[gentoo-dev] giac-xcas computer algebra system

2005-05-31 Thread corrosifdev
I have submitted many ebuilds recently for a project I help maintaining:
giac/xcas.
Giac is a computer algebra system, with console and library capabilities.
Xcas is its FLTK graphical interface (based also on FLVW for a few widgets).
I'd just like to see it appear in portage, as I think it can interest
many people.

If you are curious, the project page is here:
http://xcas.sourceforge.net

I am currently writing with a friend a new graphical interface, based on
wxWidgets... but it is too soon to make a release of it. Anyway, you can
check a screenshot here:
http://xcas.sourceforge.net/img/wxCAS.png

To install giac and xcas, you need the following ebuilds submitted by
myself (and no one is currently in the cvs of portage... I hope somebody
can help submit it):

dev-util/bakefile-0.1.8
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90446

sci-mathematics/giac-0.5.0
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94539

x11-libs/flvw-2224
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94403

sci-mathematics/xcas-0.5.0
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94542

Thanks,

Andreas.


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Portage, Jobs, and Niceness

2005-05-31 Thread Chris White
Hi all,

-- Niceness --

  While waiting for kde to compile (read as hours), I decided to take a chance 
and talk about niceness and jobs this time.  Ok so, we'll start with niceness 
first:

if portage.settings.has_key("PORTAGE_NICENESS"):
try:
os.nice(int(portage.settings["PORTAGE_NICENESS"]))
except SystemExit, e:
raise # Needed else can't exit
except Exception,e:
print "!!! Failed to change nice value to '"+str(portage.setting
s["PORTAGE_NICENESS"])+"'"
print "!!!",e

the setting PORTAGE_NICENESS in make.conf sets up the portage niceness.  This 
code gives you an idea of how it is done.  if it sees PORTAGE_NICENESS, it 
simply uses the os module's nice function to set the niceness.  Now.. niceness 
is kind of weird.. so let's demonstrate using American Idol(tm)!  Alright.. so 
you have your two wannabe singers here, ProcessPest and ProcessPrincess.  Now.. 
Simon is the cpu here, having to judge which singer he wants more (it is safe 
to note here that one doesn't suck).  Now, instead of showing who he likes 
more, he shows who he hates less!  So, we have something like this:

nice -n -19 ProcessPrincess
nice -n 10 ProcessPest

So Simon says to ProcessPrincess "You suck -19, which means I like you, you get 
more cpu"
So Simon says to ProcessPest "You suck 10, which means you suck, you get 
screwed"

Now back to our regularly scheduled technical form... Ok, so now that we know 
what's going on, niceness means how "nice" you are to other programs.  The more 
"nice" you are, the more willing you are to share your cpu to other programs.  
The less "nice" you are, the more you want to hog it to yourself.  Now, when a 
process is set niceness, it does it by INCREMENT, not setting.  This basically 
means that if you do this:

PORTAGE_NICENESS=10

portage will increase your niceness from its original (normally 0 unless nice 
was already applied to it) by 10, giving you 10 niceness.  Now if you do it 
negative:

PORTAGE_NICENESS=-3

it increases by a negative number.. so it DECREASES portage niceness.  In this 
case, it would be -3, which is generally an ok value.  Note that the values go 
from -20 to 20, and that while you can increase niceness no problem, if you 
want to increases, you're probably going to need to be root.  Note to BE 
CAREFUL ABOUT NICENESS.  Remember, the same niceness that portage gets will be 
thusly applied to its child processes.  That means if you're running -j5 with 
PORTAGE_NICENESS=-19, subprocesses will all recieve -19 niceness too.  That's a 
lot of programs trying to grab for the cpu (I can tell you from experience that 
it can happen..)!  Only try this if you have some spectacular multi processor 
elite setup.  So that's what you get with niceness.  Now let's look at jobs:

-- Jobs --

Then there's jobs.  Now, this is extremly usefull for people that realized "Oh 
crap, I'm in the middle of emerge-ing such and such package and I just realized 
I need all my cpu for something more important (homework maybe?)".  No need to 
fear!  Bash has this nice little deal called jobs.  Let's take a look:

Scenario

 Ahh crud!  My xorg-x11 compile is halfway through and I just 
noticed this security patch I need to get through asap!  What to do! (or I'm 
compiling kde and realize I missed an assignment at school!).  Nice little 
handy bash function called jobs can take care of this.  To work with jobs, 
simply press CTRL+Z during the compile.  This stops the process as so:

(please note I was lazy here and removed my japanese error messages.. now 
you're not dreaming)

making imake with BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS= and CROSSCOMPILEFLAGS=-DCROSSCOMPILEDIR="" 
in config/imake
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.8.99.8/work/xc/config/imake'
rm -f ./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto
./config/imake/imake -I./config/cf  -s ./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto -f 
./config/makedepend/Imakefile -DTOPDIR=../.. -DCURDIR=./config/makedepend
./config/cf/Imake.tmpl:109  include 
 Imakefile.c:35 :
./config/cf/linux.cf:390: Warning: "BuildLibGlxWithoutPIC" redefined
./config/cf/site.def:44  include ,
 ./config/cf/Imake.tmpl:46 
 Imakefile.c:35 :
./config/cf/host.def:63: Warning: this is the location of the previous 
definition
cd ./config/makedepend && rm -f -r Makefile Makefile.dep makedepend *.o 
bootstrap
cd ./config/makedepend && make -f Makefile.proto bootstrap
make[2]: Entering directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.8.99.8/work/xc/config/makedepend'
make[2]: `bootstrap'
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.8.99.8/work/xc/config/makedepend'
./config/imake/imake -I./config/cf  -s ./config/imake/Makefile.proto -f 
./config/imake/Imakefile -DTOPDIR=../.. -DCURDIR=./config/imake -DBootStrap

[1]+  Stopped emerge xorg-x11

And it stopped!  Now that you've done your stuff, you'd like it to run again.  
First off, we do a jobs listing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage, Jobs, and Niceness

2005-05-31 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 31/05/2005-17:48:21(+0900): Chris White types
> Hi all,
...

Shouldn't this go to gentoo-user?

-- 
\Georgi Georgiev   \  Ferguson's Precept: A crisis is when you \
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/  can't say "let's forget the whole thing."/
\   +81(90)2877-8845   \   \


pgpyZzMOr1Sry.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] giac-xcas computer algebra system

2005-05-31 Thread corrosifdev
Dice R. Random wrote:

> You've probably noticed it already, but I just wanted to point this
> out in case you hadn't.  If I'm understanding that screenshot
> correctly I think you have a bug in your rendering engine.  It looks
> to me like you're integrating (1/3*x^2 + x) with respect to x, but the
> output looks like it says (1/(3*1/3*x^3) + 1/2*x^2) which would reduce
> to (1/x^3 + 1/2*x^2) whereas it should be (1/3*1/3*x^3 + 1/2*x^2)
> which would reduce to (1/9*x^3 + 1/2*x^2).
>
> On 5/31/05, *corrosifdev* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
> I am currently writing with a friend a new graphical interface,
> based on
> wxWidgets... but it is too soon to make a release of it. Anyway,
> you can
> check a screenshot here:
> http://xcas.sourceforge.net/img/wxCAS.png
>
>
Yep that's right, I should have checked it before submitting the
screenshot :)
The rendering engine is far from finished and has some issues... The new
interface is still in alpha stage, and that's why I didn't submit any
ebuild for it.
Anyway, the CAS engine itself works very fine.

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 02:53 am, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> This particular error occured on my machine with
> baselayout-1.11.12-r2 and therefore I file a bugreport against
> baselayout at bugs.gentoo.org #94120.

are you using lvm2 as your root filesystem ?
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage, Jobs, and Niceness

2005-05-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 05:05 am, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 31/05/2005-17:48:21(+0900): Chris White types
>
> > Hi all,
>
> ...
>
> Shouldn't this go to gentoo-user?

sounds like it ...
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-31 Thread Konstantin Kletschke
Am 2005-05-31 08:20 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:

> > baselayout at bugs.gentoo.org #94120.
> 
> are you using lvm2 as your root filesystem ?

No I only have /home, /usr and subdirs under /usr as lvm2 volumes, not
root. Sorry, yes, I forgot to mention...

Konsti

-- 
GPG KeyID EF62FCEF
Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E  A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 08:45 am, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> Am 2005-05-31 08:20 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> > > baselayout at bugs.gentoo.org #94120.
> >
> > are you using lvm2 as your root filesystem ?
>
> No I only have /home, /usr and subdirs under /usr as lvm2 volumes, not
> root. Sorry, yes, I forgot to mention...

did you properly `etc-update` then ?

your /etc/conf.d/rc must have RC_VOLUME_ORDER set to at least 'lvm'

i assume at boot you never see a message like 'Setting up the Logical Volume 
Manager' before the 'Checking all filesystems' message ?
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag

2005-05-31 Thread Daniel Westermann-Clark
On 2005-05-31 00:56:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> anyone have probs with moving bzip2 to global ?  we currently
> utilize it in gnupg, xqf, mkvtoolnix, tar, and we could use it in
> portage in the future

Some ebuilds use the global bzlib USE flag, is another necessary?
Maybe it should be renamed?

-- 
Daniel Westermann-Clark
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag

2005-05-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 09:41 am, Daniel Westermann-Clark wrote:
> On 2005-05-31 00:56:31 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > anyone have probs with moving bzip2 to global ?  we currently
> > utilize it in gnupg, xqf, mkvtoolnix, tar, and we could use it in
> > portage in the future
>
> Some ebuilds use the global bzlib USE flag, is another necessary?
> Maybe it should be renamed?

ah, was not aware of said flag ... yes they should be unified ...

personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others think we 
should use ?  just stick with bzlib since it's what we've had it for a while 
now ?
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-31 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2005-05-28 at 11:03 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote:
> |>you mean so i will not have to use 'gentoo nolvm2' on the next livecd on
> |>my system?
> |
> |
> | That had nothing to do with the init scripts, so these changes would no
> | affect that in any way.  All of the no* commands affect things that are
> | specific to the livecd.
> |
> then i'll have to make sure to test as many of the next livecd release
> candidates to see if it still requires me to specify that or not

It won't.  We're turning off all of the volume management in the initrd
by default.  This means all of them (dmraid, evms, lvm2) will be
available, but not enabled.  You will be required to do* if you want
them on, since they caused problems for some people, much as how doscsi
is not enabled by default.

I'm also working on making a nice little document of all the do* no*
commands available on the releases, so troubleshooting should be a bit
easier for us all.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[gentoo-dev] GNAP 1.7 Release (Gentoo Network APpliance)

2005-05-31 Thread Thierry Carrez
GNAP 1.7 is out !

GNAP is a Gentoo-based Network Appliance building system. It allows to
build LiveCDs or bootable disks with a customized network appliance
configuration in seconds. This is especially useful to quickly install
Gentoo on small-CPU hosts to use them as routers, firewalls, VPN boxen...

Starting points :
http://embedded.gentoo.org/gnap.xml
http://embedded.gentoo.org/gnap-userguide.xml

This version includes two major new features.

R/W overlay
It is now possible to specify the name of a partition from which to
overlay files at boot-time, allowing to write configuration changes back
to a floppy or a specific CF partition for example.

Easier extensibility
Add new functionality to GNAP used to force you to rebuild a complete
new core, which took both time and effort. The new extension system in
gnap_make allows you to build extensions without building a new core,
and the new gnap_remaster tool helps you to add extensions to existing
core files.

So emerge gnap and play ! Ask me on IRC for any questions you may have.

For bugs/patches/enhancement requests, use the Bugzilla "Embedded"
component and assign bugs to me. Thank you.

-- 
Thierry Carrez (Koon)


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage, Jobs, and Niceness

2005-05-31 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 31/05/2005-17:48:21(+0900): Chris White types
> 
>>Hi all,
> 
> ...
> 
> Shouldn't this go to gentoo-user?
> 
Maybe Ciaranm's guide; I doubt all devs are shell wizards ;)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=AfQB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage, Jobs, and Niceness

2005-05-31 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 31 May 2005 11:29:24 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > Shouldn't this go to gentoo-user?
| > 
| Maybe Ciaranm's guide; I doubt all devs are shell wizards ;)

I don't think really basic 'Unix 101' job control stuff belongs in The
Doc.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm



pgpOwUMGWei92.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] GNAP 1.7 Release (Gentoo Network APpliance)

2005-05-31 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 17:04 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> This version includes two major new features.
> 
> R/W overlay
> It is now possible to specify the name of a partition from which to
> overlay files at boot-time, allowing to write configuration changes back
> to a floppy or a specific CF partition for example.

Just curious, but what did you do to do this?  I'm going to guess
there's some boot-time option to mount a unionfs, no?  Is this something
we can extend to genkernel to allow us to have configurable LiveCD
releases, or is it something that is GNAP-specific?

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage, Jobs, and Niceness

2005-05-31 Thread Aron Griffis
Chris,

This is useful information but not appropriate for gentoo-dev.  Some
people have suggested -user, which might be a good place.  Other
places I can think of are the forums or a blog.

Regards,
Aron

--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer



pgp2B3hiYwm1x.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag

2005-05-31 Thread Aron Griffis
Vapier wrote:   [Tue May 31 2005, 10:16:06AM EDT]
> personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others
> think we should use ?  just stick with bzlib since it's what we've
> had it for a while now ?

I'd prefer bzip2

--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer



pgpr0BSR3puGD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag

2005-05-31 Thread Maurice van der Pot
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:16:06AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> ah, was not aware of said flag ... yes they should be unified ...

Agreed.

> personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others think we 
> should use ?  just stick with bzlib since it's what we've had it for a while 
> now ?

I'd say always try to make things more logical. Besides, there are only
a few packages using the bzlib flag.

I did however find quite a few that did an unconditional --with-bzlib as
well as one (dev-util/gambas) that uses bzlib2, which I can't find
anywhere.

Maurice.

-- 
Maurice van der Pot

Gentoo Linux Developer   [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe!   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.kfk4ever.com



pgpOKxUBlgX1k.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] GNAP 1.7 Release (Gentoo Network APpliance)

2005-05-31 Thread Thierry Carrez
Chris Gianelloni wrote:

>>R/W overlay
>>It is now possible to specify the name of a partition from which to
>>overlay files at boot-time, allowing to write configuration changes back
>>to a floppy or a specific CF partition for example.
> 
> Just curious, but what did you do to do this?  I'm going to guess
> there's some boot-time option to mount a unionfs, no?  Is this something
> we can extend to genkernel to allow us to have configurable LiveCD
> releases, or is it something that is GNAP-specific?

Oh no. I just found out about unionfs very recently, thanks to solar.

The current implementation is completely manual (and asynchronous) : the
contents of the partition is overlaid over the live filesystem at boot,
and you can remount the partition later on to save modified files. The
idea is to backup some /etc and /var things that you want to keep over a
reboot.

What is GNAP-specific, though, is the idea to add a tarball to a LiveCD
and have an init script overlay files over the filesystem at boot. This
allows user-level customization of the LiveCD configuration files in
seconds. The "R/W overlay" feature is just there to avoid burning a new
LiveCD whenever you change a conf file.

-- 
Koon
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-31 Thread Konstantin Kletschke
Am 2005-05-31 09:18 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:

> did you properly `etc-update` then ?

Ooops!

> your /etc/conf.d/rc must have RC_VOLUME_ORDER set to at least 'lvm'

ARGH!! I apologize! I always watch the diff output while etc-updating
exactly, even on baselayout or something else importand stuff, but this
time RC_VOLUME_ORDER did not made it into my new /etc/conf.d/rc!

> i assume at boot you never see a message like 'Setting up the Logical Volume 
> Manager' before the 'Checking all filesystems' message ?

No, was completely missing :)


Thanks for your help and tips!

Kind Regards, Konsti

-- 
GPG KeyID EF62FCEF
Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E  A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-dev] Last rites: nss-mysql

2005-05-31 Thread Robin H. Johnson
This package is no longer maintained upstream, and has several problems.

An alternative implementation exists (and works as well as being
actively maintained) as sys-libs/libnss-mysql.

If there are no complaints, I'll hard-mask libnss-mysql on Friday, and
remove it at the end of next week.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page  : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ#   : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgpSLlVb5qk38.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: libnss-mysql

2005-05-31 Thread Anthony Gorecki
On Tue, 31 May 2005 17:14:46 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> An alternative implementation exists (and works as well as being
> actively maintained) as sys-libs/libnss-mysql.

I think that what Robin was trying to state was that an alternative to 
libnss-mysql is available, not that the alternative /is/ libnss-mysql :)


-- 
Anthony Gorecki
Ectro-Linux Foundation


pgp5qstpETp31.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: nss-mysql

2005-05-31 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 06:18:15PM -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2005 17:14:46 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > An alternative implementation exists (and works as well as being
> > actively maintained) as sys-libs/libnss-mysql.
> I think that what Robin was trying to state was that an alternative to 
> libnss-mysql is available, not that the alternative /is/ libnss-mysql :)
No.

The old package is nss-mysql.
libnss-mysql is what any users of nss-mysql should move to.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page  : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ#   : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgphASz6D8Q6N.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: nss-mysql

2005-05-31 Thread Anthony Gorecki
On Tue, 31 May 2005 18:46:52 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The old package is nss-mysql.
> libnss-mysql is what any users of nss-mysql should move to.

In that case, your last paragraph was wrong:

> If there are no complaints, I'll hard-mask libnss-mysql on Friday, and
> remove it at the end of next week.


Technically, libnss-mysql is also obsolete: it's been replaced by its creator
by NSVS. There's an ebuild for that package in Bugzilla. It works wonderfully.


-- 
Anthony Gorecki
Ectro-Linux Foundation


pgpdF7b0ouMjA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: nss-mysql

2005-05-31 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:11:16PM -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote:
> In that case, your last paragraph was wrong:
> > If there are no complaints, I'll hard-mask libnss-mysql on Friday, and
> > remove it at the end of next week.
Whoops. My bad.

> Technically, libnss-mysql is also obsolete: it's been replaced by its creator
> by NSVS. There's an ebuild for that package in Bugzilla. It works wonderfully.
NSVS is nice, but it's also a bit of overkill for the moment.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page  : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
ICQ#   : 30269588 or 41961639
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85


pgpu9jhhq8ewV.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag

2005-05-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 01:38 pm, Aron Griffis wrote:
> Vapier wrote: [Tue May 31 2005, 10:16:06AM EDT]
>
> > personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others
> > think we should use ?  just stick with bzlib since it's what we've
> > had it for a while now ?
>
> I'd prefer bzip2

the three packages using bzlib have been changed to bzip2

thanks all ... this is a good example of why we e-mail gentoo-dev before just 
doing stuff :)
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 06:49 pm, Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
> Am 2005-05-31 09:18 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> > did you properly `etc-update` then ?
>
> Ooops!

someone (i think johnm) mentioned this to me before ... i'm going to add a 
small patch so that if RC_VOLUME_ORDER is unset, it'll default to "raid evms 
lvm dm" ... i'll drop it with 1.11.13 or 1.11.14

that way people who are bad and dont etc-update dont end up with bjorked 
systems
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: baselayout-1.11.12-r2 request for testers

2005-05-31 Thread Konstantin Kletschke
Am 2005-05-31 18:57 -0400 schrieb Mike Frysinger:

> small patch so that if RC_VOLUME_ORDER is unset, it'll default to "raid evms 
> lvm dm" ... i'll drop it with 1.11.13 or 1.11.14

Yes and may be add a boot warning meanwhile that the RC_VOLUME_ORDER is
completely unset. I for example would have seen that :)

Konsti

-- 
GPG KeyID EF62FCEF
Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E  A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list