[RESULT][VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 5
Hello, I am closing the vote. It took longer than 72 hours but we eventually reached the quorum and the vote has passed with the following votes: 7+1 votes including: * 3 IPMC: Patrick Hunt, Olivier Lamy, Henry Saputra (voted on the "Need some help for releasing S4 0.6.0" thread) * 3 PPMC: Matthieu Morel, Kishore Gopalakrishna, Flavio Junqueira * 1 non binding committer vote : Daniel Gomez Ferro Thanks all for reviewing and voting ! I will proceed with the release in the next few days. Matthieu On May 6, 2013, at 14:37 , Matthieu Morel wrote: > Hello, > > this is the *fifth* release candidate for Apache S4, version 0.6.0 > > We fixed 2 blocking issues wrt RC1, related to s4 tools, 1 blocking issue in > RC2, related to metrics logging configuration, issues related to the package > contents and license headers in RC3, and removed included javadoc files in > RC4. > > > > This release fixes the following issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312322&version=12321702 > > > *** Please download, test and vote by Thursday, May 9th 2013, 13:00:00 GMT *** > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag). > > > Source package in zip format: > > http://people.apache.org/~mmorel/s4-0.6.0-incubating-release-candidate-5/ > > > > The (git) tag to be voted upon: 0.6.0-RC5: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-s4.git;a=tree;h=8b43b317104cfc9ebc42f6e8ec9c9557867155aa;hb=2f474503e2da111601bb92ca7186c136ba28e5b0 > > > > S4 KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/s4/dist/KEYS > > > The README.md file contains instructions for installing the gradle wrapper > (which is not shipped with the source release). > > > We include a RAT check task. (Can be used by fetching rat from /lib dir in > the git repo and using the .rat-excludes file at the root of the git repo) > > It can be run with : > gradlew rat > output > > > Please cast your vote, thanks! > > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > NOTES: > > - All releases by podlings must be approved by the Incubator PMC. The > conventional process is for the podling to follow the usual Apache process > and then call for a Incubator PMC VOTE on the general incubator list. > For RC5 however, following recommendations from our mentors, we are > proceeding to a parallel vote on both general@incubator and s4-dev > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating(RC5)
On Tue, May 21, 2013, at 12:56 AM, Florian Hopf wrote: > Thanks, so far I got the impression that the most important place to put > my key is at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ > I am not sure yet how to upload files to the dist folder but I'll figure > that out. You should have SVN access there. If you're still having trouble, let us know. > As those changes don't require any changes to the source tree I think we > don't need to vote on the dev-list again but only on the incubator list? Not sure there's a hard and fast rule there. I would probably re-start the vote, but that's me. I don't think it's absolutely necessary. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[VOTE][IP CLEARANCE] Apache CXF - WS-Eventing service
CXF has received a donation of a WS-Eventing service that we'd like to have as part of the project. The IP Clearance document: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cxf-wseventing.html Full description and the patch containing the code is found attached to JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5023 MD5 (wseventing.patch) - feab399c89044762d5759a25c26057a7 Please vote to approve this contribution. Lazy consensus applies: if no -1 votes are cast within the next 72 hours, the vote passes. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating(RC5)
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Florian Hopf wrote: > Hi Joe, > > thanks for your feedback. This is my first release and only the second > release of the Odftoolkit so I am glad to get some guidance on things we > missed so far. > > > On 18.05.2013 20:41, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 12, 2013, at 09:17 AM, Florian Hopf wrote: >>> >>> RC 5 of the ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating is ready for release. This >>> release candidate addresses missing licenses and the disclaimer that >>> have been identified during the last IPMC vote. >> >> >> Which of the artifacts are we meant to be voting on? We have three >> source choices (tar.bz2, tar.gz, zip) - and ideally we'd be testing >> *all* of these to verify that they're the same. Why not distribute just >> one tarball? >> >> I'm OK with convenience binaries, but I really don't think it's a good >> idea to put them in the same directory as the source artifacts you want >> voted on. > > > Ok, I will put the binaries separately and only add the source zip. > I wonder if it would be good to publish just three files: one each of source, doc and binaries? Just do them all as .zip (which is available on all platforms). It would make release verification a little easier. > >> >> Also, I can't +1 this because the signature of the distributed artifact >> does not match the KEYS file in your dist directory. >> >> Your dist directory has this KEYS file: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/odftoolkit/KEYS >> >> Which only has Devin Han's key. You're distributing a KEYS file with >> your own key, but obviously we're not going to trust a KEYS file that is >> distributed with the source tarball itself. >> >> You need to upload your new KEYS file and point to it in your email >> asking for votes. Could you please re-roll this and start a new VOTE? > > > Thanks, so far I got the impression that the most important place to put my > key is at https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/ > I am not sure yet how to upload files to the dist folder but I'll figure > that out. > > As those changes don't require any changes to the source tree I think we > don't need to vote on the dev-list again but only on the incubator list? > Maybe have the votes in parallel, at the same time? -Rob > Thanks > > Florian > > > -- > Florian Hopf > Freelance Software Developer > > http://blog.florian-hopf.de > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
AIFTTT, message connector
Hi all, I am looking for a Champion. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/jamespruett I know all-you-all are busy, so please know that I appreciate your time! -Jim Pruett
Re: AIFTTT, message connector
Sorry for telling, the proposal does not match proposal standards, and contains invalid information in competitors section. 24.05.2013 1:57 пользователь "james pruett" написал: > Hi all, > > I am looking for a Champion. > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/jamespruett > > I know all-you-all are busy, > so please know that I appreciate your time! > > > -Jim Pruett >
Re: AIFTTT, message connector
James, what Alexei said. Plus you have received some hints from me per PM and from Nandana on this mailinglist. I repost what he wrote you on 26 april: > There is a guide [1] in the Apache Incubator website that helps you to > write a good proposal and also a template that you can use as a guide. You > can also take a look at few existing proposals [2]. > > Best Regards, > Nandana > > [1] - http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html > [2] - http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProjectProposals I highly suggest you are reading this and look at the other proposals. Otherwise I feel it is extremely unlikely that anybody will step on this. Cheers Christian On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Alexei Fedotov wrote: > Sorry for telling, the proposal does not match proposal standards, and > contains invalid information in competitors section. > 24.05.2013 1:57 пользователь "james pruett" написал: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am looking for a Champion. >> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/jamespruett >> >> I know all-you-all are busy, >> so please know that I appreciate your time! >> >> >> -Jim Pruett >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
