[Bug libgcj/14144] Serialisation bug with abstract classes

2006-02-16 Thread gcc at pcedev dot com 


-- 

gcc at pcedev dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |gcc at pcedev dot com
   |dot org |
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14144

[Bug libgcj/14144] Serialisation bug with abstract classes

2006-02-16 Thread gcc at pcedev dot com 


--- Comment #2 from gcc at pcedev dot com  2006-02-16 10:47 ---
The problem comes from the choice of the constructor during the deserialization
process. Up to now, the first non abstract, non serializable constructor in the
super classes were choosen. So it incorrectly skipped all abtract constructor
(which, in your case, is executing "set = new TreeSet();").
The contructor choice algorithm has been updated to take this choice in account
and is available in the current CVS version of classpath.
Christian, if you still have this piece of code around, can you confirm the fix
?


-- 

gcc at pcedev dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14144