Hi Jürgen,
mainly you are right. As there is no change in the first processing
steps between the cross sectional and the longitudinal stream, it is
sufficient, to simply copy that data from the cross sectional
directories, instead of rerunning it.
The -long stream starts being different in the skullstrip step (where
additionally information from the base template is used).
For a detailed description of each step see:
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/LongitudinalProcessing
Cheers, Martin
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 15:42 +0100, Jürgen Hänggi wrote:
> Dear FS experts
>
> Am I right that the input for step 3 in recon-all -long are the already
> cross-sectionally processed images from step 1 and not the raw images that I
> used to create these cross-sectionally images?
>
> Thanks for clarification
> Regards
> Jürgen
>
>
> Jürgen Hänggi, Ph.D.
> Division Neuropsychology
> Institute of Psychology
> University of Zurich
> Binzmuehlestrasse 14, PO Box 25
> 8050 Zurich, Switzerland
> 0041 44 635 73 97 (phone office)
> 0041 76 445 86 84 (phone mobile)
> 0041 44 635 74 09 (fax office)
> BIN 4.D.04 (office room number)
> j.haenggi[at]psychologie.uzh.ch (email)
> http://www.psychologie.uzh.ch/neuropsy/ (website)
> http://www.juergenhaenggi.ch (private website)
>
> This e-mail (and any attachment/s) contains confidential and/or privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this
> e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
> e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the
> material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer