Hi Bruce and Nguyen,
Thanks for your reply.
The scanner is a Sonata Siemens of 1.5 T with a new head coil -I'm waiting
the feedback from the engineer of the neurorad for more technical details
over this coil-
The following is the output of 'mri_convert' over the native scanner data
(mr.1.3.12.2.1107)
I cancel the subject name for a privacy issue :-)
---
Identification
NumarisVersyngo MR 2002B 4VA21A
ScannerModel Sonata
PatientName X
Date and time
StudyDate 20040630
StudyTime 182400.00
SeriesTime184547.703000
AcqTime 183813.397498
Acquisition parameters
PulseSeq *tfl3d1_ns
Protocol MPRAGE_sag_1.0mm_sense2
PhEncDir ROW
EchoNo0
FlipAngle 0.261799
EchoTime 3.93
InversionTime 1100
RepetitionTime2160
PhEncFOV 256
ReadoutFOV256
Image information
RunNo 1
SeriesNo 2
ImageNo 1
NImageRows512
NImageCols512
NFrames 1
SliceArraylSize 1
IsMosaic 0
ImgPos 90.3748 165.9758 123.3529
VolRes 0.5000 0.5000 1.
VolDim512 512 176
Vc -0. -1. 0.
Vr -0. -0. -1.
Vs -1. -0. 0.
VolCenter 2.3748 37.9758 -4.6471
TR=2160.00, TE=3.93, TI=1100.00, flip angle=15.00
i_ras = (-0, -1, 0)
j_ras = (-0, -0, -1)
k_ras = (-1, -0, 0)
Original Data has (0.5, 0.5, 1) mm size and (512, 512, 176) voxels.
Data is conformed to 1 mm size and 256 voxels for all directions
changing data type from 4 to 0 (noscale = 0)...
MRIchangeType: Building histogram
Reslicing using trilinear interpolation
writing to
---
We used 2 acquisitions.
The acquisitions were taked one at the beginning and one at the end of the
scanning session [MPRAGE1-ODDBALL-STERNBERG-DTI-MPRAGE2] so after 1 hour
+/-.
The scanner perform a 'real time motion correction' over the scanning
session.
I use the 'mri_motion_correct' script to register and average the
acquisitions, and the 'talairach2' script to obtain the trasform.xfm.
Then I use the GUI for the -stage 1 (process volume) and -stage 2 (create
surface).
I attach an example of the segmentation.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Fischl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "F.Musso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 4:08 AM
Subject: Re: bad segmentation [newbie]
> Hi Francesco,
>
> these look pretty bad. Can you describe the acquisitions? How many? Did
you
> motion correct and average them? What is the resolution? What field
> strength? What receive coil(s)?
>
> cheers,
> Bruce
<>___
Freesurfer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer