Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Linkis(Incubating) 1.1.2-RC1
Hi Jean-Baptiste Onofré , Thanks for the checking and guidances. I'd cancel this vote here, will re-initiate a vote after solved the problems you indicated. Thanks again for helping Linkis become a better, more Apache Way compliant project :) XiaoHua Yi Best Regards. Jean-Baptiste Onofré 于2022年6月25日周六 13:26写道： > -1 (binding) > > IMHO, LICENSE file looks incomplete for me and some ASF headers don't look > good. > > Can you please fix that and submit a new release ? > > Regards > JB > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 5:17 PM seayi wrote: > > > > Hello Incubator Community, > > > > The Apache Linkis community has voted and approved the release of Apache > > Linkis(incubating) 1.1.2-RC1. We now kindly request IPMC members and the > > incubator community to help review and vote for this release. > > > > Apache Linkis builds a computation middleware layer to decouple the > upper > > applications and the underlying data engines, provides standardized > > interfaces (REST, JDBC, WebSocket etc.) to easily connect to various > > underlying engines (Spark, Presto, Flink, etc.), while enables cross > engine > > context sharing, unified job& engine governance and orchestration. > > > > Linkis community vote thread: > > • > https://lists.apache.org/thread/h2v71m9pr2z8286386r59c1jhv5f32z7 > > > > Vote result thread: > > • > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4wovq49zroqpd9ttt9f17d8mvdsf2p3p > > > > The release candidate: > > • > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/linkis/1.1.2-RC1/ > > > > Git tag for the release: > > • > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-linkis/releases/tag/release-1.1.2-rc1 > > > > Release notes: > > • https://linkis.apache.org/docs/1.1.2/release-notes-1.1.2/ > > > > The artifacts signed with PGP key [seayi], corresponding to [ > > se...@apache.org], that can be found in keys file: > > • https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/linkis/KEYS > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number > > of votes are reached. > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > More detail checklist please refer: > > • > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist > > > > Steps to validate the release，Please refer to: > > • https://linkis.apache.org/community/how-to-verify > > > > Thanks, > > On behalf of Apache Linkis(Incubating) community > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1
Hi Felix and JB, Sounds good. We'll cancel this vote and prepare a new WIP release that addresses the feedback mentioned in this thread. Best, Hezheng On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:24 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi, > > I would recommend to cancel this vote and prepare a new release including: > - cleanup on the icon and png file about license > - flag DISCLAIMER on WIP > - improve NOTICE file > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 9:27 PM Hezheng Yin > wrote: > > > > Hi Felix, thanks for the suggestion. If we were able to resolve the > > licensing issues Justin raised, would you still recommend us switching to > > WIP DISCLAIMER? > > > > Hi Justin, thanks for the clarification. We have gone through all the > > image files in the release: > > > > 1. All flaticon icons [1] are replaced with blueprintjs icons [2] that > have > > Apache 2.0 license. > > 2. For images created by ourselves, do we need to formally license them? > If > > so, is there a guideline that we can follow? > > 3. In DevLake UI, we also make use of GitHub/GitLab/Jenkins/Jira logos on > > the integration page. We found their logo usage guidelines [3][4][5][6] > > online but couldn't find a formal license for these logos. For example, > the > > GitHub Logos and Usage page [3] states it's ok to "Use the Octocat or > > GitHub logo to advertise that your product has built-in GitHub > > integration". Is it compliant with Apache policy to include such logos in > > the release? > > > > We'll restart the voting process on the DevLake mailing list once we > > address the issues above. > > > > [1] https://www.flaticon.com/pricing > > [2] https://blueprintjs.com/ > > [3] https://github.com/logos > > [4] > > > https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/marketing/corporate-marketing/brand-activation/trademark-guidelines/ > > [5] https://www.jenkins.io/press/ > > [6] https://www.atlassian.com/company/news/press-kit > > > > Best, > > Hezheng > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:52 PM Justin Mclean > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > And to be sure, we should go through the community vote step again > before > > > > making another voting thread in general@incubator.apache.org. Is > this > > > > correct? Thanks in advance! > > > > > > Yes your PPMC will ned to vote on the new release candidate before > > > bringing it for a vote by the incubator PMC. > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > Justin > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1
Hi, > 1. All flaticon icons [1] are replaced with blueprintjs icons [2] that have > Apache 2.0 license. You may need to double check that, this has come up before and they where using a modified version of the Apache license.[1] > 2. For images created by ourselves, do we need to formally license them? If > so, is there a guideline that we can follow? Depends on what you mean by “yourself”, if it was created by committers to the project and not derived from other icons/logos I assume that would be Apache licensed. > 3. In DevLake UI, we also make use of GitHub/GitLab/Jenkins/Jira logos on > the integration page. We found their logo usage guidelines [3][4][5][6] > online but couldn't find a formal license for these logos. I would just follow their guidelines for use of the logos. In some cases 3rd parties only allow their logos to be used in certain ways. You most likely would also need to include trademark attribution. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://github.com/PixarAnimationStudios/USD/issues/1342 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache DevLake (Incubating) v0.11.0-rc1
Hi, If you look at [1] you notice it states "Modified Apache 2.0 License” so this is actually not an Apache license and it should not be called that. Justin 1. https://github.com/PixarAnimationStudios/USD/blob/release/LICENSE.txt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
