[gentoo-dev] testing pambase-20120417
# Pawel Hajdan, Jr. (17 Apr 2012) # Masked for testing and review. >=sys-auth/pambase-20120417 >=sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5-r1 >=sys-apps/hardened-shadow-0.9-r1 Please help testing above packages (feel free to skip hardened-shadow if you're not using it, but I'm pretty sure you have shadow and pambase on your systems). Maintainers, please review any changes. I can fix what you don't like in those updates. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Packages inside lcd herd up for grabs
As lcd herd is empty for some time, these are the packages that are for grabs now: app-misc/g15mpd app-misc/glcdprocdriver app-misc/lcd-stuff app-misc/lcd4linux app-misc/lcdproc dev-libs/luise-bin dev-libs/serdisplib media-libs/libirman I will move them to maintainer-needed (keeping lcd herd and it CCed to allow the herd to revive in the future more easily) in a week. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?
Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). Thank you. -- http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/ kabel
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote: > Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be > in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). > Thank you. You can just follow the version bump request: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315 -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?
On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote: > > Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be > > in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). > > You can just follow the version bump request: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315 yes, please follow the bugs rather than posting to the gentoo-dev list -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?
Thank you. On 17.04.2012 16:54, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2012 09:40:22 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: >> On Tuesday 17 April 2012 15:36:51 kabel wrote: >>> Hello there, I just wanted to ask when an ebuild for gcc-4.7.0 will be >>> in portage tree (unkeyworded, I suppose, like 4.6.0-4.6.2 are). >> >> You can just follow the version bump request: >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409315 > > yes, please follow the bugs rather than posting to the gentoo-dev list > -mike -- http://blackhole.sk/~kabel/ kabel
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: several obsolete ruby-gnome2 components
# Hans de Graaff (17 Apr 2012) # ruby-gnome2 modules obsoleted by upstream. These are # no longer maintained and mostly depend on gnome # components that have been obsoleted themselves. # bug 408251 for ruby-gtkmozembed, no specific bug # for the other components, nothing in the tree depends # on them. dev-ruby/ruby-gnomevfs dev-ruby/ruby-gtkglext dev-ruby/ruby-gtkhtml2 dev-ruby/ruby-gtkmozembed dev-ruby/ruby-panel-applet2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: several obsolete ruby-gnome2 components
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:06 +0200 Hans de Graaff wrote: > # Hans de Graaff (17 Apr 2012) You need to set ECHANGELOG_USER and then browse the tree to fix your ChangeLog entries. Cheers, jer PS: I've seen this more and more the last few months. What's going on?
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: several obsolete ruby-gnome2 components
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 23:24 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:53:06 +0200 > Hans de Graaff wrote: > > > # Hans de Graaff (17 Apr 2012) > > You need to set ECHANGELOG_USER and then browse the tree to fix your > ChangeLog entries. No, this is from the package.mask file where I typed this manually, and apparently I can't keep my email addresses apart :-( Now fixed, thanks for noticing. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
