Problem with quotas on 4.10
Hi, I have following problem on a 4.10 I have "options QUOTA" enabled in kernel In "/etc/rc.conf" enable_quotas="YES" That's my "/etc/fstab" /dev/da0s1b noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da0s1h /data ufs rw,userquota,groupquota 2 2 /dev/da0s1f /tmpufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1g /usrufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1e /varufs rw 2 2 /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc/proc procfs rw 0 0 I set quotas for a user "foo" to 100MB then I copyied as root a file (2 MB) in his directory (/data/foo) the user is not over quotas! he has enough space left and I would with "chown foo filename" change the owner of the file but the command didn't finish. I can nothing do in this directory (/data/foo) if I try a (in another terminal) "ls -l /data/foo" the command hangs i cannot kill the chown process in "top" I see the the chown process with state "chkdq1" I can't reboot the machine. I must power off and then power on, that the problem is away. I tryied the same on 5.3 and there it works well. What I'm doing wrong? Wolfgang ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
wi hostap: no TODS in 4.10, but 5.3 works?
Hi all, Is the wi driver in 4.10 up-to-date with the 5.3 driver? Can it be backported? I have an issue with the 4.10; 5.3 works: My D-Link 650 802.11b Intersil Prism 2.5 (primary 1.1.1, station 1.8.0) has always worked fine in hostap mode in my 4.10-p3 system (using a PLX-based PCMCIA-PCI bridge). However, my new Dell Latitude has a Truemobile 1450 a/b/g wireless inside and cannot associate with the FreeBSD hostap system. With debug turned on, I see these messages on the BSD side: wihap_data_input: no TODS src=00:90:4b:xx:xx:xx Conversely, putting the Prism card in a FreeBSD 5.3 with exactly the same ifconfig parameters DOES work! The Dell can associate just fine. Regards, Sven ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ?
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:05:16AM +1100, Carl Makin wrote: > Do you want to yank it in 5 or 6-CURRENT? There are a *lot* of people > using vinum and yanking it in 5-STABLE would force us all to use the 5.3 > security branch until gvinum caught up. >From my experiences today with setting up a very old machine[1] with 5.3-RC2, I think it would be best to keep both until gvinum had caught up. Vinum can do things which gvinum appears incapable of - such as initialising a RAID-5 plex. -- Adrian Wontroba [1] A Fujitsu M700 4 way Ppro - the state of the art in 1997 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
