Re: [gentoo-dev] PR Project Activity Issues

2009-01-30 Thread djay
Oo
 Envoyé avec BlackBerry® d'Orange 

-Original Message-
From: AllenJB 

Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:30:34 
To: 
Subject: [gentoo-dev] PR Project Activity Issues


Hi all,

The Gentoo PR Project currently appears to be having difficulties with 
keeping up, both with the newsletters and announcements, and I believe 
this is currently reflecting badly on the project as a whole. These 
issues are apparently holding back some key changes to the Gentoo 
website to make it easier to navigate and help the project appear more 
active than is reflected by the current front page.

If the project needs more hands, and these aren't appearing, then 
perhaps more should be done to advertise the positions and exactly what 
they entail (I would suggest announcements on the forums, with specifics 
on who to talk to for those interested).

The newsletter has been having issues for some time, and this makes me 
wonder if the amount of effort required is excessive for the value 
obtained from those efforts. While the GuideXML system Gentoo uses for 
newsletters, etc is nice, does it require too much time and effort to 
convert articles to GuideXML and get the newsletters published?

Alternative setups for the newsletter could be to either go text-only or 
web-only.

Text-only would involved producing a text-only email, which is then 
copied and pasted onto the website for archiving. This would obviously 
require minimal formatting work.

My idea for a web-only setup would require more initial work, but I 
think would make maintenance much easier once set up. The Gentoo 
Newsletter would become a separate website, not based on GuideXML, but 
on a standard CMS. Instead of having set release dates (weekly or 
monthly), articles would just be released as soon as they are produced.

The regular features like bug stats, GLSAs, developer changes could be 
easily generated automatically (I suspect almost all of those are mostly 
done automatically anyway - adapting such scripts for a CMS that can 
publish from RSS feeds should be relatively trivial) and would appear on 
the website without any intervention.

As above, articles would be published as and when they are ready. 
Instead of just 1 editor, this website-based setup would be able to have 
multiple editors with little collaboration required (just to mark 
submissions as being worked on when an editor picks them up, which 
should be easily doable using a ticket-based system (bugzilla) or 
mailing list).

An advantage, as I see it, of the website-based system is that it could 
be expanded to include features not currently easily possible with the 
current newsletter - categorized archiving of articles (not just be 
publish date) and user comments. While I haven't looked, it's probably 
possible to even find a CMS which includes email notification of new 
articles as a feature.


AllenJB

PS. This did start out as a submission for a council meeting agenda 
item, but I couldn't stop writing.

PPS. To preempt the obvious suggestion: I do intend to become a 
developer, I just don't feel I have the time to commit right now. 
That'll hopefully change in ~6 months once I've finished uni and have a job.



[gentoo-dev] net-im/ejabberd up for grabs

2009-01-30 Thread Caleb Tennis
I was maintaining this on behalf of some folks previously, but it could use a 
new
maintainer if someone is so inclined.

Caleb




Re: [gentoo-dev] PR Project Activity Issues

2009-01-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 01:55 Tue 27 Jan , Alec Warner wrote:
> Getting Index2 live is I think a different operational issue (that 
> changes to the website are very slow) and really has nothing to do 
> with PR aside from them not nagging someone to commit it ;)

In this case, Xavier had it ready in early January, and I was blocking 
on it for the last 2 weeks to write up an announcement.

> PR@ is a nghtmare of spam and what I'll term 'crap.'  having real 
> things marked as such with informative subjects would be useful. 
> having some kind of rotation would be useful having some kind of vague 
> 'we will read and respond within 3 days unless its a holiday' would be 
> useful.
> 
> Right now the expectations of pr@ are non-existent and apparently 
> think the mail is read and answered quickly.  In reality only Donnie 
> reads it and replies; he has a busy as hell personal life and I'm 
> surprised he manages to read it at all.
> 
> So I would like to set expectations ;)

Yes, it would be a good idea to put expectations wherever people find 
our contact info. Here's roughly what they are:

1. If it is a prewritten news item that needs editing, it will get a quick 
response.

2. If it is news that is not accompanied by a draft of some sort, no 
estimated response time. This point is where I think we have the biggest 
opportunity for improvement.

3. If it is an additional vendor listing for CDs, no estimated response 
time. These generally get batched and done at extended intervals.

4. If it is a user support request, no estimated response time. 
Occasionally someone will respond to say that we don't do support at pr@ 
and point at appropriate places like forums, lists, IRC.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com


pgpY0GwXSlcj3.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] PR Project Activity Issues

2009-01-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 08:42 Tue 27 Jan , AllenJB wrote:
> If you have some insight as to why these are apparent issues, please  
> teach me. I would not have posted this thread if it were not for the  
> fact that several developers also seem to think there is a problem and  
> there seems to be no discussion going on that I can see as to what the  
> causes of the problems are and how to solve them, so I decided to start 
> one.
>
> PR has the dubious honor of being probably the most publicly visible of  
> all the Gentoo projects, so maybe the issues are being blown out of  
> proportion, but without any discussion there's no way to discover  
> whether or not this is the case.

I guess this is the part that really gets on my nerves. If you have a 
complaint like this, directly contact the person or group responsible 
and try to work things out with them. Don't go to the entire developer 
community as if the sky has fallen.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com


pgp7Kl9RpJ2jw.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2009-01-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
I need to tighten my focus so I can have a larger impact upon Gentoo 
with the time I have. To that end, I'm stopping maintenance of these 
packages, which are available for anyone to take:

app-misc/colordiff
app-shells/fish
sys-process/iotop

and...

The system-config-* collection
--

This is a group of the Fedora GUI config tools. Some of them are quite 
nice and have no decent graphical alternative I know of, such as BIND, 
NFS, and HTTPD.

app-admin/authconfig
app-admin/firstboot
app-admin/hwbrowser
app-admin/system-config-bind
app-admin/system-config-date
app-admin/system-config-display
app-admin/system-config-httpd
app-admin/system-config-keyboard
app-admin/system-config-language
app-admin/system-config-lvm
app-admin/system-config-nfs
app-admin/system-config-printer
app-admin/system-config-samba
app-admin/system-config-soundcard
app-admin/system-config-users
dev-libs/alchemist
dev-python/pycups
dev-python/pyxf86config
dev-python/rhpl
dev-python/rhpxl
net-dns/bind-dns-keygen
sys-apps/hwdata-redhat
sys-apps/kudzu
sys-apps/usermode
sys-libs/libuser
sys-libs/system-config-base

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com


pgphMsgLLqKXO.pgp
Description: PGP signature