[ANNOUNCE] Apache Sedona 1.3.1-incubating released
Dear all, We are happy to report that we have released Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.3.1-incubating. Thank you again for your help. Apache Sedona (incubating) is a cluster computing system for processing large-scale spatial data. Vote thread (Permalink from https://lists.apache.org/list.html): https://lists.apache.org/thread/v8r6xlx5tlkot1x9cvptc9j55o2x64zv Vote result thread (Permalink from https://lists.apache.org/list.html): https://lists.apache.org/thread/ykyto9rctpwboc4s1bz6mmo4kk6d7xy7 Website: http://sedona.apache.org/ Release notes: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/blob/sedona-1.3.1-incubating/docs/setup/release-notes.md Download links: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona/releases/tag/sedona-1.3.1-incubating Additional resources: Get started: http://sedona.apache.org/setup/overview/ Tutorials: http://sedona.apache.org/tutorial/rdd/ Mailing list: d...@sedona.apache.org Twitter: https://twitter.com/ApacheSedona Discord: https://discord.gg/9A3k5dEBsY Regards, Apache Sedona (incubating) Team
RE: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal
Are there any further questions anyone has about KIE? I know we're nearing the end of the year and people may not be watching as closely, but wanted to make sure since the discussion has died down. If there are no further questions, are we able to go to a vote? From: Jason Porter Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 08:37 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal From: Calvin Kirs Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 23:31 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] KIE Proposal On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 11:45 PM Jason Porter wrote: > > We don’t feel like KIE and Servicecomb-kie clash. One is an acronym (KIE- > Knowledge Is Everything), and the other is a suffix. Both projects are very > different as well. Servicecomb-kie is a configuration center for > microservices written in Go, whereas KIE is a knowledge engineering and > process automation solution written in Java. For example, how was this > handled in the context of Apache DeltaCloud and Apache DeltaSpike; or Apache > DataFu and Apache DataLab? Is there precedence within the ASF for similarly > named projects? The two communities have also co-existed for roughly the same > time, using the same names without clashes. That's not a problem If two projects are in different fields. we'd just need to be careful with the project description. Perfect! Thank you, Calvin. > > > As was stated previously, the number of projects is much smaller than the > number of GitHub repos. This is because KIE did not use a singular repository > model within the GitHub organization. The projects we’re currently > considering in this proposal are Kogito, jBPM, Drools, KIE-Tools, and another > project for the CNCF Serverless Workflow implementation that is going through > a naming process now. KIE-Tools is a little odd, though, as it doesn’t stand > on its own well. The existing code base contains a lot of modules and code, > which could be considered legacy, which we do not plan to move over. There > will be a cleaning and pruning process to ensure a more relevant, > sustainable, and forward-looking set of modules as code is moved over. This > should further reduce the amount of code that is moved over. We understand we > may need to collapse the repositories moving over to the ASF. Let us know if > you want to see how everything rolls into a more flat structure. > > > Regarding umbrella versus standalone projects, we believe that the unified > and cohesive experience provides more value than just the sum of its parts. > This is also not just about where we are now, but where we hope to evolve as > a knowledge engineering platform. On the surface, those projects can be seen > as independent in their business rules, decisions, and workflow domains. > However, real-world use cases are more complex. Usually, they require a lot > of interdependencies, for example, business rules orchestration is > accomplished by using a workflow file definition (i.e., BPMN), and complex > workflow decisions are better modeled in DMN models. The aim is to try and > drive consistency and ease of use across those technologies, in an integrated > and holistic manner. > > > If those projects end up as individual TLPs, it'll be up to users to write a > lot of boiler-plate code - or create additional new projects to handle and > abstract the unified experience. > > > Of course, as a consequence of the unified vision, the current codebase is > taking advantage of this unification, which means there's a lot of shared > code among the projects. Moving away from this will also result in more > top-level supporting projects to provide additional code, needed as > foundational code or integration code, which may actually create more > complexity and end-user confusion. > > > > Although it might not be the most popular example within Apache, KIE aims to > provide a similar umbrella cohesiveness that Apache OpenOffice has for their > sub-projects like Write and Calc. We really want the community to think of > knowledge engineering as a whole domain of technologies for problem-solving, > and not on individual silo technologies. > > > Lastly, fracturing the community we have already created around the KIE brand > and concept is certainly not ideal and will weaken the overall project brands > and success. We believe we'll be able to leverage further what we currently > have in the community and build upon it to create a more cohesive > knowledge-processing solution if everything stays together and people remain > invested in the success of the knowledge engineering platform as a whole, > rather than their individual technologies. > > > We would like to initially keep the PPMC small, ideally 5-7 people. We have > around 50 people identified as initial committers, but having a PMC that > large during incubation is not ideal for the issues
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
I am a mentor of SDAP. Forwarding my vote from the PPMC thread [1]: +1 (binding) Julian [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/vh9472q76kzndcs55pmpjmld8snzn1ny On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 7:19 PM Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > 1.0.0-rc2. > > The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP > (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. > > We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. > > SDAP community vote thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 > > Instructions for building docker images from source can be found here: > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html > Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html > > The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: > > - nexusproto: > - URL: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f > - ingester: > - URL: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea > - nexus: > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ > > For verification, the hashes of the .tar.gz artifacts we are voting on are > as follows: > > apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > > db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 > > apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd > > > apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0. > > The vote is open for 72 hours or until at least 3 “+1” PMC votes are cast > and passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes are > cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 > [ ] +0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > Thank you, > Riley > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0-rc2
Hello, In consideration of the upcoming holiday weekend, let's extend this vote to last to a week from now. Thank you, Riley On 2022/12/23 03:19:10 Riley Kuttruff wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache SDAP (incubating) version > 1.0.0-rc2. > > The Apache SDAP community has voted to approve release of Apache SDAP > (incubating) version 1.0.0-rc2. > > We now request the Incubator PMC review and vote on this release. > > SDAP community vote thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6nmknw8n1flwsqp4n3cromnrck21xmh9 > > Instructions for building docker images from source can be found here: > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/build.html > Instructions for deploying locally to test can be found here: > https://incubator-sdap-nexus.readthedocs.io/en/latest/quickstart.html > > The tags to be voted on are 1.0.0-rc2: > > - nexusproto: > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexusproto/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: f3c726e69997436dd9ee6f9a993d4c95ee490b6f > - ingester: > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-ingester/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: 2c8a9d35320f11a5db2534802f43366ddaff2fea > - nexus: > - URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-sdap-nexus/tree/1.0.0-rc2 > - Commit: f60e98331ac29b57ca40322f8f96e98a5c69e553 > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sdap/apache-sdap-1.0.0-rc2/ > > For verification, the hashes of the .tar.gz artifacts we are voting on are as > follows: > > apache-sdap-ingester-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > db380c3002351e65ec3581a3ff0cacbb7092f46292b0a656a78a919e1409738442e845731050a2160a556a7818f22b2ab4bb6da437200bc0a62419332de49ad7 > > apache-sdap-nexus-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > da34e9830cf5126bac498180d7cdd95bc2cfc13535c7b4355ba51de64e3589a385a969e0cf1a89fa77e436b30c99a48abffab4b4ef03b23982aa33c2e83e8dbd > > > apache-sdap-nexusproto-1.0.0-src.tar.gz: > 05dc8e96d9c49207750c1da13f630493e8d08f5e68733742c157ac6c85ede29aca25f3c94cd706acbbe21cee41ebc052a880b4d6ce859bf510bcc2d66d8f88b2 > > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x4e98c4a32026656e14e0b570fc20035a010e3b7b > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0. > > The vote is open for 72 hours or until at least 3 “+1” PMC votes are cast and > passes if at least 3 +1 PMC votes are > cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SDAP (incubating) 1.0.0 > [ ] +0 No opinion > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > Thank you, > Riley > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
