Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Jean T. Anderson wrote: Overall the release looks good to me. I verified the *.asc signatures and looked more closely at uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz . I noticed just one thing that struck me as odd in the user documentation. The "UIMA Documentation Overview" in uima-docbooks/src/index.html includes an IBM copyright line after the Apache copyright: Copyright © 2006, 2007 The Apache Software Foundation Copyright © 2004, 2006 International Business Machines Corporation The Apache copyright is for the collected work published by Apache, and the NOTICE file collects all copyright notices and attributions. I don't know if adding non-Apache copyrights to the user doc is correct, so somebody more knowledgeable needs to say for sure. I give this release a +1 (but realize somebody might authoritatively say that the copyright in the overview doc needs to change). We are of course happy to do whatever is correct here. The rationale for doing it this way was 2-fold. First: although *source code* no longer is supposed to have "copyright" statements in the headers (it only has license statements); the documentation (when formatted as a book for printing) traditionally has copyright statements. Second: the documentation is often printed into a book (it has a table of contents, page numbers, etc.,). As such it would be somewhat more likely to be independently "distributed" than source code. If we are going to put copyright statements in the book, it seemed appropriate to include the copyright statement that would have otherwise been in the notices file. But IANAL, so am happy to follow the advice of those who understand this area better. -Marshall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
+1 The copyright statement is true, AFAIK. Portions are still under IBM's copyright, and acknowledging that in this way seems good to me for the reasons Marshall named. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Marshall Schor wrote: Jean T. Anderson wrote: Overall the release looks good to me. I verified the *.asc signatures and looked more closely at uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz . I noticed just one thing that struck me as odd in the user documentation. The "UIMA Documentation Overview" in uima-docbooks/src/index.html includes an IBM copyright line after the Apache copyright: Copyright © 2006, 2007 The Apache Software Foundation Copyright © 2004, 2006 International Business Machines Corporation The Apache copyright is for the collected work published by Apache, and the NOTICE file collects all copyright notices and attributions. I don't know if adding non-Apache copyrights to the user doc is correct, so somebody more knowledgeable needs to say for sure. I give this release a +1 (but realize somebody might authoritatively say that the copyright in the overview doc needs to change). We are of course happy to do whatever is correct here. The rationale for doing it this way was 2-fold. First: although *source code* no longer is supposed to have "copyright" statements in the headers (it only has license statements); the documentation (when formatted as a book for printing) traditionally has copyright statements. Second: the documentation is often printed into a book (it has a table of contents, page numbers, etc.,). As such it would be somewhat more likely to be independently "distributed" than source code. If we are going to put copyright statements in the book, it seemed appropriate to include the copyright statement that would have otherwise been in the notices file. Such a book 'independently "distributed"' still has to adhere to the terms of the Apache Software Licence v2 which requires a readable form of the notice file (see 4d in ASLv2). Maybe these IBM copyright notices would form a "readable version" of the notice file? I don't think an ASF distribution needs to contain them, a producer of a book would have to incorporate them into their book. IANAL, Dan. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: >> Jean T. Anderson wrote: >>> Overall the release looks good to me. I verified the *.asc signatures >>> and looked more closely at uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-src.tar.gz . >>> >>> I noticed just one thing that struck me as odd in the user >>> documentation. The "UIMA Documentation Overview" in >>> uima-docbooks/src/index.html includes an IBM copyright line after the >>> Apache copyright: >>> >>>Copyright © 2006, 2007 The Apache Software Foundation >>>Copyright © 2004, 2006 International Business Machines Corporation Accumulated copyrights are generally accumulated (in sequence) so the order of this notice appears odd to me too. I would expect them transposed, IBM the original owner/contributor, ASF the supplemental/collected works copyright holder. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE][Retry] Approve the release of Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating
+1 On 3/8/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: After correcting some issues in our last release candidate (thanks to Jean Anderson for finding these), the Apache UIMA community has again voted to release version 2.1.0-incubating. We would now like to ask the Incubator PMC to approve this release. The issues that were corrected since the last release candidate are: - Updated some files that used the old Apache license header so they now use the newer version. - Our NOTICE file now includes acknowledgment that the code was originally contributed by IBM - Removed redundant LICENSE and NOTICE files from our source distribution - Corrected some of the metdata in our Maven POM files (Although we are not asking to release our Maven artifacts at this time, only our source and binary distributions.) Release artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/ The release was signed by Michael Baessler. His public key is available here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/trunk/uimaj-distr/src/main/readme/KEYS Release notes: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/RELEASE_NOTES.html The release has been tagged in SVN: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/uima/uimaj/tags/uimaj-2.1.0-RC4/ Here is a link to our vote thread on the uima-dev list: http://www.mail-archive.com/uima-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02501.html We've run the RAT utility and have posted the reports, along with our own comments, here: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/RAT-2.1.0-bin.txt http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/RAT-2.1.0-src.txt The original unedited RAT reports are also posted: http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/RAT-2.1.0-incubating-bin.txt http://people.apache.org/~mbaessler/UIMAReleases/uimaj-2.1.0-incubating-RC4/RAT-2.1.0-incubating-src.txt We have done thorough testing of this release, which is documented here: http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan21.html We ask that you please vote to approve this release: [ ] +1 Approve the release as Apache UIMA 2.1.0-incubating [ ] -1 Recommend against releasing at this time (identify issues you consider showstoppers) Thanks! - The Apache UIMA team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Approve release of SCA specification APIs by Tuscany project
The Tuscany community recently voted to release version 1.0- incubating of our implementation of the API classes for the OSOA specification V1.0: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200703.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] The source archives and RAT reports can be found at: http://people.apache.org/~jboynes/sca-api-r1.0-1.0-incubating and the binary in the Maven repo at: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/osoa/ sca-api-r1.0/1.0-incubating Thanks -- Jeremy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Approve release of Apache Tuscany SCA Java Kernel 2.0-alpha-incubating
The Tuscany community recently voted to release version 2.0-alpha- incubating of the Kernel for SCA Java. [VOTE] to release the kernel modules http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200703.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] [VOTE] to release an amended version of the sample code http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200703.mbox/% [EMAIL PROTECTED] For this release we have transitioned away from a single distribution to a number of separate modules that can be released separately. The first of these are the kernel and runtime modules voted on here which provide a baseline (alpha) version for development of other modules. The source distributions for these can be found here: http://people.apache.org/~jboynes/kernel-2.0-alpha-incubating/ http://people.apache.org/~jboynes/runtime-2.0-alpha-incubating/ along with a binary assembly for a standalone runtime installation. The project artifacts are also available through the Maven repo. For full details, please see the links in the original [VOTE] thread. We would like to ask the IPMC to approve this release. Thanks -- Jeremy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PROPOSAL] Tika, a content analysis toolkit
> This is a proposal to start a content analysis toolkit project in the > Apache Incubator. The live version of the proposal is available at > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TikaProposal. +1 Looks like a good fit. -- jaaron - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]