Re: [Vote] Accept JRS project for incubation

2007-06-30 Thread Leo Simons

+1

On Jun 29, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
...

Java Resource Simulator (JRS) Proposal

The following is a proposal for a new top-level project within the  
ASF.


Abstract
-
The Java Resource Simulator (JRS) is a Java-based interface response
capture/playback tool for testing purposes, intended for use in
development or testing environments.
Proposal

JRS will provide a lightweight (meaning no or very little code changes
to the application under test) utility for Java applications that
simulates interactions with remote services, without having to have an
active connection to those remote services. JRS is currently a
community source, internal project at American Express. This proposal
is to develop the JRS code and community at the ASF.

...

cheers,

Leo Simons
--
http://www.leosimons.com/blog/



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [VOTE] approve release of CXF 2.0-incubator

2007-06-30 Thread robert burrell donkin

On 6/29/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Robert,

I've updated the eclipse plugin

The ONLY change in this is the eclipse-plugin.   I did NOT rebuild
anything else.

The staging area is at:
http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator_take2/




+1

comments and observations
--

like the release notes :-)

- robert


Re: [VOTE] approve release of CXF 2.0-incubator

2007-06-30 Thread Davanum Srinivas

+1 from me too. Maybe we should use that release notes as a template :)

thanks,
dims

On 6/30/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 6/29/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Robert,
>
> I've updated the eclipse plugin
>
> The ONLY change in this is the eclipse-plugin.   I did NOT rebuild
> anything else.
>
> The staging area is at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0_incubator_take2/



+1

comments and observations
--

like the release notes :-)

- robert




--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Incubator new committer redux

2007-06-30 Thread Craig L Russell

The thread has died down with no consensus, so I'm going to try again.

Regarding how a Podling can get a "new to Apache" committer. First,  
the rules:


1. Only the Incubator PMC can vote in a new committer, with three +1  
and no -1 votes recorded.


2. All Incubator PMC members should be able to participate in the  
vote if they choose to.


3. The Podling PMC should be learning how to govern the project,  
meaning that they should practice how to vote.


I think we have agreed that the [DISCUSS] of a new committer can  
happen on the Podling PMC private list and the discussion can be  
summarized by the Mentors to the Incubator PMC private list. The  
issue is how to organize the binding vote.


I think we have two proposals on the table that are practical.

1. The [VOTE] thread runs simultaneously on both the IPMC and PPMC  
private lists, and all voting occurs simultaneously on both lists.


2. The [VOTE] thread runs first on the PPMC private list (not  
binding) and then on the IPMC private list (binding) and the Mentors  
provide feedback in both directions.


Have I missed any?

Craig Russell
DB PMC, OpenJPA PMC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://db.apache.org/jdo




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: Incubator new committer redux

2007-06-30 Thread Martijn Dashorst

On 6/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Have I missed any?


Not according to me, perhaps only that adding a PPMC member should
follow the same procedure.

Martijn

--
Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Incubator new committer redux

2007-06-30 Thread Craig L Russell

Hi Martijn,

On Jun 30, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:


On 6/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Have I missed any?


Not according to me, perhaps only that adding a PPMC member should
follow the same procedure.


No, the PPMC is a different beast entirely, and the procedures are  
already in place.


Craig


Martijn

--
Wicket joins the Apache Software Foundation as Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket 1.3.0-beta2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0-beta2/

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature