Re: Traditional Chinese Translation
Commit all of them in rev. 20395 Thanks! Cristian Il 11/03/2011 02:01, Kuang-che Wu ha scritto: New translation files attached. ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Interactive Javascript + Canvas (jqPlot) powered graphs
Dear Andy, I'm sorry for not replying earlier. I'm very excited about your patches, but haven't had the time to actually do some testing. I was planning to apply them to SVN trunk as soon as we have a 2.4-stable branch created, so that your patches here (javascript) and also the previous python module patches will be available in the experimental trunk branch, as soon as it is separated from the 2.4-stable branch. By the way, how do I apply your patch series most easily? I'm using git-svn locally and I'm used to "git am" but not the way you've submitted the patches. Regards, Christian Zitat von Andy Clayton : Hi all, [I sent this once before, but that was during the mail server hiccup a month or so ago. Perhaps as a result it got somewhat lost in the torrent of mail. Either that or people aren't here just to appease me. Anyways, I thought I would send it one last time in case anyone wants to try it out and comment. I should have much more time next week to hopefully clean things up further and get it closer to being ready.] I finally had some time to sit down and clean this up a little. Given that I am lazy I also switched from Flot to jqPlot because it supports more of what Gnucash needs without changes or unsupported extensions. There still is a decent amount of work to be done to reach parity with the gog charts, but I wanted to post what I have so far if anyone would like to try it out and comment. For now I left the old charts in for comparison. Once things are in a bit better shape I'll make a bug and post the latest patches. Here is a list of at least some of the possible issues I am aware of: * The default coloring could probably be better (plus support for when specific colors are specified) * The legend needs to get out of the way of the graph * On bar graphs as more bars get packed in there seems to be too much padding compared to bar width (really small bars with lots of whitespace) * On any of the bar graphs over time the x-axis labels are (to me) misleading. A bar labeled 01/01/2011, for example, actually represents the value up to the next x position, say 01/02/2011. Perhaps labeling it with the through date (the inclusive end date) would make more sense, rather than the start? Then again, maybe that is just a matter of preference. Or maybe I will avoid the issue entirely by simplifying the labels to just year, or month and year, for the simple cases. Anyways, feel free to give a try and let me know what could be different or better. Thanks, Andy ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Git repo ready!
John Ralls writes: >> However, I think the git repo is missing many of the recent tags, e.g. the >> 2.4.3 tag. Maybe you need to run "git push --tags" or something similar so >> that the tags are actually pushed? > > Hmm. It looks like they have been lost somehow. I had a problem with > the script, which I thought that I'd fixed, but it looks like I was > just dropping the tags instead of converting them to git tags. I > should be able to fix this without having to redo everything. Well, this is why we're running these tests ;) If you do have to re-run it, well, we can. > Regards, > John Ralls -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warl...@mit.eduPGP key available ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Interactive Javascript + Canvas (jqPlot) powered graphs
Do you have some sample plots you can attach? Phil - I used to be a hypochondriac AND a kleptomaniac. So I took something for it. From: Andy Clayton To: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org Sent: Fri, March 11, 2011 9:33:04 AM Subject: Re: Interactive Javascript + Canvas (jqPlot) powered graphs Hi all, [I sent this once before, but that was during the mail server hiccup a month or so ago. Perhaps as a result it got somewhat lost in the torrent of mail. Either that or people aren't here just to appease me. Anyways, I thought I would send it one last time in case anyone wants to try it out and comment. I should have much more time next week to hopefully clean things up further and get it closer to being ready.] I finally had some time to sit down and clean this up a little. Given that I am lazy I also switched from Flot to jqPlot because it supports more of what Gnucash needs without changes or unsupported extensions. There still is a decent amount of work to be done to reach parity with the gog charts, but I wanted to post what I have so far if anyone would like to try it out and comment. For now I left the old charts in for comparison. Once things are in a bit better shape I'll make a bug and post the latest patches. Here is a list of at least some of the possible issues I am aware of: * The default coloring could probably be better (plus support for when specific colors are specified) * The legend needs to get out of the way of the graph * On bar graphs as more bars get packed in there seems to be too much padding compared to bar width (really small bars with lots of whitespace) * On any of the bar graphs over time the x-axis labels are (to me) misleading. A bar labeled 01/01/2011, for example, actually represents the value up to the next x position, say 01/02/2011. Perhaps labeling it with the through date (the inclusive end date) would make more sense, rather than the start? Then again, maybe that is just a matter of preference. Or maybe I will avoid the issue entirely by simplifying the labels to just year, or month and year, for the simple cases. Anyways, feel free to give a try and let me know what could be different or better. Thanks, Andy ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Any further proposed changes to the GSoC org application?
(the subject says it all) http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GSoC2011/OrgApplication Does anyone still have improvements for the organization application? Please go ahead and edit the wiki page. The application deadline is a few hours from now and I will submit it in 2 hours from now. Thanks! Christian ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Any further proposed changes to the GSoC org application?
On vrijdag 11 maart 2011, Christian Stimming wrote: > (the subject says it all) > > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GSoC2011/OrgApplication > Does anyone still have improvements for the organization application? > Please go ahead and edit the wiki page. The application deadline is a few > hours from now and I will submit it in 2 hours from now. > > Thanks! > > Christian Wow, I'm quite impressed by your org application. I read it through it and it seems fairly complete to me. Geert ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Any further proposed changes to the GSoC org application?
On Mar 11, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Christian Stimming wrote: > (the subject says it all) > > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GSoC2011/OrgApplication > Does anyone still have improvements for the organization application? Please > go ahead and edit the wiki page. The application deadline is a few hours from > now and I will submit it in 2 hours from now. > I made a couple of changes to te "Why is your organization applying..." paragraph, but do you really want to claim that we're working on "radically new features and technologies"? That's pretty far-fetched, I think. There's certainly nothing radically new on the ideas page. Regards, John Ralls ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Any further proposed changes to the GSoC org application?
Am Freitag, 11. März 2011 schrieb John Ralls: > On Mar 11, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Christian Stimming wrote: > > (the subject says it all) > > > > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GSoC2011/OrgApplication > > Does anyone still have improvements for the organization application? > > Please go ahead and edit the wiki page. The application deadline is a > > few hours from now and I will submit it in 2 hours from now. > > I made a couple of changes to te "Why is your organization applying..." > paragraph, Thanks. > but do you really want to claim that we're working on > "radically new features and technologies"? That's pretty far-fetched, I > think. There's certainly nothing radically new on the ideas page. Not on the ideas page, yes. On the other hand, this is an *application*, so our text must prove that we're willing to go a few steps beyond what is currently visible. Also note that I didn't claim that we already have any "radically new" features - there's just some more momentum currently, which might eventually lead to features which even might be rather new. If you have another wording in mind that doesn't seem too off to you, feel free to replace that - but just saying "we want to implement a minor new feature" is too boring as well. Again, this is the application, so we need to show off a bit, too, at least in the first answer. We're getting down to reality rather quickly during the rest of the questions anyway. Regards, Christian ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Any further proposed changes to the GSoC org application?
On Mar 11, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. März 2011 schrieb John Ralls: >> On Mar 11, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Christian Stimming wrote: >>> (the subject says it all) >>> >>> http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GSoC2011/OrgApplication >>> Does anyone still have improvements for the organization application? >>> Please go ahead and edit the wiki page. The application deadline is a >>> few hours from now and I will submit it in 2 hours from now. >> >> I made a couple of changes to te "Why is your organization applying..." >> paragraph, > > Thanks. > >> but do you really want to claim that we're working on >> "radically new features and technologies"? That's pretty far-fetched, I >> think. There's certainly nothing radically new on the ideas page. > > Not on the ideas page, yes. On the other hand, this is an *application*, so > our text must prove that we're willing to go a few steps beyond what is > currently visible. Also note that I didn't claim that we already have any > "radically new" features - there's just some more momentum currently, which > might eventually lead to features which even might be rather new. If you have > another wording in mind that doesn't seem too off to you, feel free to > replace > that - but just saying "we want to implement a minor new feature" is too > boring as well. Again, this is the application, so we need to show off a bit, > too, at least in the first answer. We're getting down to reality rather > quickly during the rest of the questions anyway. > Mmmph. I guess that's why I don't do so well at selling. You're up against the deadline now, so we'll have to go with it as-is. Regards, John Ralls ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Git repo ready!
On Mar 11, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > John Ralls writes: > >>> However, I think the git repo is missing many of the recent tags, e.g. the >>> 2.4.3 tag. Maybe you need to run "git push --tags" or something similar so >>> that the tags are actually pushed? >> >> Hmm. It looks like they have been lost somehow. I had a problem with >> the script, which I thought that I'd fixed, but it looks like I was >> just dropping the tags instead of converting them to git tags. I >> should be able to fix this without having to redo everything. > > Well, this is why we're running these tests ;) > > If you do have to re-run it, well, we can. "We", eh? Anyway, it's all fixed. The references were in git, they just didn't get tagged correctly so they were dangling. A wee perl script fixed everything up and it's now pushed to Github. Regards, John Ralls ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Git repo ready!
Am Freitag, 11. März 2011 schrieb John Ralls: > On Mar 11, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > John Ralls writes: > >>> However, I think the git repo is missing many of the recent tags, e.g. > >>> the 2.4.3 tag. Maybe you need to run "git push --tags" or something > >>> similar so that the tags are actually pushed? > >> > >> Hmm. It looks like they have been lost somehow. I had a problem with > >> the script, which I thought that I'd fixed, but it looks like I was > >> just dropping the tags instead of converting them to git tags. I > >> should be able to fix this without having to redo everything. > > Anyway, it's all fixed. The references were in git, they just didn't get > tagged correctly so they were dangling. A wee perl script fixed everything > up and it's now pushed to Github. Thanks. Err... how do I pull those newly pushed tags in my local repo? "git pull" et al doesn't seem to do that. Regards, Christian ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Any further proposed changes to the GSoC org application?
Am Freitag, 11. März 2011 schrieb Geert Janssens: > > http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/GSoC2011 > > Does anyone still have improvements for the organization application? > > Please go ahead and edit the wiki page. The application deadline is a few > > hours from now and I will submit it in 2 hours from now. The deadline has passed. I've handed in all our texts that we prepared with all the edits from the wiki page. Now we can wait a week and see what's going to come out of it. > > Wow, I'm quite impressed by your org application. I read it through it and > it seems fairly complete to me. A big thank-you goes to the wiki user AshokR who provided a significant amount of explanations and answers, especially on those questions where I didn't have any ideas in the beginning. Thanks a lot! Regards, Christian ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Re: Git repo ready!
On Mar 11, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. März 2011 schrieb John Ralls: >> On Mar 11, 2011, at 7:06 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: >>> John Ralls writes: > However, I think the git repo is missing many of the recent tags, e.g. > the 2.4.3 tag. Maybe you need to run "git push --tags" or something > similar so that the tags are actually pushed? Hmm. It looks like they have been lost somehow. I had a problem with the script, which I thought that I'd fixed, but it looks like I was just dropping the tags instead of converting them to git tags. I should be able to fix this without having to redo everything. >> >> Anyway, it's all fixed. The references were in git, they just didn't get >> tagged correctly so they were dangling. A wee perl script fixed everything >> up and it's now pushed to Github. > > Thanks. > > Err... how do I pull those newly pushed tags in my local repo? "git pull" et > al doesn't seem to do that. git fetch --tags I've set up the other two repos (gnucash-docs and htdocs) as well, and set them up for every-four-hour updating as with code. Regards, John Ralls ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
