Re: string freeze break request for gnome-menus

2011-03-30 Thread Vincent Untz
Le mardi 29 mars 2011, à 16:20 +0530, Andre Klapper a écrit :
> On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> > My proposal was tweak gnome-menu and put all them under existing Other
> > category. Advantages: 
> >   * it exists - so no need to break string freeze
> >   * it works on both panel and shell
> >   * it's a horrid place - so dishonour will force developer to place
> > their stuff in a proper submenu or convert to g-c-c panel :)
> 
> Looks like we have to come to an agreement here as this one has a 3.0
> target flag set...

It's getting really late to add strings, and we're not completely sure
how to deal with the new submenus from a layout perspective, so I
suggest we should just put the missing .desktop files in Other. And
we'll take time to find a solution we're really happy with for 3.2.

I've attached a patch to the bug:
 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645061
 http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=184663

Opinions?

Vincent

-- 
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
>From 39c6b8a51c1ef0d4082f21c62b5c3345ebf9ab70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vincent Untz 
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:53:39 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] layout: Show administration tools and old capplets in Other

Right now, administration tools and capplets that used to be in the
Control Center are not accessible in any way. With this patch, they
appear in Other. While this is not perfect, this will make them
accessible until we find the right solution.

To do this, we just exclude .desktop files that match panels from the
Control Center instead of excludings the Settings category, which is too
broad.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645061
---
 layout/applications.menu |2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/layout/applications.menu b/layout/applications.menu
index a1a9476..9a15849 100644
--- a/layout/applications.menu
+++ b/layout/applications.menu
@@ -145,8 +145,8 @@
 
   
 Core
-Settings
 Screensaver
+X-GNOME-Settings-Panel
   
 

-- 
1.7.4.1
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: string freeze break request for gnome-menus

2011-03-30 Thread Frederic Peters
Vincent Untz wrote:

> Le mardi 29 mars 2011, à 16:20 +0530, Andre Klapper a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> > > My proposal was tweak gnome-menu and put all them under existing Other
> > > category. Advantages: 
> > >   * it exists - so no need to break string freeze
> > >   * it works on both panel and shell
> > >   * it's a horrid place - so dishonour will force developer to place
> > > their stuff in a proper submenu or convert to g-c-c panel :)
> > 
> > Looks like we have to come to an agreement here as this one has a 3.0
> > target flag set...
> 
> It's getting really late to add strings, and we're not completely sure
> how to deal with the new submenus from a layout perspective, so I
> suggest we should just put the missing .desktop files in Other. And
> we'll take time to find a solution we're really happy with for 3.2.
> 
> I've attached a patch to the bug:
>  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645061
>  http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=184663
> 
> Opinions?

Works for me.


Frederic
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: string freeze break request for gnome-menus

2011-03-30 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:06 +0530, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Vincent Untz wrote:
> > It's getting really late to add strings, and we're not completely sure
> > how to deal with the new submenus from a layout perspective, so I
> > suggest we should just put the missing .desktop files in Other. And
> > we'll take time to find a solution we're really happy with for 3.2.
> > 
> > I've attached a patch to the bug:
> >  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645061
> >  http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=184663
> > 
> > Opinions?
> 
> Works for me.
> Frederic

Probably the least intrusive workaround for the time being, hence +1.
We can still continue discussing after 3.0.

andre
-- 
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: Variables placheholders comment

2011-03-30 Thread Shaun McCance
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 17:54 +0200, dooteo wrote:
> Hi all, 
> 
> There is a comment into gnome-packagekit which makes me doubt about my
> faith in gettext.
> 
> Here is the comment:
> 
>   #. TRANSLATOR: "%i %s %i %s" are "%i minutes %i seconds"
>   #. * Swap order with "%2$s %2$i %1$s %1$i if needed
>   #. TRANSLATOR: "%i %s %i %s" are "%i hours %i minutes"
>   #. * Swap order with "%2$s %2$i %1$s %1$i if needed
> 
> but, as far as I know, swap order (if translation needs) should be:
> 
>   %4$s %3$i %2$s %1$i (which outputs such as 'seconds number minutes
> number' message)
> 
> So, placeholders should be unique. Am I wrong?

Right, the two messages are distinct, but they're merged
because they have the same msgid. If your language does
something like "# minutes # hours" but then something
else like "# (#) minutes (seconds)", this won't work.

That's why we have msgctxt. Developers should use it
in cases like this.

--
Shaun


___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


string freeze break request for control-center network panel

2011-03-30 Thread Matthias Clasen
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646027

is about making the network panel show the same information as the
gnome-shell network menu for devices that cannot be activated. In
particular, we want to indicate if the device cannot be activated
because firmware may be missing. This adds the same 'Firmware missing'
string that was added to gnome-shell a while ago.

The patch has been tested on a system exhibiting the 'firmware
missing' symptom, and works as expected.

I don't think this is super-duper important and could move it to
3.0.1, but on the other hand, it is low risk, and makes the system be
a little more helpful in a broken situation.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


String additions to 'epiphany.master'

2011-03-30 Thread GNOME Status Pages
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
http://l10n.gnome.org.

There have been following string additions to module 'epiphany.master':

+ "Downloads"

Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it
might be worth investigating.
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: download-dir setting not being respected

2011-03-30 Thread Andre Klapper
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Xan Lopez  wrote:
> > >> With the download rewrite in ephy we stopped following some of our
> > >> documented behavior in the download-dir key. In particular,
> > >> "Downloads" is no longer understood to be the downloads dir, and we
> > >> use the desktop directory when the key has that value. Patch in
> > >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644641 rectifies this.
> > >> Permission to commit for 3.0?

Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >  Turns out I was misreading the patch. +1/2
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 09:24 +0530, Frederic Peters wrote:
> 2 of 2.

@Xan:
Turns out that this commit broke the string freeze by adding
"Downloads", hence CC'ing i18n mailing list.

andre
-- 
mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com

___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: download-dir setting not being respected

2011-03-30 Thread Xan Lopez
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Andre Klapper  wrote:
> @Xan:
> Turns out that this commit broke the string freeze by adding
> "Downloads", hence CC'ing i18n mailing list.

Sorry about that. "Downloads" is already in ephy and
"Downloads" used to be there too (many translations still have it), so
I guess it should be possible to bring it back from the dead for those
that lost it recently.

Xan
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n


Re: download-dir setting not being respected

2011-03-30 Thread Xan Lopez
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Xan Lopez  wrote:
> Sorry about that. "Downloads" is already in ephy and
> "Downloads" used to be there too (many translations still have it), so
> I guess it should be possible to bring it back from the dead for those
> that lost it recently.

Since i18n is on the loop now may this serve as an official request to
break the string freeze too. If it's too late I guess we can live with
"Downloads" not being translated for the time being...

Xan
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n