Re: String freeze break for GNOME Shell
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Piotr Drąg wrote: > 2013/10/9 Enrico Nicoletto : >> I give my +1 vote from the i18n side ^^ >> > > The votes should come from the Coordination Team. I was actually > reluctant to give my +1, because these are quite big changes late in > the cycle and I was waiting for other translators' opinion. Since > there were no objections, here is my +1. Thank you for looking into this. I usually don't review these, as I have very limited time. Because I have very limited time, I would mostly prefer string freezes to mean something and for freeze breaks to be postponed wherever possible. In that sense I encourage you to exercise your judgement - silence can't be interpreted in any specific way. If freeze break requests will just become a rubber-stamping process, we can just as well save the developers some time and abandon it completely. Keep well Friedel ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
[empathy] (5 commits) Created branch gnome-3-10
The branch 'gnome-3-10' was created. Summary of new commits: 480300e... Rename NUM_TP_ to TP_NUM_ 8e0edf2... Add missing telepathy-glib-dbus.h includes 8daa7e5... EmpathyMessage: remove flags, they are useless d88af3d... [l10n] Updated Catalan (Valencian) translation 01a825b... telepathy-account-widgets: update ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
Oh my, it's this time of the year again ... When the new status menu work landed, the "Notification" switch that used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like to land this[1] now for 3.10.1. At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected. Cheers, Florian [0] https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Design/Guidelines/SystemStatus/ [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707073 ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
2013/10/10 Florian Müllner : > Oh my, it's this time of the year again ... > > When the new status menu work landed, the "Notification" switch that > used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the > mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like > to land this[1] now for 3.10.1. > > At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze > break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite > some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect > that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected. > It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to approve a break in this cycle. -- Piotr Drąg http://raven.fedorapeople.org/ ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On 10 October 2013 15:38, Piotr Drąg wrote: > 2013/10/10 Florian Müllner : >> Oh my, it's this time of the year again ... >> >> When the new status menu work landed, the "Notification" switch that >> used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the >> mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like >> to land this[1] now for 3.10.1. >> >> At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze >> break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite >> some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect >> that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected. >> > > It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I > give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to > approve a break in this cycle. +1 for release team -- Javier Jardón Cabezas ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: freeze break for default lock screen wallpaper
Piotr Drąg , Sat, 5 Oct 2013 15:10:03 +0200: > 2013/10/4 Matthias Clasen : > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Jakub Steiner wrote: > >> I'd like to ask for a freeze break for a very visible and poorly timed > >> fix, but I believe we should go through with it for 3.10.1. This > >> totally slipped through and currently we ship a pink(ish) lock screen > >> background as a default. > >> > >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709425 > > > > +1 from me. The pink is getting some raised eyebrows... > > > >> Unfortunately the wallpapers are translated so it does add a string :( > >> > > We don't show that string anywhere in the UI though, from what I can > > tell (might be nice if we did). > > > > I can't find it anywhere in the UI either, so here is 1/2 from i18n. This is 2/2 for i18n. Petr Kovar ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
Piotr Drąg , Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:38:42 +0200: > 2013/10/10 Florian Müllner : > > Oh my, it's this time of the year again ... > > > > When the new status menu work landed, the "Notification" switch that > > used to be in the user menu was removed, although according to the > > mockups[0] it should be included in the message tray menu - I'd like > > to land this[1] now for 3.10.1. > > > > At this point in time, this constitutes both a UI and string freeze > > break, though it restores functionality that has been around for quite > > some time (3.4?) and was only removed late this cycle, so I suspect > > that there are translations/documentation that can be resurrected. > > > > It's a bit too late, but since we already accepted bigger changes, I > give 1/2 from i18n. Please note that this the last time I'm going to > approve a break in this cycle. 2/2 for i18n. Florian, please try to push the change ASAP so that translators have enough time to get their translations updated for the point release. Thank you, Petr Kovar ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Freeze break request for GNOME Shell
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Javier Jardón wrote: > > > +1 for release team > Second approval for the release team ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
String additions to 'gnome-shell.master'
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-shell.master': + "Notifications" Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it might be worth investigating. http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell/log/?h=master ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
