > Maxim Britov wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:21:07 +0100 > > Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > > > >>Maxim Britov escribe: > >> > >>>For use it, you should have XMPP / Jabber account and client with > >>>conference support. Clients is: tkabber, psi, gaim, iChat and many > >>>others. > >> > >>I suggest Gajim which is truly ellegant and available for Linux and > >>Windows. > > I not used gajim yet. I prefer tkabber and psi at the moment. > > Tkabber can sign messages with gnupg. > > PSI/Tkabber can encrypt messages with gnupg. > > PSI also has "signed presence". Yes, but psi doesn't support sign messages. Tkabber does. -- Maxim Britov GnuPG KeyID 0x4580A6D66F3DB1FB xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 198171258 Fingerprint: 4059 B5C5 8985 5A47 8F5A 8623 4580 A6D6 6F3D B1FB GnuPG-ru Team (http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-ru) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Reply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Maxim Britov wrote: > > Yes, but psi doesn't support sign messages. Tkabber does. Time for You to check out Psi 0.10 My Friend. JOHN :) Timestamp: Thursday 26 Jan 2006, 08:36 --500 (Eastern Standard Time) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-cvs-3991: (MingW32) Comment: Public Key at: http://tinyurl.com/8cpho Comment: Gossamer Spider Web of Trust: http://www.gswot.org Comment: Homepage: http://tinyurl.com/9ubue Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJD2NDFAAoJEBCGy9eAtCsPew4H/AvngNmFUAbbzAHrhxSI4UrL u4p04ovJBl8Vw0ci1/XgTkSSIXGG1F1YgX5N+WnMnG33iRmaQvCrHGwgo5Qc+igC yrPIQFONwQVbLXhrRJcbh2CJmg9whT/qfP2qbPy/fe+vltPi5ZJgGCXFJ1iiiNt6 0P2uhs9nSJl/d30uhS62JDyqFDDsD8eJAO15OIfBAzZLEU8mO7Kr5wDnj2TNutCK /UoFsgIsfJyfuxwwYmBCD/0t9tpR4nwdmDdONoYnJwcl5FvAjA2szcgXEoy8Brj4 XaABMQRydEWqxVrd1Wc6FO/ssKOvD+PxzleblxaGOwWcGRcgsEDtFyeHEC9on3A= =EuUT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Reply
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:38:15 -0500 John W. Moore III wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Maxim Britov wrote: > > > > Yes, but psi doesn't support sign messages. Tkabber does. > > Time for You to check out Psi 0.10 My Friend. PSI sign presence only at the moment. afaik Discussion from [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent to you. -- Maxim Britov GnuPG KeyID 0x4580A6D66F3DB1FB xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 198171258 Fingerprint: 4059 B5C5 8985 5A47 8F5A 8623 4580 A6D6 6F3D B1FB GnuPG-ru Team (http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-ru) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: There new XMPP (aka Jabber) room GnuPG-ru
Maxim Britov escribe: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:21:07 +0100 > Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > > > Maxim Britov escribe: > > > For use it, you should have XMPP / Jabber account and client with > > > conference support. Clients is: tkabber, psi, gaim, iChat and many > > > others. > > > > I suggest Gajim which is truly ellegant and available for Linux and > > Windows. > > I not used gajim yet. I prefer tkabber and psi at the moment. > Tkabber can sign messages with gnupg. > PSI/Tkabber can encrypt messages with gnupg. > > Gajim supports OpenPGP. I've not tried it, though. Cordially, Ismael -- Tout fourmille de commentaries, d'auteurs il en est grande chert? http://lamediahostia.blogspot.com/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ivalladt/ pgponHEWFkQ5a.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: gpgsm: bad signature (which actually is not bad)
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:38:17 +0100, Carsten Pfeiffer said: > I'm having a problem importing an X.509 certificate in PEM format with gpgsm > (1.9.19 -- unfortunately there is no Debian package for 1.9.20, yet). May you send me this certificate by PM so that I can have a look at it? Salam-Shalom, Werner ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Problem upgrading WinPT
Timo Schulz wrote: >No. If you deleted all existing (older versions) of PTD.dll, libgpgme-11.dll >and replace WinPT.exe and all DLL's in the WinPT folder it should work. OK, so no registering of dll's is required. The only file I kept was keyserver.conf, containing a single line: http://subkeys.pgp.net >Maybe you can check out the latest CVS snapshot, it contains some fixes: >http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~twoaday/winpt-cvs-exe.zip I'll test it ASAP. -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site: [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Problem upgrading WinPT
Timo Schulz twoaday at gmx.net wrote on Thu Jan 26 07:13:42 CET 2006 : >> (except the keyserver config) from the old WinPT dir and copied the new >> files there. However, now WinPT crashes at startup. >I got some reports about this problem but I was never able to >reproduce it. >On most machines it works and currently I've no clue what the problem >is. i think i might have found the problem, and also, why only some of us, Johan, myself, and only a very few others, are having it, and why it is hard for most others to reproduce it ... _v3 rsa keys_ ! while these are accepted by gnupg (am currently using 1.4.2 and 1.4.3 cvs mingw32), they refuse to be imported by winpt 0.11.6 or the winpt-cvs, have tried a new install on a new machine, never having winpt or gnupg and imported keys one by one into winpt when the first v3 key was imported, 0.11.6 said it didn't have a self-signature, (it did, but it was a v3 md5 one) and then after that, 0.11.6 crashes upon startup on my other machine, with existing gnupg keyrings, with v3 keys in them, winpt-cvs crashes upon loading the pubring.gpg on start-up would like to ask others here to confirm if this is so, (with respect to those who prefer not to have idea loaded, have prepared a v3 twofish keypair for testing, that does not require 'idea') -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-cvs (MingW32) Comment: v3 key-twofish // photo has old key in hyperspace ;-) mQCNAzvpqngAAAEEAMdzrhUz+sZHrU1soIuhgN1abgkaJa+MInPfS14VxvWi8lfT qUPzQD/g1d1zqWOv1p+pkGcYzv/iCexHpU9HYzR2t9xQtbWarsoAppHy8ZzUHzMA xS+qiHdq+R8tOhARzVrjc+XR4ERUz17ok+BE7bW+CNPURJZIlKrPna4qLD4XAAUR tB50ZnJzYXRlc3QgPHRmcnNhdGVzdEBrZXkudGVzdD6JAJUDBRA76ap4qs+drios PhcBA8gEBACQP8hwrZ0fBFAWglfizvUYUM0YYrPo5mX4dinbkT01IGnAIhN5m8z3 D9holNuuVvPSknkEldRtWrfwAFE32QykuEfnrI+C8gqVbMccaSiIKaOYP3zYPmWV +5FGXmorWqujmfzxiM8pHgDVTvbWV1AZl8uYJU3p9U/78Uk7uG8kfQ== =fxtV -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- -BEGIN PGP PRIVATE KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-cvs (MingW32) Comment: passphrase: [EMAIL PROTECTED] lQHoAzvpqngAAAEEAMdzrhUz+sZHrU1soIuhgN1abgkaJa+MInPfS14VxvWi8lfT qUPzQD/g1d1zqWOv1p+pkGcYzv/iCexHpU9HYzR2t9xQtbWarsoAppHy8ZzUHzMA xS+qiHdq+R8tOhARzVrjc+XR4ERUz17ok+BE7bW+CNPURJZIlKrPna4qLD4XAAUR CrY6FwIQXMh3je8FQVLuybUD/ujkFoKrFupR7490gasSOfWZDFYaO+JCW6R7JNSl Vfj6sTCKwMalGrPsAx4aDPEZtiJxtsAAgrf2+y6BC3F/dkiuMA+H3Zcci7ozLdAK lYHHPbgPTBb+gzLsje0Qfbi/nhNDRlpDJBtdQW3rjenoO7Z59g2veUzhedRmXuvv TB31AgDDLoTJZniynJWlPQxL9IYNnuBzDs2U+FN9NS1z0keW69NyoTlOaYx/MD6H NrDlZMnKVQ1kWNa6ByJ0eL7zYMB2AgDsuoIqVGxBvUFbkVXlih0oaf74kFPkExg3 CLkNqAuoxb6XwNrR9p7ABtXqAG7aGrMw4je9+6BfH8hh/QEGjYJ2Af1k0Dujo4P0 p02Cb0SmzxLVSiEAn68DNhht5GfKpjBSvv5kZoVOQ+E6ixCwWH/HipXCsVEieQdc 9tPoBOzDLWGko260HnRmcnNhdGVzdCA8dGZyc2F0ZXN0QGtleS50ZXN0Pg== =aKox -END PGP PRIVATE KEY BLOCK- the key works fine in gnupg, and used to work fine in earlier winpt versions (on my system) Thanks in Advance for testing/clarifying vedaal Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Problem upgrading WinPT // spam protection changed the passphrase
vedaal at hush.com vedaal at hush.com wrote Thu Jan 26 20:24:17 CET 2006 : the spam protection changed the passphrase > -BEGIN PGP PRIVATE KEY BLOCK- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.3-cvs (MingW32) >Comment: passphrase: tfrsatest at key.test ^^ the correct passphrase has the @ immediately following tfrsatest and key.test immediately following the @ no spaces anywhere in the passphrase (my early test keys were all done with the passphrase exactly the same name as the key, so when prompted for the passphrase, it could be copied just by loking at the name of the key that gnupg lists, have since modified it to leave out the @ and address) sorry ;-) vedaal Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Problem upgrading WinPT
On Thu Jan 26 2006; 14:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > why only some of us, Johan, myself, and only a very few others, are > having it, and why it is hard for most others to reproduce it ... > > _v3 rsa keys_ ! Excellent work. > on my other machine, with existing gnupg keyrings, > with v3 keys in them, > winpt-cvs crashes upon loading the pubring.gpg on start-up Thanks for the test data, I will definitely check this out tomorrow and hopefully I can fix the crashes and release 0.11.7 which works again on these machines. Timo ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Problem upgrading WinPT
Timo Schulz wrote: >Maybe you can check out the latest CVS snapshot, it contains some fixes: >http://www.stud.uni-hannover.de/~twoaday/winpt-cvs-exe.zip >(the file just contains the WinPT.exe and PTD.dll, so you need an existing > WinPT installation) Still gives the same error: a NULL pointer assignment: The instruction at "0x00441dfd" referenced memory at "0x". The memory could not be read. Click on OK to terminate the program. Click on CANCEL to debug the program. -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site: [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/index.html PGP/GPG public keys at http://www.xs4all.nl/~johanw/pgpkeys.html ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Problem with revoking my old key
Hello everybody, This is my first post on this mailinglist so please bear with me ;-) I've had a gnupg-keypair for about 4 years and the public key is published on several keyservers. Recently however my key has been compromised so yesterday I decided to make a new one. First I made a revocation certificate for the old key using "gpg --revoke-gen --output revoke_old_key.asc [EMAIL PROTECTED]". The revocation certificate looks like this: -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: A revocation certificate should follow iGcEIBECACcFAkPYlycgHQNVbnNhdGlzZmFjdG9yeSBudW1iZXIgb2YgYml0cy4A CgkQYFyEwpQ49PDniwCeKoortWgSt0+G1323SDwQztF3CkYAn0Gy2bNPXwKuSMyp MQwoa/N8cu2O =Vzao -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Now I've been trying to upload the revocation certificate to the various keyservers but none of them wants to accept it. For example, when I try uploading it to wwwkey.pgp.net I get this as a response: Add failed: Malformed Key --- unexpected packet type and/or order of packets Am I doing something wrong or why is my key not being accepted by the keyservers? //Daniel -- Excuse me, I believe you have my stapler...? Support cryptography for personal privacy: http://www.gnupg.org Download my OpenPGP public key at: http://www.kingsofcode.net/dl/pubkey.asc ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Problem with revoking my old key
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:42:06PM +0100, Daniel Löfquist wrote: > Hello everybody, > This is my first post on this mailinglist so please bear with me ;-) > I've had a gnupg-keypair for about 4 years and the public key is published on > several keyservers. Recently however my key has been compromised so yesterday > I > decided to make a new one. First I made a revocation certificate for the old > key > using "gpg --revoke-gen --output revoke_old_key.asc [EMAIL PROTECTED]". > The revocation certificate looks like this: Do this: gpg --import revoke_old_key.asc So the key on your keyring is revoked. Now upload the key to the keyserver: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --send-key [EMAIL PROTECTED] David ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Problem with revoking my old key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Löfquist wrote: > Hello everybody, > This is my first post on this mailinglist so please bear with me ;-) > I've had a gnupg-keypair for about 4 years and the public key is published on > several keyservers. Recently however my key has been compromised so yesterday > I > decided to make a new one. First I made a revocation certificate for the old > key > using "gpg --revoke-gen --output revoke_old_key.asc [EMAIL PROTECTED]". > The revocation certificate looks like this: > > -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: A revocation certificate should follow > > iGcEIBECACcFAkPYlycgHQNVbnNhdGlzZmFjdG9yeSBudW1iZXIgb2YgYml0cy4A > CgkQYFyEwpQ49PDniwCeKoortWgSt0+G1323SDwQztF3CkYAn0Gy2bNPXwKuSMyp > MQwoa/N8cu2O > =Vzao > -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- > > Now I've been trying to upload the revocation certificate to the various > keyservers but none of them wants to accept it. For example, when I try > uploading it to wwwkey.pgp.net I get this as a response: > > Add failed: Malformed Key --- unexpected packet type and/or order of packets > > Am I doing something wrong or why is my key not being accepted by the > keyservers? > > > //Daniel > > I get the same message when I try to import your key. So if it is not you, it is both Thunderbird 1.5 and the keyserver. I would not expect both to be buggy in the same way. - -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 21:50:00 up 6 days, 13:17, 5 users, load average: 4.22, 4.41, 4.58 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD2YrQPtu2XpovyZoRAtt9AKDJzYJva9KX/HW9MLRW/4QM4nzpVwCgiFIR LDWbGg7zA1Qol3eyXECxX3M= =B8Pg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Re: Problem with revoking my old key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Running Thunderbird version 1.5 (20051201) + enigmail 0.94.0, Macintosh OSX 10.4.4, GnuPG 1.4.2. When I received Daniel's message, TB+Enigmail indicated, in a colored strip over the message's text "click the Decrypt icon to import key" (I don't remember the exact words). When I clicked that icon, a message was displayed "...cannot import revocation certificate key 9438F4F0...". Again, I don't remember the exact words, but that was the gist of the message. I then searched for Daniel's keys with CLI: $ gpg -search-keys [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I don't have to specify the keyserver in CLI, this is done in GPGPreferences, a feature of MacGPG, which is the GnuPG for the Mac Project) This produced two keys: one created 2002-10-20 one created 2006-01-25 Both keys were valid, none contained any trace of revocation. I then went back to Daniel's original message, clicked again the Decrypt icon, and GnuPG[via TB+enigmail] displayed a long message the gist of which was the successful import of the revocation certificate, and detailing other data e.g. trust levels, etc. Went to $ gpg --edit-key 9438F4F0 with the following output: - - This key was revoked on 2006-01-26 by DSA key 9438F4F0 Daniel Löfquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pub 1024D/9438F4F0 created: 2002-10-20 revoked: 2006-01-26 usage: CSA trust: unknown validity: revoked This key was revoked on 2006-01-26 by DSA key 9438F4F0 Daniel Löfquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sub 1024g/DDF10144 created: 2002-10-20 revoked: 2006-01-26 usage: E [ revoked] (1). Daniel Löfquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - - I don't know whether Daniel has already followed David Shaw's suggestion: import the revocation certificate into Daniel's keyring, and they upload the resulting public key keyblock to a keyserver, which is the standard way to use a revocation certificate. I am sure that when I downloaded Daniel's keys from a keyserver (wwwkeys.pgp.net) the key was not revoked. I have *not* of course uploaded the revoked public key keyblock to a keyserver. That's Daniel's privilege. Therefore it seems that by importing the revocation certificate as it appeared in Daniel's email, *when the corresponding key was present in my keyring* gpg actually revoked the key. If this is what happened, that means that when one has obtained the revocation certificate, it is possible to revoke the corresponding key in one's own keyserver, without the intervention of the certificate's issuer, and I believe that is detailed in GnuPG documentation. This is why revocation certificates must be carefully saved and protected in the issuer's system, until such time the user him/herself needs to apply the certificate. Wouldn't it be "better" if the actual application of the revocation certificate would be conditioned to the use of the key's passphrase, thus limiting the revocation certificate's application to the key's owner only? Just 2¢ Charly Jean-David Beyer wrote the following on 1/26/06 9:52 PM: > Daniel Löfquist wrote: [...] >>> Now I've been trying to upload the revocation certificate to the various >>> keyservers but none of them wants to accept it. For example, when I try >>> uploading it to wwwkey.pgp.net I get this as a response: >>> >>> Add failed: Malformed Key --- unexpected packet type and/or order of packets >>> >>> Am I doing something wrong or why is my key not being accepted by the >>> keyservers? >>> >>> >>> //Daniel >>> >>> > I get the same message when I try to import your key. So if it is not you, > it is both Thunderbird 1.5 and the keyserver. I would not expect both to be > buggy in the same way. > > -- > .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. > /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. > /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jerseyhttp://counter.li.org > ^^-^^ 21:50:00 up 6 days, 13:17, 5 users, load average: 4.22, 4.41, 4.58 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) Comment: GnuPG for Privacy Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQ9m5sm69XHxycyfPAQh91BAAlLA6u2GJmJBpgxPq0f+Sw8PRQR0Oig9P m1jyL9oXCr88kdozc6YuJN/ORcw4mUBpzpK5uUJayAVppjVTT0yZ2TtabNryL1FG B3AVHRi4IpZ69RqpYPHPwsrtWzgrniPppMKUjTHUWXkdoDNuVcdaIFNEVmY+7Ddg KTmp+F1Z0s0L+Et8QKR1OIjcthXp06E9//8mItAKcxBFKiYKU8FH40SjAVmt65ff AHZzdraz9NB3SqVR0h0lRWfry+dLCU2FUTrqE7eUjlmVNlfUi1kEwuKHd8juKfxC tv3DacjSxUhiinpqScEOcilk7IkN/EK43Si0AOHIF9sx/SwT/hnTOkWl1g8lMnpr fLT5MUY6ekjCAi4OKrdGPHG8Fw3O1T5kGVI/hPL96xWbCZL5QtZvPMS1u5oG23oB 0VAVHeUxShKkiMxJtJIlj5lzhIKrLgNtmgqF+CsU739jxunxHoUx2uXuyv12JTKg DwQMbIMETS9WoDoY/PTFs3iFKqzlTDDcC9A6uEqcWM+0/IZJSWVm/vp4ELwp0pkX iIZanHbFGeVAtOsvzMNpVWrhikYFb2ZVRC6YJjqW+fO5vWpyFkgIvv5xpJCI0beE VeiPB5ZeyQUgEWExe46jfeHoKNsTSNkG0TZhbtt1BMltFeJd44quLZyrZUXgCR5R BU9gr4vHPaw= =JPDx -END PGP SIGNATURE--
