Current problem reports assigned to r...@freebsd.org
Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description o ports/160637 ruby [maintainer-update][patch] graphics/rubygem-dragonfly: o ports/160377 ruby New port: net/rubygem-stompserver Provide reliable mes o ports/160291 ruby devel/rubygem-rake 0.9.2 update breaks redmine o ports/160195 ruby [patch][maintainer-update] security/rubygem-bcrypt-rub o ports/159982 ruby [MAINTAINER] mail/rubygem-vmail: update to 2.3.2 f ports/158301 ruby [PATCH] mail/rubygem-vmail: update to 1.5.0 s ports/156066 ruby [NEW PORT] databases/rubygem-xapian-full (self contain o ports/149817 ruby [wishlist] ports-mgmt/portupgrade: portinstall -p opti o ports/144769 ruby [PATCH] ports-mgmt/portupgrade should have a configura o ports/140364 ruby [patch] ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel: #! line substitu o ports/140008 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade: many papercut omissions on por o ports/137958 ruby [patch] ports-mgmt/portupgrade fails with recursive de s ports/134714 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade deletes user data without quest o ports/13 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel: completely removes packa o ports/129930 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade - portinstall tries to install s ports/129891 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade fails to recognize variations o o ports/127889 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade detects spurious failures and s o ports/127019 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade does not recognize fail conditi f ports/126140 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade runtime error o ports/112818 ruby ports-mgmt/portupgrade -a fails with database error 20 problems total. ___ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Patching gemspec file
> I am trying to create a port from a gem which uses "=" to specify exact > versions of its dependencies, which of course don't match the versions > in the FreeBSD port. > > Is there a way to patch the gemspec file without copying the whole > bsd.ruby.mk into the port file or rolling out my custom gem? It's not a very clean solution, but you can 'patch' the gemspec in the 'post-install target' in your Makefile, see a previous post on this list: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ruby/2011-June/001300.html Otherwise if the Gem actually works with more relaxed requirements that meet those in the current Ports tree I'd see if you can get the author to do a release with those relaxed requirements, I did this for the Larch gem (ports/158389). I would personally say this is the best solution to avoid cluttering the Ports tree with one off gems. You could always fork the gem as an alternative if the upstream development has ceased. Finally if the requirements are exact and you may need to port the specific versions of the gems you require into the Ports tree to sit alongside their 'new versions'. I did that when solving this PR: ports/147809, also see ports/150775 for the actual 'second' gem port. Regards Eric ___ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
portupgrade-devel issue
Hi folks, this came up on pointyhat. Can you fix portupgrade-devel port to stop spamming /usr/ports/distfiles (or whatever $DISTDIR happens to be) with files that are not listed in distinfo? I see you're doing some creative things with git, it can live in /tmp instead I suppose... -- -- Pav Lucistnik Do not meddle in the fashions of wizards, for they are seasonal and quick to fall out of style! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: portupgrade-devel issue
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:16 +0200 Pav Lucistnik mentioned: > Hi folks, > > this came up on pointyhat. Can you fix portupgrade-devel port to stop > spamming /usr/ports/distfiles (or whatever $DISTDIR happens to be) with > files that are not listed in distinfo? > > I see you're doing some creative things with git, it can live in /tmp > instead I suppose... > Hi! Sorry for that. What kind of extra files do you see? It's not supposed to do this... -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments ___ freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portupgrade-devel issue
Stanislav Sedov píše v po 12. 09. 2011 v 14:01 -0700: > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:16 +0200 > Pav Lucistnik mentioned: > > > Hi folks, > > > > this came up on pointyhat. Can you fix portupgrade-devel port to stop > > spamming /usr/ports/distfiles (or whatever $DISTDIR happens to be) with > > files that are not listed in distinfo? > > > > I see you're doing some creative things with git, it can live in /tmp > > instead I suppose... > > > > Hi! > > Sorry for that. > What kind of extra files do you see? It's not supposed to do this... ls -l portupgrade-devel-,2/portupgrade/latest lrwxr-xr-x 1 ports-amd64 wheel 44 Sep 11 07:07 portupgrade-devel-,2/portupgrade/latest -> /tmp/distfiles//portupgrade/pkgtools-.tar.gz -- -- Pav Lucistnik It also explains why paper clips just lie there while you look at them, but as soon as you turn your back, they run away, giggling wildly, and transform themselves into coat hangers. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: portupgrade-devel issue
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:06:38 +0200
Pav Lucistnik mentioned:
> Stanislav Sedov píše v po 12. 09. 2011 v 14:01 -0700:
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:36:16 +0200
> > Pav Lucistnik mentioned:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > this came up on pointyhat. Can you fix portupgrade-devel port to stop
> > > spamming /usr/ports/distfiles (or whatever $DISTDIR happens to be) with
> > > files that are not listed in distinfo?
> > >
> > > I see you're doing some creative things with git, it can live in /tmp
> > > instead I suppose...
> > >
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Sorry for that.
> > What kind of extra files do you see? It's not supposed to do this...
>
> ls -l portupgrade-devel-,2/portupgrade/latest
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 ports-amd64 wheel 44 Sep 11 07:07
> portupgrade-devel-,2/portupgrade/latest ->
> /tmp/distfiles//portupgrade/pkgtools-.tar.gz
>
Hmm.
What is the "portupgrade-devel-,2" dir? According to the makefile it
creates the symlink
in the ${_DISTDIR} for the file in the ${_DISTDIR}.
For the missing version -- I just realized that I probably need to add fetch
depends...
--
Stanislav Sedov
ST4096-RIPE
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
___
freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ruby
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ruby-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
