make installkernel fails

2005-03-14 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 
Hello!
For some days now make installkernel fails with
	
cd /usr/include/nfsserver;  for h in *.h; do  if [ -L $h ]; then 
rm -f $h; fi;  done
cd /usr/include/pccard;  for h in *.h; do  if [ -L $h ]; then rm 
-f $h; fi;  done
cd /usr/include/posix4;  for h in *.h; do  if [ -L $h ]; then rm 
-f $h; fi;  done
cd /usr/include/sys;  for h in *.h; do  if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f 
$h; fi;  done
cd /usr/include/vm;  for h in *.h; do  if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f 
$h; fi;  done
cd /usr/include/cam/scsi;  for h in *.h; do  if [ -L $h ]; then 
rm -f $h; fi;  done
cd /usr/include/dev/acpica;  for h in *.h; do  if [ -L $h ]; then 
rm -f $h; fi;  done
cd: can't cd to /usr/include/dev/acpica
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/src/include.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
-
acpica seems to be a file, not a directory.
Regards,
Uli.

*****
* Peter Ulrich Kruppa - Wuppertal - Germany * 
*
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: OpenOffice works now with system gcc 2.95.3

2002-06-13 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 

On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Martin Blapp wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> After the last patchset has been comitted, OO builds now
> with the system gcc and works afterwards without crashing
> in the help system.
>
> I've removed the dependency on ports gcc31. OpenOffice building
> on CURRENT with system GCC is still broken. You'll still
> need USE_GCC=3.1 there.
>
> We need testers now, who test the OS-dependent functions
> if they work as they should. Please report any problems to me.
Mat Dillons patch leads to

---
# patch < /root/rtld-elf.diff
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Patch made by Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|This patch fixes the soffice install. If you get a message
|about missing files during user installation, your system
|is affected and you have to install this patch.
|
|1.) Apply the patch: cd /usr/src && patch < rtld-elf.diff
|2.) cd /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf
|3.) make depend && make && make install
|
|If you have questions, contact Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|--- libexec/rtld-elf/i386/reloc.c.orig  Mon Jun 10 13:16:37 2002
|+++ libexec/rtld-elf/i386/reloc.c   Mon Jun 10 13:39:56 2002
--
Patching file libexec/rtld-elf/i386/reloc.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 115.
Hunk #2 failed at 146.
Hunk #3 failed at 165.
Hunk #4 failed at 183.
Hunk #5 failed at 195.
Hunk #6 failed at 209.
6 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to
libexec/rtld-elf/i386/reloc.c.rej
Hmm...  Ignoring the trailing garbage.
done

  -
I don't know the consequences of these failures.

Regards,

Uli.


>
> Known issues:
> -
>
> - Choosing the JDK does not work in OO setup:
>
>   Only the Linux JDK 1.3.1 works for now. The native JDK does not have hotspot
>   and does not support native threads. If you use choose the linux JDK, the
>   Linux emulation needs to be running.
>
>
> - Mozilla cannot be started from OO:
>
>   Even if I make the neccessary config entries, mozilla does not start.
>   That's a problem in the mozilla scripts. I hope that the mozilla
>   hook in /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/mozilla will sonn be fixed.
>
>
> - The setup crashes:
>
>   You may not have installed the rtld patch. Please get this patch:
>   http://people.freebsd.org/~mbr/patches/rtld-elf.diff
>
>
> - The build does exit with a ld: memory exhausted
>
>   Add this to your kernel configuration till we have fixed the problem
>   with ld:
>
>   options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)"
>   options MAXSSIZ="(256*1024*1024)"
>
>
> Martin
>
> Martin Blapp, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --
> ImproWare AG, UNIXSP & ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH
> Phone: +41 061 826 93 00: +41 61 826 93 01
> PGP: 
> PGP Fingerprint: B434 53FC C87C FE7B 0A18 B84C 8686 EF22 D300 551E
> --
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
>

*---*
*Peter Ulrich Kruppa*
*  -  Wuppertal -   *
*  Germany  *
*---*


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

ppp -nat broken???

2004-10-26 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 
Hi!
I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed 
something new.

I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. 
Everything works all-right from the gateway itself.
From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but
domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host").
These are my rc.conf lines:
kern_securelevel_enable="NO"
inetd_enable="YES"
gateway_enable="YES"
named_enable="YES"
ppp_enable="YES"
ppp_mode="ddial"
ppp_nat="YES"
ppp_profile="my-profile"
Thanks for any hints,
Uli.
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: ppp -nat broken???

2004-10-26 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Hello,
It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following:
- show us your /etc/resolv.conf
domain  pukruppa.de
nameserver 195.62.99.42
nameserver 195.62.97.177

- are you really sure named is configured correctly?
No, until now I never had to configure anything there.
Uli.
greets,
Samuel Trommel

Hi!
I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed
something new.
I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway.
Everything works all-right from the gateway itself.
From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but
domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host").
These are my rc.conf lines:
kern_securelevel_enable="NO"
inetd_enable="YES"
gateway_enable="YES"
named_enable="YES"
ppp_enable="YES"
ppp_mode="ddial"
ppp_nat="YES"
ppp_profile="my-profile"
Thanks for any hints,
Uli.
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
 | Wuppertal |
 |  Germany  |
 +---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

RE: ppp -nat broken???

2004-10-26 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Hello Peter,
Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all. 
Windows-IP-Konfiguration
Hostname: tiny
Primäres DNS-Suffix :
Knotentyp   : Hybrid
IP-Routing aktiviert: Nein
WINS-Proxy aktiviert: Nein
Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung
Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix  :
Beschreibung: 00-80-88-03-C4-
3A
DHCP aktiviert  : Nein
IP-Adresse  : 192.168.10.4
Subnetzmaske: 255.255.255.0
Standardgateway : 192.168.10.1
DNS-Server  : 192.168.10.1
primärer WINS-Server: 192.168.10.1

And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf.
nameserver 192.168.10.1
So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off?
Doesn't work either.


Samuel Trommel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22
Aan: Samuel Trommel
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken???
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Hello,
It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following:
- show us your /etc/resolv.conf
domain  pukruppa.de
nameserver 195.62.99.42
nameserver 195.62.97.177

- are you really sure named is configured correctly?
No, until now I never had to configure anything there.
Uli.
greets,
Samuel Trommel

Hi!
I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed
something new.
I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway.
Everything works all-right from the gateway itself.
From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but
domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host").
These are my rc.conf lines:
kern_securelevel_enable="NO"
inetd_enable="YES"
gateway_enable="YES"
named_enable="YES"
ppp_enable="YES"
ppp_mode="ddial"
ppp_nat="YES"
ppp_profile="my-profile"
Thanks for any hints,
Uli.
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
 | Wuppertal |
 |  Germany  |
 +---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
--
Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij.
Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

RE: ppp -nat broken???

2004-10-26 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Oke.. are you using DHCP or static.
No, I am using static.
If i'm not right. Give us some more information about your 
setup.. i'm just guessing around now..
Really sorry about this, I set this up long ago and never thought 
about it again.

Uli.
greets,
Samuel Trommel
Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:20
Aan: Samuel Trommel
CC: Samuel Trommel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken???
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Hello Peter,
Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all.
Windows-IP-Konfiguration
Hostname: tiny
Primäres DNS-Suffix :
Knotentyp   : Hybrid
IP-Routing aktiviert: Nein
WINS-Proxy aktiviert: Nein
Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung
Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix  :
Beschreibung: 00-80-88-03-C4-
3A
DHCP aktiviert  : Nein
IP-Adresse  : 192.168.10.4
Subnetzmaske: 255.255.255.0
Standardgateway : 192.168.10.1
DNS-Server  : 192.168.10.1
primärer WINS-Server: 192.168.10.1

And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf.
nameserver 192.168.10.1
So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off?
Doesn't work either.


Samuel Trommel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22
Aan: Samuel Trommel
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken???
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Hello,
It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following:
- show us your /etc/resolv.conf
domain  pukruppa.de
nameserver 195.62.99.42
nameserver 195.62.97.177

- are you really sure named is configured correctly?
No, until now I never had to configure anything there.
Uli.
greets,
Samuel Trommel

Hi!
I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed
something new.
I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway.
Everything works all-right from the gateway itself.
From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but
domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host").
These are my rc.conf lines:
kern_securelevel_enable="NO"
inetd_enable="YES"
gateway_enable="YES"
named_enable="YES"
ppp_enable="YES"
ppp_mode="ddial"
ppp_nat="YES"
ppp_profile="my-profile"
Thanks for any hints,
Uli.
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
 | Wuppertal |
 |  Germany  |
 +---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
--
Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij.
Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
--
Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij.
Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/

+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

RE: ppp -nat broken???

2004-10-27 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Just set named="NO" instead of "YES" reboot you server 
and(rc.conf). Change the DNS-Server of you clients in:

Primary nameserver 195.62.99.42
Secundary nameserver 195.62.97.177
Yes, that works, thank you so far, but ...
I never had to do this before this way. I always simply set my 
gateway as name-server and I wonder what has changed the last 
week or so.
Just imagine, I had to upgrade our school's gateway/proxy (which 
runs on 4.7) one day: I would have to run around and change 40x2 
nameserver addresses.

Uli.
greets,
Samuel Trommel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:55
Aan: Samuel Trommel
CC: Samuel Trommel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken???
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Oke.. are you using DHCP or static.
No, I am using static.
If i'm not right. Give us some more information about your
setup.. i'm just guessing around now..
Really sorry about this, I set this up long ago and never thought
about it again.
Uli.
greets,
Samuel Trommel
Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 17:20
Aan: Samuel Trommel
CC: Samuel Trommel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: ppp -nat broken???
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Hello Peter,
Oke, if you are using windows clients show me ipconfig /all.
Windows-IP-Konfiguration
Hostname: tiny
Primäres DNS-Suffix :
Knotentyp   : Hybrid
IP-Routing aktiviert: Nein
WINS-Proxy aktiviert: Nein
Ethernetadapter LAN-Verbindung
Verbindungsspezifisches DNS-Suffix  :
Beschreibung: 00-80-88-03-C4-
3A
DHCP aktiviert  : Nein
IP-Adresse  : 192.168.10.4
Subnetzmaske: 255.255.255.0
Standardgateway : 192.168.10.1
DNS-Server  : 192.168.10.1
primärer WINS-Server: 192.168.10.1

And in the case of linux/unix /etc/resolv.conf.
nameserver 192.168.10.1
So if you don't using named(!?:) turn it off?
Doesn't work either.


Samuel Trommel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Peter Ulrich Kruppa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: dinsdag 26 oktober 2004 15:22
Aan: Samuel Trommel
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: ppp -nat broken???
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Samuel Trommel wrote:
Hello,
It has something to do with your DNS. Do the following:
- show us your /etc/resolv.conf
domain  pukruppa.de
nameserver 195.62.99.42
nameserver 195.62.97.177

- are you really sure named is configured correctly?
No, until now I never had to configure anything there.
Uli.
greets,
Samuel Trommel

Hi!
I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed
something new.
I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway.
Everything works all-right from the gateway itself.
From my workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but
domain names won't be resolved ("unknown host").
These are my rc.conf lines:
kern_securelevel_enable="NO"
inetd_enable="YES"
gateway_enable="YES"
named_enable="YES"
ppp_enable="YES"
ppp_mode="ddial"
ppp_nat="YES"
ppp_profile="my-profile"
Thanks for any hints,
Uli.
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
 | Wuppertal |
 |  Germany  |
 +---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
--
Deze email is gecontroleerd door CAIWAY Internet Virusvrij.
Voor meer informatie, zie http://www.caiway.nl/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+-------+
--
Deze email is gecontroleerd door

Re: ppp -nat broken [solved]

2004-10-29 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
I wonder if userland ppp's nat option is broken or if I missed 
something new.
First of all: My humble apologies to everybody for setting you on 
the wrong track. Indeed -nat works all-right. My problems were 
caused by recent changes of named and BIND.
Big thanks for all hints which helped me to analyze this. For 
details look further down.

I am using my freebsd (5.3-STABLE) machine as internet gateway. 
Everything works all-right from the gateway itself. From my 
workstations I can ping any IP in the internet, but domain 
names won't be resolved ("unknown host").

These are my rc.conf lines:
kern_securelevel_enable="NO"
inetd_enable="YES"
gateway_enable="YES"
named_enable="YES"
ppp_enable="YES"
ppp_mode="ddial"
ppp_nat="YES"
ppp_profile="my-profile"
This configuration starts named as a local nameserver. I never 
had to do anything else. This stopped working "out of the box" 
some time ago. From /usr/src/UPDATING (20040928, 20040925) I 
learn that named and BIND have changed. I did the respective 
changes and edited two entries in /var/named/etc/named/named.conf
1) I commented
	listen-on	{127.0.0.1;};
2) I put my two nameserver IPs (from /etc/resolv.conf) into
	forwarders {
		195.62.99.42;
		195.62.97.177;
	};

After restarting named everything worked as before: my clients 
accept my gateway's IP as gateway *and* nameserver.

Thanks and regards,
Uli.

+---+
|Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: ppp -nat broken [solved]

2004-10-29 Thread Peter Ulrich Kruppa 
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 09:52:51AM +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
learn that named and BIND have changed. I did the respective
changes and edited two entries in /var/named/etc/named/named.conf
1) I commented
listen-on   {127.0.0.1;};
Instead of opening a 53/tcp, 53/udp port to the world (ANYADDR),
you may prefer to restrict the address range to your internal LAN only,
with something like (replace 192.168.10.0/24 accordingly):
listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.10.0/24; };
Check with 'sockstat -46' to be sure.
2) I put my two nameserver IPs (from /etc/resolv.conf) into
forwarders {
195.62.99.42;
195.62.97.177;
};
They are not absolutely necessary: named is perfectly able to
query root and other servers itself. You could experiment with
or without forwarders, and pick the configuration that is faster
for you. As a general rule of thumb: Forwarders are good for
recursive queries, because only one query will travel through
your ADSL link, other queries being done by your ISPs nameservers.
They are also good, because you can profit from your ISPs nameservers'
cache. But they can hinder performance, should one or both of those
nameservers be down for whatever reason.
Both works perfectly well,
another thanks!
Uli.

Cheers,
cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
+-------+
    |Peter Ulrich Kruppa|
| Wuppertal |
|  Germany  |
+---+
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"