date:20150823

[VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

2015-08-23 Thread jan i

Hi

The corinthia podling have voted on a release and would now like the IPMC
to vote.

We thank Justin Mclean for his highly valuable help in getting the bits
right.

Release artifacts can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/

In case of doubt the signing has been done with my key (j...@apache.org)
which are available in apache KEYS as well as public servers.

Please Vote:
[ ] +1 for accepting the release
[ ] +0 for not caring about the release
[ ] -1 for not accepting the release, must give a reason.

Rules are the normal
min. 3 +1 and no -1

Vote runs at least until Thursday 20th August or continue until we have the
needed 3 +1.

In the PPMC VOTE 2 IPMC cast a +1
Daniel Gruno cast a +1
Jan Iversen cast a +1

Thanks in advance for helping us making our first release.
rgds
jan i.

-- Forwarded message --
From: jan i 
Date: 23 August 2015 at 10:10
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
To: "d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org" 

Hi

I am pleased to announce that we can continue with our release. It has been
a long
journey so far and the next step is to have IPMC vote for the release.

The vote passed with:
8 +1 (include 1 Mentor vote)
0 +0 (Dennis gave this in the PRE-VOTE, but wrote "I do not give permission
for this to be applied automatically to a genuine [VOTE]" so it is not
counted.
0 -1

4 PPMC abstained from voting (will be discussed later on private).

Daniel Gruno and Myself have binding IPMC votes, which I will transfer.

rgds
jan i.

On 20 August 2015 at 21:27, Dorte Fjalland 
wrote:

> +1
>
> Regards
> Dorte
> El 20/8/2015 17:15, "Louis Suárez-Potts"  escribió:
>
> > +1
> > louis
> >
> > PS thanks for the reminder.
> >
> >
> > > On 18 Aug 15, at 14:06, jan i  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > We have found some errors during the PRE-VOTE phase, which made that
> > period
> > > very
> > > valuable instead of jumping direct to a VOTE.
> > >
> > > This is the call for the official VOTE for
> > incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip
> > >
> > > and the signature:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip.asc
> > >
> > > The vote we will follow the standard guidelines:
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority
> approval
> > >  --
> > i.e.,
> > > at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and
> there
> > > must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be vetoed."
> > >
> > > VOTE runs until Monday 23th August, where the IPMC VOTE will start.
> > >
> > > I invite our mentors to vote, since their vote count as IPMC.
> > >
> > > All IPMC who vote, please write if you do NOT want your vote to be
> > > transferred to the IPMC vote.
> > >
> > > rgds
> > > jan i
> > >
> > > Vote:
> > > [ ] +1, I agree in releasing the artifacts
> > > [ ] +0, I do not care if we release the artifacts
> > > [ ] -1, I do not want the artifacts to be release because 
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

2015-08-23 Thread jan i

Sorry I did mean to write:

Vote runs at least until Thursday 27th August or continue until we have the
needed 3 +1.

rgds
jan i.


On 23 August 2015 at 10:24, jan i  wrote:

> Hi
>
> The corinthia podling have voted on a release and would now like the IPMC
> to vote.
>
> We thank Justin Mclean for his highly valuable help in getting the bits
> right.
>
> Release artifacts can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/
> 
>
> In case of doubt the signing has been done with my key (j...@apache.org)
> which are available in apache KEYS as well as public servers.
>
> Please Vote:
> [ ] +1 for accepting the release
> [ ] +0 for not caring about the release
> [ ] -1 for not accepting the release, must give a reason.
>
> Rules are the normal
> min. 3 +1 and no -1
>
> Vote runs at least until Thursday 20th August or continue until we have
> the needed 3 +1.
>
> In the PPMC VOTE 2 IPMC cast a +1
> Daniel Gruno cast a +1
> Jan Iversen cast a +1
>
> Thanks in advance for helping us making our first release.
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: jan i 
> Date: 23 August 2015 at 10:10
> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
> To: "d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org" <
> d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I am pleased to announce that we can continue with our release. It has
> been a long
> journey so far and the next step is to have IPMC vote for the release.
>
> The vote passed with:
> 8 +1 (include 1 Mentor vote)
> 0 +0 (Dennis gave this in the PRE-VOTE, but wrote "I do not give
> permission for this to be applied automatically to a genuine [VOTE]" so it
> is not counted.
> 0 -1
>
> 4 PPMC abstained from voting (will be discussed later on private).
>
> Daniel Gruno and Myself have binding IPMC votes, which I will transfer.
>
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
> On 20 August 2015 at 21:27, Dorte Fjalland 
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards
>> Dorte
>> El 20/8/2015 17:15, "Louis Suárez-Potts"  escribió:
>>
>> > +1
>> > louis
>> >
>> > PS thanks for the reminder.
>> >
>> >
>> > > On 18 Aug 15, at 14:06, jan i  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi.
>> > >
>> > > We have found some errors during the PRE-VOTE phase, which made that
>> > period
>> > > very
>> > > valuable instead of jumping direct to a VOTE.
>> > >
>> > > This is the call for the official VOTE for
>> > incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip
>> > >
>> > > and the signature:
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip.asc
>> > >
>> > > The vote we will follow the standard guidelines:
>> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>> > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority
>> approval
>> > >  --
>> > i.e.,
>> > > at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and
>> there
>> > > must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
>> vetoed."
>> > >
>> > > VOTE runs until Monday 23th August, where the IPMC VOTE will start.
>> > >
>> > > I invite our mentors to vote, since their vote count as IPMC.
>> > >
>> > > All IPMC who vote, please write if you do NOT want your vote to be
>> > > transferred to the IPMC vote.
>> > >
>> > > rgds
>> > > jan i
>> > >
>> > > Vote:
>> > > [ ] +1, I agree in releasing the artifacts
>> > > [ ] +0, I do not care if we release the artifacts
>> > > [ ] -1, I do not want the artifacts to be release because 
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

2015-08-23 Thread John D. Ament

Jan,

Couple of notes:

- File should be named XX-incubating not incubator-XX.
- You have a LINK_DEPENDENCIES.txt which seems to represents a NOTICES
file.  As well as a DISCLAIMER file.  Not sure its role.
- Remove the file extension from NOTICE/LICENSES.txt.
- Your source distribution includes w3c-tidy-html5 plus its license, but is
not references in your NOTICE file.

- Files missing headers:
- InfoPlist.strings
- DocFormats-info.plist
- The entire test/data directory (maybe its a limitation of the data?)

John

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:24 AM jan i  wrote:

> Hi
>
> The corinthia podling have voted on a release and would now like the IPMC
> to vote.
>
> We thank Justin Mclean for his highly valuable help in getting the bits
> right.
>
> Release artifacts can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/
> <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip.asc
> >
>
> In case of doubt the signing has been done with my key (j...@apache.org)
> which are available in apache KEYS as well as public servers.
>
> Please Vote:
> [ ] +1 for accepting the release
> [ ] +0 for not caring about the release
> [ ] -1 for not accepting the release, must give a reason.
>
> Rules are the normal
> min. 3 +1 and no -1
>
> Vote runs at least until Thursday 20th August or continue until we have the
> needed 3 +1.
>
> In the PPMC VOTE 2 IPMC cast a +1
> Daniel Gruno cast a +1
> Jan Iversen cast a +1
>
> Thanks in advance for helping us making our first release.
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: jan i 
> Date: 23 August 2015 at 10:10
> Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
> To: "d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org" <
> d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> Hi
>
> I am pleased to announce that we can continue with our release. It has been
> a long
> journey so far and the next step is to have IPMC vote for the release.
>
> The vote passed with:
> 8 +1 (include 1 Mentor vote)
> 0 +0 (Dennis gave this in the PRE-VOTE, but wrote "I do not give permission
> for this to be applied automatically to a genuine [VOTE]" so it is not
> counted.
> 0 -1
>
> 4 PPMC abstained from voting (will be discussed later on private).
>
> Daniel Gruno and Myself have binding IPMC votes, which I will transfer.
>
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>
> On 20 August 2015 at 21:27, Dorte Fjalland 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards
> > Dorte
> > El 20/8/2015 17:15, "Louis Suárez-Potts"  escribió:
> >
> > > +1
> > > louis
> > >
> > > PS thanks for the reminder.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 18 Aug 15, at 14:06, jan i  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > We have found some errors during the PRE-VOTE phase, which made that
> > > period
> > > > very
> > > > valuable instead of jumping direct to a VOTE.
> > > >
> > > > This is the call for the official VOTE for
> > > incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip
> > > >
> > > > and the signature:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/corinthia/incubator-corinthia_release_0.1.zip.asc
> > > >
> > > > The vote we will follow the standard guidelines:
> > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > > > "Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority
> > approval
> > > >  --
> > > i.e.,
> > > > at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively for release, and
> > there
> > > > must be more positive than negative votes. Releases may not be
> vetoed."
> > > >
> > > > VOTE runs until Monday 23th August, where the IPMC VOTE will start.
> > > >
> > > > I invite our mentors to vote, since their vote count as IPMC.
> > > >
> > > > All IPMC who vote, please write if you do NOT want your vote to be
> > > > transferred to the IPMC vote.
> > > >
> > > > rgds
> > > > jan i
> > > >
> > > > Vote:
> > > > [ ] +1, I agree in releasing the artifacts
> > > > [ ] +0, I do not care if we release the artifacts
> > > > [ ] -1, I do not want the artifacts to be release because 
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

2015-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean

Hi,

> - File should be named XX-incubating not incubator-XX.

Yep that should be the case - see 3.1 of [1], but I think this can be corrected 
next release.

> - You have a LINK_DEPENDENCIES.txt which seems to represents a NOTICES
> file.  As well as a DISCLAIMER file.  Not sure its role.

A disclaimer is required and is usually in a DISCLAIMER file [2].
"For releases, the text SHOULD be included in a separate DISCLAIMER file stored 
alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files.”

Link dependancies don’t need to be listed in the NOTICE file but only what is 
actually bundled in the release. [3]

> - Remove the file extension from NOTICE/LICENSES.txt.

.txt is acceptable see [4] "They may be named LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt"

> - Your source distribution includes w3c-tidy-html5 plus its license, but is
> not references in your NOTICE file.

IMO there no need as it is under permissive BSD style license licensed [5].

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
2. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/branding.html#disclaimers
3. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#bundled-vs-non-bundled
4. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#source-tree-location
5. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

2015-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean

Hi,

+1 binding

I checked:
 - signatures and hashes correct
 - file names contain incubator rather than incubating - but intent is clear
 - DISCLAIMER exits
 - LICENSE and NOTICE correct
 - All source files have Apache headers
 - No unexpected binary files

I wasn’t to able to compile from source as I don’t have the correct environment 
set up, but I could follow the build instructions.

Please fix the release artefact name for the net release - incubating rather 
than incubator.

Things you may want to think about changing of for the next release, however 
none are actually required.
 - put the hashes in .md5 / .sha files rather than CHECKSUMS (tends to be the 
way it’s done)
 - have the version number in the unzipped directory (incubator-corinthia)
 - InfoPlist.strings has zero real content so an Apache header not needed but 
could be added for completeness
 - Be nice to have the build instruction in the release and not referenced via 
a URL (as the URL and it’s contents may change)

Thanks,
Justin


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32

2015-08-23 Thread Daniel Gruno

I am unsure whether this is a request for IPMC votes, or just a notice
that a vote is coming. The subject does not match the first line of text :)

In any case, I checked the RC, verified the archive (
http://compliance.rocks/result.html?25e563c1 ) with a few 3rdparty and
CSS files excluded in the scan (as you can see on that page), and it
passed. The build works, I'm not interested in the test framework.

Consider this a (latent) +1.

With regards,
Daniell.

On 08/22/2015 11:43 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> A vote is underway on the Ripple Dev list for release 0.9.32.
> 
> The Ripple dev thread can be found at 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ripple-dev/201508.mbox/browser
> 
> The text of the initial vote email is copied below for your convenience.
> 
> At this point we have 2 IPMC votes and 3 PPMC votes, I request IPMC members 
> to look over the VOTE for us:
> 
> --- pasted initial VOTE text from 
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ripple-dev/201508.mbox/browser
> ---
> 
> [Since 0.9.31 was a bust because of a regression, here is another release 
> that includes a fix
> for that regression (and a couple of other minor fixes)]
> 
> Please review and vote on the release of Ripple 0.9.32.
> 
> The package you are voting on is available for review at 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ripple/.
> The SHA-1 hash for the package is:
> 
> 63a997594e4f08df8d48a644962b47bee4efd91e
> 
> It was published from its corresponding git tag:
> 
> incubator-ripple: 0.9.32 (f8c6a0bc99)
> 
> While we need three +1 *binding* votes (which for an Apache Incubator project 
> like Ripple
> means Apache IPMC members), active Ripple contributors and committers/PPMC 
> members are still
> encouraged to review the release and vote. Before voting +1, please refer to 
> and verify compliance
> with the checklist at 
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#check-list
> (however, we only need to consider changes since the previous release).
> 
> If you do vote +1, please include the steps you took in order to be confident 
> the release
> meets requirements.
> 
> Upon a successful vote, I will upload the archive to 
> dist/release/incubator/ripple and publish
> it to NPM.
> 
> I vote +1:
> * Verified license headers with Apache RAT (using 'jake rat').
> * Manually verified there were no new source files that need license headers, 
> nor new third
> party dependencies that needed to have license information included in the 
> LICENSE file.
> * Verified the build works and all tests pass.
> * Manually tested all changes that have been made since the last release.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Tim
> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32

2015-08-23 Thread Justin Mclean

Hi,

+1 binding

I checked:
- signatures and hashed good
- filename contains incubating
- DISCLAIMER exits
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no unexpected binaries
- all source files have headers

I did’t have an environment set that could compile the project. Would be nice 
to have pointer on how to set up “jake".

What's the provanance of these two files? I notice the first can be found here 
[1]
ripple-emulator-0.9.32-incubating/thirdparty/dredd.txt
ripple-emulator-0.9.32-incubating/thirdparty/fail.txt

The header on lib/client/platform/webworks.core/2.0.0/client/utils.js is 
probably a little misleading as it contains a mix of licensed code, but not 
sure if any changes are required.

There’s no need (but no issue) for Rico or XMLHttpRequest.js to be included in 
LICENSE as they Apache licensed. [2] 

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://www.retrojunkie.com/asciiart/tvmovies/dredd.htm 

2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep

[VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

Re: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

Re: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

Re: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

Re: [VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1

Re: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32

Re: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32

7 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information