[Bug 236141] LLD (unlike BFD) ignores unresolved references in libraries for indirect linking
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236141 --- Comment #6 from Antoine Brodin --- Can the default be flipped until issues in ports are resolved? I will post here the list of new failures when the build is finished. There are patches floating around, like: https://github.com/libharu/libharu/pull/109/commits/5cc80928121bea38a16794e2cc24191d86e900cd https://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/158994/ https://sources.debian.org/src/libpuzzle/0.11-3/debian/patches/02_link_against_libm_jump_regress_1_test/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236141] LLD (unlike BFD) ignores unresolved references in libraries for indirect linking
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236141 --- Comment #7 from Jan Beich --- I agree with antoine@. As long as /stable/11 is supported only aarch64, armv7 and ports limited to FreeBSD 12+ may accidentally underlink libraries. Bustage from --no-allow-shlib-undefined default currently interferes with Clang 8 and LLVM openmp dogfooding which is supposed to facilitate MFC to /stable/11 before 11.3 freeze. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236714] Clang problem with rctl(8)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|b...@freebsd.org|toolch...@freebsd.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236141] LLD (unlike BFD) ignores unresolved references in libraries for indirect linking
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236141 --- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: antoine Date: Fri Mar 22 16:19:42 UTC 2019 New revision: 496577 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/496577 Log: Fix build after base r345349 PR: 236141 Changes: head/www/faup/Makefile head/www/faup/files/ head/www/faup/files/patch-CMakeLists.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236714] Clang problem with rctl(8)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714 Mark Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ma...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Mark Johnston --- It's a regression from r341182. The kernel is exporting racct_enable as a bool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: llvm submittal 41050 created for powerpc64 C++ exception code generation: ld r2,40(r1) missing or skipped before bl __cxa_begin_catch code
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59694 is a review for a fix for WITH_LLVM_LIBUNWIND= when WITHOUT_LIB32= is in use. Why not lib32 as well? Well . . . As stands: A) 32-bit powerpc llvm-libunwind fails to build. and: B) If it did build, it would have the r2 (TOC) problem even after this patch. Attempting to fix (B) without fixing (A) would leave an untestable fix. So it is unlikely that covering (B) should be part of the 41050 defect's effort, even though powerpc64 FreeBSD will still be incomplete for libunwind support overall. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236714] Clang problem with rctl(8)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714 --- Comment #2 from Edward Tomasz Napierala --- Thanks! I wonder if we could perhaps return an error from sysctl(3) in this case? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236714] Clang problem with rctl(8)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714 --- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to Edward Tomasz Napierala from comment #2) It would probably be better to detect the case where the old buffer is larger than 1 byte, and zero the full buffer before writing out the value. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236714] Clang problem with rctl(8)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236714 Dimitry Andric changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@freebsd.org --- Comment #4 from Dimitry Andric --- (In reply to Mark Johnston from comment #1) > It's a regression from r341182. The kernel is exporting racct_enable as a > bool. Yes indeed, I did a bit of debugging, and it turns out that if you pass a pointer to an int (and the length of an int, obviousl), the sysctl does not modify the variable at all... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236141] LLD (unlike BFD) ignores unresolved references in libraries for indirect linking
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236141 --- Comment #9 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: kwm Date: Fri Mar 22 23:57:12 UTC 2019 New revision: 496605 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/496605 Log: Fix build after base r345349 While do some cleanup of the port. PR: 236141 Changes: head/devel/libglade2/Makefile head/devel/libglade2/pkg-plist -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236141] LLD (unlike BFD) ignores unresolved references in libraries for indirect linking
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236141 --- Comment #10 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: kwm Date: Sat Mar 23 00:01:05 UTC 2019 New revision: 496606 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/496606 Log: Update gtk30 to 3.24.7. This release contains a fix for the build failure after base r345349. PR: 236141 Obtained from: gnome devel repo Changes: head/x11-toolkits/gtk30/Makefile head/x11-toolkits/gtk30/distinfo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236141] LLD (unlike BFD) ignores unresolved references in libraries for indirect linking
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236141 Bug 236141 depends on bug 236719, which changed state. Bug 236719 Summary: [PATCH] games/torcs: add libusbhid link to try fix in 13-CURRENT https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236719 What|Removed |Added Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 236141] LLD (unlike BFD) ignores unresolved references in libraries for indirect linking
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236141 Jan Beich changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||236719 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236719 [Bug 236719] x11-toolkits/plib: consumers fail --no-allow-shlib-undefined with Gold or LLD 9 (or on 13-CURRENT) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
