FVWM: [worksforme] FVWM does not update the window title when the new window title contains a unicode character
Was: Re: reusing old configs in new versions [Re: FVWM: Reviewing FVWM] Now: [worksforme] FVWM does not update the window title when the new window title contains a unicode character Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:29:42PM +0200, Michael Großer wrote: >> Thomas Adam wrote: >> > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:31:52PM +0200, Michael Großer wrote: >> >> [...] I also will use this >> >> opportunity to point out another bug (FVWM does not update the window >> >> title when the new window title contains a unicode character, which >> >> always happens when I use bugzilla). >> > >> > You do not need to point this out, it's been a known bug for a while. >> >> Oh! When will it be fixed then? I'm confronted with this bug up to hundred > > When I get round to it. > > Can you also look in to "BugOpts TransliterateUtf8"? I've had success in > the past setting that. But the fix is altogether more complex. I've a > working branch on my github FVWM repository which holds prototype fixes, > ISTR. It's probably out of date though. This is a problem I give the highest priority now. Today, I tested this line of code: > BugOpts TransliterateUtf8 True It does not solve my problem with FVWM version 2.5.26 (because this option doesn't exist there), but it solved my problem with FVWM version 2.5.30. Now, I have a really good reason to manually compile and install a new FVWM version on my Debian Lenny based productive systems since they are still more bug free then newer Debian Squeeze based systems (where I have to find a lot of workarounds first before I will be happy with them). Michael
Re: FVWM: [worksforme] FVWM does not update the window title when the new window title contains a unicode character
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:59:28AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote: > but it solved my problem with FVWM version 2.5.30. That version is not supported. I know Debian is falling behind something chronic with keeping up to date, but I won't want to hear any bug reports from you which aren't against either 2.6.3 or more preferrably the CVS version taken from branch-2_6. -- Thomas Adam -- "Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.)
FVWM: Why is Debian behind schedule regarding recent FVWM versions so much?
Was: Re: FVWM: [worksforme] FVWM does not update the window title when the new window title contains a unicode character Now: Why is Debian behind schedule regarding recent FVWM versions so much? Original-Nachricht > Datum: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:05:15 + > Von: Thomas Adam > An: "Michael Großer" > CC: fvwm@fvwm.org > Betreff: Re: FVWM: [worksforme] FVWM does not update the window title when > the new window title contains a unicode character > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:59:28AM +0100, Michael Großer wrote: > > but it solved my problem with FVWM version 2.5.30. > > That version is not supported. I know Debian is falling behind something > chronic with keeping up to date, but I won't want to hear any bug reports > from you which aren't against either 2.6.3 or more preferrably the CVS > version taken from branch-2_6. > > -- Thomas Adam > > -- > "Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am > not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.) > I plan to use at least KVM and FVWM directly from upstream on further systems, because these packages are the most important. But, the idea of a distribution like Debian is to get stable software onto the computer by typing "apt-get install something". Each exception I have to make erodes the whole idea of a ready-to-use Linux distribution. My Wheezy and Sid systems, wich were up-to-date during Christmas, also come with FVWM "2.5.30". This seems to be true until now: http://packages.debian.org/lenny/fvwm --> fvwm (1:2.5.26-1) http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/fvwm --> fvwm (1:2.5.30.ds-1) http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/fvwm --> fvwm (1:2.5.30.ds-1) http://packages.debian.org/sid/fvwm --> fvwm (1:2.5.30.ds-1 and others) Does anybody know why even Sid is behind schedule that much?
Re: FVWM: Why is Debian behind schedule regarding recent FVWM versions so much?
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:17:29PM +0100, michael.gros...@gmx.de wrote: > But, the idea of a distribution like Debian is to get > stable software onto the computer by typing > "apt-get install something". Each exception I have to make > erodes the whole idea of a ready-to-use Linux distribution. Use a different distro? > Does anybody know why even Sid is behind schedule that much? The maintainer often goes AWOL; this is not news, and anyone who's really wanting to use FVWM via apt-get just build their own .deb file. Either way, go pester Manoj about this, as I have done so many times already, but I care not to discuss such things here as they're off-topic. -- Thomas Adam -- "Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.)