Re: csup crash
13.09.2011 03:29, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote: On Monday, September 12, 2011 2:01:16 am Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: Dear colleagues, I found csup is crashing on my building machine on some broken repo element, but cannot quickli realize what's the source of problem What OS version are you running? I wonder if you have this fix: it is on rather fresh stable/8: FreeBSD beaver.rinet.ru 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #5 r224908M: Tue Aug 16 15:43:23 MSD 2011 ma...@beaver.rinet.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEAVER amd64 so I suppose I'd have the fix you'd mentioned. I'm still have broken repo as a ZFS snapshot, so I'm ready to provide more info or test any fix you provide. Have you found a broken file? What its content? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
15.12.2011 17:36, Michael Larabel пишет: On 12/15/2011 07:25 AM, Stefan Esser wrote: Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel: No, the same hardware was used for each OS. In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was used. Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is more similar in concept to ext4 and since that is what most FreeBSD users will use with FreeBSD? I was running some ZFS vs. UFS tests as well and this happened to have ZFS on when I was running some other tests. Can we look at the tests? My opinion is ZFS without tuning is much slower than UFS2. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Request for testing - top 3.8b1 in the base system
Edwin Groothuis wrote:
Oh yes, I forgot about that:
The old top(1) and new top(1) counts the processes different:
- "ps xauw | wc" gives 265
- "ps xauwH | wc" gives 295 (expand threads)
But what about running processes?
I have quad core processor with the summary lines:
new top: 127 processes: 5 running, 104 sleeping, 18 waiting
old top: 90 processes: 1 running, 89 sleeping
Let's see what process is running:
% ps axuwH | awk '{if(index($8,"R")) print}'
root12 100.0 0.0 0 8 ?? RL 14Sep08 20648:50.71
[idle: cpu2]
root13 100.0 0.0 0 8 ?? RL 14Sep08 20647:09.32
[idle: cpu1]
root14 100.0 0.0 0 8 ?? RL 14Sep08 20640:25.87
[idle: cpu0]
root11 86.1 0.0 0 8 ?? RL 14Sep08 20650:27.95
[idle: cpu3]
sem 71228 0.0 0.0 3204 996 p7 R+1:59AM 0:00.00 ps axuwH
Is it correct idle cpu pseudo processes are counted?
Anyway new top looks much better. Thanks, Edwin!
PS. 7.1-PRERELEASE from May 10.
--
Dixi.
Sem.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ldconfig -R issue (Was: Problems with icu - 3.8)
+stable@ Yoshihiro Ota wrote: Why are so many people are bitten by this? Is that the jobs of port-upgrading tool to safe copy these libraries to compat so that all programs using the old libraries works? Portupgrade preserves the libraries in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg: % ls /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/ libicudata.so.36.0 libicule.so.36.0libicuuc.so.36.0 libicui18n.so.36.0 libiculx.so.36.0 libicuio.so.36.0libicutu.so.36.0 ldconfig knows about the directory: % ldconfig -r | head -2 /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints: search directories: /lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/compat:/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/local/lib/mysql:/usr/local/lib/compat/pkg But ldconfig -R don't rescan them: % ldconfig -R % ldconfig -r | grep libicudata 231:-licudata.38 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libicudata.so.38 386:-licudata.38 => /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.38 Could anybody investigate it? I have no time now. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Sharing NTFS via NFS
Hi. For some reason I need to share USB disk with NTFS via NFS. I use fusefs-ntfs to mount the USB disk. But can't export it. I've got this message from mountd(8): mountd[85534]: can't export /mnt After googling I found out Linux can export Ntfs-3g with option no_root_squash: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1791330 But how to do this with FreeBSD (10.0-RELEASE now)? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Sharing NTFS via NFS
01.07.2015 1:26, Rick Macklem wrote: Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi. For some reason I need to share USB disk with NTFS via NFS. I use fusefs-ntfs to mount the USB disk. But can't export it. I've got this message from mountd(8): mountd[85534]: can't export /mnt After googling I found out Linux can export Ntfs-3g with option no_root_squash: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1791330 But how to do this with FreeBSD (10.0-RELEASE now)? Short answer is you can't. Fuse file systems on FreeBSD can't be exported. I'd like to read a long answer. Why? What limitations? ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: [PATCH] ipfwpcap(8)
Vadim Goncharov wrote: Hi, I've recently found a patch (also available at http://antigreen.org/vadim/freebsd/ipfwpcap/) made by me and my friend in January to ipfwpcap(8) introduced in 7.0. Now it have more features, Unfortunately too old to apply. And using of pidfile_* functions from libutil is preferable IMHO. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
computer with USB keyboard hangs in loader boot prompt after a time
Hi. I have a machine with Intel DX58SO X58 mother board (no ps/2 ports). I've installed FreeBSD 7.1 on it without any problem and it works fine. Till I need boot from another device. I press 6 in boot menu, get loader prompt and the computer hangs after a time. Quite random time. From second to tens seconds. I thought it just keyboard froze, but once the computer started beeping, so it looks like a memory corruption or something like that. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: computer with USB keyboard hangs in loader boot prompt after a time
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Hi. I have a machine with Intel DX58SO X58 mother board (no ps/2 ports). I've installed FreeBSD 7.1 on it without any problem and it works fine. Till I need boot from another device. I press 6 in boot menu, get loader prompt and the computer hangs after a time. Quite random time. From second to tens seconds. I thought it just keyboard froze, but once the computer started beeping, so it looks like a memory corruption or something like that. As kib@ has told me, it was fixed with r189017 | jhb | 2009-02-25, and was MFCed with r189307 | jhb | 2009-03-03. Yeap, it works in STABLE now. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
upgrading from 10.0 to 10.3 problem
Hello. I tried to upgrade from 10.0-RELEASE: # freebsd-update -r 10.3-RELEASE upgrade ... # freebsd-update install ... # reboot ... # freebsd-update install Installing updates...Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Now I have: # freebsd-version -ku 10.3-RELEASE-p4 10.0-RELEASE It's not looking good. How to fix? PS. In /var/log/messages I see "(gunzip), uid 0: exited on signal 11" And yes: # gunzip Segmentation fault (core dumped) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Fwd: upgrading from 10.0 to 10.3 problem
Hello. I tried to upgrade from 10.0-RELEASE: # freebsd-update -r 10.3-RELEASE upgrade ... # freebsd-update install ... # reboot ... # freebsd-update install Installing updates...Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Now I have: # freebsd-version -ku 10.3-RELEASE-p4 10.0-RELEASE It's not looking good. How to fix? PS. In /var/log/messages I see "(gunzip), uid 0: exited on signal 11" And yes: # gunzip Segmentation fault (core dumped) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
kernel installation problem on STABLE-11
Hi. On FreeBSD 11.0 kernel installation procedure is broken. It does not work without COMPILER_TYPE=clang: make[2]: "/usr/src/share/mk/bsd.compiler.mk" line 145: Unable to determine compiler type for CC=cc . Consider setting COMPILER_TYPE. Command 'make installworld COMPILER_TYPE=clang KERNCONF=MYKERNERL' works fine. And it looks like it works without COMPILER_TYPE=clang if you buildworld before. But I'm not sure. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 doesn't work with db42
Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> rm /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-freebsd6/bdb.so >> >> then tell me what happens if you run portupgrade again! >> >> I've gone through this today, so it's still fresh in my mind! > > After removing bdb.so portupgrade is working again. Thank you! > > Just for my knowledge - from where goes this error? What should be > fixed? Ruby-bdb or portupgrade? ports/99697 Please note the topic is ports@ relate. And was discussed there. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade bug: -M no longer works after v2.1.0
Atanas wrote: > Recent portupgrade versions no longer obey the -M command line switch, > i.e. any optional arguments to be prepended to each make command. > It should. I'll investigate it. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade bug: -M no longer works after v2.1.0
Atanas wrote: > Recent portupgrade versions no longer obey the -M command line switch, > i.e. any optional arguments to be prepended to each make command. > > How to reproduce: > > # portinstall -M "APACHE_HARD_SERVER_LIMIT=1024" www/apache13 Everything work file. Use -m for getting what you want. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade bug: -M no longer works after v2.1.0
Atanas wrote: > Sergey Matveychuk said the following on 7/11/2006 10:08 PM: >> Atanas wrote: >>> Recent portupgrade versions no longer obey the -M command line switch, >>> i.e. any optional arguments to be prepended to each make command. >>> >>> How to reproduce: >>> >>> # portinstall -M "APACHE_HARD_SERVER_LIMIT=1024" www/apache13 >> >> Everything work file. Use -m for getting what you want. >> > For www/apache13 the -m switch could give the same result as -M would, > but I'm not sure whether it's not just a coincidence. The -m switch was > supposed to serve a different purpose: > > -m > --make-argsSpecify arguments to append to each make(1) com- > mand line. > -M > --make-env Specify arguments to prepend to each make(1) com- > mand line. > > I tried testing another port where I used both: > > # portinstall -M 'WITH_SYSLOG_FACILITY=local5' -m '-DWITHOUT_IPV6' > mail/courier-imap > > With portupgrade-2.0.1_1,1 (the stock 6.1-RELEASE package) it worked. > With portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 it failed (ignoring the -M part like for > www/apache13 before). > > Then I joined both in one -m switch: > > # portinstall -m 'WITH_SYSLOG_FACILITY=local5 -DWITHOUT_IPV6' > mail/courier-imap > > and the latest portupgrade-2.1.3.2,2 did it just fine. > > So, like you suggested, the -m switch seems to cover the functionality > that -M used to provide. I'm not sure however whether this "prepend to > append" conversion would work for all ports. But for these that I use it > appears to work, so I have no problem and will update my scripts to use > -m only. > > The no longer working (obsolete?) -M switch would need to be removed > from the man page though. Both -m and -M works fine but do different things. -m pass its argument as make file argument(s) and -M pass its argument as environment variable(s). You can't set make variable with environment variable. They are different! -M has never worked as you expected. You can test it with a command: %cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 %env APACHE_HARD_SERVER_LIMIT=1024 make against of % make APACHE_HARD_SERVER_LIMIT=1024 I think you confuse the two variables types. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade bug: -M no longer works after v2.1.0
John E Hein wrote: > This is incorrect. > make(1) looks at the environment for variables. > See the man page. OK, something really broke in portupgrade then. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: portupgrade bug: -M no longer works after v2.1.0
Atanas wrote: > Please, don't get me wrong. I'm not asking for help or for a workaround. > I'm actually trying to help identifying a problem or regression. > > If this is not a bug, but a feature change, please have it documented. It was a bug. Fixed. Thanks. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Boot FreeBSD from grub
Joseph Koshy wrote: > sz> How can add FreeBSD into grub menu? I can see FreeBSD file > sz> system via fdisk -l comand. > > Something like the following should work in > "/boot/grub/menu.lst": > > title FreeBSD > root (hd0,a) > kernel /boot/loader > > assuming that the 'a' partition is where the kernel resides. > > There might be a catch: I'm not sure if GRUB understands > UFS2 filesystems, so you might need to ensure that the 'a' > partition is UFS1. > grub knows UFS2. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
sio driver sucks
Do you know an old sio driver is hardly usable? There are many silo overflows, working with a terminal device is a nightmare. There was a report about one crash with a message about a spinlock holed more than 5 seconds (there is no core dump because it has not repeated). After a discussion in a Russian FIDO group I've change it on uart and the problems gone. I think a default driver should be changed from sio to uart until it will be fixed. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sio driver sucks
O. Hartmann wrote: > Had those overflows many times when I used FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE, > 6.1-STABLE and a modem. > But this never had a so bad influence forcing me into using uart. I tried to configure cisco router plugged in a serial port. It was very uncomfortable. It hangs for a few tens seconds after every a few minutes. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: sio driver sucks
Matthew Jacob wrote: > YMMV and your message is content free. I use sio all the time as a > [EMAIL PROTECTED] w/o any problems. > > On 11/12/06, Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Do you know an old sio driver is hardly usable? >> >> There are many silo overflows, working with a terminal device is a >> nightmare. There was a report about one crash with a message about a >> spinlock holed more than 5 seconds (there is no core dump because it has >> not repeated). >> >> After a discussion in a Russian FIDO group I've change it on uart and >> the problems gone. >> >> I think a default driver should be changed from sio to uart until it >> will be fixed. On Proliant DL360 I had a problem with sio. Input/output was jammed for 20-40 seconds every 1-3 minutes. On the FIDO group I found a few reports like mine. After a discussion it was offered to change sio driver with uart. After I do so, the problem gone. It's a common serial port. Nothing special. Now it detects as uart0: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 dmesg.boot: Copyright (c) 1992-2006 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Sat Nov 11 14:57:30 MSK 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/XXX ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3065.81-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf25 Stepping = 5 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x4400> Logical CPUs per core: 2 real memory = 1073717248 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1041727488 (993 MB) MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-15 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 16-31 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 32-47 on motherboard ioapic3 irqs 48-63 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x920-0x923 on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 pcib0: on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 3.0 (no driver attached) ciss0: port 0x2800-0x28ff mem 0xf5f8-0xf5fb,0xf5 df-0xf5df3fff irq 31 at device 4.0 on pci0 ciss0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pci0: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 5.2 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 15.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x17 7,0x376,0x2000-0x200f at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 ohci0: mem 0xf5e7-0xf5e70fff irq 10 at devic e 15.2 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcib1: on acpi0 pci1: on pcib1 bge0: mem 0xf7ef-0xf7ef irq 30 a t device 2.0 on pci1 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX -FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:11:85:d5:ba:6b pcib2: on acpi0 pci4: on pcib2 bge1: mem 0xf7ff-0xf7ff irq 29 a t device 2.0 on pci4 miibus1: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX -FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:11:85:d5:ba:47 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] fdc0: port 0x3f2-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 orm0: at iomem 0xc-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xcbfff,0xcc000-0xcd7ff ,0xee000-0xe on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 uart0: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 ugen0: American Power Conversion Smart-UPS 1500 RM FW:617.3.I USB FW:1.5, rev 1. 10/0.06, addr 2 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 3065813092 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert loadable, rule-based forwarding enabled, defau lt to deny, logging unlimited acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4 da0 at ciss0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 135.168MB/s transfers da0: 140006MB (286734240 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 35139C) -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: problems with portupgrade under non-root user
Julian C. Dunn wrote: > I want to set up a FreeBSD system so that all portupgrades are done by a > "portbld" user, which has restricted 'sudo' rights to execute only > portupgrade-related commands. To that end, I did the following: > > $ sudo chown -R portbld:portbld /usr/ports > $ sudo chown -R portbld:portbld /var/db/sup/ports-all > $ cd /usr/ports && sudo -u portbld make update > (cvsup runs) > (add 'portbld' to sudoers with NOPASSWD: ALL for now) > $ sudo -u portbld portupgrade -s dovecot You need root at least for port install. > > Unfortunately this last step doesn't work: ruby dumps core: > > Making all in doc > cat dovecot-config.in|sed "s|moduledir=|moduledir=/usr/local/lib/dovecot|" >> dovecot-config > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! mail/dovecot (dovecot-1.0.r22)(Permission denied) > ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed > /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2084: [BUG] Segmentation fault > ruby 1.8.5 (2006-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] > > Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) /var/db/pkg and var/db/ports must be writable for the user too. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Problem with portupgrade
Michael Proto wrote: > Phillip Ledger wrote: >> i have been trying to get portupgrade working, however everything i try >> to run it im getting an error with the portsdb. now i have tryed to >> rebuild it as requested initaly by portupgrade but im still getting an >> error >> >> portupgrade -aRr >> [missing key: categories] [Updating the portsdb in >> /var/tmp ... - 16413 port entries found >> .1000.2000.3000.4000.5000.6000.7000.8000.9000.1.11000.12000.13000.14000.15000.16000 >> . done] >> missing key: categories: Cannot read the portsdb! >> /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:548:in `open_db': database >> file error (PortsDB::DBError) >>from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:702:in `port' >>from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:890:in >> `all_depends_list' >>from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:809:in `tsort_build' >>from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:801:in `each' >>from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:801:in `tsort_build' >>from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:823:in `sort_build' >>from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:827:in `sort_build!' >>from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:721:in `main' >>from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/optparse.rb:755:in `initialize' >>from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `new' >>from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:220:in `main' >>from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:2084 >> >> >> any idea whats causeing the issue or how to fix it? > > > Try removing /usr/ports/INDEX-6.db and running "portsdb -u", which > should rebuild it from your existing /usr/ports/INDEX-6 file. > > (if you're using FreeBSD 5 it would be INDEX-5 above). > If it does not help, you should update portupgrade to the last version and rebuild the database again. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
time goes slow in VmWare
Hello. I have a problem with FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE in VmWare Server on Windows 2003 host. Time is a hour slow for a day. I have hint.apic.0.disabled=1 in loader.conf I've tried all possible values in kern.timecounter.hardware. Nothing helps. I've found it's not only my problem: http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=26034&tstart=0 ntpd does not help. I think because it's too rude time for NTP. Any hints please. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: time goes slow in VmWare
Adrian Chadd wrote: > The solution is to install the VMware or VirtualPC supplied drivers > for your environment. They'll include, amongst other things, fixes for > the RTC and timer drivers which will fix your clock skew issues (and > if you've noticed, things like "sleep" acting oddly.) What do you mean as 'VMware supplied drivers'? vmware-guestd is running. No other special driver I know. BTW. Setting HZ=100 does help. Thanks! -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
6.1-RELEASE disk hangs after loading kernel on sparc64
I've downloaded 6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-disc1.iso and try to boot. loader boots kernel and hangs on message: jumping to kernel entry at 0x... What can I do? PS. It's sun 480 with 4 CPU. I have no complete info on the configuration. -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 6.1-RELEASE disk hangs after loading kernel on sparc64
Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 12:08 +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >> I've downloaded 6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-disc1.iso and try to boot. >> loader boots kernel and hangs on message: >> jumping to kernel entry at 0x... >> >> What can I do? >> >> PS. It's sun 480 with 4 CPU. I have no complete info on the configuration. > > The Sun 480 is Ultrasparc-III processors and is not supported at this > time. And CURRENT too? -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 6.1-RELEASE disk hangs after loading kernel on sparc64
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Gavin Atkinson wrote: >> On Mon, 2006-06-19 at 12:08 +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >>> I've downloaded 6.1-RELEASE-sparc64-disc1.iso and try to boot. >>> loader boots kernel and hangs on message: >>> jumping to kernel entry at 0x... >>> >>> What can I do? >>> >>> PS. It's sun 480 with 4 CPU. I have no complete info on the configuration. >> The Sun 480 is Ultrasparc-III processors and is not supported at this >> time. > > And CURRENT too? > Sorry, found the info on web site. BTW OpenBSD supports UltraSparc III. (http://kerneltrap.org/node/6668) -- Dixi. Sem. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
??: fxp half-duplex problemm
> What if you do > > ifconfig fxp0 media autoselect I don't undertand. Autoselect is turned on by default. I have full-duplex then. Sem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
??: ??: fxp half-duplex problemm
> If the switch supports full duplex why would you not want to use it ? It became buggy in full-duplex. It send zerro packets permanently in full-duplex port. Link works but slowlier. Sem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
