recent 6BETA5 crash with ifconfig nge0
After upgrade from 6BETA4 to 6BETA5 i got this every time i use ifconfig nge0 up Also i suppose this somehow connected with ifconfig becasue i've got same panic with old kernel, but new ifconfig. Jura Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 fault virtual address = 0x80030 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc0512a10 stack pointer = 0x28:0xe4d16b3c frame pointer = 0x28:0xe4d16b4c code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 2818 (ifconfig) [thread pid 2818 tid 100118 ] Stopped at m_freem+0x10: testb $0x1,0x10(%eax) db> trace Tracing pid 2818 tid 100118 td 0xc1f91a80 m_freem(80020,0,c1fb8400,80206910,c1fa2900) at m_freem+0x10 nge_stop(c1ec7bb8,c244c9d4,805f000,0,e4d16bc4) at nge_stop+0x1b8 nge_init_locked(2,c1f934a0,0,c1f93400,c1fb8400) at nge_init_locked+0x2a nge_ioctl(c1fb8400,80206910,c2658cc0,c1eb92c0,c2556bcc) at nge_ioctl+0x2f1 ifhwioctl(c2658cc0,c1f91a80,c05d2298,c06a4020,c065e213) at ifhwioctl+0x634 ifioctl(c2556b20,80206910,c2658cc0,c1f91a80,0) at ifioctl+0x68 soo_ioctl(c21a4ab0,80206910,c2658cc0,c2529000,c1f91a80) at soo_ioctl+0x2e8 ioctl(c1f91a80,e4d16d04,c,c,c1f91a80) at ioctl+0x115 syscall(3b,3b,3b,3,1) at syscall+0x223 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1f --- syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF32, ioctl), eip = 0x480db35f, esp = 0xbfbfe3dc, ebp = 0xbfbfe428 --- ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: High interrupts w/ Cisco 350 card
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 18:01 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Tue, 2005-Sep-20 19:44:07 -0400, Peter D. Quilty wrote: > >I'm running 5.4-RELEASE-p6 on a Toshiba Tecra M2 laptop. My network > >card is a Cisco 350 PCMCIA card. I'm experiencing a very high rate of > >interrupts during heavy network traffic. > > Not quite. "vmstat -i" reports 173 interrupts/sec. That's not high. > "systat -iostat" shows a ludicrously high interrupt load though. > > I notice that almost all the hardware on your laptop maps to irq 11 - > that's undesirable. Can you convince your BIOS to use different > interrupt mappings? No, the PCI bus is hardcoded to use only irqs 10 & 11. The video card uses 10 and everything else shares 11. > > This Cisco card works fine in every other laptop I have. > > What OS? All are running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE. > > I suspect it might be a cardbus problem, but I don't > >know how to resolve it or troubleshoot it any further. > > The PCCard bus is fairly atrocious (basically ISA) but isn't that bad. > I can get roughly wire speed from a 10baseT NIC without serious CPU > strain on a P-233 laptop. > > Have you tried anything other that FreeBSD 5.4 on your Tecra? No, I haven't. It is my primary laptop and I would prefer not to have to load another OS merely for testing. > >interrupt total rate > ... > >irq11: cbb0 cbb1+++ 6773905173 > ... > > /0 /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100 > >cpu user|X > > nice| > > system|X > >interrupt|XXX > > idle|XXX > ... ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: High interrupts w/ Cisco 350 card
On 9/22/05, Peter D. Quilty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 18:01 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > On Tue, 2005-Sep-20 19:44:07 -0400, Peter D. Quilty wrote: > > >I'm running 5.4-RELEASE-p6 on a Toshiba Tecra M2 laptop. My network > > >card is a Cisco 350 PCMCIA card. I'm experiencing a very high rate of > > >interrupts during heavy network traffic. > > > > Not quite. "vmstat -i" reports 173 interrupts/sec. That's not high. > > "systat -iostat" shows a ludicrously high interrupt load though. > > > > I notice that almost all the hardware on your laptop maps to irq 11 - > > that's undesirable. Can you convince your BIOS to use different > > interrupt mappings? > > > > No, the PCI bus is hardcoded to use only irqs 10 & 11. The video card > uses 10 and everything else shares 11. > > > > > This Cisco card works fine in every other laptop I have. > > > > What OS? > > > > All are running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE. > > > > > I suspect it might be a cardbus problem, but I don't > > >know how to resolve it or troubleshoot it any further. > > > > The PCCard bus is fairly atrocious (basically ISA) but isn't that bad. > > I can get roughly wire speed from a 10baseT NIC without serious CPU > > strain on a P-233 laptop. > > > > Have you tried anything other that FreeBSD 5.4 on your Tecra? > > > > No, I haven't. It is my primary laptop and I would prefer not to have > to load another OS merely for testing. > > > > >interrupt total rate > > ... > > >irq11: cbb0 cbb1+++ 6773905173 > > ... > > > /0 /10 /20 /30 /40 /50 /60 /70 /80 /90 /100 > > >cpu user|X > > > nice| > > > system|X > > >interrupt|XXX > > > idle|XXX > > ... > I also have an Cisco Aironet 350 and the only time I had such an issue was connecting to a WPA enabled AP and a recent (couple of months) firmware update from Cisco corrected this issue. Given that you're using 5.4 and WPA is only coming out in 6.0 I know this is a long shot but I would try updating the firmware of the card. Heck, every update I do gives me more speed and stability :) -- Joao Barros ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
6-Release Beta 5: extremely slow installation in VMWare 4.52
Hi All, trying to install 6-stable in a VMWare 4.5.2 WS installation, running on an 1.6 GHz Celeron CPU. After 3 hours, it still extracts scontrib into /usr/src directory. On tty 3, top tells cpio ist in vlruwk state for ages. CPU states: 0.1% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.8 interrupt, 99.5% idle. Installing Beta 4 went flawlessly, so I guess some filesystem change since then is the culprit. Regards, Christoph Sold ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
6BETA5 panic with ifconfig nge
Addon rom gdb
#7 0xc0635164 in trap (frame=
{tf_fs = -415563768, tf_es = 40, tf_ds = 40, tf_edi = -1040566016, tf_esi
= 11, tf_ebp = -415499444, tf_isp = -415499480, tf_ebx = 352, tf_edx = 524320,
tf_ecx = 55296, tf_eax = 524320, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip =
-1068416848, tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 66050, tf_esp = 100, tf_ss = 0}) at
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:442
#8 0xc061aaca in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139
#9 0xc05140b0 in m_freem (mb=0x80020) at mbuf.h:420
#10 0xc0471478 in nge_stop (sc=0xc1fa3900) at /usr/src/sys/dev/nge/if_nge.c:2125
#11 0xc04719da in nge_init_locked (sc=0xc1fa3900) at
/usr/src/sys/dev/nge/if_nge.c:1685
#12 0xc04732a1 in nge_ioctl (ifp=0xc1fb8400, command=2149607696,
data=0xc26f61a0 "nge0")
at /usr/src/sys/dev/nge/if_nge.c:2018
#13 0xc055a8d4 in ifhwioctl (cmd=0, ifp=0xc1fb8400, data=0xc26f61a0 "nge0",
td=0x80020) at /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:1272
#14 0xc055b108 in ifioctl (so=0xc25c2858, cmd=2149607696, data=0xc26f61a0
"nge0", td=0xc24c9a80)
at /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:1506
#15 0xc0502308 in soo_ioctl (fp=0x80020, cmd=2149607696, data=0xc26f61a0,
active_cred=0xc2190c00, td=0xc24c9a80)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_socket.c:214
#16 0xc04fac95 in ioctl (td=0xc24c9a80, uap=0xe73bfd04) at file.h:258
#17 0xc0635643 in syscall (frame=
{tf_fs = 59, tf_es = 59, tf_ds = -1078001605, tf_edi = 3, tf_esi = 1,
tf_ebp = -1077943256, tf_isp = -415498908, tf_ebx = -1077943312, tf_edx =
-2145359600, tf_ecx = 134595453, tf_eax = 54, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2,
tf_eip = 1208857439, tf_cs = 51, tf_eflags = 583, tf_esp = -1077943332, tf_ss =
59}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:986
#18 0xc061ab1f in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:200
#19 0x0033 in ?? ()
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
timeout waiting for read
Hi. Just upgraded to FreeBSD 6 beta5 (i386). During reboot I get this message (in one line): unknown: timeout waiting for read DRQunknown: timeout waiting for read DRQSMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! regards Claus ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 6-Release Beta 5: extremely slow installation in VMWare 4.52
Christoph Sold wrote: Hi All, trying to install 6-stable in a VMWare 4.5.2 WS installation, running on an 1.6 GHz Celeron CPU. After 3 hours, it still extracts scontrib into /usr/src directory. On tty 3, top tells cpio ist in vlruwk state for ages. CPU states: 0.1% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.8 interrupt, 99.5% idle. Installing Beta 4 went flawlessly, so I guess some filesystem change since then is the culprit. Regards, Christoph Sold We mostly have reports on VMWare 5, not 4, so given those reports I'm surprised that it works at all =-) I can't think of anything that has changed that would be a smoking gun. In fact, debugging was removed from BETA5, so it _should_ go faster, not slower. Do you have the ability to install BETA4 and then incrementally update the source tree? That might be a good way to find out what happened. Scott ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:53 -0700, Hector Lecuanda wrote: > On 9/20/05, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: > > > I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch > > > supports this device, but 5.x does not. > > > > > > Is support for this device to be included in the near future? > > > who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? > > > > Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for > > questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try > > either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. > > Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. > > Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does > include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x > does not. =( > > Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? > i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) > driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck > would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch are the following changes, though that is untested: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2005-May/121728.html I actually have one of the affected cards which I was planning to use in a 5-STABLE machine in the (semi-)near future, thanks for pointing out the issue! Gavin ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
On 9/22/05, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:53 -0700, Hector Lecuanda wrote: > > On 9/20/05, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: > > > > I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch > > > > supports this device, but 5.x does not. > > > > > > > > Is support for this device to be included in the near future? > > > > who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? > > > > > > Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for > > > questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try > > > either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. > > > > Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. > > > > Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does > > include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x > > does not. =( > > > > Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? > > i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) > > driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck > > would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. > > Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 > has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch > are the following changes, though that is untested: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2005-May/121728.html > > I actually have one of the affected cards which I was planning to use in > a 5-STABLE machine in the (semi-)near future, thanks for pointing out > the issue! > > Gavin > > How can I get the patches to update my source? i've been fiddling with cvsup and the web interface for CVS, but no luck.. hehe.. there must be a straightforward way and i cant seem to figure it out.. thx -- -Hector Lecuanda PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
At 12:58 PM 22/09/2005, Gavin Atkinson wrote: Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch are the following changes, though that is untested: I think the version in 7 and 6 relies on other changes in the tree. Have a look at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-July/017292.html http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/MFC-RELENG_5/patch-em that takes into account those changes. ---Mike ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
RE: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
I had this same issue with an Intel Pro 1000 nic. I just downloaded/installed the current driver from Intel and all was good. The driver I'm referring to is here: http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=N&I nst=Yes&ProductID=838&DwnldID=9159&strOSs=52&OSFullName=FreeBSD*&lang=eng Hope that helps. --Jade -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hector Lecuanda Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:10 PM To: Gavin Atkinson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; John Baldwin Subject: Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x] On 9/22/05, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:53 -0700, Hector Lecuanda wrote: > > On 9/20/05, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: > > > > I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch > > > > supports this device, but 5.x does not. > > > > > > > > Is support for this device to be included in the near future? > > > > who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? > > > > > > Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for > > > questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions try > > > either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. > > > > Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. > > > > Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does > > include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x > > does not. =( > > > > Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? > > i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) > > driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck > > would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. > > Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 > has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch > are the following changes, though that is untested: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2005-May/121728.html > > I actually have one of the affected cards which I was planning to use in > a 5-STABLE machine in the (semi-)near future, thanks for pointing out > the issue! > > Gavin > > How can I get the patches to update my source? i've been fiddling with cvsup and the web interface for CVS, but no luck.. hehe.. there must be a straightforward way and i cant seem to figure it out.. thx -- -Hector Lecuanda PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.4/109 - Release Date: 9/21/2005 ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Looking for txp(4) and wb(4) users
Is there anyone out there with a wb(4) or txp(4) card that can test patches to fixup the locking and make them MPSAFE? The patches should apply to both HEAD and RELENG_6. Thanks! -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: High interrupts w/ Cisco 350 card
On Thu, 2005-Sep-22 07:13:29 -0400, Peter D. Quilty wrote: >On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 18:01 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: >> Have you tried anything other that FreeBSD 5.4 on your Tecra? > >No, I haven't. It is my primary laptop and I would prefer not to have >to load another OS merely for testing. It would probably be sufficient to boot the first install CD, go into fixit mode, bring up the interface and try to pass some traffic over it. No need for a full install. Other than that, I'm out of suggestions. -- Peter Jeremy ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on 5.x]
On 9/22/05, Jade Spangenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had this same issue with an Intel Pro 1000 nic. I just > downloaded/installed the current driver from Intel and all was good. The > driver I'm referring to is here: > > http://downloadfinder.intel.com/scripts-df-external/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=N&I > nst=Yes&ProductID=838&DwnldID=9159&strOSs=52&OSFullName=FreeBSD*&lang=eng > > Hope that helps. > > --Jade > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hector Lecuanda > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 12:10 PM > To: Gavin Atkinson > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; John Baldwin > Subject: Re: em(4) support for 82573 1000/PRO nic on 5.x [was: Re: em on > 5.x] > > On 9/22/05, Gavin Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:53 -0700, Hector Lecuanda wrote: > > > On 9/20/05, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 01:55 pm, Hector Lecuanda wrote: > > > > > I have an Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic. I've seen that the 4.x branch > > > > > supports this device, but 5.x does not. > > > > > > > > > > Is support for this device to be included in the near future? > > > > > who can I contact regarding patches to make it work? > > > > > > > > Erm, the em(4) driver is in 5.x. Also, this mailing list is more for > > > > questions about writing device drivers. For more general questions > try > > > > either the questions@ or stable@ mailing lists. > > > > > > Thank you, i will redirect my query to the appropriate mailing list. > > > > > > Perhaps i should have explained that the em(4) driver in 4.x does > > > include support for the Intel 82573 1000/PRO nic; while the one in 5.x > > > does not. =( > > > > > > Is it planned to merge the work on 4.x to 5.x and HEAD? > > > i tried to recompile the kernel with the 4.x sources for the em(4) > > > driver, but obviously a lot has changed in the kernel, and as luck > > > would have it, my attempt did not yield any success. > > > > Support seems to be in HEAD and therefore 6.x already. It looks like 5 > > has simply been missed. I suspect all that is needed in the 5 branch > > are the following changes, though that is untested: > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2005-May/121728.html > > > > I actually have one of the affected cards which I was planning to use in > > a 5-STABLE machine in the (semi-)near future, thanks for pointing out > > the issue! > > > > Gavin > > > > > How can I get the patches to update my source? i've been fiddling with > cvsup and the web interface for CVS, but no luck.. hehe.. there must > be a straightforward way and i cant seem to figure it out.. > > thx > > > -- > -Hector Lecuanda > PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: > http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc > http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt Indeed, the driver from intel worked like a charm... you may want to download it from ftp://aiedownload.intel.com/df-support/9159/eng/em-3.2.15.tar.gz since intel's website breaks lynx or CURL... -- -Hector Lecuanda PGP Public Key / Llave Publica PGP: http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.asc http://lecuanda.com/pgp_pubkey.txt ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
critical BOOT failure updating to latest 5-Stable (5.4)
I have a usable kernel that I built from 5-Stable sources on July 4th, 2005. But the last two days, I tried to compile and install the lastest 5-Stable, and neither one would boot. During the boot, the entire normal dmesg is output (the part which is in "bold" on the CRT), except the last line which normally says, Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a the system freezes with the disk LED "on" on the computer. So the last message I see on the screen during the failed boot is this: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Okay, since I tried two kernels, and both froze up at the same place, but there was one minor difference, here it is... I saw this error the very last time I booted to the second bad kernel: ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=0 This error was right below the line SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Okay, that is definitely an indication of some sort of timing or driver issue. But as far as I know, this hard disk has no other known problems, and obviously it boots flawlessly on the other 5.4 kernels and has for a long, long time. Has anything changed in the bootstrap code for the last two months in 5-Stable? I have not left the machine frozen for more than a couple of minutes, but during that time Scroll Lock/Scroll Back won't work. But it's possible the system is possibly in a long (but finite) state of disk reading and it's not completely frozen. I am inclusing the dmesg from a good boot. It looks like the bad boot messages are the same, at least as far as I can tell. Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 4 18:28:47 CDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BILLYSMP3 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Pentium Pro (199.31-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x617 Stepping = 7 Features=0xfbff real memory = 536870912 (512 MB) avail memory = 515719168 (491 MB) MPTable: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 1 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 0 ioapic0: Assuming intbase of 0 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface cpu0 on motherboard cpu1 on motherboard pcib0: pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xfff0-0x,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 1.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0x5400-0x541f irq 19 at device 1.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered rl0: port 0x5000-0x50ff mem 0x5000-0x50ff irq 18 at device 6.0 on pci0 miibus0: on rl0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:ba:4d:57:6f pci0: at device 11.0 (no driver attached) orm0: at iomem 0xc-0xc7fff on isa0 fdc0: at port 0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: at port 0x64,0x60 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <6 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 ep0: <3Com 3C509B-TPO EtherLink III (PnP)> at port 0x210-0x21f irq 5 on isa0 ep0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:26:77:23:83 unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) unknown: can't assign resources (port) Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec IP Filter: v3.4.35 initialized. Default = pass all, Logging = enabled Interrupt storm detected on "irq5: ep0"; throttling interrupt source ad0: 8809MB [17898/16/63] at ata0-master WDMA2 ad2: 2014MB [4092/16/63] at ata1-master WDMA2 acd0: DVDROM at ata1-slave PIO4 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
HP DL140 and ata0-slave: FAILURE-ATA_IDENTIFY timed out.
Hi, we've got HP DL-140 G3. When trying to startup installation CD of FBSD 5.4 on it we've got: atapci0: port 0x1470-0x147f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,-x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #0 on atapci0 ... ata0-slave: FAILURE-ATA_IDENTIFY timed out. ata0-slave: FAILURE-ATA_IDENTIFY timed out. ata0-master: FAILURE-ATA_IDENTIFY timed out. ata0-master: FAILURE-ATA_IDENTIFY timed out. ata0-slave: FAILURE-ATA_IDENTIFY timed out. ata1-master: FAILURE-ATA_IDENTIFY timed out. ata1-master: FAILURE-ATA_IDENTIFY timed out. And after a while sysinstall start up, but there is no disks to partition it. FBSD 6-BETA4 is OK, and FBSD 4.11 too. But only in 5 it's broken. Can anybody tell what wrong with this? Best Regards, p. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
