Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)
Thanks for the links Andrew, those are good insights. - Henry On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote: > You might also want to have a look at how Scala itself deals with the issue > of required binaries for the build: > > https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/master/pull-binary-libs.sh > https://github.com/scala/scala/blob/master/tools/binary-repo-lib.sh > > I'm not necessarily a huge fan of this (builds on *nix only, for example), > but it's at least another approach to throw into the mix... > > ap > > -- > Andrew Phillips > Apache jclouds > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment
> [X ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)
Hi, although the basics looks fine: * keys checked * builds fine on a clean environment I got some warnings that should be fixed in future releases: * only key from one committer, without his apache email address * few dependencies retrieved from out of maven central * some libraries' binaries distributed with the source code I'm not an expert on SBT, and I'm not sure why you need both... On 14/12/13 04:13, Patrick Wendell wrote: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating! [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... Therefore I do not feel comfortable accepting the release, so I have to vote +0 until those issue are clarified (see also further discussions in this thread). Cheers, -- Sergio Fernández Senior Researcher Knowledge and Media Technologies Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925 sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at http://www.salzburgresearch.at - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment
Obviously +1 from me on doing experiments, and -1 for the silly policy update stuff. ...ant On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting > process, > I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select > podlings to earn binding votes under limited circumstances by completing a > release checklist. > > For participating podlings, the Incubator's release management guide... > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > ... would be supplanted by the following documents: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html > > The scope of this VOTE is limited to approving the following patch to our > policy page: > > https://paste.apache.org/k4vJ > > Here is the patch content minus markup: > > 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process > > Select podlings pre-cleared by a majority vote of the IPMC MAY > participate in > an alternate release voting process: > > Should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling > SHALL > hold a vote on the Podling's dev list and create a permanently archived > Release Manifest as described in the Experimental Release Guide. At > least > three +1 votes from PPMC members are required (see the Apache Voting > Process page). If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the > Podling > SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and > formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. > > Formal approval requires three binding +1 votes and more positive than > negative votes. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are always > binding. For all releases after the first, votes cast by members > of the PPMC > are binding if a Mentor approves the Release Manifest. > > Please note that the proposed change is both incremental and reversible: > > * It is incremental because podlings must be opted in by vote of the > IPMC to > participate. > * It is reversible because once the experiment has run its course the > policy change can be reverted with zero impact through lazy consensus. > > Those who may have questions about the legitimacy of allowing binding votes > from non-IPMC members should see this post from Roy Fielding: > > http://s.apache.org/v7 > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. > [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. > > This majority VOTE will run for 7 days and will close at 13:00 PST on > Friday, > December 20, 2013. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are binding. > > Here is my own +1. > > Marvin Humphrey > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)
> * only key from one committer, without his apache email address I'll generate a key w/ my apache address for the next release. So far we've only had one release manager so there is only one key. > * few dependencies retrieved from out of maven central This has been covered extensively in this thread and there is an actionable plan for our next major release. > * some libraries' binaries distributed with the source code Directly related to the last point. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment
[X] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. I kinda feel it doesn't need the Policy change and at this point it should be the 2014 ... but hey - still a positive vote. Regards, Dave On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting process, > I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select > podlings to earn binding votes under limited circumstances by completing a > release checklist. > > For participating podlings, the Incubator's release management guide... > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > ... would be supplanted by the following documents: > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html > > The scope of this VOTE is limited to approving the following patch to our > policy page: > >https://paste.apache.org/k4vJ > > Here is the patch content minus markup: > >2013 Alternate Release Voting Process > >Select podlings pre-cleared by a majority vote of the IPMC MAY > participate in >an alternate release voting process: > >Should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL >hold a vote on the Podling's dev list and create a permanently archived >Release Manifest as described in the Experimental Release Guide. At least >three +1 votes from PPMC members are required (see the Apache Voting >Process page). If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling >SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and >formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. > >Formal approval requires three binding +1 votes and more positive than >negative votes. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are always >binding. For all releases after the first, votes cast by members > of the PPMC >are binding if a Mentor approves the Release Manifest. > > Please note that the proposed change is both incremental and reversible: > > * It is incremental because podlings must be opted in by vote of the IPMC to >participate. > * It is reversible because once the experiment has run its course the >policy change can be reverted with zero impact through lazy consensus. > > Those who may have questions about the legitimacy of allowing binding votes > from non-IPMC members should see this post from Roy Fielding: > >http://s.apache.org/v7 > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. > [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. > > This majority VOTE will run for 7 days and will close at 13:00 PST on Friday, > December 20, 2013. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are binding. > > Here is my own +1. > > Marvin Humphrey > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating
FYI we got the last missing IPMC binding vote. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sirona-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCAN%3DtixmOspWgDXwVTfRiKvMK3kwBwRpiVrmzJ5xwKGiWDk3xfg%40mail.gmail.com%3E So the vote now passed the requirement of 3 IPMC binding vote SO the vote has passed. On 2 December 2013 11:37, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to release Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating. > > Release notes: > http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/releases/release-notes-0.1-incubating.html > > Vote result from dev@sirona: > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-sirona-dev/201312.mbox/browser > > Maven staged release repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesirona-003/ > > Distribution: > * binaries: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sirona/0.1-incubating/binaries/ > * sources: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/sirona/0.1-incubating/src/ > > KEYS file available here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/sirona/KEYS > > Vote open for 72H > > [+1] > [0] > [-1] > > Thanks > -- > Olivier Lamy > Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Spark 0.8.0-incubating (rc4)
NOTICE, LICENSE, and README files looks good. Checksum and signatures on the source jar looks good. Per comments by Marvin and sebb, Spark will resolve the included jar files in the source distribution in next release of 0.9 I am giving: +1 since this is 0.8.1 release which really hard to change build packaging. We'll get it right for 0.9. - Henry On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Patrick Wendell wrote: > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark > (incubating) version 0.8.1. > > The tag to be voted on is v0.8.1-incubating (commit b87d31d): > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-spark/repo?p=incubator-spark.git;a=commit;h=b87d31dd8eb4b4e47c0138e9242d0dd6922c8c4e > > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at: > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.1-incubating-rc4/ > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pwendell.asc > > The staging repository for this release can be found at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachespark-040/ > > The documentation corresponding to this release can be found at: > http://people.apache.org/~pwendell/spark-0.8.1-incubating-rc4-docs/ > > For information about the contents of this release see: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-spark.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES.txt;h=ce0aeab524505b63c7999e0371157ac2def6fe1c;hb=branch-0.8 > > A vote on this release has passed within the Spark PPMC [1]. > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating! > > The vote is open until Tuesday, December 17th at 03:30 UTC and > passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 IPMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 0.8.1-incubating > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > To learn more about Apache Spark, please see > http://spark.incubator.apache.org/ > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-spark-dev/201312.mbox/%3CCABPQxsuEYMn_JE0qEOcrt4J5-N1PJWgGcN7m0qzNefW7fsz2PA%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > (Note that at present the concluding message isn't shown due to lag in the > mail archives.) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[ANN] Apache Sirona 0.1-incubating
The Apache Sirona Team is pleased to announce the first release 0.1-incubating of Apache Sirona project. Apache Sirona provide a simple but extensible monitoring solution for Java applications. It's an incubating project and a technology preview release. So some APIs can be change in the future. The full release notes is available here: http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/releases/release-notes-0.1-incubating.html You can download the releases sources/binaries: http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/download.cgi We hope you will enjoy using Apache Sirona! If you have any questions, please consult: * the web site: http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/ * the sirona mailing lists: http://sirona.incubator.apache.org/mail-lists.html Have Fun, -- The Apache Sirona Team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment
On Friday, December 13, 2013, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. > [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. > +1
Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment
Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. > [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. Here is my +1 -David - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Enable Release Checklist Experiment
+1 On Dec 13, 2013, at 12:59 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, > > As the next step in our ongoing efforts to reform the release voting process, > I propose that we run an experiment allowing the PPMC members of select > podlings to earn binding votes under limited circumstances by completing a > release checklist. > > For participating podlings, the Incubator's release management guide... > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > ... would be supplanted by the following documents: > >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release_manifest.txt >http://incubator.apache.org/guides/release.html > > The scope of this VOTE is limited to approving the following patch to our > policy page: > >https://paste.apache.org/k4vJ > > Here is the patch content minus markup: > >2013 Alternate Release Voting Process > >Select podlings pre-cleared by a majority vote of the IPMC MAY > participate in >an alternate release voting process: > >Should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL >hold a vote on the Podling's dev list and create a permanently archived >Release Manifest as described in the Experimental Release Guide. At least >three +1 votes from PPMC members are required (see the Apache Voting >Process page). If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling >SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and >formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. > >Formal approval requires three binding +1 votes and more positive than >negative votes. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are always >binding. For all releases after the first, votes cast by members > of the PPMC >are binding if a Mentor approves the Release Manifest. > > Please note that the proposed change is both incremental and reversible: > > * It is incremental because podlings must be opted in by vote of the IPMC to >participate. > * It is reversible because once the experiment has run its course the >policy change can be reverted with zero impact through lazy consensus. > > Those who may have questions about the legitimacy of allowing binding votes > from non-IPMC members should see this post from Roy Fielding: > >http://s.apache.org/v7 > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 Yes, apply the patch enabling the experiment. > [ ] -1 No, do not apply the patch enabling the experiment. > > This majority VOTE will run for 7 days and will close at 13:00 PST on Friday, > December 20, 2013. Votes cast by members of the Incubator PMC are binding. > > Here is my own +1. > > Marvin Humphrey > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
