date:20160711

Re: Warning from d...@juneau.incubator.apache.org

2016-07-11 Thread Nick Kew

On Sun, 2016-07-10 at 20:52 -0700, Danese Cooper wrote:
> I get these in spates. As James says they don't seem to cause real trouble so 
> I have learned to ignore them. They only happen between Apache mail server 
> and Gmail.

It's not just gmail, nor just any-mail.

It was those messages that persuaded me to stitch to using
my @apache.org address when I sign up to an apache list
(10+ years ago).  Delivering to an @apache.org address
triggers them too.

-- 
Nick Kew

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC report for July 2016

2016-07-11 Thread John D. Ament

All,

Below is the current draft of the board report.  There's still a large
number of podlings not signed off, mentors don't forget to sign off or
review with the podling changes required to get a sign off.

John



Incubator PMC report for July 2016

The Apache Incubator is the entry path into the ASF for projects and
codebases wishing to become part of the Foundation's efforts.

There are 58 podlings currently undergoing incubation.  We have one
podling planning to graduate this month and added four podlings to the
roster.  June was a busy month, adding two IPMC member, and completing
twelve releases, in addition to other activities.


* Community

  New IPMC members:

  - Jochen Wiedmann
  - Tim Ellison

  People who left the IPMC:

  - N/A

* New Podlings

  - CarbonData
  - DistributedLog
  - Juneau
  - Pirk

* Graduations

  The board has motions for the following:

  - Kudu

* Releases

  The following releases entered distribution during the month of
  June:

  - 2016-06-01 Apache Range 0.5.3-incubating
  - 2016-06-03 Apache Trafodion 2.0.0-incubating
  - 2016-06-06 Apache Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating
  - 2016-06-06 Apache Omid (incubating) 0.8.2.0
  - 2016-06-09 Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.0
  - 2016-06-10 Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating
  - 2016-06-14 Apache Beam 0.1.0-incubating
  - 2016-06-22 Apache Myriad 0.2.0-incubating
  - 2016-06-26 Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating
  - 2016-06-28 Apache Slider 0.91.0-incubating
  - 2016-06-30 Apache Taverna 3.1.0-incubating
  - 2016-06-30 Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1

* IP Clearance

  - N/A

* Legal / Trademarks

  - An audit was conducted of podling websites to see how far off they are
compared to the Incubator's branding guide.  Eleven podlings were found to
be in complete violation and requests to correct have been issued.  Most
have already corrected the issue.
  - Justin has provided a summary of building NOTICE and LICENSE files in
the form of a screencast for podlings to use as reference.

* Infrastructure

  - There are open questions around the usage of GitHub issues for issue
tracking, it is unclear if it is a valid tool to use.

* Miscellaneous

  - A vote was started to retire the CMDA podling.  It was later canceled,
giving them another three months to try to work through community issues.
Public mailing list participation has increased as a part of this result.
  - Discussions are resuming to retire the OpenAz podling, as only one of
the three volunteers who stepped up to resume has availability to work on
the podling.

* Credits

  - Report Manager:

 Summary of podling reports 

* Still getting started at the Incubator

  - CarbonData
  - DistributedLog
  - Fluo
  - Gossip
  - Juneau
  - Pirk
  - Pony Mail
  - PredictionIO

* Not yet ready to graduate

  No release:

  - Airflow
  - HAWQ
  - Milagro

  Community growth:

  - FreeMarker
  - Geode
  - MADlib
  - Metron
  - Mynewt
  - Rya
  - Tephra

* Ready to graduate

  The Board has motions for the following:

  - Kudu

* Did not report, expected next month

  - CMDA
  - HORN
  - OpenAz
  - Quickstep


--
   Table of Contents
Airflow
BatchEE
CarbonData
Climate Model Diagnostic Analyzer
DataFu
DistributedLog
Fluo
FreeMarker
Gearpump
Geode
Gossip
HAWQ
HORN
iota
Juneau
MADlib
Metron
Milagro
Mynewt
ODF Toolkit
OpenAz
Pirk
Pony Mail
PredictionIO
Quickstep
Rya
Tephra

--


Airflow

Airflow is a workflow automation and scheduling system that can be used to
author and manage data pipelines.

Airflow has been incubating since 2016-03-31.

Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:

  1. Getting an Apache release out.
  2. Podling name search has to happen.
  3. Verify distribution rights

Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
aware of?

  We've done a lot of work on distribution rights (3), but we need to wrap
  it up.

  We've been pushing out our release due to stability concerns and the need
  for a testing framework

How has the community developed since the last report?

  - Since our last podling report 1 month ago, we grew our contributors from
148 to 160.
  - In June 2016 we had 56 commits.
  - We organized a meet up at WePay. We also had one before at Airbnb.
  - We had several committers meetings.
  - 1 new committer. 2 offers were given but 1 was declined.

How has the project developed since the last report?

  - Migrated all files to contain Apache 2.0 license headers.
  - Replaced charting library that was non-Apache 2.0 compliant (a large
effort).
  - Release Airflow incubator website, and added appropriate branding and
disclaimers.

Date of last release:

  None (had a non-Apache release on 2016-06-13)*

  * Release was discussed and approved here:


https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/inc

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

2016-07-11 Thread Casey Stella

Thanks for the careful attention, Justin.

Regarding the sample data for the StixExtractorTest.java, that came from
here

and
I considered it to be 3-clause BSD licensed due to the underlying project
license here
.
If you think it's clearer, we can pull it into its own file and mention it
in the LICENSE for next release (JIRA here
).

Regarding the effective_tld_names.dat, we had this discussion last release
and believe that they are reference data and should be considered
acceptable. We did note them in the LICENSE here
.  The
rationale around why we think they should be acceptable as per category B
is as follows:

   - It's reference data, so not source code, so I feel that the category B
   wording was trying to make the distinction between source code and non-src
   code (i.e. "binary/object" in their language)
   - It's not source code, so paragraph 3 shouldn't apply, but even so, it
   has not changed since the last release
   - It's currently only supported for a legacy enrichment adapter, but
   will be removed next release as we found a better way of doing things.

Thoughts?

Best,
Casey



On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> -1 (binding) until MPL licensed source issue resolved.
>
> I checked:
> - name contains incubating
> - signatures and hashes good
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE is OK, but look to be missing one permissive license? and
> assuming its ok it would be best if the MPL was in another file.
> - NOTICE is OK (but perhaps requires a notice from MPL?)
> - All ASF source file have apache header
> - No unexpected binary files
> - Can compile from source
>
> For the license I think this file [1] may incorrectly have an apache
> header. I’m also unsure of it’s license, but it’s likely to be permissive
> [2] and needs to be mentioned in LICENSE. Can you fix this in the next
> release please.
>
> There is a more serious issue in that the source includes MPL licensed
> files.[4][5][6] This is a category B license [3] and as such files under
> these terms can only included in binary form, but they plain text. They are
> not small (10,000 lines) and given they contain list of domain name it
> seems likely they they would change so I don’t think the last paragraph in
> [3] applies either. It would also be a good idea to list where they come
> from.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1.
> ./metron-platform/metron-data-management/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/dataloads/extractor/stix/StixExtractorTest.java
> 2. http://stixproject.github.io/legal/
> 3. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
> 4.
> ./metron-platform/metron-common/src/test/resources/effective_tld_names.dat
> 5.
> ./metron-platform/metron-enrichment/src/main/resources/effective_tld_names.dat
> 6.
> ./metron-platform/metron-parsers/src/test/resources/effective_tld_names.dat
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

2016-07-11 Thread Justin Mclean

Hi,

> .
> If you think it's clearer, we can pull it into its own file and mention it
> in the LICENSE for next release

Sounds fine to me.

> Regarding the effective_tld_names.dat, we had this discussion last release
> and believe that they are reference data and should be considered
> acceptable. 

The nothing that I can see in the legal answered questions to say that Category 
B “reference data” in text form is acceptable. 

Was this discussed on legal discuss? Is there a JIRA anywhere saying it’s OK to 
make a source release containing those files?

Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

2016-07-11 Thread Daniel Gruno

+1 (binding) also.

With regards,
Daniel.

On 07/09/2016 10:08 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 18:16 -0600, Jan van Doorn wrote:
> 
>> I don't think the association with ATS would hold us back, but I do think it 
>> could give prospective users of Traffic Control the impression that it only 
>> works with ATS. This is true now, but won't be in the future.
> 
> I'm not sure a bit of internal organisation will make much difference
> once you start listing TC+TS and TC+Other as equally valid options.
> But I don't want to make an issue of it.
> 
>> Only one or two people actively work on both projects, the development 
>> communities are mostly separate.
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
>> I'm not familiar with the HTTPD and APR history, is there a lesson we should 
>> learn from that?
> 
> The main issue we've found is that with a close relationship and with
> a large overlap between the dev teams, we've often found a development
> in HTTPD driving one in APR, even to the point of "we need a new APR
> release that'll support [new HTTPD feature]".  At the same time, the
> original reason for the separation - that APR has applications outside
> httpd (Apache SVN being one such) - works well.
> 
> On reflection, you probably have a cleaner separation than that anyway.
> 
> +1 (binding) to your vote.
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

[VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

2016-07-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

Hi guys,


sirona vote passed on dev@ so here is the general vote (the dev thread was
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/sirona-dev/201607.mbox/browser).

This release is mainly about getting fixes out + some enhancements on the
path tracking + few new features to integrate with existing infrastructures
like splunk.

Release notes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314925&version=12334027
Keys file: *https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sirona/KEYS
*
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sirona/tags/sirona-0.4-incubating/
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesirona-1003
Dev dist:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sirona/0.4-incubating/

Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.

Please vote:
[ ] +1 release it
[ ] +0 don't care
[ ] -1 no cause ${blocker}

Thanks,
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Wordpress Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

2016-07-11 Thread John D. Ament

Romain,

I'm failing to see the vote result on dev@sirona.  I see votes from you and
Olivier.

John

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:07 PM Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
>
> sirona vote passed on dev@ so here is the general vote (the dev thread was
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/sirona-dev/201607.mbox/browser).
>
> This release is mainly about getting fixes out + some enhancements on the
> path tracking + few new features to integrate with existing infrastructures
> like splunk.
>
> Release notes:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314925&version=12334027
> Keys file: *https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sirona/KEYS
> *
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sirona/tags/sirona-0.4-incubating/
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesirona-1003
> Dev dist:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sirona/0.4-incubating/
>
> Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 don't care
> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker}
>
> Thanks,
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Wordpress Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

2016-07-11 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau

@John: JL just voted too - why i closed the vote on dev@. Seems
mail-archives didn't eat it yet


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau  |  Blog
 | Old Wordpress Blog
 | Github  |
LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
 | JavaEE Factory


2016-07-11 22:19 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :

> Romain,
>
> I'm failing to see the vote result on dev@sirona.  I see votes from you
> and
> Olivier.
>
> John
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:07 PM Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> >
> > sirona vote passed on dev@ so here is the general vote (the dev thread
> was
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/sirona-dev/201607.mbox/browser
> ).
> >
> > This release is mainly about getting fixes out + some enhancements on the
> > path tracking + few new features to integrate with existing
> infrastructures
> > like splunk.
> >
> > Release notes:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314925&version=12334027
> > Keys file: *https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sirona/KEYS
> > *
> > Tag:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sirona/tags/sirona-0.4-incubating/
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesirona-1003
> > Dev dist:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sirona/0.4-incubating/
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> > everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1 release it
> > [ ] +0 don't care
> > [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker}
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Wordpress Blog
> >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> >  | JavaEE Factory
> > 
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

2016-07-11 Thread John D. Ament

Ah ok, I see it on Pony Mail:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ec6f2b78221d6287d0db3cc8a07fdec72161a54b7e032961f664ec70@%3Cdev.sirona.apache.org%3E

Though for some reason this is marked as a private list.

John

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:21 PM Romain Manni-Bucau 
wrote:

> @John: JL just voted too - why i closed the vote on dev@. Seems
> mail-archives didn't eat it yet
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Wordpress Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
>  | JavaEE Factory
> 
>
> 2016-07-11 22:19 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament :
>
> > Romain,
> >
> > I'm failing to see the vote result on dev@sirona.  I see votes from you
> > and
> > Olivier.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:07 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > >
> > > sirona vote passed on dev@ so here is the general vote (the dev thread
> > was
> > >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/sirona-dev/201607.mbox/browser
> > ).
> > >
> > > This release is mainly about getting fixes out + some enhancements on
> the
> > > path tracking + few new features to integrate with existing
> > infrastructures
> > > like splunk.
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314925&version=12334027
> > > Keys file: *https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/sirona/KEYS
> > > *
> > > Tag:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sirona/tags/sirona-0.4-incubating/
> > > Staging repository:
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesirona-1003
> > > Dev dist:
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sirona/0.4-incubating/
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72h or until we get 3 +1 bindings. Binding or not
> > > everyone is very welcomed to test and vote.
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > > [ ] +1 release it
> > > [ ] +0 don't care
> > > [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker}
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >  | Old Wordpress Blog
> > >  | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn  | Tomitriber
> > >  | JavaEE Factory
> > > 
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

2016-07-11 Thread Casey Stella

Ok, fair points.  The discussion was within the project's mailing list here

rather
than a discussion with legal.  As such, we're going to do the work to
remove that reference data and cut a new release candidate.  Thanks for the
attention again. :)

Best,

Casey

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > <
> https://github.com/STIXProject/stixproject.github.io/blob/master/LICENSE>.
> > If you think it's clearer, we can pull it into its own file and mention
> it
> > in the LICENSE for next release
>
> Sounds fine to me.
>
> > Regarding the effective_tld_names.dat, we had this discussion last
> release
> > and believe that they are reference data and should be considered
> > acceptable.
>
> The nothing that I can see in the legal answered questions to say that
> Category B “reference data” in text form is acceptable.
>
> Was this discussed on legal discuss? Is there a JIRA anywhere saying it’s
> OK to make a source release containing those files?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Re: Warning from d...@juneau.incubator.apache.org

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC report for July 2016

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

Re: [VOTE] Accept Traffic Control into the Apache Incubator

[VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.4-incubating

Re: [VOTE] Releasing Apache Metron 0.2.0BETA-RC2

10 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information