Re: Transifex instance for GNOME
Hi, Sorry my big delay. I don't use this mail ( peng...@gmail.com ) anymore. So I can help in the Transifex instance install, do you have any information about that? How install for example? Cheers Alexandro Silva alexosl...@gmail.com > * Find a team of people to take the job > > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure > > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs > > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?) > > * Decide to switch (or not to switch) On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: > Alexandro: ping? > > Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 07:44 -0500 schrieb Paul Cutler: > > Alexandro Silva had been working on this. Alexandro, do you have any > > updates? The original bug > > was https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066 > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Paul > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada > > wrote: > > Hi sysadmins. > > > > I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset proposal > > made by the > > release team and the discussion that started at the gnome-i18n > > mailing > > list about how to support external modules not hosted on GNOME > > infrastructure. > > > > In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies the program > > that runs > > on l10n.gnome.org could support auto-commit from the web > > interface but > > is blocker is on your side. > > > > Please, could you elaborate the stat of the affairs regarding > > this > > topic? > > > > Could we try to get the details of why it isn't done yet? Not > > to blame! > > just to elaborate a plan or try to figure out how to fix the > > spots. > > > > In a not so recent survey we made on GNOME language teams > > coordinators > > one of the more requested features for improving Damned-Lies > > was to get > > auto-commit from within Damned-Lies itself, so if anyone can > > fix that > > blocker be sure that your work will be hugely appreciated! > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > El dv 15 de 10 de 2010 a les 09:41 +0200, en/na Claude Paroz > > va > > escriure: > > > Hi, > > > > > > In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets > > reorganizations, > > > several people have expressed the proposal to install a > > Transifex > > > instance to replace Damned Lies. > > > > > > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But I'm also not > > convinced > > > that we will be able to keep current D-L functionalities. > > However if we > > > get some new ones, maybe the global balance might still be > > positive. > > > I think the main objective would be to support (a) > > auto-commit in GNOME > > > git infrastructure (the blocker is currently on sysadmin > > side) and (b) > > > auto-commit in an i18n branch of each tracked branch for > > modules not > > > hosted in GNOME infrastructure. > > > > > > We need now some people to take care of this. Personally I > > currently > > > don't have the required time to dive into this issue. > > > > > > Here are some steps we could follow to go further: > > > * Find a team of people to take the job > > > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure > > > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs > > > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?) > > > * Decide to switch (or not to switch) > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Claude > > > > -- > > gil forcada > > > > [ca] guifi.net - una xarxa lliure que no para de créixer > > [en] guifi.net - a non-stopping free network > > bloc: http://gil.badall.net > > planet: http://planet.guifi.net > > > > ___ > > gnome-infrastructure mailing list > > gnome-infrastruct...@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure > > > > > > ___ > > gnome-i18n mailing list > > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > > -- > mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed > http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper > > -- Alexandro Silva http://blog.alexos.com.br ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: Transifex instance for GNOME
Hi, André's ping was about bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066 Which Paul Cutler said you were working on. Could you give us a status update on it? Cheers, El dc 27 de 10 de 2010 a les 11:34 -0300, en/na Alexandro Silva va escriure: > Hi, > > > Sorry my big delay. I don't use this mail ( peng...@gmail.com ) > anymore. > So I can help in the Transifex instance install, do you have any > information about that? How install for example? > > > Cheers > > > Alexandro Silva > alexosl...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > * Find a team of people to take the job > > > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME infrastructure > > > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs > > > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot languages?) > > > * Decide to switch (or not to switch) > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Andre Klapper wrote: > Alexandro: ping? > > Am Samstag, den 16.10.2010, 07:44 -0500 schrieb Paul Cutler: > > > Alexandro Silva had been working on this. Alexandro, do > you have any > > updates? The original bug > > was https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599066 > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Paul > > > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:20 AM, Gil Forcada > > > wrote: > > Hi sysadmins. > > > > I'm quite sure you are aware of the new moduleset > proposal > > made by the > > release team and the discussion that started at the > gnome-i18n > > mailing > > list about how to support external modules not > hosted on GNOME > > infrastructure. > > > > In the following mail Claude says that Damned-Lies > the program > > that runs > > on l10n.gnome.org could support auto-commit from the > web > > interface but > > is blocker is on your side. > > > > Please, could you elaborate the stat of the affairs > regarding > > this > > topic? > > > > Could we try to get the details of why it isn't done > yet? Not > > to blame! > > just to elaborate a plan or try to figure out how to > fix the > > spots. > > > > In a not so recent survey we made on GNOME language > teams > > coordinators > > one of the more requested features for improving > Damned-Lies > > was to get > > auto-commit from within Damned-Lies itself, so if > anyone can > > fix that > > blocker be sure that your work will be hugely > appreciated! > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > El dv 15 de 10 de 2010 a les 09:41 +0200, en/na > Claude Paroz > > va > > escriure: > > > Hi, > > > > > > In recent discussions about new GNOME modulesets > > reorganizations, > > > several people have expressed the proposal to > install a > > Transifex > > > instance to replace Damned Lies. > > > > > > I'm absolutely not opposed to such an idea. But > I'm also not > > convinced > > > that we will be able to keep current D-L > functionalities. > > However if we > > > get some new ones, maybe the global balance might > still be > > positive. > > > I think the main objective would be to support (a) > > auto-commit in GNOME > > > git infrastructure (the blocker is currently on > sysadmin > > side) and (b) > > > auto-commit in an i18n branch of each tracked > branch for > > modules not > > > hosted in GNOME infrastructure. > > > > > > We need now some people to take care of this. > Personally I > > currently > > > don't have the required time to dive into this > issue. > > > > > > Here are some steps we could follow to go further: > > > * Find a team of people to take the job > > > * Install a Transifex instance on GNOME > infrastructure > > > * Configure Transifex for GNOME needs > > > * Test Transifex global functionality (pilot > languages?) > > > * Decide to switch (
String additions to 'gnome-disk-utility.master'
This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org. There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-disk-utility.master': + "A hard disk is reporting health problems." + "Examine" + "Hard Disk Problems Detected" + "Multiple hard disks are reporting health problems." + "Multiple system hard disks are reporting health problems." Note that this doesn't directly indicate a string freeze break, but it might be worth investigating. ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
Re: String additions to 'gnome-disk-utility.master'
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 22:18 +, GNOME Status Pages wrote: > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > http://l10n.gnome.org. > > There have been following string additions to module > 'gnome-disk-utility.master': > > + "A hard disk is reporting health problems." > + "Examine" > + "Hard Disk Problems Detected" > + "Multiple hard disks are reporting health problems." > + "Multiple system hard disks are reporting health problems." your commit 575f884eb645e4ee3699de774b74caab923e4b63 to git master broke the string freeze for GNOME 2.32 as g-d-u does not have a gnome-2-32 branch yet. andre -- mailto:ak...@gmx.net | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
