Re: Cursor (trackpoint) "creep" with moused?

2002-08-30 Thread Raymond Wiker

Barney Wolff writes:
 > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 04:52:42PM -0400, Andy Sparrow wrote:
 > > 
 > > I'm just curious as to why this might be - the trackpoint "creep", that 
 > > is - does anyone have any ideas? :-)
 > 
 > I've experienced the same effect on a Toshiba laptop running W2k, so
 > perhaps it's the device, not anything fbsd-specific.

Some of my colleagues have seen this on their Dell notebooks
running W2K & Win XP. One of them has had the entire keyboard assembly
replaced, twice, because of this problem. S, I would say it's
likely to be a hardware problem.

-- 
Raymond WikerMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Engineer Web:   http://www.fast.no/
Fast Search & Transfer ASA   Phone: +47 23 01 11 60
P.O. Box 1677 Vika   Fax:   +47 35 54 87 99
NO-0120 Oslo, NORWAY Mob:   +47 48 01 11 60

Try FAST Search: http://alltheweb.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Problems with FreeBSD - causing zalloc to return 0 ?!

2002-08-30 Thread Arnvid Karstad

Hiya all,

We've been troubled by "Fatal trap 12"'s for a little
while now. The machine was running 4.6 perfectly, until
I decided to try a cvs up to RELENG_4_6 about a week ago.
Then it started to crash alot, we went back to RELENG_4.
And there were no problems there. But then we decided to
send in an error report http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=42046
and went back to RELENG_4_6 After going through alot
of testing, kernel testing, and other funny things we
decided to end the testing and go back to RELENG_4...
Voila... The problems where now resident in that CVS Tag
also. We have found a working workaround by adding the
following to the kernel config:

options INVARIANTS
options INVARIANT_SUPPORT

running the kernel with GENERIC instead of our custom
kernel makes the system panic alot faster. It would seem
that zalloc return's 0 when it shouldn't be able to do
that. 

There are more incidents like this at several other
machines that were upgraded at the same time.

Anyone know of a better workaround than using INVARIANTS?

Mvh/Best regards,

Arnvid L. Karstad



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



/etc/fstab -> uid=?

2002-08-30 Thread Mario Pranjic

Hi!

I apologize for this rather stupid question, but mount on FreeBSD is a bit
different comparing to mount on Linux.

I need to mount one filesystem with the ownership of some UID other than
root.

On Linux I could put uid=xx, gid=yy in /etc/fstab after 'rw' option, but
FreeBSD doesn't seem to have that option.

Can someone give me a hint how it's done under FreeBSD.

Mario Pranjic, dipl.ing.
sistem administrator
Knjiznica, Institut Rudjer Boskovic
-
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 72059629
tel: +385 1 45 60 954 (interni: 1293)
-



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Updating world with least downtime

2002-08-30 Thread David Schultz

Thus spake Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For a modern system and a reasonable disk, this is trivial. I have a
> system which MUST not be down for over 15 minutes and I can do it
> quite easily unless I really fumble something in mergemaster. I do
> always merge a few files later and tend to install most changes very
> quickly, having ode the same upgrade on a non-critical system just
> before I do the critical one so I know what to expect.
> 
> The actual installworld time on my 1GHZ system is about 5 minutes
> (5:34 last time).

Nice record.  There ought to be a better solution than ``run
mergemaster really fast and hope nothing goes wrong,'' though.
For example, you could use mergemaster with -D on a copy of /etc
and commit the copy in single user mode.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Cursor (trackpoint) "creep" with moused?

2002-08-30 Thread Andy Sparrow


> Toshiba trackpoints will ocasionally recalibrate themselves, which
> manifests as about 5 seconds of creep - longer if you try and fight it :).

Exactly - this in fact, was what I was doing, which I've only realised 
since I understood the underlying mechanism.

As soon as I noticed the creep, I'd both become acutely aware of it, and 
try to compensate for it - which made it persist. When I first saw this, 
I thought that the trackpoint hadn't correctly returned to a neutral 
position, so I'd try to provide input and hope that it would, in fact, 
center itself (and at least I'd keep the mouse near where I wanted it to 
be).

I seem to have never lost this habit - which is, of course, precisely 
what you /shouldn't/ do, if the hardware is to compensate for some bias.

Now, in fact, I'm having fun with it. I can provoke it at will by gently 
applying pressure in a single direction. After a few seconds, it 
"notices" that there's an inbuilt bias, and the creep will stop - at 
which point, releasing the pressure gives a creep in the opposite 
direction, which similarly lasts for a few seconds before it corrects 
again.

> At least on toshiba my porteget 300CT and 320CT laptops lthis is so, and I
> hear from many other toshiba users that this is 'normal'.
> 
> As for minutes of creep (the original poster mentioned it fixing itself
> after 45 seconds...)

Heh. This would appear to be some kind of time dilation effect due to 
irritation. It certainly doesn't take that long now...

Thanks all!

AS





msg49235/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Periodic: support for non-sendmail MTAs

2002-08-30 Thread francisv

Hi,

I noticed that /etc/periodic/daily/500.queuerun uses a sendmail-specific
command line "-Ac". Some installations use Postfix and it does not
understand this command line.

---
 francis a. vidal [bitstop network services] | http://www.bitstop.ph
 streaming media + web hosting   | http://www.keystone.ph
 v(02)330-2871,(02)330-2872; f(02)330-2873   | http://www.kuro.ph 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Periodic: support for non-sendmail MTAs

2002-08-30 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro

francisv> I noticed that /etc/periodic/daily/500.queuerun uses a
francisv> sendmail-specific command line "-Ac". Some installations use
francisv> Postfix and it does not understand this command line.

Set:

daily_submit_queuerun="NO"

in /etc/periodic.conf.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Periodic: support for non-sendmail MTAs

2002-08-30 Thread Makoto Matsushita


francisv> Some installations use Postfix and it does not understand
francisv> this command line.

I don't think MTAs except sendmail use this script.

Instead, create your own periodic scripts under /usr/local/etc/periodic
or some other places.  It would be better ports/mail/postfix does that,
but it's just a ports issue.

-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: OpenOffice problems on 4.6.2

2002-08-30 Thread Daniel O'Connor

On Sat, 2002-08-31 at 02:34, Jerry A! wrote:
> : > $ ./soffice
> : > ELF interpreter /compat/svr4/lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found
> : > Abort trap
> : > ELF interpreter /compat/svr4/lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found
> : > [1]   1256 Abort trap ./soffice 
> : > $

Uhh, SVR4?!
Looks like brandelf is needed to mark the binaries as the right type.

I haven't had any problems building OO 1.0.1_3. Remember you need a
valid DISPLAY variable set to install though.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140  AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Periodic: support for non-sendmail MTAs

2002-08-30 Thread parv

in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Gregory Neil Shapiro thusly...
>
> Set:
> 
> daily_submit_queuerun="NO"
> 
> in /etc/periodic.conf.

ah, i was wondering about that that setting it in /etc/rc.conf
doesn't do much.  thanks.

  - parv

-- 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Latest kernel panic, second server ...

2002-08-30 Thread Marc G. Fournier


Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: mp_lock = 0002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: fault virtual address  = 0xdf9c
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: fault code = supervisor read, page not 
present
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: instruction pointer= 0x8:0xc01e6bab
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: stack pointer  = 0x10:0xf9b3ed7c
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: frame pointer  = 0x10:0xf9b3ed84
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: code segment   = base 0x0, limit 0xf, 
type 0x1b
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: processor eflags   = interrupt enabled, resume, 
IOPL = 0
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: current process= 71960 (gzcat)
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: interrupt mask = none <- SMP: XXX
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: trap number= 12
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: panic: page fault
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: mp_lock = 0002; cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: boot() called on cpu#0
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel:
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: syncing disks... 159 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 
3 3 3 3 3
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: giving up on 3 buffers
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: Uptime: 2d10h19m18s
Aug 30 23:39:41 jupiter /kernel: amr0: flushing cache...done


jupiter# nm -n /kernel | grep c01e6bab
jupiter# nm -n /kernel | grep c01e6ba
jupiter# nm -n /kernel | grep c01e6b
c01e6b24 t vm_map_entry_create
c01e6b68 T vm_map_lookup_entry
c01e6bd4 T vm_map_insert





To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Re: Problems with FreeBSD - causing zalloc to return 0 ?!

2002-08-30 Thread Marc G. Fournier


Okay, I've setup this script on both my (un)STABLE servers, and will
report after the next crash ... which shouldn't take long :)

On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:

>
> :Is there any definite way of determining this?  From what I can find int
> :he man page, VNODES have to do with the file system and directory lists
> :... my last two crashes look to be related to the file system itself, so
> :have started to watch the VNODE numbers to, but is there some way of
> :determining what I should raise, and where?
>
> If you can get to a DDB> prompt on the crash (kernel config w/ DDB)
> do this:
>
> ddb> print *kernel_vm_end
>
> And tell me what you get.  Also note the fault address.
>
> In order to really track down the cause I need a vmcore and kernel.debug
> to play with, but baring that you might be able to dump memory
> statistics to a file like once a second until the machine crashes.
>
> while (1)
>   sleep 1
>   date >> stats.log
>   vmstat -m >> stats.log
>   vmstat -z >> stats.log
>   netstat -m >> stats.log
>   fsync stats.log
> end
>
> :I'm running 4Gig of RAM and Dual CPU over here, so having a swap device
> :large enough to 'dump core' is kinda out of the question, so I can't
> :provide any more infomration that i have so far in other messages :(
>
> If you can reproduce the crash with less memory you may be able to
> generate a core.  To boot the machine with less memory add a line
> to your /boot/loader.conf file:
>
> hw.physmem="768m"
>
> I usually always keep such a line in my loader.conf file, commented
> out (e.g. #hw.physmem=...) until I need it, because I always forget
> the name of the variable :-)
>
> :And, also, should any 'server class' operating system be more graceful
> :about such things?  Some sort of soft limit that triggers it to refuse new
> :processes or something when its hit, so that it doesn't actually crash?
> :Kinda like the NMBCLUSTERS warning/error message when its set too low?
>
> FreeBSD-current will be far more graceful, but FreeBSD-stable is still
> using algorithms based on circa 1990 system memory capacities.  As
> memory capacities have grown larger then available KVM the algorithms
> have been less able to cope with the massive number of resources
> that can now be cached.
>
>   -Matt
>
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message