/bin/sh core dumps on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-11-12 Thread Hans F. Nordhaug
Hi!

Suddenly /bin/sh started to crash all the time with core dumps. I'm
running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 (i386) and I have not updated anything
lately.  The /bin/sh binary seems to be untouched. It might be some
hardware trouble, but the machine seems to run OK now. (I had to
replace /bin/sh with a symlink to /rescue/sh.)

I would like to track down the problem, but running sh I only get
"Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)". I would be happy to run
gdb and give you a backtrace. Any clues?

Hans

PS! I tried to run "freebsd-update IDS" to see if any files are
broken, but it stops at
Inspecting system... sha256: ///boot/kernel/utopia.ko.symbols: Input/output 
error
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: /bin/sh core dumps on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-11-12 Thread Ivan Voras

Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:

Hi!

Suddenly /bin/sh started to crash all the time with core dumps. I'm
running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 (i386) and I have not updated anything
lately.  The /bin/sh binary seems to be untouched. It might be some
hardware trouble, but the machine seems to run OK now. (I had to
replace /bin/sh with a symlink to /rescue/sh.)

I would like to track down the problem, but running sh I only get
"Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)". I would be happy to run
gdb and give you a backtrace. Any clues?

Hans

PS! I tried to run "freebsd-update IDS" to see if any files are
broken, but it stops at
Inspecting system... sha256: ///boot/kernel/utopia.ko.symbols: Input/output 
error


All of this points to a hardware problem.

I think the best thing you can try is to manually get a hash fingerprint 
of your sh and compare it with another, known good copy.


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: /bin/sh core dumps on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-11-12 Thread Michal
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Suddenly /bin/sh started to crash all the time with core dumps. I'm
>> running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 (i386) and I have not updated anything
>> lately.  The /bin/sh binary seems to be untouched. It might be some
>> hardware trouble, but the machine seems to run OK now. (I had to
>> replace /bin/sh with a symlink to /rescue/sh.)
>>
>> I would like to track down the problem, but running sh I only get
>> "Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)". I would be happy to run
>> gdb and give you a backtrace. Any clues?
>>
>> Hans
>>
>> PS! I tried to run "freebsd-update IDS" to see if any files are
>> broken, but it stops at
>> Inspecting system... sha256: ///boot/kernel/utopia.ko.symbols:
>> Input/output error
> 
> All of this points to a hardware problem.
> 

Last time I saw things like this it was either a hard drive on the way
out, or a PSU dying. Run some pre-OS tests (Ultimate boot cd or
something) to try and get some results outside of the OS

> I think the best thing you can try is to manually get a hash fingerprint
> of your sh and compare it with another, known good copy.
> 
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: /bin/sh core dumps on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
> Suddenly /bin/sh started to crash all the time with core dumps. I'm
> running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 (i386) and I have not updated anything
> lately.  The /bin/sh binary seems to be untouched. It might be some
> hardware trouble, but the machine seems to run OK now. (I had to
> replace /bin/sh with a symlink to /rescue/sh.)
> 
> I would like to track down the problem, but running sh I only get
> "Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)". I would be happy to run
> gdb and give you a backtrace. Any clues?
> 
> PS! I tried to run "freebsd-update IDS" to see if any files are
> broken, but it stops at
> Inspecting system... sha256: ///boot/kernel/utopia.ko.symbols: Input/output 
> error

Hardware problem.  Take your pick: bad RAM, bad hard disk, bad
motherboard, bad PSU, bad cabling.

You can rule out hard disk problems by installing smartmontools from
ports (sysutils/smartmontools).  Please provide output from the
following command:

smartctl -a /dev/{disk}

Where {disk} is "ad4", "da0", or similar -- and NOT something like
"ad8s1" or "da0s1d".

If multiple disks are in your machine -- the one you want is the
disk you boot from (where /boot exists, and/or root filesystem).

I can teach you how to decode/read SMART statistics correctly.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick   j...@parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Ivan Voras

Jeremy Chadwick wrote:


I can teach you how to decode/read SMART statistics correctly.



Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)

I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so 
statistics and what indicates what...


Here is for example my desktop drive:

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE 
UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f   087   083   006Pre-fail 
Always   -   45398197
  3 Spin_Up_Time0x0003   096   093   000Pre-fail 
Always   -   0
  4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032   100   100   020Old_age 
Always   -   64
  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   036Pre-fail 
Always   -   0
  7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f   084   060   030Pre-fail 
Always   -   247407473
  9 Power_On_Hours  0x0032   089   089   000Old_age 
Always   -   10155
 10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0013   100   100   097Pre-fail 
Always   -   0
 12 Power_Cycle_Count   0x0032   100   100   020Old_age 
Always   -   64
187 Reported_Uncorrect  0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always 
  -   0
189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a   100   100   000Old_age   Always 
  -   0
190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   058   055   045Old_age   Always 
  -   42 (Lifetime Min/Max 37/44)
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022   042   045   000Old_age   Always 
  -   42 (0 20 0 0)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered  0x001a   062   059   000Old_age   Always 
  -   45398197
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000Old_age   Always 
  -   0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   100   100   000Old_age 
Offline  -   0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x003e   200   200   000Old_age   Always 
  -   0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   0x   100   253   000Old_age 
Offline  -   0
202 TA_Increase_Count   0x0032   100   253   000Old_age   Always 
  -   0


I see many values exceeding threshold but since I see it so often on 
other drives I don't know what the threshold is for.


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Thomas Backman
On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)
> 
> I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so statistics and 
> what indicates what...
> 
> Here is for example my desktop drive:
> 
> SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
> Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED  
> WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
>  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f   087   083   006Pre-fail Always   
> -   45398197
>  3 Spin_Up_Time0x0003   096   093   000Pre-fail Always   
> -   0
>  4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032   100   100   020Old_age Always   - 
>   64
>  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   036Pre-fail Always   
> -   0
>  7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f   084   060   030Pre-fail Always   
> -   247407473
>  9 Power_On_Hours  0x0032   089   089   000Old_age Always   - 
>   10155
> 10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0013   100   100   097Pre-fail Always   
> -   0
> 12 Power_Cycle_Count   0x0032   100   100   020Old_age Always   - 
>   64
> 187 Reported_Uncorrect  0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always  
>  -   0
> 189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a   100   100   000Old_age   Always  
>  -   0
> 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   058   055   045Old_age   Always  
>  -   42 (Lifetime Min/Max 37/44)
> 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022   042   045   000Old_age   Always  
>  -   42 (0 20 0 0)
> 195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered  0x001a   062   059   000Old_age   Always  
>  -   45398197
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000Old_age   Always  
>  -   0
> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   100   100   000Old_age Offline  
> -   0
> 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x003e   200   200   000Old_age   Always  
>  -   0
> 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   0x   100   253   000Old_age Offline  
> -   0
> 202 TA_Increase_Count   0x0032   100   253   000Old_age   Always  
>  -   0
> 
> I see many values exceeding threshold but since I see it so often on other 
> drives I don't know what the threshold is for.
None of the your values are exceeding the threshold - it works backwards. If 
the value is LOWER than the threshold, you might be in trouble.
Also, judging by the raw read error rate, seek error rate and hardward ECC 
recovered, allow me to guess that this is a Seagate drive. :-)
(Seagate drives, perhaps among others, use these raw values way differently 
than others. My Hitachi 7K1000.B has 0 on those.)

Regards,
Thomas___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Ivan Voras

Thomas Backman wrote:

On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:

Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)

I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so statistics and 
what indicates what...

Here is for example my desktop drive:

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED  
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f   087   083   006Pre-fail Always   -  
 45398197
 3 Spin_Up_Time0x0003   096   093   000Pre-fail Always   -  
 0
 4 Start_Stop_Count0x0032   100   100   020Old_age Always   -   
64
 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   036Pre-fail Always   -  
 0
 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f   084   060   030Pre-fail Always   -  
 247407473
 9 Power_On_Hours  0x0032   089   089   000Old_age Always   -   
10155
10 Spin_Retry_Count0x0013   100   100   097Pre-fail Always   -  
 0
12 Power_Cycle_Count   0x0032   100   100   020Old_age Always   -   
64
187 Reported_Uncorrect  0x0032   100   100   000Old_age   Always   
-   0
189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a   100   100   000Old_age   Always   
-   0
190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   058   055   045Old_age   Always   
-   42 (Lifetime Min/Max 37/44)
194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022   042   045   000Old_age   Always   
-   42 (0 20 0 0)
195 Hardware_ECC_Recovered  0x001a   062   059   000Old_age   Always   
-   45398197
197 Current_Pending_Sector  0x0012   100   100   000Old_age   Always   
-   0
198 Offline_Uncorrectable   0x0010   100   100   000Old_age Offline  -  
 0
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count0x003e   200   200   000Old_age   Always   
-   0
200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate   0x   100   253   000Old_age Offline  -  
 0
202 TA_Increase_Count   0x0032   100   253   000Old_age   Always   
-   0

I see many values exceeding threshold but since I see it so often on other 
drives I don't know what the threshold is for.

None of the your values are exceeding the threshold - it works backwards. If 
the value is LOWER than the threshold, you might be in trouble.


Good to know.


Also, judging by the raw read error rate, seek error rate and hardward ECC 
recovered, allow me to guess that this is a Seagate drive. :-)
(Seagate drives, perhaps among others, use these raw values way differently 
than others. My Hitachi 7K1000.B has 0 on those.)


Yes, it's Seagate. Statistically I have the least problems with their 
drives. But I imagine that lack of standardization about these 
statistics very much limits the usability of SMART, right?


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: Problems moving hostapd AP config from 6.4 to 8.0RC2

2009-11-12 Thread Geoff Roberts
Hi Sam,

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:53:17 pm Sam Leffler wrote:
> Setting HOSTAPD_CFLAGS directly is the intended mechanism.  EAP_SERVER
> is the important one to define; past that you're just adding in some of
> the more esoteric mechanisms.  I should probably enable it by default
> (it comes setup out of the box to do only WPA-PSK).

Making a tunable that defaults to enabled sounds logical as the example files 
have references to it. However I can understand the concern in doing 
something different to the "shrink wrapped" edition :)

It would possibly make a sensible companion setting for WPA_SUPPLICANT_EAPOL - 
HOSTAPD_EAP?

Kind regards,

Geoff

-- 

___
From the desk of Geoff Roberts
Implementation Partner
AUSTRALIAN PROJECTS PTY LIMITED

S A F E   K N O W L E D G E
IT Security - Data Protection

Email: supp...@apro.com.au

NATIONAL HELP DESK SUPPORT
Sydney          02 4231 4222
Melbourne       03 9017 8222
Adelaide        08 6461 6222
Perth           08 8463 1222
Brisbane        07 3137 1555
Hobart          03 6281 2555
Canberra        02 6112 8855
___

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Bruce Cran
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:56:16 +0100
Ivan Voras  wrote:

> Yes, it's Seagate. Statistically I have the least problems with their 
> drives. But I imagine that lack of standardization about these 
> statistics very much limits the usability of SMART, right?
> 

The main problem with SMART appears to be that it's not an accurate
predictor of drive failure, according to a study done at Google - see
http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf

-- 
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Ivan Voras

Bruce Cran wrote:

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:56:16 +0100
Ivan Voras  wrote:

Yes, it's Seagate. Statistically I have the least problems with their 
drives. But I imagine that lack of standardization about these 
statistics very much limits the usability of SMART, right?


The main problem with SMART appears to be that it's not an accurate
predictor of drive failure, according to a study done at Google - see
http://labs.google.com/papers/disk_failures.pdf


I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of 
nonstandard interpretations of statistics? I do remember they said they 
buy from multiple drive vendors.


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


can't boot table-8 on HP Proliant DL580 G5

2009-11-12 Thread Daniel Braniss
Hi,
the boot stops somewhare after probing ata0, so far
playing with the BIOS (disabling stuff) does not help.
BTW, linux boots ok (except it has problems with IPMI)
So, any success stories there?

danny


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote:
> I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of 
> nonstandard interpretations of statistics?

Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes",
so it is quite logical for different vendors to have different
statistics. :)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Ivan Voras

Dimitry Andric wrote:

On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote:
I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of 
nonstandard interpretations of statistics?


Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes",
so it is quite logical for different vendors to have different
statistics. :)


I see your point :)

Though I would hope that a statistics like:

  1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f   087   083   006Pre-fail Always 
  -   45398197


would have an equivalent across vendors :) I know, it's too much to ask :)

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


8.0-rc2 meshmode breaks hostap mode on ath0

2009-11-12 Thread Marten Vijn

hi

8.0-rc2 802.11s breaks ap mode:
- on the same interface 
- when mesh is on diffent channel

how-to reproduce:
ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ath0 wlanmode hostap
ifconfig wlan0 ssid bert channel 3 up
ifconfig wlan1 create wlandev ath0 wlanmode mesh
ifconfig wlan1 channel 3 meshid ernie up
ifconfig ==> wlan0  =>  status: running
ifconfig wlan1 channel 7
ifconfig ==> wlan0 =>  status: no carrier

details below,

kind regards,
Marten

dmesg:

# dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights
reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 8.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 10 20:24:18 CET 2009
r...@master:/usr/obj/nanobsd.full/usr/src/sys/KERNEL i386
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Enhanced Am486DX4/Am5x86 Write-Back (486-class CPU)
  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x494  Stepping = 4
  Features=0x1
real memory  = 67108864 (64 MB)
avail memory = 55230464 (52 MB)
wlan: mac acl policy registered
kbd1 at kbdmux0
ACPI Error: A valid RSDP was not found 20090521 tbxfroot-309
ACPI: Table initialisation failed: AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI: Try disabling either ACPI or apic support.
*** WARNING: missing CPU_ELAN -- timekeeping may be wrong
pcib0:  pcibus 0 on motherboard
pci0:  on pcib0
ath0:  mem 0xa000-0xa000 irq 10 at device 16.0 on
pci0
ath0: [ITHREAD]
ath0: AR5212 mac 5.9 RF5112 phy 4.3
sis0:  port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem
0xa001-0xa0010fff irq 11 at device 18.0 on pci0
sis0: Silicon Revision: DP83816A
miibus0:  on sis0
nsphyter0:  PHY 0 on miibus0
nsphyter0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
sis0: Ethernet address: 00:00:24:c5:59:8c
sis0: [ITHREAD]
sis1:  port 0xe100-0xe1ff mem
0xa0011000-0xa0011fff irq 5 at device 19.0 on pci0
sis1: Silicon Revision: DP83816A
miibus1:  on sis1
nsphyter1:  PHY 0 on miibus1
nsphyter1:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
sis1: Ethernet address: 00:00:24:c5:59:8d
sis1: [ITHREAD]
sis2:  port 0xe200-0xe2ff mem
0xa0012000-0xa0012fff irq 9 at device 20.0 on pci0
sis2: Silicon Revision: DP83816A
miibus2:  on sis2
nsphyter2:  PHY 0 on miibus2
nsphyter2:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
sis2: Ethernet address: 00:00:24:c5:59:8e
sis2: [ITHREAD]
cpu0 on motherboard
isa0:  on motherboard
pmtimer0 on isa0
orm0:  at iomem 0xc8000-0xd0fff pnpid ORM on isa0
ata0 at port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 irq 14 on isa0
ata0: [ITHREAD]
ata1 at port 0x170-0x177,0x376 irq 15 on isa0
ata1: [ITHREAD]
atkbdc0:  at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0
atkbd0:  irq 1 on atkbdc0
kbd0 at atkbd0
atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
atkbd0: [ITHREAD]
psm0: unable to get the current command byte value.
atrtc0:  at port 0x70 irq 8 on isa0
uart0: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on
isa0
uart0: [FILTER]
uart0: console (9600,n,8,1)
uart1: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0
uart1: [FILTER]
Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
ad0: 1923MB  at ata0-master PIO4
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
Invalid time in real time clock.
Check and reset the date immediately!
wlan0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:6b:34:58:99
wlan1: Ethernet address: 00:0b:6b:34:58:99
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop...
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...0 0 done
All buffers synced.
Uptime: 9m38s
Rebooting...
Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights
reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 8.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 10 20:24:18 CET 2009
r...@master:/usr/obj/nanobsd.full/usr/src/sys/KERNEL i386
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Am5x86 Write-Back (486-class CPU)
  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x4f4  Stepping = 4
  Features=0x1
real memory  = 67108864 (64 MB)
avail memory = 55230464 (52 MB)
wlan: mac acl policy registered
kbd1 at kbdmux0
ACPI Error: A valid RSDP was not found 20090521 tbxfroot-309
ACPI: Table initialisation failed: AE_NOT_FOUND
ACPI: Try disabling either ACPI or apic support.
*** WARNING: missing CPU_ELAN -- timekeeping may be wrong
pcib0:  pcibus 0 on motherboard
pci0:  on pcib0
ath0:  mem 0xa000-0xa000 irq 10 at device 16.0 on
pci0
ath0: [ITHREAD]
ath0: AR5212 mac 5.9 RF5112 phy 4.3
sis0:  port 0xe000-0xe0ff mem
0xa001-0xa0010fff irq 11 at device 18.0 on pci0
sis0: Silicon Revision: DP83816A
miibus0:  on sis0
nsphyter0:  PHY 0 on miibus0
nsphyter0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
sis0: Ethernet address: 00:00:24:c5:59:8c
sis0: [ITHREAD]
sis1:  port 0xe100-0xe1ff mem
0xa0011000-0xa0011fff irq 5 at device 19.0 on pci0
sis1: Silicon Revision: DP83816A
miibus1:  on sis1
nsphyter1:  PHY 0 on mii

8.0-rc2 dropped hardsupport

2009-11-12 Thread Marten Vijn
Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
7.2 and higher):

- WRAP 1C
- WRAP 2E (EOL)
- ALIX 1C

Both devices stopped booting as described in several postings and pr's.

My question/suggestion to announce this in the
>7.2 and 8.0 release notes. (or better to fix the issues)

kind regards,
Marten


-- 
http://www.voedselbankleiden.nl Needs your help!
http://martenvijn.nl
http://bsd.wifisoft.org/nek/ The Network Event Kit
http://opencommunitycamp.org OCC 2010




___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Ian Smith
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:
 > Dimitry Andric wrote:
 > > On 2009-11-12 14:35, Ivan Voras wrote:
 > > > I've seen it. But I don't remember if they addressed the problem of
 > > > nonstandard interpretations of statistics?
 > > 
 > > Note the statistics you quoted are "Vendor Specific SMART Attributes",
 > > so it is quite logical for different vendors to have different
 > > statistics. :)
 > 
 > I see your point :)
 > 
 > Though I would hope that a statistics like:
 > 
 >   1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f   087   083   006Pre-fail Always
 > -   45398197
 > 
 > would have an equivalent across vendors :) I know, it's too much to ask :)

True .. but all you really need to know is that as far as your disk 
vendor is concerned, your error rate is 87 (somethings), the worst it's 
ever been is 83 and if it were nearer 6 somethings, you should worry :)

 9 Power_On_Hours  0x0032   089   089   000Old_age Always -   
10155

Seagate says you're only 11% on the way to (mean) oblivion .. if you 
believe it should run 11.4 years.  We had one 4GB IBM drive that did!

cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


8.0-RC3 Available

2009-11-12 Thread Ken Smith

The third and hopefully last of the Release Candidates for the FreeBSD
8.0 release cycle is now available.  Unless something catastrophic comes
up within the next couple of days we will begin the final builds for
8.0-RELEASE.

There is one known issue with the igb(4) driver we are still deciding
whether or not to fix as part of 8.0-RELEASE versus doing an Errata
Notice for it some time after the release is out.  It has been patched
in head, and the SVN commit for it is r199192.  If any of you are able
to give that patch a try on a machine with the igb(4) NIC it would be
appreciated.

If you notice problems you can report them through the normal Gnats PR
system or on the freebsd-current mailing list.  I do cross-post
announcements to freebsd-stable because this particular release is
"about to become a stable branch" but when it comes to watching for
issues related to the release most of the developers pay more attention
to the freebsd-current list.

ISO images for all supported architectures are available on the FTP
sites, and a "memory stick" image is available for amd64/i386
architectures.  For amd64/i386 architectures the cdrom and memstick
images include the documentation packages but no other packages.  The
DVD image includes the packages that will probably be available on the
official release media but is subject to change between now and release.
For sparc64 there is now a livefs cdrom, disc1 includes the
documentation packages, and the DVD image has the set of packages that
currently build for sparc64 (which is a sub-set of the set provided for
amd64/i386).

If you are using csup/cvsup methods to update an older system the branch
tag to use is RELENG_8_0.

The freebsd-update(8) utility supports binary upgrades of i386 and amd64
systems running earlier FreeBSD releases. Systems running 7.0-RELEASE,
7.1-RELEASE, 7.2-RELEASE, 8.0-BETA1, 8.0-BETA2, 8.0-BETA3, 8.0-BETA4,
8.0-RC1 or 8.0-RC2 can upgrade as follows:
  
# freebsd-update upgrade -r 8.0-RC3
  
During this process, FreeBSD Update may ask the user to help by merging
some configuration files or by confirming that the automatically
performed merging was done correctly.  Systems running 8.0-BETA3 may
print the warning

INDEX-OLD.all: Invalid arguments

when downloading updates; this warning is a harmless bug (fixed in
8.0-BETA4) and can be safely ignored.

# freebsd-update install
  
The system must be rebooted with the newly installed kernel before continuing.
  
# shutdown -r now
   
After rebooting, freebsd-update needs to be run again to install the new
userland components:

# freebsd-update install
   
At this point, users of systems being upgraded from FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 or
earlier will be prompted by freebsd-update to rebuild all third-party
applications (e.g., ports installed from the ports tree) due to updates
in system libraries.  See:

http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2009-07-11-freebsd-update-to-8.0-beta1.html

for mode details.  After updating installed third-party applications
(and again, only if freebsd-update printed a message indicating that
this was necessary), run freebsd-update again so that it can delete the
old (no longer used) system libraries:

# freebsd-update install
   
Finally, reboot into 8.0-RC3:
   
# shutdown -r now

MD5/SHA256 checksums for the image files:

MD5 (8.0-RC3-amd64-bootonly.iso) = 641881caa82ea85c118bc15fff12fce6
MD5 (8.0-RC3-amd64-disc1.iso) = 854c273b89792cd0366d5399df1034eb
MD5 (8.0-RC3-amd64-dvd1.iso) = 9bd1bb2507bc2a3037bc321bb2724bd6
MD5 (8.0-RC3-amd64-livefs.iso) = c5f427c8bf823e10a5348935cec2d7ee
MD5 (8.0-RC3-amd64-memstick.img) = 6af9e213914a58a5779715ae5882bd25

MD5 (8.0-RC3-i386-bootonly.iso) = dfaec92ae358ab780d317aa66482ca9e
MD5 (8.0-RC3-i386-disc1.iso) = 460f6cfddaebee6ae59a7d5f73695246
MD5 (8.0-RC3-i386-dvd1.iso) = 98d3f65f2444a8745f787df5ce9e1f0c
MD5 (8.0-RC3-i386-livefs.iso) = 5184b7f6403d1d24991533bde0e580ff
MD5 (8.0-RC3-i386-memstick.img) = 8774ef1d6bdf541e440f2f8ed22a2493

MD5 (8.0-RC3-ia64-bootonly.iso) = fd0af8f34937cf7fc78ea0063252afb7
MD5 (8.0-RC3-ia64-disc1.iso) = 96313c25e53fc333c258ed675007f3d7
MD5 (8.0-RC3-ia64-disc2.iso) = 235714607a2805c396ece829839405be
MD5 (8.0-RC3-ia64-disc3.iso) = 53fca9243ccc788190ca58d24f363cbe
MD5 (8.0-RC3-ia64-dvd1.iso) = 4e24736ab50bc2227c72dbeab6869266
MD5 (8.0-RC3-ia64-livefs.iso) = b6d76cf77ed714631bf714ff78b8e950

MD5 (8.0-RC3-pc98-bootonly.iso) = 137d17ec3830b6ae831b6fb48adf86e0
MD5 (8.0-RC3-pc98-disc1.iso) = 3624b1f7b3a659a7454718e38b9a1ee0
MD5 (8.0-RC3-pc98-livefs.iso) = 29ed3786b2df1c2e72e45d1187f3e788
MD5 (8.0-RC3-powerpc-bootonly.iso) = e7d8508639dee4aed5e52a24d6e27b69
MD5 (8.0-RC3-powerpc-disc1.iso) = 1016ae7753db153b7be0f5d167f595b9
MD5 (8.0-RC3-powerpc-disc2.iso) = aec2400454631cc2eaecb6f618bfecc8
MD5 (8.0-RC3-powerpc-disc3.iso) = fe36d621ad4b6347f8ade9800ccfab7b

MD5 (8.0-RC3-sparc64-bootonly.iso) = c35ddcb4dd050c793d89973eba02df72
MD5 (8.0-RC3-sparc64-disc1.iso) = 0d3855603ac868609fb882c32108
MD5 (8.0-RC3-sparc64-dvd1.iso) 

Re: 8.0-rc2 dropped hardsupport

2009-11-12 Thread Larry Baird
In article <1091012.9283.79...@localhost> you wrote:
> Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
> 7.2 and higher):
> 
> - WRAP 1C
> - WRAP 2E (EOL)
> - ALIX 1C
> 
> Both devices stopped booting as described in several postings and pr's.
I have FreeBSD 8 running on WRAP and ALIX boards.  LBA support for ALIX is
broken in older versions of the BIOS.  For LBA to work you need BIOS
v0.99h.  What problems are you seeing?

Larry

-- 

Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: l...@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 8.0-rc2 dropped hardsupport

2009-11-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday 12 November 2009 9:26:38 am Marten Vijn wrote:
> Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
> 7.2 and higher):
> 
> - WRAP 1C
> - WRAP 2E (EOL)
> - ALIX 1C
> 
> Both devices stopped booting as described in several postings and pr's.

What are these devices?  Random model numbers generally aren't enough context 
for most people to figure out what you are asking.  Are these embedded ARM 
boards, storage controllers, wireless NICs, etc.?

-- 
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 8.0-rc2 dropped hardsupport

2009-11-12 Thread Ivan Voras

John Baldwin wrote:

On Thursday 12 November 2009 9:26:38 am Marten Vijn wrote:

Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
7.2 and higher):

- WRAP 1C
- WRAP 2E (EOL)
- ALIX 1C

Both devices stopped booting as described in several postings and pr's.


What are these devices?  Random model numbers generally aren't enough context 
for most people to figure out what you are asking.  Are these embedded ARM 
boards, storage controllers, wireless NICs, etc.?


Small (embedded) x86 boards: http://www.pcengines.ch/


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 8.0-rc2 dropped hardsupport

2009-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick


On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:35:17AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 12 November 2009 9:26:38 am Marten Vijn wrote:
> > Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
> > 7.2 and higher):
> > 
> > - WRAP 1C
> > - WRAP 2E (EOL)
> > - ALIX 1C
> > 
> > Both devices stopped booting as described in several postings and pr's.
> 
> What are these devices?  Random model numbers generally aren't enough context 
> for most people to figure out what you are asking.  Are these embedded ARM 
> boards, storage controllers, wireless NICs, etc.?

The above are all PC Engines products.

WRAP series: http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap.htm
ALIX series: http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick   j...@parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 8.0-rc2 dropped hardsupport

2009-11-12 Thread Ivan Voras

Marten Vijn wrote:

Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
7.2 and higher):




- ALIX 1C


For what it's worth, I've run the entire 7-STABLE and 8-CURRENT/STABLE 
development cycle kernels on a similarily equipped fit-pc with AMD Geode 
(I think it is LX800) without any issue at all.


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 8.0-rc2 dropped hardsupport

2009-11-12 Thread Mike Tancsa

At 11:01 AM 11/12/2009, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:



On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:35:17AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 12 November 2009 9:26:38 am Marten Vijn wrote:
> > Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
> > 7.2 and higher):
> >
> > - WRAP 1C
> > - WRAP 2E (EOL)
> > - ALIX 1C
> >
> > Both devices stopped booting as described in several postings and pr's.
WRAP series: http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap.htm
ALIX series: http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm



Not sure about the older WRAP boards, but the current Alix boxes work 
very well with RELENG_7 and RELENG_8.


There is a patch however for RELENG_7 that never got MFC'd for some 
reason that I use as well.  Phk ?


---Mike

--- sys/i386/i386/geode.c   2007-09-18 05:19:44.0 -0400
+++ sys/i386/i386/geode.c.good  2008-09-12 17:13:18.0 -0400
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
  */

 #include 
-__FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/geode.c,v 1.10 2007/09/18 
09:19:44 phk Exp $");
+__FBSDID("$FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/i386/geode.c,v 1.11 2008/02/10 
19:14:42 phk Exp $");


 #include 
 #include 
@@ -40,41 +40,50 @@
 #include 

 static struct bios_oem bios_soekris = {
-   { 0xf, 0xf1000 },
-   {
-   { "Soekris", 0, 8 },/* Soekris Engineering. */
-   { "net4", 0, 8 },   /* net45xx */
-   { "comBIOS", 0, 54 },   /* comBIOS ver. 1.26a  20040819 ... */
-   { NULL, 0, 0 },
-   }
+{ 0xf, 0xf1000 },
+{
+   { "Soekris", 0, 8 },/* Soekris Engineering. */
+   { "net4", 0, 8 },   /* net45xx */
+   { "comBIOS", 0, 54 },   /* comBIOS ver. 1.26a  20040819 ... */
+   { NULL, 0, 0 },
+}
 };

 static struct bios_oem bios_soekris_55 = {
-   { 0xf, 0xf1000 },
-   {
-   { "Soekris", 0, 8 },/* Soekris Engineering. */
-   { "net5", 0, 8 },   /* net5xxx */
-   { "comBIOS", 0, 54 },   /* comBIOS ver. 1.26a  20040819 ... */
-   { NULL, 0, 0 },
-   }
+{ 0xf, 0xf1000 },
+{
+   { "Soekris", 0, 8 },/* Soekris Engineering. */
+   { "net5", 0, 8 },   /* net5xxx */
+   { "comBIOS", 0, 54 },   /* comBIOS ver. 1.26a  20040819 ... */
+   { NULL, 0, 0 },
+}
 };

 static struct bios_oem bios_pcengines = {
-   { 0xf9000, 0xfa000 },
-   {
-   { "PC Engines WRAP", 0, 28 },   /* PC Engines WRAP.1C v1.03 */
-   { "tinyBIOS", 0, 28 },  /* tinyBIOS V1.4a 
(C)1997-2003 */

-   { NULL, 0, 0 },
-   }
+{ 0xf9000, 0xfa000 },
+{
+   { "PC Engines WRAP", 0, 28 },   /* PC Engines WRAP.1C v1.03 */
+   { "tinyBIOS", 0, 28 },  /* tinyBIOS V1.4a (C)1997-2003 */
+   { NULL, 0, 0 },
+}
+};
+
+static struct bios_oem bios_pcengines_55 = {
+{ 0xf9000, 0xfa000 },
+{
+   { "PC Engines ALIX", 0, 28 },   /* PC Engines ALIX */
+   { "tinyBIOS", 0, 28 },  /* tinyBIOS V1.4a (C)1997-2005 */
+   { NULL, 0, 0 },
+}
 };

 static struct bios_oem bios_advantech = {
-   { 0xfe000, 0xff000 },
-   {
-   { " PCM-582", 5, 33 },  /* PCM-5823 BIOS V1.12 ... */
-   { "GXm-Cx5530", -11, 35 },  /* 06/07/2002-GXm-Cx5530... */
-   { NULL, 0, 0 },
-   }
+{ 0xfe000, 0xff000 },
+{
+   { " PCM-582", 5, 33 },  /* PCM-5823 BIOS V1.12 ... */
+   { "GXm-Cx5530", -11, 35 },  /* 06/07/2002-GXm-Cx5530... */
+   { NULL, 0, 0 },
+}
 };

 static unsignedcba;
@@ -117,6 +126,11 @@
}

a = rdmsr(0x514c);
+   if (bit >= 16) {
+   a += 0x80;
+   bit -= 16;
+   }
+
if (onoff)
outl(a, 1 << bit);
else
@@ -256,11 +270,13 @@
 * by the bios, see p161 in data sheet.
 */
cba = pci_read_config(self, 0x64, 4);
-   printf("Geode CBA@ 0x%x\n", cba);
+   if (bootverbose)
+   printf("Geode CBA@ 0x%x\n", cba);
geode_counter = cba + 0x08;
outl(cba + 0x0d, 2);
-   printf("Geode rev: %02x %02x\n",
-   inb(cba + 0x3c), inb(cba + 0x3d));
+   if (bootverbose)
+   printf("Geode rev: %02x %02x\n",
+   inb(cba + 0x3c), inb(cba + 0x3d));
tc_init(&geode_timecounter);
EVENTHANDLER_REGISTER(watchdog_list, geode_watchdog,
NULL, 0);
@@ -270,13 +286,14 @@
case 0x0510100b:
gpio = pci_read_config(self, PCIR_BAR(0), 4);
gpio &= ~0x1f;
-   printf("Geode GPIO@ = %x\n", gpio);
-   if ( bios_oem_strings(&bios_soekris,
-

ciss(4) not seeing multiple LUNs

2009-11-12 Thread Guido Falsi
Hello,

I'm having a strange problem with HP hardware and the ciss(4) driver.

I have an HP DL160 G6 server with FreeBSD 8 (cvsupped from RELENG_8
yesterday) with a Smart Array P212 SAS controller. There is an HP
Storageworks 1/8 G2 autoloader (dmesg from the machine attached).

The problem is I only get the sa0 device from the tape drive on LUN 0 of
the device, the ch0 device which should be at LUN 1 is not detected.

Camcontrol gives this output:

# camcontrol devlist -v
scbus0 on ciss0 bus 0:
scbus1 on ciss0 bus 32:
   at scbus1 target 4 lun 0 (sa0,pass0)
scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0:
<> at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0)
# camcontrol reportluns 1:4
2 LUNs found
0
1

If I try to force a rescan of device 4:1:1 (or any 4:1:x for that
matter) it will happily report a device, but it will be the same device
it sees on LUN 0.

I tried the syscontrols reported in ciss(4) without any change.

I could not find much ducumentation about this on HP site. The
controller's documentation says it "supports" the autoloader, so it
should be able to see it. Maybe I need to enable something in the
contorller but I got no documetnation about that.

Does someone has got an idea? Is this a problem with the ciss driver?

Thanks in advance for any help!

-- 
Guido Falsi 
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


RE: 8.0RC2 "top" statistics seem broken

2009-11-12 Thread Matthew Fleming
> > [snip]
> > 
> > Load average and %CPU user are right, as are other global
statistics.
> > The load is produced by the "7z" process (archivers/p7zip) which
> > compresses some data in two threads but is credited with 0% CPU,
though
> > its runtime is correct (increments every second as it should in a
> > CPU-bound process). It doesn't help if I expand / show individual
> threads.
> 
> I believe this is related to multithreaded processes only. I saw this
for
> intr kernel process. Singlethread processes eat CPU slightly less than
> on 7.2, however, I can not say is it statistic errors or real speedup.
> I saw the issue on SMP/ULE only and can not say anything about UP and
> 4BSD scheduler.

Check out r197652 on stable/7.  I had a similar problem where top was
showing 0% for a CPU hog, but since I was unable to replicate it on
CURRENT (and the ULE accounting code is different between releases) I
only submitted for stable/7.  I think the patch will be easy to apply by
hand, though, to test it.

Thanks,
matthew

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: ciss(4) not seeing multiple LUNs

2009-11-12 Thread Guido Falsi
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:33:15PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have an HP DL160 G6 server with FreeBSD 8 (cvsupped from RELENG_8
> yesterday) with a Smart Array P212 SAS controller. There is an HP
> Storageworks 1/8 G2 autoloader (dmesg from the machine attached).

Forgot the attachment, sorry.

Here it comes.

-- 
Guido Falsi 
Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 8.0-RC2 #6: Thu Nov 12 11:57:04 CET 2009
r...@xxx.xxx.it:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/UXIFI04 amd64
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU   E5504  @ 2.00GHz (2000.08-MHz K8-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x106a5  Stepping = 5
  
Features=0xbfebfbff
  
Features2=0x9ce3bd
  AMD Features=0x28100800
  AMD Features2=0x1
  TSC: P-state invariant
real memory  = 4294967296 (4096 MB)
avail memory = 4095668224 (3905 MB)
ACPI APIC Table: 
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 4 CPUs
FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 4 core(s)
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 16
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 18
 cpu2 (AP): APIC ID: 20
 cpu3 (AP): APIC ID: 22
ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1
ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 3
ioapic0  irqs 0-23 on motherboard
ioapic1  irqs 24-47 on motherboard
kbd1 at kbdmux0
acpi0:  on motherboard
acpi0: [ITHREAD]
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 10, bff0 (3) failed
Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0
acpi_hpet0:  iomem 0xfed0-0xfed003ff on acpi0
Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900
pcib0:  port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
pci0:  on pcib0
pcib1:  at device 1.0 on pci0
pci8:  on pcib1
pcib2:  at device 3.0 on pci0
pci7:  on pcib2
ciss0:  port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 
0xfb80-0xfbbf,0xfbeff000-0xfbef irq 24 at device 0.0 on pci7
ciss0: PERFORMANT Transport
ciss0: [ITHREAD]
pcib3:  at device 7.0 on pci0
pci6:  on pcib3
pcib4:  at device 9.0 on pci0
pci5:  on pcib4
igb0:  port 0xd880-0xd89f 
mem 0xfb76-0xfb77,0xfb74-0xfb75,0xfb7b8000-0xfb7bbfff irq 32 at 
device 0.0 on pci5
igb0: Using MSIX interrupts with 3 vectors
igb0: [ITHREAD]
igb0: [ITHREAD]
igb0: [ITHREAD]
igb0: Ethernet address: 00:26:55:80:53:fe
igb1:  port 0xdc00-0xdc1f 
mem 0xfb7e-0xfb7f,0xfb7c-0xfb7d,0xfb7bc000-0xfb7b irq 42 at 
device 0.1 on pci5
igb1: Using MSIX interrupts with 3 vectors
igb1: [ITHREAD]
igb1: [ITHREAD]
igb1: [ITHREAD]
igb1: Ethernet address: 00:26:55:80:53:ff
pcib5:  at device 10.0 on pci0
pci4:  on pcib5
pci0:  at device 20.0 (no driver 
attached)
pci0:  at device 20.1 (no driver 
attached)
pci0:  at device 20.2 (no driver 
attached)
uhci0:  port 0xb800-0xb81f irq 16 at device 26.0 
on pci0
uhci0: [ITHREAD]
uhci0: LegSup = 0x2400
usbus0:  on uhci0
ehci0:  mem 0xfa7f8000-0xfa7f83ff irq 18 at 
device 26.7 on pci0
ehci0: [ITHREAD]
usbus1: EHCI version 1.0
usbus1:  on ehci0
pcib6:  irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0
pci3:  on pcib6
pcib7:  irq 16 at device 28.4 on pci0
pci2:  on pcib7
vgapci0:  mem 
0xf800-0xf8ff,0xfb6fc000-0xfb6f,0xfa80-0xfaff irq 16 at 
device 0.0 on pci2
uhci1:  port 0xb880-0xb89f irq 23 at device 29.0 
on pci0
uhci1: [ITHREAD]
uhci1: LegSup = 0x2400
usbus2:  on uhci1
uhci2:  port 0xbc00-0xbc1f irq 19 at device 29.1 
on pci0
uhci2: [ITHREAD]
uhci2: LegSup = 0x2400
usbus3:  on uhci2
uhci3:  port 0xc000-0xc01f irq 18 at device 29.2 
on pci0
uhci3: [ITHREAD]
uhci3: LegSup = 0x2400
usbus4:  on uhci3
ehci1:  mem 0xfa7fa000-0xfa7fa3ff irq 23 at 
device 29.7 on pci0
ehci1: [ITHREAD]
usbus5: EHCI version 1.0
usbus5:  on ehci1
pcib8:  at device 30.0 on pci0
pci1:  on pcib8
isab0:  at device 31.0 on pci0
isa0:  on isab0
atapci0:  port 
0xc880-0xc887,0xc800-0xc803,0xc480-0xc487,0xc400-0xc403,0xc080-0xc09f mem 
0xfa7fc000-0xfa7fc7ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0
atapci0: [ITHREAD]
atapci0: AHCI called from vendor specific driver
atapci0: AHCI v1.20 controller with 6 3Gbps ports, PM not supported
ata2:  on atapci0
ata2: [ITHREAD]
ata3:  on atapci0
ata3: [ITHREAD]
ata4:  on atapci0
ata4: [ITHREAD]
ata5:  on atapci0
ata5: [ITHREAD]
ata6:  on atapci0
ata6: [ITHREAD]
ata7:  on atapci0
ata7: [ITHREAD]
acpi_button0:  on acpi0
atrtc0:  port 0x70-0x71 irq 8 on acpi0
uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0
uart0: [FILTER]
cpu0:  on acpi0
ACPI Warning: Incorrect checksum in table [OEMB] - 11, should be 10 20090521 
tbutils-275
coretemp0:  on cpu0
est0:  on cpu0
p4tcc0:  on cpu0
cpu1:  on acpi0
coretemp1:  on cpu1
est1:  on cpu1
p4tcc1:  on cpu1
cpu2:  on acpi0
coretemp2:  on cpu2
est2:  on cpu2
p4tcc2:  on cpu2
cpu3:  on acpi0
coretemp3:  on cpu3
est3:  on cpu3
p4tcc3:  on cpu3
orm0:  at iomem 0xc-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xcbfff on isa0
sc0:  at flags 0x100 

Re: 8.0-rc2 dropped hardwaresupport

2009-11-12 Thread Marten Vijn
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 15:21 +, Larry Baird wrote:
> In article <1091012.9283.79...@localhost> you wrote:
> > Support for the following devices seems not to be continued in 8.0 (and
> > 7.2 and higher):
> > 
> > - WRAP 1C
> > - WRAP 2E (EOL)
> > - ALIX 1C
> > 
> > Both devices stopped booting as described in several postings and pr's.
> I have FreeBSD 8 running on WRAP and ALIX boards.  LBA support for ALIX is
> broken in older versions of the BIOS.  For LBA to work you need BIOS
> v0.99h.  What problems are you seeing?
> 
> Larry
> 
I did some more testing, and I made an error on the ALIX 1C since it
does boot but it hangs on devd

but for WRAP 1C and 2E:

PC Engines WRAP.2B/2C v1.11
640 KB Base Memory
130048 KB Extended Memory

01F0 Master 044A CF CARD 2GB 
Phys C/H/S 3909/16/63 Log C/H/S 977/64/63

1  FreeBSD
2  FreeBSD

F6 PXE
Boot:  1 

Here it ends

Would you recommend to downgrade the bios? I have version 1.11 on all
boards.

thanks Marten






-- 
http://www.voedselbankleiden.nl needs your help!
http://martenvijn.nl
http://bsd.wifisoft.org/nek/ 
http://opencommunitycamp.org OCC 2010


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:25:12PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> 
> >I can teach you how to decode/read SMART statistics correctly.
> >
> 
> Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)
> 
> I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so
> statistics and what indicates what...

I started a write-up but after writing about 300 lines realised that if
I continued the details would eventually be lost in the Sea of
Information Chaos that is a mailing list.  :-)  I've gone over how to
read SMART data 3 separate times in the past 2 months (at work, on a
public forum, and in private mail), so this would be the 4th...
  
I'll work on writing an actual HTML document to put up on my web site
and will respond with the URL once I finish it.

Sorry for the "yeah sure I can help you read this data" response
followed by what will probably be labelled as an excuse by some.
Admittedly reading the output is pretty simple, but "getting familiar"
with what the output looks like (on a per-vendor basis) takes exposure
to all sorts of drives, ditto with F/W bugs and so on.

In general though, don't let anyone tell you SMART is worthless.  The
"overall health assessment" status is generally worthless, but the
per-attribute data is of great use.  Don't let anyone tell you the
weighted/adjusted values (VALUE/WORST/THRESH) are useless either; in
some cases they're all you can safely rely on.  Don't damn SMART when
it's actually the manufacturers which need to be spanked for setting
such unreasonable health failure thresholds.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwick   j...@parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 8.0-rc2 dropped hardwaresupport

2009-11-12 Thread Larry Baird
Marten,

> I did some more testing, and I made an error on the ALIX 1C since it
> does boot but it hangs on devd

> but for WRAP 1C and 2E:
> 
> PC Engines WRAP.2B/2C v1.11
> 640 KB Base Memory
> 130048 KB Extended Memory
> 
> 01F0 Master 044A CF CARD 2GB 
> Phys C/H/S 3909/16/63 Log C/H/S 977/64/63
> 
> 1  FreeBSD
> 2  FreeBSD
> 
> F6 PXE
> Boot:  1 
> 
> Here it ends
> 
> Would you recommend to downgrade the bios? I have version 1.11 on all
> boards.
The 0.99h BIOS is for ALIX boards. I am running v1.11 on my WRAP boards.
PC Engines WRAP.1C/1D/1E v1.11
640 KB Base Memory
130048 KB Extended Memory

Looking at your geometry, I would recommend verifing that the BIOS is set
for LBA mode (not CHS).  If you change mode, you will probably need to
reinstall FreeBSD.

Larry

-- 

Larry Baird| http://www.gta.com
Global Technology Associates, Inc. | Orlando, FL
Email: l...@gta.com | TEL 407-380-0220, FAX 407-380-6080
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 8.0RC2 "top" statistics seem broken

2009-11-12 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 08:42:28AM -0800, Matthew Fleming wrote:

> > > [snip]
> > > 
> > > Load average and %CPU user are right, as are other global
> statistics.
> > > The load is produced by the "7z" process (archivers/p7zip) which
> > > compresses some data in two threads but is credited with 0% CPU,
> though
> > > its runtime is correct (increments every second as it should in a
> > > CPU-bound process). It doesn't help if I expand / show individual
> > threads.
> > 
> > I believe this is related to multithreaded processes only. I saw this
> for
> > intr kernel process. Singlethread processes eat CPU slightly less than
> > on 7.2, however, I can not say is it statistic errors or real speedup.
> > I saw the issue on SMP/ULE only and can not say anything about UP and
> > 4BSD scheduler.
> 
> Check out r197652 on stable/7.  I had a similar problem where top was
> showing 0% for a CPU hog, but since I was unable to replicate it on
> CURRENT (and the ULE accounting code is different between releases) I
> only submitted for stable/7.  I think the patch will be easy to apply by
> hand, though, to test it.

Thank you very much. I have applied your patch and it fixes the bug:

CPU 0: 22.0% user,  0.0% nice,  4.9% system,  0.0% interrupt, 73.2% idle
CPU 1:  1.2% user,  0.0% nice,  1.2% system,  4.9% interrupt, 92.7% idle

  PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE   SIZERES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
   11 root   2 171 ki31 0K32K CPU00  12:11 165.77% idle
 1338 nobody 1  44  -10   439M   433M kqread  0   0:24 14.45% nginx
 1339 nobody 1  44  -10   439M   433M kqread  0   0:23 12.89% nginx
   12 root  15 -60- 0K   240K WAIT0   0:09  4.39% intr


CPU 0: 16.2% user,  0.0% nice,  8.5% system,  0.8% interrupt, 74.5% idle
CPU 1:  1.2% user,  0.0% nice,  1.9% system,  4.2% interrupt, 92.7% idle

  PID USERNAMEPRI NICE   SIZERES STATE   C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
   11 root171 ki31 0K32K RUN 1   6:39 88.96% {idle: cpu1}
   11 root171 ki31 0K32K RUN 0   6:11 77.59% {idle: cpu0}
 1338 nobody   44  -10   439M   433M CPU00   0:27 14.45% nginx
 1339 nobody   44  -10   439M   433M RUN 1   0:26 14.26% nginx
   12 root-68- 0K   240K WAIT1   0:09  4.69% {irq19: bge0}

The patch against 8.0-PREREALSE is attached.


-- 
Igor Sysoev
http://sysoev.ru/en/
--- sys/kern/sched_ule.c2009-11-02 09:25:28.0 +0300
+++ sys/kern/sched_ule.c2009-11-12 21:53:45.0 +0300
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
u_int   ts_slptime; /* Number of ticks we vol. slept */
u_int   ts_runtime; /* Number of ticks we were running */
int ts_ltick;   /* Last tick that we were running on */
+   int ts_incrtick;/* Last tick that we incremented on */
int ts_ftick;   /* First tick that we were running on */
int ts_ticks;   /* Tick count */
 #ifdef KTR
@@ -1991,6 +1992,7 @@
 */
ts2->ts_ticks = ts->ts_ticks;
ts2->ts_ltick = ts->ts_ltick;
+   ts2->ts_incrtick = ts->ts_incrtick;
ts2->ts_ftick = ts->ts_ftick;
child->td_user_pri = td->td_user_pri;
child->td_base_user_pri = td->td_base_user_pri;
@@ -2182,11 +2184,12 @@
 * Ticks is updated asynchronously on a single cpu.  Check here to
 * avoid incrementing ts_ticks multiple times in a single tick.
 */
-   if (ts->ts_ltick == ticks)
+   if (ts->ts_incrtick == ticks)
return;
/* Adjust ticks for pctcpu */
ts->ts_ticks += 1 << SCHED_TICK_SHIFT;
ts->ts_ltick = ticks;
+   ts->ts_incrtick = ticks;
/*
 * Update if we've exceeded our desired tick threshhold by over one
 * second.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

82573 xfers pause, no watchdog timeouts, DCGDIS ineffective (7.2-R)

2009-11-12 Thread Royce Williams
We have servers with dual 82573 NICs that work well during low-throughput 
activity, but during high-volume activity, they pause shortly after transfers 
start and do not recover.  Other sessions to the system are not affected.

These systems are being repurposed, jumping from 6.3 to 7.2.  The same system 
and its kin do not exhibit the symptom under 6.3-RELEASE-p13.  The symptoms 
appear under freebsd-updated 7.2-RELEASE GENERIC kernel with no tuning.

Previously, we've been using DCGDIS.EXE (from Jack Vogel) for this symptom.  
The first system to be repurposed accepts DCGDIS with 'Updated' and subsequent 
'update not needed', with no relief.  

Notably, there are no watchdog timeout errors - unlike our various Supermicro 
models still running FreeBSD 6.x.  All of our other 7.x Supermicro flavors had 
already received the flash update and haven't show the symptom.

Details follow.

Kernel:

rand# uname -a
FreeBSD rand.acsalaska.net 7.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Fri Oct  2 
12:21:39 UTC 2009 
r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

sysctls:

rand# sysctl dev.em
dev.em.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.6
dev.em.0.%driver: em
dev.em.0.%location: slot=0 function=0
dev.em.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x108c subvendor=0x15d9 
subdevice=0x108c class=0x02
dev.em.0.%parent: pci13
dev.em.0.debug: -1
dev.em.0.stats: -1
dev.em.0.rx_int_delay: 0
dev.em.0.tx_int_delay: 66
dev.em.0.rx_abs_int_delay: 66
dev.em.0.tx_abs_int_delay: 66
dev.em.0.rx_processing_limit: 100
dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.6
dev.em.1.%driver: em
dev.em.1.%location: slot=0 function=0
dev.em.1.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x108c subvendor=0x15d9 
subdevice=0x108c class=0x02
dev.em.1.%parent: pci14
dev.em.1.debug: -1
dev.em.1.stats: -1
dev.em.1.rx_int_delay: 0
dev.em.1.tx_int_delay: 66
dev.em.1.rx_abs_int_delay: 66
dev.em.1.tx_abs_int_delay: 66
dev.em.1.rx_processing_limit: 100

kenv:

rand# kenv | grep smbios | egrep -v 'socket|serial|uuid|tag|0123456789'
smbios.bios.reldate="03/05/2008"
smbios.bios.vendor="Phoenix Technologies LTD"
smbios.bios.version="6.00"
smbios.chassis.maker="Supermicro"
smbios.planar.maker="Supermicro"
smbios.planar.product="PDSMi "
smbios.planar.version="PCB Version"
smbios.system.maker="Supermicro"
smbios.system.product="PDSMi"


The system is not yet production, so I can invasively abuse it if needed.  The 
other systems are in production under 6.3-RELEASE-p13 and can also be inspected.

Any pointers appreciated.

Royce


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 82573 xfers pause, no watchdog timeouts, DCGDIS ineffective (7.2-R)

2009-11-12 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:36:16AM -0900, Royce Williams wrote:
> We have servers with dual 82573 NICs that work well during low-throughput 
> activity, but during high-volume activity, they pause shortly after transfers 
> start and do not recover.  Other sessions to the system are not affected.

Please define "low-throughput" and "high-volume" if you could; it might
help folks determine where the threshold is for problems.

> These systems are being repurposed, jumping from 6.3 to 7.2.  The same system 
> and its kin do not exhibit the symptom under 6.3-RELEASE-p13.  The symptoms 
> appear under freebsd-updated 7.2-RELEASE GENERIC kernel with no tuning.
> 
> Previously, we've been using DCGDIS.EXE (from Jack Vogel) for this symptom.  
> The first system to be repurposed accepts DCGDIS with 'Updated' and 
> subsequent 'update not needed', with no relief.  
> 
> Notably, there are no watchdog timeout errors - unlike our various Supermicro 
> models still running FreeBSD 6.x.  All of our other 7.x Supermicro flavors 
> had already received the flash update and haven't show the symptom.
> 
> Details follow.
> 
> Kernel:
> 
> rand# uname -a
> FreeBSD rand.acsalaska.net 7.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Fri Oct  
> 2 12:21:39 UTC 2009 
> r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386
> 
> sysctls:
> 
> rand# sysctl dev.em
> dev.em.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.6
> dev.em.0.%driver: em
> dev.em.0.%location: slot=0 function=0
> dev.em.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x108c subvendor=0x15d9 
> subdevice=0x108c class=0x02
> dev.em.0.%parent: pci13
> dev.em.0.debug: -1
> dev.em.0.stats: -1
> dev.em.0.rx_int_delay: 0
> dev.em.0.tx_int_delay: 66
> dev.em.0.rx_abs_int_delay: 66
> dev.em.0.tx_abs_int_delay: 66
> dev.em.0.rx_processing_limit: 100
> dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.6
> dev.em.1.%driver: em
> dev.em.1.%location: slot=0 function=0
> dev.em.1.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x108c subvendor=0x15d9 
> subdevice=0x108c class=0x02
> dev.em.1.%parent: pci14
> dev.em.1.debug: -1
> dev.em.1.stats: -1
> dev.em.1.rx_int_delay: 0
> dev.em.1.tx_int_delay: 66
> dev.em.1.rx_abs_int_delay: 66
> dev.em.1.tx_abs_int_delay: 66
> dev.em.1.rx_processing_limit: 100
> 
> kenv:
> 
> rand# kenv | grep smbios | egrep -v 'socket|serial|uuid|tag|0123456789'
> smbios.bios.reldate="03/05/2008"
> smbios.bios.vendor="Phoenix Technologies LTD"
> smbios.bios.version="6.00"
> smbios.chassis.maker="Supermicro"
> smbios.planar.maker="Supermicro"
> smbios.planar.product="PDSMi "
> smbios.planar.version="PCB Version"
> smbios.system.maker="Supermicro"
> smbios.system.product="PDSMi"
> 
> 
> The system is not yet production, so I can invasively abuse it if needed.  
> The other systems are in production under 6.3-RELEASE-p13 and can also be 
> inspected.
> 
> Any pointers appreciated.
> 
> Royce

For what it's worth as a comparison base:

We use the following Supermicro SuperServers, and can confirm that no
such issues occur for us using RELENG_6 nor RELENG_7 on the following
hardware:

Supermicro SuperServer 5015B-MTB - amd64 - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-T+B - amd64 - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-T+B - amd64 - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-T+B - i386  - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-T+B - i386  - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L

The 5015B-MTB system presently runs RELENG_8 -- no issues there either.

Relevant server configuration and network setup details:

- All machines use pf(4).
- All emX devices are configured for autoneg.
- All emX devices use RXCSUM, TXCSUM, and TSO4.
- We do not use polling.
- All machines use both NICs simultaneously at all times.
- All machines connected to an HP ProCurve 2626 switch (100mbit,
  full-duplex ports, all autoneg).
- We do not use Jumbo frames.
- No add-in cards (PCI, PCI-X, nor PCIe) are used in the systems.
- All of the systems had DCGDIS.EXE run on them; no EEPROM settings
  were changed, indicating the from-the-Intel-factory MANC register
  in question was set properly.

Relevant throughput details per box:

- em0 pushes ~600-1000kbit/sec at all times.
- em1 pushes ~100-200kbit/sec at all times.
- During nightly maintenance (backups), em1 pushes ~2-3mbit/sec
  for a variable amount of time.
- For a full level 0 backup (which I've done numerous times), em1
  pushes 60-70mbit/sec without issues.

I've compared your sysctl dev.em output to that of our 5015M-T+B systems
(which use the PDSMi+, not the PDSMi, but whatever), and ours is 100%
identical.

All of our 5015M-T+B systems are using BIOS 1.3, and the 5015B-MTB
system is using BIOS 1.30.

If you'd like, I can provide the exact BIOS settings we use on the
machines in question; they do deviate from the factory defaults a slight
bit, but none of the adjustments are "tweaks" for performance or
otherwise (just disabling things which we don't use, etc.).

-- 
| Je

Re: 82573 xfers pause, no watchdog timeouts, DCGDIS ineffective (7.2-R)

2009-11-12 Thread Jack Vogel
It is critically important on these systems that you get the latest BIOS on
them, so
maybe that's the difference between you two.  I am going to be putting out a
new
em driver to CURRENT soon, it might be an option to try that as well, it
sounds
like a hang, management/os race in the driver is a possibility.

Jack


On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:36:16AM -0900, Royce Williams wrote:
> > We have servers with dual 82573 NICs that work well during low-throughput
> activity, but during high-volume activity, they pause shortly after
> transfers start and do not recover.  Other sessions to the system are not
> affected.
>
> Please define "low-throughput" and "high-volume" if you could; it might
> help folks determine where the threshold is for problems.
>
> > These systems are being repurposed, jumping from 6.3 to 7.2.  The same
> system and its kin do not exhibit the symptom under 6.3-RELEASE-p13.  The
> symptoms appear under freebsd-updated 7.2-RELEASE GENERIC kernel with no
> tuning.
> >
> > Previously, we've been using DCGDIS.EXE (from Jack Vogel) for this
> symptom.  The first system to be repurposed accepts DCGDIS with 'Updated'
> and subsequent 'update not needed', with no relief.
> >
> > Notably, there are no watchdog timeout errors - unlike our various
> Supermicro models still running FreeBSD 6.x.  All of our other 7.x
> Supermicro flavors had already received the flash update and haven't show
> the symptom.
> >
> > Details follow.
> >
> > Kernel:
> >
> > rand# uname -a
> > FreeBSD rand.acsalaska.net 7.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Fri
> Oct  2 12:21:39 UTC 2009 
> r...@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
>  i386
> >
> > sysctls:
> >
> > rand# sysctl dev.em
> > dev.em.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.6
> > dev.em.0.%driver: em
> > dev.em.0.%location: slot=0 function=0
> > dev.em.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x108c subvendor=0x15d9
> subdevice=0x108c class=0x02
> > dev.em.0.%parent: pci13
> > dev.em.0.debug: -1
> > dev.em.0.stats: -1
> > dev.em.0.rx_int_delay: 0
> > dev.em.0.tx_int_delay: 66
> > dev.em.0.rx_abs_int_delay: 66
> > dev.em.0.tx_abs_int_delay: 66
> > dev.em.0.rx_processing_limit: 100
> > dev.em.1.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.6
> > dev.em.1.%driver: em
> > dev.em.1.%location: slot=0 function=0
> > dev.em.1.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x108c subvendor=0x15d9
> subdevice=0x108c class=0x02
> > dev.em.1.%parent: pci14
> > dev.em.1.debug: -1
> > dev.em.1.stats: -1
> > dev.em.1.rx_int_delay: 0
> > dev.em.1.tx_int_delay: 66
> > dev.em.1.rx_abs_int_delay: 66
> > dev.em.1.tx_abs_int_delay: 66
> > dev.em.1.rx_processing_limit: 100
> >
> > kenv:
> >
> > rand# kenv | grep smbios | egrep -v 'socket|serial|uuid|tag|0123456789'
> > smbios.bios.reldate="03/05/2008"
> > smbios.bios.vendor="Phoenix Technologies LTD"
> > smbios.bios.version="6.00"
> > smbios.chassis.maker="Supermicro"
> > smbios.planar.maker="Supermicro"
> > smbios.planar.product="PDSMi "
> > smbios.planar.version="PCB Version"
> > smbios.system.maker="Supermicro"
> > smbios.system.product="PDSMi"
> >
> >
> > The system is not yet production, so I can invasively abuse it if needed.
>  The other systems are in production under 6.3-RELEASE-p13 and can also be
> inspected.
> >
> > Any pointers appreciated.
> >
> > Royce
>
> For what it's worth as a comparison base:
>
> We use the following Supermicro SuperServers, and can confirm that no
> such issues occur for us using RELENG_6 nor RELENG_7 on the following
> hardware:
>
> Supermicro SuperServer 5015B-MTB - amd64 - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
> Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-T+B - amd64 - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
> Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-T+B - amd64 - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
> Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-T+B - i386  - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
> Supermicro SuperServer 5015M-T+B - i386  - Intel 82573V + Intel 82573L
>
> The 5015B-MTB system presently runs RELENG_8 -- no issues there either.
>
> Relevant server configuration and network setup details:
>
> - All machines use pf(4).
> - All emX devices are configured for autoneg.
> - All emX devices use RXCSUM, TXCSUM, and TSO4.
> - We do not use polling.
> - All machines use both NICs simultaneously at all times.
> - All machines connected to an HP ProCurve 2626 switch (100mbit,
>  full-duplex ports, all autoneg).
> - We do not use Jumbo frames.
> - No add-in cards (PCI, PCI-X, nor PCIe) are used in the systems.
> - All of the systems had DCGDIS.EXE run on them; no EEPROM settings
>  were changed, indicating the from-the-Intel-factory MANC register
>  in question was set properly.
>
> Relevant throughput details per box:
>
> - em0 pushes ~600-1000kbit/sec at all times.
> - em1 pushes ~100-200kbit/sec at all times.
> - During nightly maintenance (backups), em1 pushes ~2-3mbit/sec
>  for a variable amount of time.
> - For a full level 0 backup (which I've done numerous times), em1
>  pushes 60-70m

FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I have a dell 1950 here on the floor.  Since "1950" seems to refer to a lot
of things with a lot of configurations, I'm going to attempt to narrow that
down a bit.

It's got 2x 2.33Ghz dual core pentiums (stepping 06-0F-6 according to the
bios) in it and it has an SAS RAID card that FreeBSD recognises.  I've
upgraded the BIOS to 2.6.1.  It has two SAS 70G drives in a RAID 1
configuration and it has a DVD (although it will only boot from CDs).

If it helps, it's between 2 and 3 years old, I think.

If I allow the machine to boot normally, it stopps after checking the floppy
(there is no floppy) with the following message:

fdc0:  port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
fdc0: does not respond
device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6

If I boot the machine without ACPI, it seems to stop at the same place
(stopping after having checked the ata controller, which checks right before
the floppy)

If I boot the machine verbose, I get no more information --- it stopps at
the same place.

I have tried this (so far) with 7.2-R and 7.1-R.  Both do the same thing.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-12 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:

> I have a dell 1950 here on the floor.  Since "1950" seems to refer to a lot
> of things with a lot of configurations, I'm going to attempt to narrow that
> down a bit.
>
> It's got 2x 2.33Ghz dual core pentiums (stepping 06-0F-6 according to the
> bios) in it and it has an SAS RAID card that FreeBSD recognises.  I've
> upgraded the BIOS to 2.6.1.  It has two SAS 70G drives in a RAID 1
> configuration and it has a DVD (although it will only boot from CDs).
>
> If it helps, it's between 2 and 3 years old, I think.
>
> If I allow the machine to boot normally, it stopps after checking the
> floppy
> (there is no floppy) with the following message:
>
> fdc0:  port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
> fdc0: does not respond
> device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6
>
> If I boot the machine without ACPI, it seems to stop at the same place
> (stopping after having checked the ata controller, which checks right
> before
> the floppy)
>
> If I boot the machine verbose, I get no more information --- it stopps at
> the same place.
>
> I have tried this (so far) with 7.2-R and 7.1-R.  Both do the same thing.
>
>

Can you disable the floppy drive and controller?  There are usually separate
options on different screens.

-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: SMART

2009-11-12 Thread Rick C. Petty
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:44:28AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:25:12PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > 
> > >I can teach you how to decode/read SMART statistics correctly.
> > 
> > Actually, it would be good if you taught more than him :)
> > 
> > I've always wondered how important are each of the dozen or so
> > statistics and what indicates what...
> 
> I'll work on writing an actual HTML document to put up on my web site
> and will respond with the URL once I finish it.

Isn't this sufficient?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.#Known_ATA_S.M.A.R.T._attributes

If not, could you make the changes on wikipedia?  This isn't a
FreeBSD-specific topic, and the larger community would benefit from such
documentation.

-- Rick C. Petty
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


KVM tips for bsd as guest?

2009-11-12 Thread Rudy


Downloaded iso, but qemu barfs when trying to install --- loads kernel  
but panics during boot of 7.2 ( and 8.0-rc3) install ISOs.  I am  
trying to set up a bsd guest ... Host OS is debian.


Virtualbox installed no problem.

I am looking for a general how-to if there is one out there( tried  
searching didn't find it).


Rudy

-- MonkeyBrains.net
-- Rudy 415.425.9825

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: KVM tips for bsd as guest?

2009-11-12 Thread Marius Nünnerich
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 22:42, Rudy  wrote:
>
> Downloaded iso, but qemu barfs when trying to install --- loads kernel but
> panics during boot of 7.2 ( and 8.0-rc3) install ISOs.  I am trying to set
> up a bsd guest ... Host OS is debian.
>
> Virtualbox installed no problem.
>
> I am looking for a general how-to if there is one out there( tried searching
> didn't find it).

What about sending the kernel panic message (with backtrace)?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 8.0-RC3 Available

2009-11-12 Thread Kenyon Ralph
On 2009-11-12T10:38:37-0500, Ken Smith  wrote:
> ISO images for all supported architectures are available on the FTP
> sites, and a "memory stick" image is available for amd64/i386
> architectures.  For amd64/i386 architectures the cdrom and memstick
> images include the documentation packages but no other packages.

I just did a successful minimal install on a Dell laptop from the amd64
memstick RC3 media. I created the memstick like this on a GNU/Linux
machine:

dd if=8.0-RC3-amd64-memstick.img of=/dev/sda bs=10240 conv=sync

-- 
Kenyon Ralph


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


FreeBSD 7.x hang-on-boot on Dell 1950

2009-11-12 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
>
>> fdc0:  port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on
>> acpi0
>> fdc0: does not respond
>> device_attach: fdc0 attach returned 6
>>
>> If I boot the machine without ACPI, it seems to stop at the same place
>> (stopping after having checked the ata controller, which checks right
>> before
>> the floppy)
>>
>> If I boot the machine verbose, I get no more information --- it stopps at
>> the same place.
>>
>
> Can you disable the floppy drive and controller?  There are usually
> separate options on different screens.
>

I've now verified that 8.0-RC3 does the same thing, BTW.

Anyways... no.  There is no floppy option in the BIOS.  It's not in any of
the sub-menus (which is how Dell's BIOS is organized).  I'm also not-so-sure
that the floppy is where it's stopping because the non-ACPI boot doesn't
mention the floppy at all ... leading me to believe it's whatever is checked
"after" the floppy that is at fault... but even the verbose boot doesn't let
me know what that might be.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


how to mirror cvs or svn with rsync

2009-11-12 Thread Nikolay Tychina
Hi everybody!

How do I mirror FreeBSD sources (CVS or SVN) with rsync?
This is the first time I have to use rsync, and its man page really makes me
confused.
I would really appreciate your help.

Regards,

Nik
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: /bin/sh core dumps on FreeBSD 7.2

2009-11-12 Thread Hans F. Nordhaug
* Jeremy Chadwick  [2009-11-12]:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Hans F. Nordhaug wrote:
> > Suddenly /bin/sh started to crash all the time with core dumps. I'm
> > running FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p4 (i386) and I have not updated anything
> > lately.  The /bin/sh binary seems to be untouched. It might be some
> > hardware trouble, but the machine seems to run OK now. (I had to
> > replace /bin/sh with a symlink to /rescue/sh.)
> > 
> > I would like to track down the problem, but running sh I only get
> > "Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped)". I would be happy to run
> > gdb and give you a backtrace. Any clues?
> > 
> > PS! I tried to run "freebsd-update IDS" to see if any files are
> > broken, but it stops at
> > Inspecting system... sha256: ///boot/kernel/utopia.ko.symbols: Input/output 
> > error
> 
> Hardware problem.  Take your pick: bad RAM, bad hard disk, bad
> motherboard, bad PSU, bad cabling.
> 
> You can rule out hard disk problems by installing smartmontools from
> ports (sysutils/smartmontools).  Please provide output from the
> following command:
> 
> smartctl -a /dev/{disk}

Thx for the infp about smartmontools. The only problem I found was:

ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME  FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPEUPDATED  
WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022   001   001   045Old_age Always   
FAILING_NOW 253

Don't know if this is a serious problem.

Hans

PS! The disk is of type
Model Family: Western Digital Caviar Second Generation Serial ATA family
Device Model: WDC WD2500JS-55NCB1
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: KVM tips for bsd as guest?

2009-11-12 Thread Freddie Cash
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Marius Nünnerich  wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 22:42, Rudy  wrote:
>> Downloaded iso, but qemu barfs when trying to install --- loads kernel but
>> panics during boot of 7.2 ( and 8.0-rc3) install ISOs.  I am trying to set
>> up a bsd guest ... Host OS is debian.

i386 or amd64?

What are your KVM settings?  Number of CPUs, amount of RAM, type of
virtual disk (IDE/SCSI), type of NIC (rtl3189/e1000)?

Which CPU is in the host server (AMD/Intel)?

And which versions of KVM and Linux kernel are you running?


Last time I tested was with KVM-72 on 64-bit Debian using kernel
2.6.26, and installing/running FreeBSD 6.x and 7.x, 32-bit and 64-bit,
ran without any issues.  Used LVM-backed virtual IDE drives, and e1000
NICs.

Granted, we use AMD Opteron CPUs, which seem to have fewer issues with
KVM than Intel Xeon CPUs.

>> I am looking for a general how-to if there is one out there( tried searching
>> didn't find it).

There's no real How-To needed.  Just configure the VM, and boot.  This
is the first time I've heard of issues with installing FreeBSD into
KVM-managed VMs.

-- 
Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 82573 xfers pause, no watchdog timeouts, DCGDIS ineffective (7.2-R)

2009-11-12 Thread Royce Williams
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
 wrote:
> Please define "low-throughput" and "high-volume" if you could; it might
> help folks determine where the threshold is for problems.

My definitions are pretty subjective/operational, but for what it's worth:

- "low" is interactive SSH, DNS lookups, and pings;
- "high" is a single unthrottled rsync session.

>> rand# sysctl dev.em
>> dev.em.0.%desc: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 6.9.6

>> dev.em.0.%pnpinfo: vendor=0x8086 device=0x108c subvendor=0x15d9 
>> subdevice=0x108c class=0x02

>> kenv:
>>
>> rand# kenv | grep smbios | egrep -v 'socket|serial|uuid|tag|0123456789'
>> smbios.bios.reldate="03/05/2008"

> For what it's worth as a comparison base:
>
> We use the following Supermicro SuperServers, and can confirm that no
> such issues occur for us using RELENG_6 nor RELENG_7 on the following
> hardware:

[good cross-check list snipped]

The problem system is a 5015M-MF.  We are running 5015M-MT+ and
5015T-PR on RELENG_6 and 7, both without the symptom.

> Relevant server configuration and network setup details:
>
> - All machines use pf(4).
> - All emX devices are configured for autoneg.
> - All emX devices use RXCSUM, TXCSUM, and TSO4.
> - We do not use polling.
> - All machines use both NICs simultaneously at all times.
> - All machines connected to an HP ProCurve 2626 switch (100mbit,
>  full-duplex ports, all autoneg).
> - We do not use Jumbo frames.
> - No add-in cards (PCI, PCI-X, nor PCIe) are used in the systems.
> - All of the systems had DCGDIS.EXE run on them; no EEPROM settings
>  were changed, indicating the from-the-Intel-factory MANC register
>  in question was set properly.

No firewall is active on the problem system, and none of this back
have been DCGDIS-ified, but otherwise, our setup is identical.

> I've compared your sysctl dev.em output to that of our 5015M-T+B systems
> (which use the PDSMi+, not the PDSMi, but whatever), and ours is 100%
> identical.
>
> All of our 5015M-T+B systems are using BIOS 1.3, and the 5015B-MTB
> system is using BIOS 1.30.

The repurposed system is at 1.3 (03/05/2008) - flashed prior to
install. The production 6.3 systems are using 1.1 (or 1.1A, would have
to reboot to check, but the date is 10/27/2005).

> If you'd like, I can provide the exact BIOS settings we use on the
> machines in question; they do deviate from the factory defaults a slight
> bit, but none of the adjustments are "tweaks" for performance or
> otherwise (just disabling things which we don't use, etc.).

We're running similarly as well.

I might be able to retire another system of this batch and install
7.2, but leave the BIOS update off, to see if it makes a difference.

Royce
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


hald running 100%

2009-11-12 Thread Dan Langille
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

After upgrading to 8.0-PRERELEASE today, I'm seeing hald at 100% on both
my laptop and my desktop:


 PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZERES STATE  C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
1500 haldaemon   1 1180 22944K  4904K CPU1   1 107:44 100.00% hald

uptime was about 1:50 at this point.

Seems to be relatively common from the posts I've seen.


ThinkPad X61s.  dmesg output attached.  FWIW.

- --
Dan Langille

BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon  - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkr8vZwACgkQCgsXFM/7nTzTmwCgwSlroEPuQ8cL3U8THAlFVp7v
waIAmwRjRzNkjCUffuzhvKwj/wK5i5f6
=yVNP
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 8.0-PRERELEASE #2: Thu Nov 12 10:44:46 EST 2009
d...@laptop.example.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LAPTOP amd64
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7500  @ 1.60GHz (1596.01-MHz K8-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x6fb  Stepping = 11
  
Features=0xbfebfbff
  Features2=0xe3bd
  AMD Features=0x20100800
  AMD Features2=0x1
  TSC: P-state invariant
real memory  = 4294967296 (4096 MB)
avail memory = 4024070144 (3837 MB)
ACPI APIC Table: 
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s)
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1
ACPI Warning: 32/64X length mismatch in Gpe1Block: 0/32 20090521 tbfadt-625
ACPI Warning: Optional field Gpe1Block has zero address or length:0
102C/0 20090521 tbfadt-655
ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1
ioapic0  irqs 0-23 on motherboard
kbd1 at kbdmux0
acpi0:  on motherboard
acpi0: [ITHREAD]
acpi_ec0:  port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 10, bff0 (3) failed
Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0
acpi_hpet0:  iomem 0xfed0-0xfed003ff on acpi0
Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900
acpi_lid0:  on acpi0
acpi_button0:  on acpi0
pcib0:  port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
pci0:  on pcib0
vgapci0:  port 0x1800-0x1807 mem 
0xf800-0xf80f,0xe000-0xefff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0
agp0:  on vgapci0
agp0: detected 7676k stolen memory
agp0: aperture size is 256M
vgapci1:  mem 0xf810-0xf81f at device 2.1 on 
pci0
em0:  port 0x1840-0x185f mem 
0xf820-0xf821,0xf8225000-0xf8225fff irq 20 at device 25.0 on pci0
em0: Using MSI interrupt
em0: [FILTER]
em0: Ethernet address: 00:1d:72:86:96:3c
uhci0:  port 0x1860-0x187f irq 20 at 
device 26.0 on pci0
uhci0: [ITHREAD]
usbus0:  on uhci0
uhci1:  port 0x1880-0x189f irq 21 at 
device 26.1 on pci0
uhci1: [ITHREAD]
usbus1:  on uhci1
ehci0:  mem 
0xf8426c00-0xf8426fff irq 22 at device 26.7 on pci0
ehci0: [ITHREAD]
usbus2: EHCI version 1.0
usbus2:  on ehci0
hdac0:  mem 
0xf822-0xf8223fff irq 17 at device 27.0 on pci0
hdac0: HDA Driver Revision: 20090624_0136
hdac0: [ITHREAD]
pcib1:  irq 20 at device 28.0 on pci0
pci2:  on pcib1
pcib2:  irq 21 at device 28.1 on pci0
pci3:  on pcib2
ath0:  mem 0xf7f0-0xf7f0 irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci3
ath0: [ITHREAD]
ath0: AR5413 mac 10.3 RF5424 phy 6.1
uhci2:  port 0x18a0-0x18bf irq 16 at 
device 29.0 on pci0
uhci2: [ITHREAD]
usbus3:  on uhci2
uhci3:  port 0x18c0-0x18df irq 17 at 
device 29.1 on pci0
uhci3: [ITHREAD]
usbus4:  on uhci3
ehci1:  mem 
0xf8427000-0xf84273ff irq 19 at device 29.7 on pci0
ehci1: [ITHREAD]
usbus5: EHCI version 1.0
usbus5:  on ehci1
pcib3:  at device 30.0 on pci0
pci5:  on pcib3
cbb0:  mem 0xd7eff000-0xd7ef irq 16 at device 
0.0 on pci5
cardbus0:  on cbb0
pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0
cbb0: [FILTER]
fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xd7efe800-0xd7efefff irq 17 
at device 0.1 on pci5
fwohci0: [ITHREAD]
fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=0)
fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4.
fwohci0: EUI64 00:1d:72:ff:86:96:3c:ff
fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 1 ports.
fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes.
firewire0:  on fwohci0
dcons_crom0:  on firewire0
dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x157
fwe0:  on firewire0
if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:1d:72:96:3c:ff
fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:1d:72:96:3c:ff
fwip0:  on firewire0
fwip0: Firewire address: 00:1d:72:ff:86:96:3c:ff @ 0xfffe, S400, maxrec 
2048
fwohci0: Initiate bus reset
fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: BUS reset
fwohci0: fwohci_intr_core: node_id=0x, SelfID Count=1, CYCLEMASTER mode
pci5:  at device 0.2 (no driver attached)
isab0:  at device 31.0 on pci0
isa0:  on isab0
atapci0:  port 
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x17

Re: 82573 xfers pause, no watchdog timeouts, DCGDIS ineffective (7.2-R)

2009-11-12 Thread Royce Williams
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Royce Williams
 wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
>> - All machines connected to an HP ProCurve 2626 switch (100mbit,
>>  full-duplex ports, all autoneg).

> No firewall is active on the problem system, and none of this back
> have been DCGDIS-ified, but otherwise, our setup is identical.

Er, s/back/batch/g, and it's not a ProCurve. ;-)  But we are also
usually full-duplex and autoneg on both sides.

Based on new (embarrassing) information, I'll leave it to Jack to
decide whether or not he wants to pursue this further.

The problem box is sitting in my grotty mini-lab, with a subnet
partially serviced by a 10M hub.  Guess which Ethernet cable I picked
up.  Guess what happens when I move the system to a 100M/full
connection.

As my cow-orker put it, "You and the other four people on Earth using
that NIC on 10M hubs" can probably find workarounds.  My apologies for
the noise, though it's theoretically possible that the root cause
might still need addressing.

Jack, let me know if you want me to do any testing for you.  Or I can
always send you my hub. ;-)

Royce
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: hald running 100%

2009-11-12 Thread Adam Vande More
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Dan Langille  wrote:

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> After upgrading to 8.0-PRERELEASE today, I'm seeing hald at 100% on both
> my laptop and my desktop:
>
>
>  PID USERNAME  THR PRI NICE   SIZERES STATE  C   TIME   WCPU COMMAND
> 1500 haldaemon   1 1180 22944K  4904K CPU1   1 107:44 100.00% hald
>
> uptime was about 1:50 at this point.
>
> Seems to be relatively common from the posts I've seen.
>
>
> ThinkPad X61s.  dmesg output attached.  FWIW.
>
>
it's not a common issue anymore.  What version of hal are you running and
did you recompile after the upgrade?


-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: 82573 xfers pause, no watchdog timeouts, DCGDIS ineffective (7.2-R)

2009-11-12 Thread Jack Vogel
LOL, glad the problem has been resolved, and no thanks, I do not need
to pursue this any further.

I also want to thank Jeremy for his help and data!!

Thanks guys and good evening,

Jack


On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Royce Williams wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Royce Williams
>  wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
> >> - All machines connected to an HP ProCurve 2626 switch (100mbit,
> >>  full-duplex ports, all autoneg).
>
> > No firewall is active on the problem system, and none of this back
> > have been DCGDIS-ified, but otherwise, our setup is identical.
>
> Er, s/back/batch/g, and it's not a ProCurve. ;-)  But we are also
> usually full-duplex and autoneg on both sides.
>
> Based on new (embarrassing) information, I'll leave it to Jack to
> decide whether or not he wants to pursue this further.
>
> The problem box is sitting in my grotty mini-lab, with a subnet
> partially serviced by a 10M hub.  Guess which Ethernet cable I picked
> up.  Guess what happens when I move the system to a 100M/full
> connection.
>
> As my cow-orker put it, "You and the other four people on Earth using
> that NIC on 10M hubs" can probably find workarounds.  My apologies for
> the noise, though it's theoretically possible that the root cause
> might still need addressing.
>
> Jack, let me know if you want me to do any testing for you.  Or I can
> always send you my hub. ;-)
>
> Royce
>
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Welcome to LinkedIn!

2009-11-12 Thread LinkedIn
Thank you for using LinkedIn! You have joined over 50 million professionals 
using LinkedIn to stay connected and reach new people through trusted referrals.

Get Things Done... Better and Faster

Use LinkedIn to get whatever job you do today done better -- it's the best way 
to connect with:

* job candidates
* industry experts
* business partners
* hiring managers

Search your network now:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/TGrSvDCw7IOFPvo9di0rrrCxHfruWXUdu2q0FyGg/sea/wel_search_02_A/

Find Contacts

The average LinkedIn user knows 15 to 20 people who already have their 
professional network on LinkedIn. You probably do, too. Find out which of the 
people you know are already "LinkedIn":
http://www.linkedin.com/e/TGrSvDCw7IOFPvo9di0rrrCxHfruWXUdu2q0FyGg/fdc/wel_findcts_02_A/

How LinkedIn Works

To learn more about LinkedIn, come and take our tour:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/TGrSvDCw7IOFPvo9di0rrrCxHfruWXUdu2q0FyGg/tou/wel_tour_02_A/

Welcome!
- Your LinkedIn Team
http://www.linkedin.com/

Your email: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Add additional emails:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/TGrSvDCw7IOFPvo9di0rrrCxHfruWXUdu2q0FyGg/mep/wel_addemail_02_A/
Edit profile:
http://www.linkedin.com/e/TGrSvDCw7IOFPvo9di0rrrCxHfruWXUdu2q0FyGg/mpe/wel_editpro_02_A/
Contact settings:
https://www.linkedin.com/e/TGrSvDCw7IOFPvo9di0rrrCxHfruWXUdu2q0FyGg/csp/wel_cntset_02_A/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"