[Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-17 Thread Eli Johnson
Hi all,


I am trying to extract the volume from a FreeSurfer segmented scan within a 
pre-registered mask region, but only within the cortex, and wanted to check my 
command.


The mask is a binary mask (value of 1 across the mask) and is in the same space 
as the orig.mgz file. It covers part of the frontal lobe.


I have run:

mri_segstats --seg ./scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --id 1 --i 
./scan500_std/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --accumulate --sum test.reg1.sum


This has output a text file with a value of 495563 mm3 in the last row.


I wanted to check whether this is the correct command to extract only cortical 
GM within this mask. If this is correct, should be adding other flags (e.g. 
-pv). I have searched the mailing list and the options for mri_segstats, but 
I'm not 100% confident in what I've done - so any tips would be greatly 
appreciated.


Many thanks
Eli
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-20 Thread Eli Johnson
Hi Doug,


Thanks a lot for your help!


I have run these commands and they complete with no problems. I can also view 
the region overlaid on a surface and this looks ok, however the volumes that 
are extracted from mri_segstats are much lower than expected - around half the 
volume expected, and they don't seem in line with the volumes automatically 
extracted (i.e. total cortical gm volume from the aseg.stats file). Any 
thoughts on why this might be?


Many thanks!

Eli




Douglas N Grevegreve at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<mailto:freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?Subject=Re:%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Cortical%20volume%20from%20masked%20region&In-Reply-To=%3C0ae71986-b91f-bdaa-c726-1db7cdd71830%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%3E>
Wed Jan 18 15:30:45 EST 2017

  *   Previous message: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region 
<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049516.html>
  *   Next message: [Freesurfer] installation fail :( 
<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049518.html>
  *   Messages sorted by: [ date 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/date.html#49559>
 [ thread 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/thread.html#49559>
 [ subject 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/subject.html#49559>
 [ author 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/author.html#49559>


I would probably map the mask to the surface,eg,

mri_vol2surf --regheadersubject --hemi lh --projfrac 0.5 --i
scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --interp nearest --o lh.mask.mgz

The run

mri_segstats --seg lh.mask.mgz --id 1 --accumulate --i lh.volume --o
lh.vol.stats




From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2017 4:24 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Cortical volume from masked region


Hi all,


I am trying to extract the volume from a FreeSurfer segmented scan within a 
pre-registered mask region, but only within the cortex, and wanted to check my 
command.


The mask is a binary mask (value of 1 across the mask) and is in the same space 
as the orig.mgz file. It covers part of the frontal lobe.


I have run:

mri_segstats --seg ./scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --id 1 --i 
./scan500_std/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --accumulate --sum test.reg1.sum


This has output a text file with a value of 495563 mm3 in the last row.


I wanted to check whether this is the correct command to extract only cortical 
GM within this mask. If this is correct, should be adding other flags (e.g. 
-pv). I have searched the mailing list and the options for mri_segstats, but 
I'm not 100% confident in what I've done - so any tips would be greatly 
appreciated.


Many thanks
Eli
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-25 Thread Eli Johnson
Hi Doug,


Thank you - I have uploaded the files for you.


Eli



From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Friday, 20 January 2017 5:08 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: Cortical volume from masked region


Hi Doug,


Thanks a lot for your help!


I have run these commands and they complete with no problems. I can also view 
the region overlaid on a surface and this looks ok, however the volumes that 
are extracted from mri_segstats are much lower than expected - around half the 
volume expected, and they don't seem in line with the volumes automatically 
extracted (i.e. total cortical gm volume from the aseg.stats file). Any 
thoughts on why this might be?


Many thanks!

Eli




Douglas N Grevegreve at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<mailto:freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?Subject=Re:%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Cortical%20volume%20from%20masked%20region&In-Reply-To=%3C0ae71986-b91f-bdaa-c726-1db7cdd71830%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%3E>
Wed Jan 18 15:30:45 EST 2017

  *   Previous message: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region 
<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049516.html>
  *   Next message: [Freesurfer] installation fail :( 
<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049518.html>
  *   Messages sorted by: [ date 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/date.html#49559>
 [ thread 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/thread.html#49559>
 [ subject 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/subject.html#49559>
 [ author 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/author.html#49559>


I would probably map the mask to the surface,eg,

mri_vol2surf --regheadersubject --hemi lh --projfrac 0.5 --i
scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --interp nearest --o lh.mask.mgz

The run

mri_segstats --seg lh.mask.mgz --id 1 --accumulate --i lh.volume --o
lh.vol.stats




From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2017 4:24 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Cortical volume from masked region


Hi all,


I am trying to extract the volume from a FreeSurfer segmented scan within a 
pre-registered mask region, but only within the cortex, and wanted to check my 
command.


The mask is a binary mask (value of 1 across the mask) and is in the same space 
as the orig.mgz file. It covers part of the frontal lobe.


I have run:

mri_segstats --seg ./scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --id 1 --i 
./scan500_std/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --accumulate --sum test.reg1.sum


This has output a text file with a value of 495563 mm3 in the last row.


I wanted to check whether this is the correct command to extract only cortical 
GM within this mask. If this is correct, should be adding other flags (e.g. 
-pv). I have searched the mailing list and the options for mri_segstats, but 
I'm not 100% confident in what I've done - so any tips would be greatly 
appreciated.


Many thanks
Eli
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-25 Thread Eli Johnson

Yes, I think I got the correct email. Attached is the notification I received 
upon upload.

Thanks
Eli


You recently uploaded the following files to the Martinos Center FileDrop:

 + 20001-013-1_std.zip (251.3 MiB)

Here are the people you sent these files to:

 + gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

In case you'd like to modify some of the above information, please use the link 
below:

http://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/?g=ahht5qz16h5

Cheers,
The Martinos Center Web Team

From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2017 9:55 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: Cortical volume from masked region


Hi Doug,


Thank you - I have uploaded the files for you.


Eli



From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Friday, 20 January 2017 5:08 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: Cortical volume from masked region


Hi Doug,


Thanks a lot for your help!


I have run these commands and they complete with no problems. I can also view 
the region overlaid on a surface and this looks ok, however the volumes that 
are extracted from mri_segstats are much lower than expected - around half the 
volume expected, and they don't seem in line with the volumes automatically 
extracted (i.e. total cortical gm volume from the aseg.stats file). Any 
thoughts on why this might be?


Many thanks!

Eli




Douglas N Grevegreve at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<mailto:freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?Subject=Re:%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Cortical%20volume%20from%20masked%20region&In-Reply-To=%3C0ae71986-b91f-bdaa-c726-1db7cdd71830%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%3E>
Wed Jan 18 15:30:45 EST 2017

  *   Previous message: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region 
<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049516.html>
  *   Next message: [Freesurfer] installation fail :( 
<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049518.html>
  *   Messages sorted by: [ date 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/date.html#49559>
 [ thread 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/thread.html#49559>
 [ subject 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/subject.html#49559>
 [ author 
]<https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/author.html#49559>


I would probably map the mask to the surface,eg,

mri_vol2surf --regheadersubject --hemi lh --projfrac 0.5 --i
scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --interp nearest --o lh.mask.mgz

The run

mri_segstats --seg lh.mask.mgz --id 1 --accumulate --i lh.volume --o
lh.vol.stats




From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2017 4:24 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Cortical volume from masked region


Hi all,


I am trying to extract the volume from a FreeSurfer segmented scan within a 
pre-registered mask region, but only within the cortex, and wanted to check my 
command.


The mask is a binary mask (value of 1 across the mask) and is in the same space 
as the orig.mgz file. It covers part of the frontal lobe.


I have run:

mri_segstats --seg ./scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --id 1 --i 
./scan500_std/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --accumulate --sum test.reg1.sum


This has output a text file with a value of 495563 mm3 in the last row.


I wanted to check whether this is the correct command to extract only cortical 
GM within this mask. If this is correct, should be adding other flags (e.g. 
-pv). I have searched the mailing list and the options for mri_segstats, but 
I'm not 100% confident in what I've done - so any tips would be greatly 
appreciated.


Many thanks
Eli
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-26 Thread Eli Johnson


Sent from my iPhone

> On 26 Jan 2017, at 18:11, Douglas N Greve  wrote:
> 
> In looking at your mask, it covers only half (or less) of the brain. 
> This would explain why the total volume you get from the mask is much 
> lesss than the total gm volume reported in aseg.stats.
> 
> 
>> On 01/20/2017 12:08 PM, Eli Johnson wrote:
>> 
>> *Hi Doug,*
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *Thanks a lot for your help!*
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *I have run these commands and they complete with no problems. I can 
>> also view the region overlaid on a surface and this looks ok, however 
>> the volumes that are extracted from mri_segstats are much lower than 
>> expected - around half the volume expected, and they don't seem in 
>> line with the volumes automatically extracted (i.e. total cortical gm 
>> volume from the aseg.stats file). Any thoughts on why this might be?*
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *Many thanks!*
>> 
>> *Eli
>> *
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *Douglas N Greve*greve at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?Subject=Re:%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Cortical%20volume%20from%20masked%20region&In-Reply-To=%3C0ae71986-b91f-bdaa-c726-1db7cdd71830%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%3E>
>> /Wed Jan 18 15:30:45 EST 2017/
>> 
>>  * Previous message: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049516.html>
>>  * Next message: [Freesurfer] installation fail :(
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049518.html>
>>  * *Messages sorted by:* [ date ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/date.html#49559>
>>[ thread ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/thread.html#49559>
>>[ subject ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/subject.html#49559>
>>[ author ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/author.html#49559>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I would probably map the mask to the surface,eg,
>> 
>> mri_vol2surf --regheadersubject --hemi lh --projfrac 0.5 --i
>> scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --interp nearest --o lh.mask.mgz
>> 
>> The run
>> 
>> mri_segstats --seg lh.mask.mgz --id 1 --accumulate --i lh.volume --o
>> lh.vol.stats
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *From:* Eli Johnson 
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 17 January 2017 4:24 PM
>> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> *Subject:* Cortical volume from masked region
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> 
>> I am trying to extract the volume from a FreeSurfer segmented scan 
>> within a pre-registered mask region, but only within the cortex, and 
>> wanted to check my command.
>> 
>> 
>> The mask is a binary mask (value of 1 across the mask) and is in the 
>> same space as the orig.mgz file. It covers part of the frontal lobe.
>> 
>> 
>> I have run:
>> 
>> mri_segstats --seg ./scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --id 1 --i 
>> ./scan500_std/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --accumulate --sum test.reg1.sum
>> 
>> 
>> This has output a text file with a value of 495563 mm3 in the last row.
>> 
>> 
>> I wanted to check whether this is the correct command to extract only 
>> cortical GM within this mask. If this is correct, should be adding 
>> other flags (e.g. -pv). I have searched the mailing list and the 
>> options for mri_segstats, but I'm not 100% confident in what I've done 
>> - so any tips would be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> 
>> Many thanks
>> Eli
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> -- 
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
> Fax: 617-726-7422
> 
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
> www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
> Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-26 Thread Eli Johnson

Hi Doug,

Yes, I have a series of masks that I have created to cover the whole cortex, 
but I want to examine the regions separately. Each region outputs a volume much 
smaller than I would expect given the volumes from aseg stats for the whole 
cortex. That is to say, when I combine the volume from each region although I 
would expect it to be different to the volume from aseg stats (aseg stats is of 
course highly optimized), it's a lot smaller than expected - around half the 
size.

Sorry for not being more clear!
Thanks

> On 26 Jan 2017, at 18:11,y Douglas N Greve  wrote:
> 
> In looking at your mask, it covers only half (or less) of the brain. 
> This would explain why the total volume you get from the mask is much 
> lesss than the total gm volume reported in aseg.stats.
> 
> 
>> On 01/20/2017 12:08 PM, Eli Johnson wrote:
>> 
>> *Hi Doug,*
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *Thanks a lot for your help!*
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *I have run these commands and they complete with no problems. I can 
>> also view the region overlaid on a surface and this looks ok, however 
>> the volumes that are extracted from mri_segstats are much lower than 
>> expected - around half the volume expected, and they don't seem in 
>> line with the volumes automatically extracted (i.e. total cortical gm 
>> volume from the aseg.stats file). Any thoughts on why this might be?*
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *Many thanks!*
>> 
>> *Eli
>> *
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *
>> *
>> 
>> *Douglas N Greve*greve at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
>> <mailto:freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?Subject=Re:%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Cortical%20volume%20from%20masked%20region&In-Reply-To=%3C0ae71986-b91f-bdaa-c726-1db7cdd71830%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%3E>
>> /Wed Jan 18 15:30:45 EST 2017/
>> 
>>  * Previous message: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049516.html>
>>  * Next message: [Freesurfer] installation fail :(
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049518.html>
>>  * *Messages sorted by:* [ date ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/date.html#49559>
>>[ thread ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/thread.html#49559>
>>[ subject ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/subject.html#49559>
>>[ author ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/author.html#49559>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I would probably map the mask to the surface,eg,
>> 
>> mri_vol2surf --regheadersubject --hemi lh --projfrac 0.5 --i
>> scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --interp nearest --o lh.mask.mgz
>> 
>> The run
>> 
>> mri_segstats --seg lh.mask.mgz --id 1 --accumulate --i lh.volume --o
>> lh.vol.stats
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *From:* Eli Johnson 
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 17 January 2017 4:24 PM
>> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> *Subject:* Cortical volume from masked region
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> 
>> I am trying to extract the volume from a FreeSurfer segmented scan 
>> within a pre-registered mask region, but only within the cortex, and 
>> wanted to check my command.
>> 
>> 
>> The mask is a binary mask (value of 1 across the mask) and is in the 
>> same space as the orig.mgz file. It covers part of the frontal lobe.
>> 
>> 
>> I have run:
>> 
>> mri_segstats --seg ./scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --id 1 --i 
>> ./scan500_std/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --accumulate --sum test.reg1.sum
>> 
>> 
>> This has output a text file with a value of 495563 mm3 in the last row.
>> 
>> 
>> I wanted to check whether this is the correct command to extract only 
>> cortical GM within this mask. If this is correct, should be adding 
>> other flags (e.g. -pv). I have searched the mailing list and the 
>> options for mri_segstats, but I'm not 100% confident in what I've done 
>> - so any tips would be greatly appreciated.
>> 
>> 
>> Many thanks
>> Eli
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.n

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-26 Thread Eli Johnson
Ok sure, I will do it tomorrow as I don't have access to the stats file right 
now

Many thanks!


From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Thursday, 26 January 2017 6:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region


Hi Doug,

Yes, I have a series of masks that I have created to cover the whole cortex, 
but I want to examine the regions separately. Each region outputs a volume much 
smaller than I would expect given the volumes from aseg stats for the whole 
cortex. That is to say, when I combine the volume from each region although I 
would expect it to be different to the volume from aseg stats (aseg stats is of 
course highly optimized), it's a lot smaller than expected - around half the 
size.

Sorry for not being more clear!
Thanks

> On 26 Jan 2017, at 18:11,y Douglas N Greve  wrote:
>
> In looking at your mask, it covers only half (or less) of the brain.
> This would explain why the total volume you get from the mask is much
> lesss than the total gm volume reported in aseg.stats.
>
>
>> On 01/20/2017 12:08 PM, Eli Johnson wrote:
>>
>> *Hi Doug,*
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *Thanks a lot for your help!*
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *I have run these commands and they complete with no problems. I can
>> also view the region overlaid on a surface and this looks ok, however
>> the volumes that are extracted from mri_segstats are much lower than
>> expected - around half the volume expected, and they don't seem in
>> line with the volumes automatically extracted (i.e. total cortical gm
>> volume from the aseg.stats file). Any thoughts on why this might be?*
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *Many thanks!*
>>
>> *Eli
>> *
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *Douglas N Greve*greve at nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> <mailto:freesurfer%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu?Subject=Re:%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Cortical%20volume%20from%20masked%20region&In-Reply-To=%3C0ae71986-b91f-bdaa-c726-1db7cdd71830%40nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%3E>
>> /Wed Jan 18 15:30:45 EST 2017/
>>
>>  * Previous message: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049516.html>
>>  * Next message: [Freesurfer] installation fail :(
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/049518.html>
>>  * *Messages sorted by:* [ date ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/date.html#49559>
>>[ thread ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/thread.html#49559>
>>[ subject ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/subject.html#49559>
>>[ author ]
>>
>> <https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2017-January/author.html#49559>
>>
>>
>>
>> I would probably map the mask to the surface,eg,
>>
>> mri_vol2surf --regheadersubject --hemi lh --projfrac 0.5 --i
>> scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --interp nearest --o lh.mask.mgz
>>
>> The run
>>
>> mri_segstats --seg lh.mask.mgz --id 1 --accumulate --i lh.volume --o
>> lh.vol.stats
>>
>>
>> 
>> *From:* Eli Johnson 
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 17 January 2017 4:24 PM
>> *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> *Subject:* Cortical volume from masked region
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I am trying to extract the volume from a FreeSurfer segmented scan
>> within a pre-registered mask region, but only within the cortex, and
>> wanted to check my command.
>>
>>
>> The mask is a binary mask (value of 1 across the mask) and is in the
>> same space as the orig.mgz file. It covers part of the frontal lobe.
>>
>>
>> I have run:
>>
>> mri_segstats --seg ./scan500_std/mri/500_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz --id 1 --i
>> ./scan500_std/mri/aparc+aseg.mgz --accumulate --sum test.reg1.sum
>>
>>
>> This has output a text file with a value of 495563 mm3 in the last row.
>>
>>
>> I wanted to check whether this is the correct command to extract only
>> cortical GM within this mask. If this is correct, should be adding
>> other flags (e.g. -pv). I have searched the mailing list and the
>> options for mri_segstats, but I'm not 100% confident in what I've done
>> - so any tips would be greatly appreciated.
>

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-27 Thread Eli Johnson
Hi Doug,


I have re-uploaded the file (see bottom of this email for info):

Along with the default FS output, there are 5 masks, corresponding to frontal, 
temporal, parietal, occipital and insula regions (e.g. 
20001-013-1_std/mri/20001_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz).

There are 10 surfs corresponding to lh & rh frontal,lh & rh temporal, lh & rh 
parietal,lh & rh occipital and lh & rh insula (e.g. 
20001-013-1_std/surf/20001_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surfrh.mgz).


I ran the commands:

mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region1.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_2-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region2.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_3-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region3.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_4-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region4.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_5-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region5.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region1.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_2-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region2.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_3-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region3.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_4-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region4.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_5-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region5.stats



to extract volumes from the 10 regions. The stats files are located as 
described in the command.


Also, in the ./20001-013-1_std/stats/ folder are the default FS lobular volumes 
for comparison.


Thanks again for all of your help, do let me know if I've missed anything 
again!!


Eli





You recently uploaded the following files to the Martinos Center FileDrop:

 + 20001-013-1_std.tar.gz (252.1 MiB)

Here are the people you sent these files to:

 + gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

In case you'd like to modify some of the above information, please use the link 
below:

http://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/?g=7z2xk77v3ue

Cheers,
The Martinos Center Web Team
________
From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Thursday, 26 January 2017 7:13 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region


Ok sure, I will do it tomorrow as I don't have access to the stats file right 
now

Many thanks!

________
From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Thursday, 26 January 2017 6:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region


Hi Doug,

Yes, I have a series of masks that I have created to cover the whole cortex, 
but I want to examine the regions separately. Each region outputs a volume much 
smaller than I would expect given the volumes from aseg stats for the whole 
cortex. That is to say, when I combine the volume from each region although I 
would expect it to be different to the volume from aseg stats (aseg stats is of 
course highly optimized), it's a lot smaller than expected - around half the 
size.

Sorry for not being more clear!
Thanks

> On 26 Jan 2017, at 18:11,y Douglas N Greve  wrote:
>
> In looking at your mask, it covers only half (or less) of the brain.
> This would explain why the total volume you get from the mask is much
> lesss than the total gm volume reported in aseg.stats.
>
>
>> On 01/20/2017 12:08 PM, Eli Johnson wrote:
>>
>> *Hi Doug,*
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *Thanks a lot for your help!*
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *I have run these commands and they complete with no problems. I can
>> also view the region overlaid on a surface and this looks ok, however
>> the volumes that are extracted from mri_segstats are much lower than
>> expected - around half the volume expected, and they don't seem in
>> line with the volumes automatically extracted (i.e. total cortical gm
>> volume from the aseg.stats file). Any thoughts on why this might be?*
>>
>> *
>> *
>>
>> *Many thanks!*
>>
>> *Eli
>> *

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-27 Thread Eli Johnson
Hi Doug,


I was reading the fourth column in the stats files as the volumes (highlighted 
in yellow), as that seems to correspond to the volume_mm3 label when the 
columns are lined up. Also, when I run asegstats2file with the  
'rh.vol_region1.stats' file specified alongside 'volume' as the measure, the 
output is the fourth(highlighted) number in the stats files.


region 1 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1 4988549885.0  Seg0001 88695.1094 1.1755 0.
19.499419.4994

region 2 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1 2076120761.0  Seg0001 29523.0742 0.9522 0.
11.554711.5547

region 3 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1 3599535995.0  Seg0001 57553.2656 1.0586 0.
10.954010.9540

region 4 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1 2706027060.0  Seg0001 56422.7969 1.5332 0.
22.944622.9446

region 5 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1  2873 2873.0  Seg0001  5976.5181 1.4734 0.0424
11.541211.4987


If it's simply a case of me misinterpreting the stats file, and column 6 being 
the volume then I agree - there is no problem (and sorry for wasting so much 
time!). In that case, what does the fourth/highlighted column represent?


Many thanks

Eli

____________
From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Friday, 27 January 2017 10:24 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region


Hi Doug,


I have re-uploaded the file (see bottom of this email for info):

Along with the default FS output, there are 5 masks, corresponding to frontal, 
temporal, parietal, occipital and insula regions (e.g. 
20001-013-1_std/mri/20001_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz).

There are 10 surfs corresponding to lh & rh frontal,lh & rh temporal, lh & rh 
parietal,lh & rh occipital and lh & rh insula (e.g. 
20001-013-1_std/surf/20001_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surfrh.mgz).


I ran the commands:

mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region1.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_2-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region2.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_3-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region3.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_4-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region4.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_5-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region5.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region1.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_2-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region2.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_3-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region3.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_4-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region4.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_5-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region5.stats



to extract volumes from the 10 regions. The stats files are located as 
described in the command.


Also, in the ./20001-013-1_std/stats/ folder are the default FS lobular volumes 
for comparison.


Thanks again for all of your help, do let me know if I've missed anything 
again!!


Eli





You recently uploaded the following files to the Martinos Center FileDrop:

 + 20001-013-1_std.tar.gz (252.1 MiB)

Here are the people you sent these files to:

 + gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

In case you'd like to modify some of the above information, please use the link 
below:

http://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/?g=7z2xk77v3ue

Cheers,
The Martinos Center Web Team

From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Thursday, 26 January 2017 7:13 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region


Ok sure, I will do it tomorrow as I don't have access to the stats file rig

Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region

2017-01-27 Thread Eli Johnson
Great - that makes sense!

Thanks again for your help in resolving this.


Eli


From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Friday, 27 January 2017 4:59 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region


Hi Doug,


I was reading the fourth column in the stats files as the volumes (highlighted 
in yellow), as that seems to correspond to the volume_mm3 label when the 
columns are lined up. Also, when I run asegstats2file with the  
'rh.vol_region1.stats' file specified alongside 'volume' as the measure, the 
output is the fourth(highlighted) number in the stats files.


region 1 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1 4988549885.0  Seg0001 88695.1094 1.1755 0.
19.499419.4994

region 2 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1 2076120761.0  Seg0001 29523.0742 0.9522 0.
11.554711.5547

region 3 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1 3599535995.0  Seg0001 57553.2656 1.0586 0.
10.954010.9540

region 4 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1 2706027060.0  Seg0001 56422.7969 1.5332 0.
22.944622.9446

region 5 rh:

# ColHeaders  Index SegId NVoxels Volume_mm3 StructName Mean StdDev Min Max 
Range

  1   1  2873 2873.0  Seg0001  5976.5181 1.4734 0.0424
11.541211.4987


If it's simply a case of me misinterpreting the stats file, and column 6 being 
the volume then I agree - there is no problem (and sorry for wasting so much 
time!). In that case, what does the fourth/highlighted column represent?


Many thanks

Eli

____________
From: Eli Johnson 
Sent: Friday, 27 January 2017 10:24 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Cortical volume from masked region


Hi Doug,


I have re-uploaded the file (see bottom of this email for info):

Along with the default FS output, there are 5 masks, corresponding to frontal, 
temporal, parietal, occipital and insula regions (e.g. 
20001-013-1_std/mri/20001_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs.mgz).

There are 10 surfs corresponding to lh & rh frontal,lh & rh temporal, lh & rh 
parietal,lh & rh occipital and lh & rh insula (e.g. 
20001-013-1_std/surf/20001_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surfrh.mgz).


I ran the commands:

mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region1.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_2-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region2.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_3-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region3.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_4-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region4.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_5-in-fs_surfrh.mgz --id 
1 --accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/rh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/rh.vol_region5.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_1-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region1.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_2-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region2.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_3-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region3.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_4-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region4.stats
mri_segstats --seg ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/${i}_MNI_lobes_5-in-fs_surf.mgz --id 1 
--accumulate --i ./${i}-013-1_std/surf/lh.volume --sum 
./${i}-013-1_std/lh.vol_region5.stats



to extract volumes from the 10 regions. The stats files are located as 
described in the command.


Also, in the ./20001-013-1_std/stats/ folder are the default FS lobular volumes 
for comparison.


Thanks again for all of your help, do let me know if I've missed anything 
again!!


Eli





You recently uploaded the following files to the Martinos Center FileDrop:

 + 20001-013-1_std.tar.gz (252.1 MiB)

Here are the people you sent these files to:

 + gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu

In case you'd like to modify some of the above information, please use the link 
below:

http://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/?g=7z2xk77v3ue

Cheers,
The Martinos Center Web Team
_