Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question for users of the Firefox browser
On 05/18/2015 02:07 PM, Gevisz wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2015 06:26:31 +0100 Mick wrote: > >> On Monday 18 May 2015 02:56:43 Daniel Frey wrote: >>> On 05/17/2015 02:54 PM, Mick wrote: > Chromium now selects the whole URL when you click in the address bar. > I'm not sure when it started doing this but it was quite recently. This is not a problem at all, because this address bar auto-highlighting in Chromium does not take over the system clipboard. When I click once it selects the whole address and I can delete it, before I middle click to insert whatever was in the clipboard. As has already been commented, this won't work with FF, which replaces the clipboard when I necessarily double click to select the content of the address bar. >>> >>> I didn't even know Firefox had this behaviour when clicking the address >>> bar, because it's something I never do. >>> >>> I usually use Alt+D on the keyboard, it moves the caret to the location >>> bar and highlights its text, and I just checked, it doesn't touch the >>> clipboard. >>> >>> Dan >> >> Useful tip! I didn't know about Alt+D, thanks for sharing. :-) > > The same does Ctrl-L. > > > Thanks to all those who commented. The Alt D & Alt L were good ones, but I took Pauls advice and had a look at the config, which worked a treat. In turn I might have a look at fixing the bug that Bruce mentioned. Regards, Andrew
[gentoo-user] Re: Question for users of the Firefox browser
On 2015-05-17, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 17 May 2015 18:16:16 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: [clicking the URL "text field" doesn't select the entire string, just makes it active.] >> > 1) Is this by design? Is this the normal behaviour? >> >> Yes. That's how text widgets always work on Unix. > > Unfortunately not :( > > Chromium now selects the whole URL when you click in the address bar. I'm > not sure when it started doing this but it was quite recently. Bastards. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Spreading peanut at butter reminds me of gmail.comopera!! I wonder why?
[gentoo-user] Poor mans audio in the world of the great Jack D.
Hi, >From time to time I come across software, which directly wants to talks to good ole' alsa and get kicked by Sensei Jack D. for accessing a device, which already is occupied by him... Is there any way to go or any software to install which enables me to use Jack D.'ed software and alsa-acessing without shutting down and restarting that grandmaster Jack D. ? Thanks a lot for any Koan, which will light up my darkened ears! Best regards, Meino
Re: [gentoo-user] Tips for fresh install with GRUB2+RAID1+LVM2
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On the other hand, both btrfs and zfs will get you a level of data > security that you simply won't get from ext4+lvm+mdadm - protection > from silent corruption. That's one of the advantages i see in ZFS. Do you use it frequently? Can anyone comment on its memory usage (without dedicated SSDs for ARC)? Maybe i'd use the 4 drives as a ZFS pool. For now LVM complains about duplicate PVs (when pvcreate /dev/md0), i'll have to fiddle with the filters in lvm.conf
Re: [gentoo-user] Poor mans audio in the world of the great Jack D.
On 18 May 2015 at 19:54, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> From time to time I come across software, which directly wants
> to talks to good ole' alsa and get kicked by Sensei Jack D. for accessing
> a device, which already is occupied by him...
>
> Is there any way to go or any software to install which enables me to use
> Jack D.'ed software and alsa-acessing without shutting down and
> restarting that grandmaster Jack D. ?
>
> Thanks a lot for any Koan, which will light up my darkened ears!
> Best regards,
> Meino
>
>
>
And so the wise ~/.asoundrc thus spake:
## http://jackaudio.org/faq/routing_alsa.html
## http://www.alsa-project.org/main/index.php/Asoundrc
pcm.jackplug {
type plug
slave { pcm "rawjack" }
hint { description "JACK Audio Connection Kit" }
}
pcm.rawjack {
type jack
playback_ports {
0 system:playback_1
1 system:playback_2
}
capture_ports {
0 system:capture_1
1 system:capture_2
}
}
-- Emanuele Rusconi
[gentoo-user] How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
I'm building chromium with USE flags set to -gnome -gnome-keyring, but it's still pulling in libsecret and gnome-keyring and nagging me about a password for the keyring every time it starts. I've found that simply doing an "emerge -C gnome-keyring" fixes the the problem temporarily, but then next time I do an "emerge -u" it wants to install gnome-keyring again. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Am I elected yet? at gmail.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Tips for fresh install with GRUB2+RAID1+LVM2
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Nuno Magalhães wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On the other hand, both btrfs and zfs will get you a level of data >> security that you simply won't get from ext4+lvm+mdadm - protection >> from silent corruption. > > That's one of the advantages i see in ZFS. Do you use it frequently? > Can anyone comment on its memory usage (without dedicated SSDs for > ARC)? > > Maybe i'd use the 4 drives as a ZFS pool. > > For now LVM complains about duplicate PVs (when pvcreate /dev/md0), > i'll have to fiddle with the filters in lvm.conf > I use btrfs heavily, but not ZFS. The feature set overlaps, but ZFS has more enterprise-oriented features and is more mature, and btrfs has more single-workstation-oriented features and is less mature. For example, ZFS has features like write-intent logging and read caching that are useful especially on large arrays. Btrfs, on the other hand, lets you mix different-sized drive in a single redundancy unit or add/remove devices to a single redundancy unit, while in ZFS you can have multiple vdevs in a zpool but you cannot add/remove drives from a vdev or fully utilize drives of different sizes in a vdev. That is something which is very useful when you have a 3-drive RAID and want to make it a 4-drive RAID, but it isn't terribly useful when you want to add 5 drives to a 30-drive SAN. I'm not sure how many of those differences are design-limitations vs just being what devs have spent their time on. I'm sure over time the feature set of both will grow and further overlap each other. However, right now with the current focus I'd expect ZFS to continue to focus on features useful in very large deployments, and btrfs on features useful in small deployments. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
Hm, I can't really reproduce it here. - Did you disable these USE flags on the CLI, for that package only or system wide? - What does emerge --info say? - Is the gnome-keyring directly pulled in by chromium? 2015-05-18 20:41 GMT+02:00 Grant Edwards : > I'm building chromium with USE flags set to -gnome -gnome-keyring, but > it's still pulling in libsecret and gnome-keyring and nagging me about > a password for the keyring every time it starts. > > I've found that simply doing an "emerge -C gnome-keyring" fixes the > the problem temporarily, but then next time I do an "emerge -u" it > wants to install gnome-keyring again. > > -- > Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Am I elected yet? > at > gmail.com > > >
[gentoo-user] Re: How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
On 2015-05-18, Manuel Schönlaub wrote: > Hm, I can't really reproduce it here. I forgot to menion I'm using chromium stable 42.0.2311.135. > - Did you disable these USE flags on the CLI, for that package only or > system wide? It's not enabled anywhere (make.conf, packate.use, profile, etc), however it is not disabled anywhere either. > - Is the gnome-keyring directly pulled in by chromium? No, I don't think so. >From what I can tell from looking at ebuild files, Chromium unconditionally requires libsecret, and libsecret unconditionally requires gnome-keyring. > - What does emerge --info say? It doesn't mention gnome-keyring at all: Portage 2.2.18 (python 2.7.9-final-0, default/linux/amd64/13.0, gcc-4.8.4, glibc-2.20-r2, 3.18.11-gentoo x86_64) = System uname: Linux-3.18.11-gentoo-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-_i5-3570K_CPU_@_3.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.2 KiB Mem: 8064448 total, 1368024 free KiB Swap:5885112 total, 5879556 free Timestamp of repository gentoo: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:30:01 + sh bash 4.2_p53 ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.24 p1.4) 2.24 app-shells/bash: 4.2_p53::gentoo dev-java/java-config: 2.2.0::gentoo dev-lang/perl:5.20.2::gentoo dev-lang/python: 2.7.9-r1::gentoo, 3.3.5-r1::gentoo, 3.4.1::gentoo dev-util/cmake: 2.8.12.2-r1::gentoo dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.28-r2::gentoo sys-apps/baselayout: 2.2::gentoo sys-apps/openrc: 0.13.11::gentoo sys-apps/sandbox: 2.6-r1::gentoo sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13::gentoo, 2.69::gentoo sys-devel/automake: 1.11.6-r1::gentoo, 1.13.4::gentoo sys-devel/binutils: 2.24-r3::gentoo sys-devel/gcc:4.3.6-r1::gentoo, 4.5.4::gentoo, 4.6.4::gentoo, 4.8.4::gentoo sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.7.3::gentoo sys-devel/libtool:2.4.6::gentoo sys-devel/make: 4.1-r1::gentoo sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.18::gentoo (virtual/os-headers) sys-libs/glibc: 2.20-r2::gentoo Repositories: gentoo location: /usr/portage sync-type: rsync sync-uri: rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage priority: -1000 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/sofficerc /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt /var/lib/hsqldb" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release /etc/php/apache2-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cli-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c" CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync news parallel-fetch preserve-libs protect-owned sandbox sfperms splitdebug strict unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync" FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.cites.uiuc.edu/pub/gentoo/ http://gentoo.cs.uni.edu/ http://lug.mtu.edu/gentoo/"; LANG="en_US.utf8" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/" PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --omit-dir-times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --human-readable --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" USE="X a52 aac acl aes alsa amd64 avx berkdb bzip2 cdr cli cracklib crypt cups cxx dri dvd flac fortran gdbm gkt2 gtk iconv imap ipv6 jpeg mmx mmxext modules mozbranding mp3 multilib ncurses nls nptl nsplugin ogg openmp pam pcre pdf png popcnt readline samba session sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssl ssse3 svg tcpd tiff tk unicode v4l vorbis xv zlib" ABI_X86="64" ALSA_CARDS="ali5451 als4000 atiixp atiixp-modem bt87x ca0106 cmipci emu10k1x ens1370 ens1371 es1938 es1968 fm801 hda-intel intel8x0 intel8x0m maestro3 trident usb-audio via82xx via82xx-modem ymfpci" APACHE2_MODULES="authn_core authz_core socache_shmcb unixd actions alias auth_basic authn_alias authn_anon authn_dbm authn_default authn_file authz_dbm authz_default authz_groupfile authz_host authz_owner authz_user autoindex cache cgi cgid dav dav_fs dav_lock deflate dir disk_cache env expires ext_filter file_cache filter headers include info log_config logio mem_cache mime mime_magic negotiation rewrite setenvif speling status uni que_id userdir usertrack vhost_alias" CALLIGRA_FEATURES="kexi words flow plan sheets stage tables krita karbon braindump author" CAMERAS="ptp2" COLLECTD_PLUGINS="df interface irq load memory rrdtool swap syslog" CPU_FLAGS_X86="aes avx mmx mmxext popcnt sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3" ELIBC="glibc" GPSD_PROTOCOLS="ashtech aiv
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-05-18, Manuel Schönlaub wrote: > >> Hm, I can't really reproduce it here. > > I forgot to menion I'm using chromium stable 42.0.2311.135. > Upgrade to chromium-43; the ebuild has been adjusted to not require libsecret. See bug 538224. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538224
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
On Monday 18 May 2015 21:30:51 Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2015-05-18, Manuel Schönlaub wrote: > > Hm, I can't really reproduce it here. > > I forgot to menion I'm using chromium stable 42.0.2311.135. Same here. > > - Did you disable these USE flags on the CLI, for that package only or > > > > system wide? > > It's not enabled anywhere (make.conf, packate.use, profile, etc), > however it is not disabled anywhere either. Almost same here. I have USE="-gnome" in make.conf and gnome-keyring is also disabled globally (I guess due to my profile): $ euse -i gnome-keyring global use flags (searching: gnome-keyring) [- ] gnome-keyring - Enable support for storing passwords via gnome- keyring local use flags (searching: gnome-keyring) [- ] gnome-keyring sys-auth/pambase: Enable pam_gnome_keyring module on system login stack. This enables proper Gnome Keyring access to logins, whether they are done with the login shell, a Desktop Manager or a remote login systems such as SSH. [- ] 20101024-r2 [gentoo] [- ] 20120417-r3 [gentoo] [- ] 20140313 [gentoo] [- ] 20150213 [gentoo] > > - Is the gnome-keyring directly pulled in by chromium? > > No, I don't think so. > > From what I can tell from looking at ebuild files, Chromium > unconditionally requires libsecret, and libsecret unconditionally > requires gnome-keyring. > > > - What does emerge --info say? > > It doesn't mention gnome-keyring at all: > > Portage 2.2.18 (python 2.7.9-final-0, default/linux/amd64/13.0, gcc-4.8.4, > glibc-2.20-r2, 3.18.11-gentoo x86_64) > = > System uname: > Linux-3.18.11-gentoo-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-_i5-3570K_CPU_@_3.40GHz-with- > gentoo-2.2 KiB Mem: 8064448 total, 1368024 free > KiB Swap:5885112 total, 5879556 free > Timestamp of repository gentoo: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:30:01 + > sh bash 4.2_p53 > ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.24 p1.4) 2.24 > app-shells/bash: 4.2_p53::gentoo > dev-java/java-config: 2.2.0::gentoo > dev-lang/perl:5.20.2::gentoo > dev-lang/python: 2.7.9-r1::gentoo, 3.3.5-r1::gentoo, 3.4.1::gentoo > dev-util/cmake: 2.8.12.2-r1::gentoo > dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.28-r2::gentoo > sys-apps/baselayout: 2.2::gentoo > sys-apps/openrc: 0.13.11::gentoo > sys-apps/sandbox: 2.6-r1::gentoo > sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13::gentoo, 2.69::gentoo > sys-devel/automake: 1.11.6-r1::gentoo, 1.13.4::gentoo > sys-devel/binutils: 2.24-r3::gentoo > sys-devel/gcc:4.3.6-r1::gentoo, 4.5.4::gentoo, 4.6.4::gentoo, > 4.8.4::gentoo sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.7.3::gentoo > sys-devel/libtool:2.4.6::gentoo > sys-devel/make: 4.1-r1::gentoo > sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.18::gentoo (virtual/os-headers) > sys-libs/glibc: 2.20-r2::gentoo > Repositories: > > gentoo > location: /usr/portage > sync-type: rsync > sync-uri: rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage > priority: -1000 > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" > ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" > CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" > CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/sofficerc > /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt /var/lib/hsqldb" > CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d > /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release > /etc/php/apache2-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php5.5/ext-active/ > /etc/php/cli-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d > /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d > /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c" CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" > DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" > FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks > ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync news parallel-fetch preserve-libs > protect-owned sandbox sfperms splitdebug strict unknown-features-warn > unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync" > FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.cites.uiuc.edu/pub/gentoo/ > http://gentoo.cs.uni.edu/ http://lug.mtu.edu/gentoo/"; LANG="en_US.utf8" > LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" > MAKEOPTS="-j2" > PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" > PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/" > PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times > --omit-dir-times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats > --human-readable --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local > --exclude=/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" > USE="X a52 aac acl aes alsa amd64 avx berkdb bzip2 cdr cli cracklib crypt > cups cxx dri dvd flac fortran gdbm gkt2 gtk iconv imap ipv6 jpeg mmx > mmxext modules mozbranding mp3 multilib ncurses nls nptl nsplugin ogg > openmp pam pcre pdf png popcnt readline samba sessi
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
The unstable version (43) has had its dependency on libsecret removed. Furthermore the package's standard USE flags include gnome and gnome-keyring. You would disable them explicitly in order not to have libgnome-keyring (and gconf) installed again. Am 18.05.2015 22:32 schrieb "Grant Edwards" : > On 2015-05-18, Manuel Schönlaub wrote: > > > Hm, I can't really reproduce it here. > > I forgot to menion I'm using chromium stable 42.0.2311.135. > > > - Did you disable these USE flags on the CLI, for that package only or > > system wide? > > It's not enabled anywhere (make.conf, packate.use, profile, etc), > however it is not disabled anywhere either. > > > - Is the gnome-keyring directly pulled in by chromium? > > No, I don't think so. > > From what I can tell from looking at ebuild files, Chromium > unconditionally requires libsecret, and libsecret unconditionally > requires gnome-keyring. > > > - What does emerge --info say? > > It doesn't mention gnome-keyring at all: > > Portage 2.2.18 (python 2.7.9-final-0, default/linux/amd64/13.0, gcc-4.8.4, > glibc-2.20-r2, 3.18.11-gentoo x86_64) > = > System uname: Linux-3.18.11-gentoo-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-_i5-3570K_CPU_@ > _3.40GHz-with-gentoo-2.2 > KiB Mem: 8064448 total, 1368024 free > KiB Swap:5885112 total, 5879556 free > Timestamp of repository gentoo: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:30:01 + > sh bash 4.2_p53 > ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.24 p1.4) 2.24 > app-shells/bash: 4.2_p53::gentoo > dev-java/java-config: 2.2.0::gentoo > dev-lang/perl:5.20.2::gentoo > dev-lang/python: 2.7.9-r1::gentoo, 3.3.5-r1::gentoo, 3.4.1::gentoo > dev-util/cmake: 2.8.12.2-r1::gentoo > dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.28-r2::gentoo > sys-apps/baselayout: 2.2::gentoo > sys-apps/openrc: 0.13.11::gentoo > sys-apps/sandbox: 2.6-r1::gentoo > sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13::gentoo, 2.69::gentoo > sys-devel/automake: 1.11.6-r1::gentoo, 1.13.4::gentoo > sys-devel/binutils: 2.24-r3::gentoo > sys-devel/gcc:4.3.6-r1::gentoo, 4.5.4::gentoo, 4.6.4::gentoo, > 4.8.4::gentoo > sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.7.3::gentoo > sys-devel/libtool:2.4.6::gentoo > sys-devel/make: 4.1-r1::gentoo > sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.18::gentoo (virtual/os-headers) > sys-libs/glibc: 2.20-r2::gentoo > Repositories: > > gentoo > location: /usr/portage > sync-type: rsync > sync-uri: rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage > priority: -1000 > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" > ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" > CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" > CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/sofficerc > /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt /var/lib/hsqldb" > CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d > /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release > /etc/php/apache2-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php5.5/ext-active/ > /etc/php/cli-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d > /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d > /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c" > CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" > DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" > FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks > ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync news parallel-fetch preserve-libs > protect-owned sandbox sfperms splitdebug strict unknown-features-warn > unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync" > FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.cites.uiuc.edu/pub/gentoo/ > http://gentoo.cs.uni.edu/ http://lug.mtu.edu/gentoo/"; > LANG="en_US.utf8" > LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" > MAKEOPTS="-j2" > PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" > PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/" > PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times > --omit-dir-times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats > --human-readable --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local > --exclude=/packages" > PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" > USE="X a52 aac acl aes alsa amd64 avx berkdb bzip2 cdr cli cracklib crypt > cups cxx dri dvd flac fortran gdbm gkt2 gtk iconv imap ipv6 jpeg mmx mmxext > modules mozbranding mp3 multilib ncurses nls nptl nsplugin ogg openmp pam > pcre pdf png popcnt readline samba session sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssl > ssse3 svg tcpd tiff tk unicode v4l vorbis xv zlib" ABI_X86="64" > ALSA_CARDS="ali5451 als4000 atiixp atiixp-modem bt87x ca0106 cmipci > emu10k1x ens1370 ens1371 es1938 es1968 fm801 hda-intel intel8x0 intel8x0m > maestro3 trident usb-audio via82xx via82xx-modem ymfpci" > APACHE2_MODULES="authn_core authz_core socache_shmcb unixd actions alias > auth_basic authn_alias authn_anon authn_dbm authn_default authn_file > authz_dbm authz_default authz_groupfile authz_host authz_owner authz_user > autoindex cache cgi cgid dav dav_fs dav_lock deflate dir disk_cache env > expires ext_
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
Just upgrade to the - unstable - chrome 43. As Mike stated in an email before, the unconditional dependency in libsecret was removed in the new ebuilds. You still would have to disable or keep disabled those two USE flags explicitly of course. Am 18.05.2015 23:01 schrieb "Mick" : > On Monday 18 May 2015 21:30:51 Grant Edwards wrote: > > On 2015-05-18, Manuel Schönlaub wrote: > > > Hm, I can't really reproduce it here. > > > > I forgot to menion I'm using chromium stable 42.0.2311.135. > > Same here. > > > > - Did you disable these USE flags on the CLI, for that package only or > > > > > > system wide? > > > > It's not enabled anywhere (make.conf, packate.use, profile, etc), > > however it is not disabled anywhere either. > > Almost same here. I have USE="-gnome" in make.conf and gnome-keyring is > also > disabled globally (I guess due to my profile): > > $ euse -i gnome-keyring > global use flags (searching: gnome-keyring) > > [- ] gnome-keyring - Enable support for storing passwords via gnome- > keyring > > local use flags (searching: gnome-keyring) > > [- ] gnome-keyring > sys-auth/pambase: Enable pam_gnome_keyring module on system login > stack. This enables proper Gnome Keyring access to logins, whether > they are done with the login shell, a Desktop Manager or a remote > login systems such as SSH. > [- ] 20101024-r2 [gentoo] > [- ] 20120417-r3 [gentoo] > [- ] 20140313 [gentoo] > [- ] 20150213 [gentoo] > > > > > > - Is the gnome-keyring directly pulled in by chromium? > > > > No, I don't think so. > > > > From what I can tell from looking at ebuild files, Chromium > > unconditionally requires libsecret, and libsecret unconditionally > > requires gnome-keyring. > > > > > - What does emerge --info say? > > > > It doesn't mention gnome-keyring at all: > > > > Portage 2.2.18 (python 2.7.9-final-0, default/linux/amd64/13.0, > gcc-4.8.4, > > glibc-2.20-r2, 3.18.11-gentoo x86_64) > > = > > System uname: > > Linux-3.18.11-gentoo-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-_i5-3570K_CPU_@ > _3.40GHz-with- > > gentoo-2.2 KiB Mem: 8064448 total, 1368024 free > > KiB Swap:5885112 total, 5879556 free > > Timestamp of repository gentoo: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:30:01 + > > sh bash 4.2_p53 > > ld GNU ld (Gentoo 2.24 p1.4) 2.24 > > app-shells/bash: 4.2_p53::gentoo > > dev-java/java-config: 2.2.0::gentoo > > dev-lang/perl:5.20.2::gentoo > > dev-lang/python: 2.7.9-r1::gentoo, 3.3.5-r1::gentoo, > 3.4.1::gentoo > > dev-util/cmake: 2.8.12.2-r1::gentoo > > dev-util/pkgconfig: 0.28-r2::gentoo > > sys-apps/baselayout: 2.2::gentoo > > sys-apps/openrc: 0.13.11::gentoo > > sys-apps/sandbox: 2.6-r1::gentoo > > sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13::gentoo, 2.69::gentoo > > sys-devel/automake: 1.11.6-r1::gentoo, 1.13.4::gentoo > > sys-devel/binutils: 2.24-r3::gentoo > > sys-devel/gcc:4.3.6-r1::gentoo, 4.5.4::gentoo, 4.6.4::gentoo, > > 4.8.4::gentoo sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.7.3::gentoo > > sys-devel/libtool:2.4.6::gentoo > > sys-devel/make: 4.1-r1::gentoo > > sys-kernel/linux-headers: 3.18::gentoo (virtual/os-headers) > > sys-libs/glibc: 2.20-r2::gentoo > > Repositories: > > > > gentoo > > location: /usr/portage > > sync-type: rsync > > sync-uri: rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage > > priority: -1000 > > > > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" > > ACCEPT_LICENSE="* -@EULA" > > CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > > CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" > > CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" > > CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/sofficerc > > /usr/share/gnupg/qualified.txt /var/lib/hsqldb" > > CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/dconf /etc/env.d > > /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release > > /etc/php/apache2-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/php/cgi-php5.5/ext-active/ > > /etc/php/cli-php5.5/ext-active/ /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d > > /etc/terminfo /etc/texmf/language.dat.d /etc/texmf/language.def.d > > /etc/texmf/updmap.d /etc/texmf/web2c" CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" > > DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" > > FCFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > > FEATURES="assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks > > ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync news parallel-fetch preserve-libs > > protect-owned sandbox sfperms splitdebug strict unknown-features-warn > > unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync" > > FFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > > GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.cites.uiuc.edu/pub/gentoo/ > > http://gentoo.cs.uni.edu/ http://lug.mtu.edu/gentoo/"; LANG="en_US.utf8" > > LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" > > MAKEOPTS="-j2" > > PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" > > PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/" > > PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive -
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
On Monday 18 May 2015 22:17:43 Manuel Schönlaub wrote: > Just upgrade to the - unstable - chrome 43. As Mike stated in an email > before, the unconditional dependency in libsecret was removed in the new > ebuilds. You still would have to disable or keep disabled those two USE > flags explicitly of course. Glad this was fixed. Thanks for letting us know. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] Re: How to disable gnome-keyring support in chromium?
On 2015-05-18, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Grant Edwards > wrote: >> On 2015-05-18, Manuel Schönlaub wrote: >> >>> Hm, I can't really reproduce it here. >> >> I forgot to menion I'm using chromium stable 42.0.2311.135. >> > > Upgrade to chromium-43; the ebuild has been adjusted to not require libsecret. > > See bug 538224. > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538224 Yep. Should've checked bugzilla. Thanks. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwardsYow! Look DEEP into the at OPENINGS!! Do you see any gmail.comELVES or EDSELS ... or a HIGHBALL?? ...
Re: [gentoo-user] Recommendations for WLAN-AP?
Paul Tobias wrote: > On 2 May 2015 at 17:17, wrote: > > > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > > > Am 27.04.2015 um 20:37 schrieb waben...@gmail.com: > > > > I'm searching for a new WLAN-AP that is fast, powerful and > > > > reliable. I can remember that there were some recommendations in > > > > this list some weeks/months ago, but I can't find them. > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > wabe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tplink archer series? > > > > > > can cope with 20 laptops at the same time easily and is not too > > > expensiv. > > > > Thanks Volker. I will have a look at it. > > > > -- > > Regards > > wabe > > > > > Hi wabe, did you decide yet? You might find this article useful: > http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2015/03/from-the-wirecutter-the-best-wi-fi-router-for-most-people-anyway/ > > Before that article came out, I also arrived at the same conclusion: > the TP-Link Archer C7 v2 is the best for me. My requirements also > included OpenWRT support. Sorry for my late response, but I was on a holiday trip till last night. I never thought about using OpenWRT before I read your post, but I wish I had. I already bought two ZyXEL NWA1123-AC. Unfortunately it seems not possible to run OpenWRT on these devices. I will call the dealer tomorrow. I hope that it is possible to exchange the devices because I still have not opened the packagings. -- Regards wabe
[gentoo-user] Re: udev hanging
On 05/17/2015 10:59 PM, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: > walt wrote: >> On 05/14/2015 10:56 PM, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: >>> I have an amd64 system with an old 3.3.x kernel. Recently (I think after >>> last udev update to 217) the boot process became very slow due to "udev >>> waiting for uevents to populate /dev". After a minute or so udev prints >>> something about a lazy device (a TV tuner) then the boot continues. >>> >>> Yesterday I tried to update the kernel to 4.0.2... >> >> That kernel version is marked ~amd64 (unstable/testing). Are you accepting >> the ~amd64 keyword in your make.conf? If you ask for help in this group you >> should include that info as part of your question. You'll get better answers >> if you do. >> >> Just as important in the last year or so is whether you are using systemd or >> openrc at boot time. >> >> Life never gets simpler over time :( >> > > :-[ You're right, that was not a very good request from my side. > > System is ~amd64, openrc, udev 219. Rebuilding the kernel with lots of > changes the boot completed at least once. Now it still hangs in the same > stage while waiting the NVIDIA video driver instead of the TV tuner > driver. But pressing CTRL-C it continues without loading the faulty > driver and at least I'm able to continue debugging. > > So the udev hang is in reality an NVIDIA driver problem, so that's what > I'm working on now. > > Anyway I do have the impression that udev keeps a state somewhere, > because more than once it happened that on first boot with new kernel it > worked fine, starting from the second boot it had the 'waiting for > uevents' problem. I tried to delete /etc/udev/hwdb.bin but it didn't change. Just a random idea: gentoo "udev" is now installed by the virtual/udev package. IIUC, the udev virtual package may install different "real" packages, depending on whether you are using openrc or systemd. My reply may give you no real help, but it may attract attention from the real brains of this mailing list, who probably can give you the solid advice you need.
[gentoo-user] Re: Poor mans audio in the world of the great Jack D.
gmx.de> writes: > From time to time I come across software, which directly wants > to talks to good ole' alsa and get kicked by Sensei Jack D. for accessing > a device, which already is occupied by him... Well, this is a different question depending if you are asking for a gentoo workstation/server or one of your 'embedded' gentoo boards? > Is there any way to go or any software to install which enables me to use > Jack D.'ed software and alsa-acessing without shutting down and > restarting that grandmaster Jack D. ? I ran across this qt 'audio app' some time ago but have yet to download it and see what it can do. *maybe* it'll fill the need you have? media-sound/qjackctlhttp://qjackctl.sourceforge.net/ > Meino hth, James
[gentoo-user] howto make github look nice
Howdy, One of the things I find ugly about github is the first appearance of the main (base) page of a given project. One thing I really like about sourceforge is how some projects look much more professional. I do not need (nor want) a lecture on why this is. I only want solutions or ideas of how to create a github base page that looks much more (www) presentable like this sourceforge page: http://qjackctl.sourceforge.net/ So ideas on how to do this are most appreciated; or facts as to why it is not possible with github. Also notice in the 'menu bar' the [GIT] functionality built in. Slick. Really slick and this is how I want my pages to look, as soon as I become brave enough to start moving codes from my workstations (ugly; no gui) to the larger world for folks to start playing with some codes and overlays. I want folks to look at my projects and they have an aesthetically pleasing appearance.. (I need an edge!). curiously, James
Re: [gentoo-user] howto make github look nice
On 05/18/2015 05:47 PM, James wrote: > Howdy, > > One of the things I find ugly about github is the first appearance > of the main (base) page of a given project. One thing I really like about > sourceforge is how some projects look much more professional. I do not need > (nor want) a lecture on why this is. I only want solutions or ideas of how > to create a github base page that looks much more (www) presentable like > this sourceforge page: > > http://qjackctl.sourceforge.net/ Sourceforge allows you to ftp/scp html pages to a directory which you have access to and this is the page that .sf.net points to. >From what I remember they even have access to PHP, and maybe even a database. > So ideas on how to do this are most appreciated; or facts as to why > it is not possible with github. Also notice in the 'menu bar' the > [GIT] functionality built in. Slick. Really slick and this is how I want > my pages to look, as soon as I become brave enough to start moving codes > from my workstations (ugly; no gui) to the larger world for folks to > start playing with some codes and overlays. Presumably github has something similar, perhaps googling will help you out. Heck, maybe it's even done through your git repo. Or maybe post to a github list? FWIW, I googled 'github pages' and got a bunch of interesting results. Dan
[gentoo-user] Re: howto make github look nice
On 19/05/15 03:47, James wrote: One of the things I find ugly about github is the first appearance of the main (base) page of a given project. One thing I really like about sourceforge is how some projects look much more professional. I do not need (nor want) a lecture on why this is. I only want solutions or ideas of how to create a github base page that looks much more (www) presentable like this sourceforge page: http://qjackctl.sourceforge.net/ That's not actually the SF page for QjackCtl. That's the project page, which is really just web space where you upload your site. The actual SF page is this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/qjackctl You can do the same in GitHub though. Here's a project of mine. GitHub page: https://github.com/realnc/SDL_audiolib And the GitHub-hosted project page (I only put the documentation there though): http://realnc.github.io/SDL_audiolib Info on how to do this: https://help.github.com/categories/github-pages-basics
[gentoo-user] Re: howto make github look nice
Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes: > On 19/05/15 03:47, James wrote: > > One of the things I find ugly about github is the first appearance > > of the main (base) page of a given project. >https://github.com/realnc/SDL_audiolib >http://realnc.github.io/SDL_audiolib > Info on how to do this: >https://help.github.com/categories/github-pages-basics Ah, very nice! Monkey see:: monkey Do thx, James
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: howto make github look nice
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 02:34:53 James wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes: > > On 19/05/15 03:47, James wrote: > > > One of the things I find ugly about github is the first appearance > > > of the main (base) page of a given project. > > > > >https://github.com/realnc/SDL_audiolib > > > >http://realnc.github.io/SDL_audiolib > > > > Info on how to do this: > >https://help.github.com/categories/github-pages-basics > > Ah, very nice! Monkey see:: monkey Do > > thx, > James As Nicos said, if the aesthetic appearance is important for your project's users then you would be better off setting up your own website. There you can play not only with theming it using CSS, but also with the structure, layout and functionality, without any restrictions from what github offers. A word of warning though ... it can become a full time job both tweaking it and protecting from attacks. The latter is more or less a given if you are setting up a dynamic content website, using php or similar with a database back end. Static pages present less of a challenge. -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Tips for fresh install with GRUB2+RAID1+LVM2
On 18/05/2015 20:21, Nuno Magalhães wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On the other hand, both btrfs and zfs will get you a level of data >> security that you simply won't get from ext4+lvm+mdadm - protection >> from silent corruption. > > That's one of the advantages i see in ZFS. Do you use it frequently? > Can anyone comment on its memory usage (without dedicated SSDs for > ARC)? ZFS needs a lot of memory to function well. It does work and run with far less memory than recommended, but doesn't run *well* - performance is impaired. I don't recall the exact formula (insufficiently caffeinated at 8am) but 8G is about your minimum for a decent storage device -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
