Re: [DISCUSS] bprc proposal

[Willem Jiang]

Hi,

I just have a quick look at the proposal, it looks like we need to add
more third party dependencies from the source file in the
directory[1].

[1]https://github.com/brpc/brpc/tree/master/src/butil/third_party

Willem Jiang

Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 1:01 AM Dave Fisher  wrote:
>
> Any suggestions or comments on this proposal before I bring it to a VOTE?
>
> > On Oct 25, 2018, at 7:38 AM, Dave Fisher  wrote:
> >
> > Sorry about that I missed the topic autocorrection.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >> On Oct 24, 2018, at 9:15 PM, Dave Fisher  >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >> I would like to discuss accepting bprc project into the Incubator:
> >> Initially there were five developers from Baidu, but now these are from 
> >> several companies..
> >>
> >> Please accept the brpc podling into the Incubator.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> brpc Proposal
> >>
> >>
> >> Abstract
> >>
> >> brpc is an industrial-grade RPC framework for building reliable and 
> >> high-performance services.
> >>
> >>
> >> Proposal
> >>
> >> We propose to contribute the brpc codebase and associated artifacts(e.g. 
> >> documentation etc.) to the Apache Software Foundation, and aim to build a 
> >> wider open community around it in the 'Apache Way'.
> >>
> >>
> >> Background
> >>
> >> The RPC framework used in Baidu before 2014 was developed at 2008 and 
> >> limited in protocols and performance, and there were also serveral 
> >> implementations focused on their own scenarios from Baidu's different BU. 
> >> As an infrastructural team in Baidu, we tried to build a new framework to 
> >> unify all RPC scenarios inside. The framework was named "baidu-rpc" 
> >> internally the early versions were adopted and online at late 2014. The 
> >> framework was rapidly iterated at 2015-2017, and thousands kinds of 
> >> services and almost all core services adopted it. And in 2017, we 
> >> opensourced it as "brpc" and hope to get more adoptions and contributions 
> >> from outside. At the time of opensourcing, there're more than 1 million 
> >> instances inside Baidu using baidu-rpc (not counting clients).
> >>
> >>
> >> Rationale
> >>
> >> brpc has been approved inside baidu, since many high performance core 
> >> services are using it. And since its open source, it has been adopted by 
> >> several other companies, including Iqiyi, Didi, Sougou, BiliBili 
> >>  >> > etc.
> >>
> >>
> >> Current Status
> >>
> >> brpc has been an open source project on GitHub 
> >>  >> > (https://github.com/brpc/brpc 
> >>   >> >) since 2017.
> >>
> >> Currently it has more than 7.3k stars, 1.6k forks, and is one of the most 
> >> popular repositories in topic of rpc category in GitHub 
> >>  >> > rpc catelogy. It has been 
> >> widely used in Baidu, with 1,000,000+ instances and thousands kinds of 
> >> services. Besides, many other companies have already used it also, such as 
> >> Iqiyi, Didi, Sougou, BiliBili  >> > etc.
> >>
> >>
> >> Meritocracy
> >>
> >> brpc was originally created by Ge Jun and Chen zhangyi inside baidu from 
> >> 2014. Since its opensource in 2017, it has already followed meritocracy 
> >> principles. It accepts multiple contributions from other companies. And 
> >> now, the core developers are from several different companies.
> >>
> >> We will follow Apache way to encourage more developers to contribute in 
> >> this project. We know that only active and committed developers from a 
> >> diverse set of backgrounds can make brpc a successful project.
> >>
> >>
> >> Community
> >>
> >> brpc has been building an active community since its open source. 
> >> Currently, the community includes over 31 contributors. The core 
> >> developers of brpc are listed below.
> >>
> >>
> >> Core Developers
> >>
> >> Ge Jun(https://github.com/jamesge  
> >> > jge...@gmail.com 
> >>  >> >)
> >> Chen Zhangyi(https://github.com/chenzhangyi 
> >>   >> > frozen@gmail.com 
> >>  >> >)
> >> Jiang Rujie(https://github.com/old-bear  
> >> > 
> >> jrjb...@gmail.com 

Re: [DISCUSS] bprc proposal

[Justin Mclean]

HI,

> I just have a quick look at the proposal, it looks like we need to add
> more third party dependencies from the source file in the
> directory[1].

You can add them but IMO not required as this will be sorted out during IP 
clearance and release review during graduation.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

I’m +1 (binding) on releasing the source package, but -1 on the binary. 
Assuming you get enough votes you could IMO just release the source artefact.

I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- no unexpected binary files
- can compile from source

Two very minor things:
- You might want to consider signing the release with an Apache email address.
- What is contained in CREDITS is ally in NOTICE (in a slightly different form).
- Please include build instructions in the released software and not a link to 
them.
- At some point the documentation [1] should move to Apache infrastructure

For the binary the LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER is missing and the LICENSE 
and NOTICE are also missing from META-INF in the jars. See the release policy 
on this. [2]

Thanks,
Justin

1. https://incubator-crail.readthedocs.org
2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#distribute-other-artifacts
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.0-incubating Candidate 5

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

+1 (binding)

I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE fine
- All source files have ASF headers
- No unexpected binary files

I was unable to compile but probably my setup. It would be good to see some 
build instructions included in the release rather than having to find them 
online.

I also notice that a comment from a previous release re "Copyright 2015 The 
Heron Authors” appearing in files has not been fixed, please fix in the next 
release.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Heron Release 0.20.0-incubating Candidate 5

[Karthik Ramasamy]

 
 

 +1 (non binding)
 

 
 

 
>  
> On Oct 31, 2018 at 10:31 AM,  mailto:freen...@gmail.com)>  wrote:
>  
>  
>  
>  Hi All, 
>
> This is the 5th release candidate for Apache Heron, version 
> 0.20.0-incubating. Thanks everyone for providing various feedback for the 
> previous release candidates at the @dev mailing list voting process. This 
> release candidate passed the project's dev voting process so we are 
> bringing it to a broader voting process. 
>
> It is the starting point of Heron and contains heron's main features, such 
> as core streaming 
> processing, stateful processing, streamlet API, API server, eco support, 
> etc. 
>
> The full list of changes and fixes are available: 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-heron/compare/0.17.8...release/v-0.20.0-incubating
>  
>
> *** Please download, test and vote on this release. This vote will stay open 
> for at least 72 hours *** 
>
> Source files: 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/heron/heron-0.20.0-incubating-candidate-5/
>  
>
> SHA-512 checksums: 
> 27890ab30fc3e69b627f47d58d178d1a7dffa9dbe4ebbb5a5aa77caaac882fdc2b6f98b3b76210020db0fa3fd86e294cba214f86072e449837e1b7615cd6124a
>  
> incubator-heron-v-0.20.0-incubating-candidate-5.tar.gz 
>
> The tag to be voted upon: 
> v0.20.0-incubating-candidate-5 (45043bb6dcef1e8089c0834f17f8be0cc3f451d3) 
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-heron/releases/tag/v-0.20.0-incubating-candidate-5
>  
>
> Please download the source package, and follow the compiling guide( 
> https://apache.github.io/incubator-heron/docs/developers/compiling/compiling/)
>  
> to build and run the Heron locally. 
>
> -- 
> Best Regards, 
> Neng 
>  

Re: [DISCUSS] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal

[Xin Wang]

+1 no-binding
Sharing-Sphere is a awesmome relational database middleware. It's great for
it to be incubated in Apache community.

彭勇升 Peng Yongsheng <8082...@qq.com> 于2018年11月2日周五 下午11:59写道：

> Thanks to Sharding-Sphere team.
>
>
> My introduction:
>
> The company I worked for and the company I’m working for are using
> Sharding-Sphere. And the Sharding-Sphere is one of the SkyWalking’s OAP
> storage implementation.
>
> So, I think I can help so more, whether coding or community.
>
> —
> Yongsheng Peng
> Apache SkyWalking PPMC member
>
>
>
> > 在 2018年11月2日，23:35，吴晟 Sheng Wu  写道：
> >
> > Based inside project discussion, a volunteer and new initial committer,
> Yongsheng Peng added to the proposal.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sheng Wu
> > Apache SkyWalking
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Original --
> > From:  "吴晟 Sheng Wu";
> > Date:  Mon, Oct 29, 2018 08:25 PM
> > To:  "general";
> >
> > Subject:  Re: [DISCUSS] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 no-binding
> >
> >
> > Welcome Sharding-Sphere, a wild used sql proxy(in/out of process)
> project join the Apache Incubator.
> > The status of project is good. The community is diversity, contributors
> from different companies or as individuals.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sheng Wu
> > Apache SkyWalking
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Original --
> > From:  "zhangli...@apache.org";
> > Date:  Mon, Oct 29, 2018 05:27 PM
> > To:  "general";
> >
> > Subject:  [DISCUSS] Sharding-Sphere incubation proposal
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Apache Incubator Community,
> >
> > I would like to start a discussion about the incubation of
> Sharding-Sphere
> > at Apache.
> >
> > Please accept the Sharding-Sphere podling into the Incubator.
> >
> > We have 4 mentors, also we are welcome other volunteers to mentor us.
> >
> > The proposal can be found at
> > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ShardingSphereProposal . Here is the
> text
> > of it:
> >
> >
> > = Abstract =
> > Sharding-Sphere is an ecosystem of transparent distributed database
> > middleware, focusing on data sharding, distributed transaction and
> database
> > orchestration. It provides maximum compatibility for applications through
> > Sharding-JDBC (a driver to implement JDBC) or Sharding-Proxy (a proxy to
> > implement database protocol).
> >
> > = Proposal =
> > With a large number of end users, Sharding-Sphere has a fairly huge
> > community in China. It is also widely adopted by many [[
> > http://shardingsphere.io/community/en/company/|companies and
> > organizations]] as a solution to process their massive amounts of data.
> >
> > We believe that bringing Sharding-Sphere into Apache Software Foundation
> > could advance development of a stronger and more diverse open source
> > community.
> >
> > Dangdang submits this proposal to donate Sharding-Sphere's source codes
> and
> > all related documentations to Apache Software Foundation. The codes are
> > already under Apache License Version 2.0.
> >
> >  * Code base: https://github.com/sharding-sphere/sharding-sphere
> >
> >  * Web site: http://shardingsphere.io/
> >
> >  * Documentations: http://shardingsphere.io/document/current/
> >
> >  * Community: http://shardingsphere.io/community/
> >
> > = Background =
> >
> > Relational database hardly supports such huge amounts of data any more
> > which has increased rapidly in recent years, but for reason of technique
> > maturity, developers and DBAs still want to use it to persist core data.
> >
> > Sharding-Sphere was open sourced on Github in 2016. At the very
> beginning,
> > Sharding-Sphere is just a JDBC driver for data sharding (name as
> > Sharding-JDBC) at Dangdang internal framework; now it offers data
> sharding,
> > distributed transaction and database orchestration. Besides JDBC, proxy
> to
> > implement MySQL database protocol is also supported at present.
> > Furthermore, our roadmap includes Proxy for PostgreSQL protocol, Sidecar
> > model, data repica and elastic data scalability function as well.
> >
> > Due to the extension of project, we provide proxy model and sidecar model
> > in addition to JDBC model. Therefore, we rename it to Sharding-Sphere by
> [[
> > https://github.com/sharding-sphere/sharding-sphere/issues/788|a public
> > vote]], which refers to a sharding ecosphere with Sharding-JDBC,
> > Sharding-Proxy and Sharding Sidecar as its three sub-projects.
> >
> > Sharding-JDBC has won the [[
> http://www.oschina.net/project/top_cn_2016|TOP
> > 20 most popular open source projects in China 2016]].
> >
> > = Rationale =
> >
> > Relational database still plays a very important role on current
> > application system. The maturity of products and surrounding ecosystem,
> the
> > friendliness of its data query and developers' and DBAs' mastery of it,
> > cannot be completely replaced with other types of database in the near
> > future. However, current relational database cannot support clo

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

[Julian Hyde]

Forwarding my vote from the PPMC vote: +1 (binding)

I checked the source artifacts but not the binary artifacts. Therefore
I agree with Justin that the source artifacts can be included in the
release but not the binary artifacts.

Julian

On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:04 AM Justin Mclean  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m +1 (binding) on releasing the source package, but -1 on the binary. 
> Assuming you get enough votes you could IMO just release the source artefact.
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes good
> - LICENSE and NOTICE fine
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - no unexpected binary files
> - can compile from source
>
> Two very minor things:
> - You might want to consider signing the release with an Apache email address.
> - What is contained in CREDITS is ally in NOTICE (in a slightly different 
> form).
> - Please include build instructions in the released software and not a link 
> to them.
> - At some point the documentation [1] should move to Apache infrastructure
>
> For the binary the LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER is missing and the LICENSE 
> and NOTICE are also missing from META-INF in the jars. See the release policy 
> on this. [2]
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://incubator-crail.readthedocs.org
> 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#distribute-other-artifacts
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Griffin (incubating) as a TLP

[William Guo]

Hi all,

With 13 +1 non-binding votes, 5 +1 binding votes and no -1 or +/-0 votes,
This vote PASSES.

Thanks to everyone who voted.
The vote tally is attached.

Non-binding:
邵亮
Jenny Li
ShaoFeng Shi
Eugene Liu
Sheng Wu
Alex Lv
Yin Wan
John Liu
Kevin Yao
Matt Sicker
Xin Wang
Li De
He Wang


Binding:
Willem Jiang
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Dave Fisher
Uma Gangumalla
Henry Saputra


Thanks,
William.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

[Luciano Resende]

If the podling decide to release only the source artifacts I would be +1
(binding) for that as Justin and Julian mentioned.

On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 14:07 Julian Hyde  wrote:

> Forwarding my vote from the PPMC vote: +1 (binding)
>
> I checked the source artifacts but not the binary artifacts. Therefore
> I agree with Justin that the source artifacts can be included in the
> release but not the binary artifacts.
>
> Julian
>
> On Sun, Nov 4, 2018 at 1:04 AM Justin Mclean 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’m +1 (binding) on releasing the source package, but -1 on the binary.
> Assuming you get enough votes you could IMO just release the source
> artefact.
> >
> > I checked:
> > - incubating in name
> > - signatures and hashes good
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE fine
> > - DISCLAIMER exists
> > - no unexpected binary files
> > - can compile from source
> >
> > Two very minor things:
> > - You might want to consider signing the release with an Apache email
> address.
> > - What is contained in CREDITS is ally in NOTICE (in a slightly
> different form).
> > - Please include build instructions in the released software and not a
> link to them.
> > - At some point the documentation [1] should move to Apache
> infrastructure
> >
> > For the binary the LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER is missing and the
> LICENSE and NOTICE are also missing from META-INF in the jars. See the
> release policy on this. [2]
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://incubator-crail.readthedocs.org
> > 2.
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#distribute-other-artifacts
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
> --
Sent from my Mobile device

List of Current Podling pages are missing

[???? Sheng Wu]

Hi


I just noticed `List of Current Podlings`[1] and SkyWalking[2](maybe other 
podling projects too) pages are missing, 404 from my side.


[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/#current
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/skywalking.html


--
Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking

Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing

[Raja Sundaram Ganesan]

Actually, all the podling pages return 404.

-Raja

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:43 AM 吴晟 Sheng Wu  wrote:

> Hi
>
>
> I just noticed `List of Current Podlings`[1] and SkyWalking[2](maybe other
> podling projects too) pages are missing, 404 from my side.
>
>
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/#current
> [2] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/skywalking.html
>
>
> --
> Sheng Wu
> Apache SkyWalking

Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

Thanks for reporting - looks like there an issue with the incubator site build 
at the moment. [1]

Thanks,
Justin

1.https://builds.apache.org/job/Incubator%20Site/663/console
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing

[Justin Mclean]

Hi,

Not sure what the issue was but rebuilding the site fixed it, if’s there’s 
still any issues please post here.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing

[???? Sheng Wu]

Cool. Thanks. They are back now.



Sheng Wu
Apache SkyWalking

From Wu Sheng 's phone.


-- Original --
From: Justin Mclean 
Date: Mon,Nov 5,2018 2:43 PM
To: general 
Subject: Re: List of Current Podling pages are missing



Hi,

Not sure what the issue was but rebuilding the site fixed it, if??s there??s 
still any issues please post here.

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org